In this study, BPF was transformed into an effervescent powder beverage to improve consumer appeal by combining BPF anthocyanins with a refreshing acidic taste. This product is an instant beverage with functional antioxidant properties. The primary ingredient of effervescent powder beverage is anthocyanin extract powder, produced by three drying methods: thin-layer oven drying, spray drying, and sucrose crystallization. The anthocyanin extract powder was added in varying quantities (Table 1), including citric acid (0.9 g), tartaric acid (1.1 g), sodium bicarbonate (0.5 g), ascorbic acid (0.09 g), and sucrose (7 or 15 g). Fig 1a shows the powder form of the effervescent powder beverages enriched with BPF anthocyanins. Upon rehydration (Fig 1b), the beverage exhibits a purple color, an acidic flavor, and effervescent characteristics. The effervescent effect arises from the reaction between acidic compounds (acidulants) and carbonates or bicarbonates, which produces carbon dioxide and imparts a refreshing sensation
(Kumar et al., 2009). Anthocyanins serve as the primary pigments, giving the beverages their distinctive purple appearance.
Physical characteristic
The pH values of the effervescent beverages enriched with BPF anthocyanins, in their rehydrated liquid form, ranged from 4.96 to 5.19 (Table 2), reflecting their acidic nature and flavor. This is attributed to CO
2 dissolution during effervescent reactions, forming carbonic acid and lowering pH
(Laurent et al., 2023). The acidic condition also contributes to the purple color of effervescent beverages enriched with BPF anthocyanins, as shown in Fig 1b.
Table 2 presents the color parameters of effervescent powder beverages enriched with BPF anthocyanins. Products F1-F3 produced by thin-layer oven drying treatment exhibited the highest lightness, L (78.6 to 94.4), and lowest chromaticity, C (1.73 to 2.02). Spray drying treatment (F4-F6) produced L values ranging from 63.1 to 77.3 and C values from 2.54 to 2.91. While sucrose crystallization treatment (F7-F9) had the lowest L values (48.5 to 60.5) and the highest C values (4.20 to 4.91). Overall, increasing the addition of BPF anthocyanin extract powder decreased L value and increased C value, consistent with a more intense coloration. The observed differences in color properties, specifically the lightness and chromaticity, were influenced by drying methods. Spray drying treatment led to lower L and higher C values due to short-term high-temperature exposure, whereas thin-layer oven drying, performed over three hours, preserved the higher lightness and lower chromaticity. Sucrose crystallization treatment produced the darkest and most chromatic powders, likely due to caramelized sugar residues and browning reactions during prolonged heating. Hue angles further distinguished the products, with Hue values of F1-F6 ranging from 299.69 to 335.71 (purple) and F7-F9 from 347.37 to 351.83 (reddish-purple). Anthocyanin extract powder contributes to the color properties of effervescent beverages.
Antioxidative properties
The antioxidative properties of effervescent powder beverages enriched with BPF anthocyanins, such as the total polyphenol content, anthocyanin content, and antioxidant capacity, are illustrated in Table 3. The variation in the quantity of anthocyanin extract powder addition exerted an influence on the total polyphenol content. Among the products treated with thin-layer oven drying, F3 exhibits the highest total polyphenol content compared to F1 and F2. Similarly, among the products treated with spray drying, F6 exhibits the highest total polyphenol content compared to F4 and F5. Moreover, among the products treated with sucrose crystallization, F9 exhibits the highest total polyphenol content compared to F7 and F8. However, products produced by sucrose crystallization (F7-F9) have the lowest range of total polyphenol content due to degradation from extended high-temperature treatment. Besides anthocyanins (ternatin), the effervescent beverages also contain other polyphenols, predominantly flavanol glycosides of kaempferol, quercetin and myricetin, which represent about 73% of total phenolics in BPF
(Jeyaraj et al., 2021; Kazuma et al., 2003).
The anthocyanin content of this product is highly influenced by the amount of BPF anthocyanin extract powder added, with F3, F6 and F9 showing the highest levels within their respective drying methods (Table 3). The addition of more anthocyanin extract powder will result in a higher anthocyanin content. Products produced by sucrose crystallization also have a lower range of antocyanin content compared to thin-layer oven drying and spray drying treatment, which both have slightly different values. BPF petals predominantly contain ternatin A1-A3, B1-B4, C1-C5 and D1-D3, which are (poly)acylated anthocyanins recognized for their thermal stability
(Kazuma et al., 2003; Gamage et al., 2021). However, anthocyanins represent only about 27% of total flavonoids in the BPF petals, with flavonol glycosides being more abundant
(Kazuma et al., 2003).
The antioxidant property is the ability of compounds to donate hydrogen atoms or electrons to neutralize free radicals, thus preventing the damage caused by the free radicals (
Tan and Lim, 2015). BPF anthocyanins and other flavonoids/polyphenols are reported to protect against cardiovascular, neurological disorders, cancer and diabetes due to their antioxidant capabilities
(Gamage et al., 2021). The result analysis of the antioxidant capacity of these products (Table 3) showed that products obtained by sucrose crystallization treatment have the lowest range of values (5.08 to 5.74 mg TE/g) than the other drying methods, such as thin-layer drying (5.77 to 6.60 mg TE/g) and spray drying (5.90 to 6.96 mg TE/g). This result of antioxidant capacity correlated with total phenolic and anthocyanin content. Previous studies reported a positive correlation between total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity/DPPH assay (
Wong and Tan, 2020). The contribution of other constituents, such as ascorbic acid, may also have enhanced the antioxidant capacity observed in the formulations.
Sensory characteristic
The hedonic rating sensory test was conducted to evaluate panelists’ preferences for effervescent powder beverages enriched with BPF anthocyanins. Attributes assessed included color, taste, aroma, and overall acceptance, rated on a 7-point scale. A scale range of 5-7 was considered an acceptable response, indicating good product acceptance (Table 4). Among all formulations, product F6 achieved the highest scores across attributes. Regarding the color attribute, product F6 scored 6.07 (‘like’), reflecting its clearer purple appearance and less brown color compared to products F4 and F5. In contrast, products treated with thin-layer oven drying and sucrose crystallization exhibited more brownish hues after rehydration (Fig 1b), which was met with low acceptance by the panelists. Product F6 also obtained the highest scores for taste (5.64, on a scale from ‘rather like’ to ‘like’), which were attributed to its acidic profile and effervescent sensation generated by the reaction of citric or tartaric acid and sodium bicarbonate. This acid-base reaction not only produces carbon dioxide, which creates the bubbly effect typical of effervescent beverages, but also lowers the pH of the solution, making it more acidic. The aroma attribute received lower scores overall, with F6 scoring 4.14 (neutral), consistent with the limited aroma typically associated with BPF-based products. This suggests that aroma-enhancing additives may be required to improve sensory appeal. In terms of overall acceptance, product F6 scored the highest, with a rating of 5.68 (ranging from ‘rather like’ to ‘like’). Across all drying methods, formulations with the highest addition of anthocyanin extract powder (F3, F6 and F9) achieved the highest scores in every attribute among their respective treatment groups. This suggests that a greater anthocyanin content contributes positively to panelists’ acceptance. Overall, spray drying treatment was the most preferred, followed by sucrose crystallization and thin-layer oven drying, respectively. Generally, mean scores of attributes remained below 6 (‘like’), indicating rather low acceptance. This may reflect panelists’ unfamiliarity with effervescent beverages derived from BPF, indicating a need for broader consumer education and product introduction.