The pomegranates peels and the prepared powder are characterized in this section, this step is crucial for selecting the encapsulation conditions.
Pomegranates peel powder characterization
Characterization parameters are summarized in Table 2. Due to their initial high-water content, pomegranate peels (PP) cannot be stored for extended periods. But when transformed in PPP with a correct desiccation they contain 9% of water which presents numerous advantages. However, the acidity levels of PPP necessitate effective moisture protection during storage to prevent yeast proliferation, a common issue when preserving pomegranate peels in traditional products like cited by (
Lairini et al., 2014;
Shahid et al., 2008).
The ash content indicates that PPP is rich in minerals comparable to 4,32% amount cited by (Azmat
et al., 2024), while the brix value suggests that over half of the powder can be released as a soluble fraction in accordance with Shahid (
Shahid et al., 2008). Colour analysis showed that PPP has a clear yellow hue. This yellow color can transfer to foods when incorporated and absorbs light at 368 nm, same results were noticed by
Yagmur et al., (2024). The granulometric profile of the chosen fraction is shown in Fig 2, where we can observe that more than 80% of the powder granules size is less than 200 µm.
To evaluate the micro-encapsulation operation, in this section we will observe, under appropriate magnifications, the row material and the encapsulated PPP preparations. In a second step we will give the encapsulation efficiencies.
Microcapsules microscopic evaluation
Fig 3 displays the preparation aspect of the pomegranate peel powder (PPP). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations of the fraction less than 200 μm reveal that PPP resembles a fibrous material with irregularly shaped particles of varying sizes; it contains numerous inclusions (Fig 4a). In contrast, the encapsulation material represented by (EC) appears compact and crystallized (Fig 4b).
Fig 4c and 4d illustrate the appearance of the microcapsules, which consist of particles that are either completely or partially covering a fibrous material, making them larger than the initial PPP grains. The agglomeration density indicates the rate of powder/polymer complexation, demonstrating that pectin and casein formed a composite coating around the PPP particles (indicated by the arrow in Fig 4). This phenomenon is well explained by Tuinier and Rolin (
Tuinier et al., 2002), who describe it as the multi-layer adsorption of pectin macromolecules onto casein during acidification and was confirmed by
Suganya et al. (2017).
According to
Çam et al. (2014), the size and shape of microcapsules are critical parameters for assessing quality. In this case, the microcapsules retain the shape of the initial material, indicating that they are well-coated (
Tarone et al., 2020).
Encapsulation efficiency (EE %)
The encapsulation efficiency indicates the percentage of particles that were successfully coated during the process. The results demonstrate an efficiency of 96.73±0.30% for the EPPP (1:2) and 91.79 ± 0.10 % for the EPPP (1:1). These values are higher than those reported in several studies, which indicated encapsulation efficiencies between 69% and 92% for phenolic compounds from sour sherry, as found by
Çilek (2012). However, our results are lower than the 98% efficiency reported by
Çam et al. (2014) for the encapsulation of pomegranate peel phenolic extract.
The differences in encapsulation efficiency can be attributed to the nature of the encapsulated molecules or particles and the composition of the coating material (
Cãlinoiu et al., 2019) such as the pectin/casein ratio and the complex/powder ratio. In our case, an efficiency of over 90% indicates that the coacervation method is effective for the PPP particles.
This part will demonstrate the solubility and dissolution of the capsules under certain conditions, to predict their future behavior when incorporated in the chosen food matrix.
Solubility test of empty capsules
This test will demonstrate the behavior in water, which helps predict the diffusion of EPPP in their surrounding environment. Microcapsules made from a pectin/casein complex (2:8 ratio) showed a solubility of 31.41±0.24% under our test conditions. This erosion is primarily linked to the pH of distilled water (pH 6.8), which impacts the integrity of the coating in used coacervation system. This factor should be considered in future food formulations. A study by
Gentès (2007) confirmed that proteins have lower solubility compared to pectin at varying pH levels. It was observed that pectin migrated towards the medium depending on the pH and the applied heat treatment. This information is significant because it highlights that the behavior of each biopolymer in the coacervate complex largely depends on pH conditions (
Gentès, 2007). Our capsules exhibit greater stability in acidic pH.
In vitro microcapsules dissolution simulation
The dissolution study was conducted to examine the release kinetics of EPPP. As shown in Fig 5, the diffusion amount at the initial sampling (0 hours) reflects the encapsulation efficiency accurately. Notably, EPPP (1:2) exhibited only 5 % leakage, compared to 13% leakage for EPPP (1:1).
The partial diffusion observed during the first phase (0-2 hours) can be attributed to pectin solubilization in stomach acid (pH 1.2), which did not exceed 5% in both cases. Then the diffusion increased significantly in the intestinal environment (pH 6.8) due to casein solubilization. After 6 hours, more than 33% of the bioactive molecules from pomegranate had been released for EPPP (1:1), while EPPP (1:2) released approximately 30%. This degradation pattern of the microcapsules is consistent with the findings of Tuinier and Rolin (
Tuinier et al., 2002), who demonstrated that pectin adsorbs onto casein micelles in a multilayer formation. In this structure, casein forms the interior layer and pectin serves as the exterior layer. These results, supported by the EC solubility test, indicate that both EPPP (1:1) and EPPP (1:2) provide a protective effect on pomegranate peel powder in stomach.
The obtained results oriented our food matrix choice to bio-yogurt like made later by
Yagmur et al., (2024), in the following section we will compare the quality of the yogurt when supplemented by PPP or by the encapsulated powders, also we will choose the best formulation for potential health benefits.
Application-incorporation test in food matrix
Table 3 presents key observations following the formulation of steamed yoghurt with various microcapsule preparations. It was first observed that when PPP was added alone, it could not stay in suspension, leading to sedimentation in the yoghurt and the development of an undesirable green-yellow colour like observed in
Lai and Tang (2024) study, how used PPP to enhance yogurt quality. This issue did not occur with EPPP, where pectin hydration and the interaction between pectin, yoghurt and casein provided consistency to the mixture, preventing capsule sedimentation.
Additionally, the astringency was either partially masked or completely eliminated, indicating that the elaborated microcapsules reinforce the fermentation process. The capsules resistance resulted from the acidity due to lactose fermentation. The creamy colour
(Bakhti et al., 2025) of the preparations came from the non-encapsulated fraction of PPP and the leakage phenomenon occurring during the pH decrease during the fermentation process.
In the formulation with EPPP, syneresis and a grainy consistency were observed, likely due to capsule acidity. However, the astringency was effectively masked. Thus, the primary objective of this study was partially achieved, suggesting that these capsules can be used more efficiently and advantageously in yet prepared acidic food formulations such as fruit juices, fermented foods, liquid yoghurt and l’ben as functional foods
(Frakolaki et al., 2021). In our case the best product after the blanc regarding sensory evaluation was EPPP (1:2) (Fig 6), it was well ranked in masking astringency, have an acceptable colour and don’t present any deposit, but affected yoghurt texture.