Sensory evaluation of the product
Sensory evaluation plays an important role in determining consumer acceptability of food products. The sensory scores obtained for the developed gummies are presented in Table 2.
Among the different formulations, RCOG II received the highest sensory scores for appearance, colour, texture and overall acceptability. The balanced incorporation of red capsicum and orange extract contributed to an attractive natural colour, pleasant flavour and acceptable texture. Excess addition of red capsicum in RCOG III slightly reduced taste and flavour acceptability due to the stronger capsicum flavour.
Based on the sensory evaluation conducted by 20 untrained panel members, the RCOG II formulation received the highest overall acceptability score and was identified as the most preferred sample among the developed variations. Therefore, only the optimized formulation (RCOG II) was subjected to further analyses, including proximate nutrient composition, microbial quality assessment and cost analysis. These analyses were carried out at a private food testing laboratory in Coimbatore.
As this research was conducted as part of a postgraduate student project, the laboratory analyses were performed on a single sample and triplicate determinations were not carried out. The analytical report obtained from the food testing laboratory has been provided as supplementary material along with this manuscript.
Fig 1 represents the statistical analysis of sensory report of RCOG II. The sensory evaluation of Red Capsicum Orange Gummies (RCOG II) indicates a high level of consumer acceptability, with all sensory attributes receiving favorable scores on the nine-point hedonic scale.
Table 3 presents the mean and standard deviation values of the parameters analysed in the sensory evaluation of sample RCOGII. The sensory parameter taste score was 8.95, demonstrating that the combination of red capsicum and orange ingredients produced a desirable taste profile in the gummy. The colour score of 8.90 suggests that the attractive colour of the product contributed positively to its visual appeal, which may be associated with the natural pigments present in red capsicum and orange. The texture score of 8.85 indicates that the gummy possessed desirable textural characteristics, such as appropriate firmness and chewability, which are important quality attributes for gummy confectionery.
The flavour score was comparatively lower at 7.95, although it still represents a good level of acceptability. The comparatively lower flavour score may be attributed to the characteristic flavour of red capsicum, which could have slightly influenced the aroma and flavour profile of the product. Nevertheless, the high scores for taste, colour, texture and overall acceptability indicate that the incorporation of red capsicum and orange was successfully achieved without adversely affecting the sensory quality of the gummy.
Overall, the sensory findings demonstrate that RCOG II was the most acceptable formulation and can be considered the optimized formulation based on sensory evaluation. The high overall acceptability score of 8.95 highlights the potential of RCOG II as a novel functional confectionery product with good consumer appeal.
Nutritional analysis of the product
The proximate analysis method was employed to determine the values of macronutrients in the food samples. This analysis enabled the estimation of various quantitative aspects of the food and food substances, including moisture content, crude protein, total fat, total carbohydrate and dietary fiber. The present study involved analyzing the following parameters. The study involved the analysis of macronutrients present in the food samples.
According to the FSSAI Manual of Methods, the nutrient profile of the red capsicum orange gummies was analyzed and found to have 154 kcal/100 g of calories, 33.4 gm/100 g of carbohydrates, 4.7 gm/100 g of protein and 8.0 gm/100 g of dietary fibre. A low-fat product is indicated by the low fat level of 0.2 g/100 g. The developed gummies contained appreciable amounts of carbohydrates, protein, fibre, vitamins, minerals and bioactive compounds.
The present research work related with the study done by Perna Nath and Kim it shows that,Red capsicum powder-infused muffins had 1.80% fat, 4.08% protein, 4.05% fibre and 6.01% moisture content, according to a study by
Prerna Nath (2018). In accordance with
Kim, 2011 research work the protein level of a food product containing red capsicum powder was 2.5 g/100 g lower than that of the current study. Its total composition is also reflected in its moisture content of 60.5gm/100gm and ash content of 1.2 gm/100 gm.
The developed gummies contained appreciable amounts of carbohydrates, protein, fibre, vitamins, minerals and bioactive compounds. The presence of vitamin A, vitamin C, potassium, iron, flavonoids, phenolic acids and beta-carotene indicates the functional and nutritional value of the product. The inclusion of red capsicum and orange significantly improved the antioxidant and micronutrient profile of the gummies.
According to a study by
Mahmoud Younis (2024), bread enhanced with red pepper powder at varying concentrations included 180 mg of potassium and 10.33 g/kg of iron. The produced sample in the current investigation had a good amount of potassium concentration when compared to this study. WHO suggests an increase in potassium intake from food to control blood pressure in children aged 2-15 years.
The beta-carotene content derived from red capsicum acts as a natural pigment and antioxidant, which may help in reducing oxidative stress and supporting overall health (
Okur, 2022). Similarly, vitamin C from orange contributes to immune support and antioxidant activity. The analyzed result of water holding capacity of the developed gummies shows that 4.2 gm/gm indicating it has the required moisture content to support its shelf life. The research study conducted by
Prerna Nath, (2018) reported 0.29% of water holding capacity in red capsicum powder incorporated muffins.
Texture analysis of the developed product
The texture properties of the developed gummies are presented in Table 4. The texture analysis indicated that the developed gummies possessed desirable gummy characteristics such as firmness, elasticity, cohesiveness and chewiness. The hardness and gumminess values demonstrated good structural stability, while springiness and cohesiveness indicated proper gel formation.
The texture profile depict in Table 4 and Fig 2 discuss the analysis of RCOG II showed desirable textural characteristics, including appropriate force, hardness, springiness, gumminess, chewiness and resilience. The texture profile analysis of RCOG II showed a force of 79.90 g and hardness of 87.53 g, indicating that the gummy had adequate firmness while remaining suitable for chewing. The springiness (2.158) and cohesiveness (0.906) suggest good elasticity and structural integrity of the product. The gumminess (79.84) and chewiness (249.37) indicate desirable gummy-like chewing characteristics. The resilience value of 0.365 further reflects the product’s ability to withstand deformation.
Overall, the texture profile demonstrates that RCOG II possessed favorable textural properties suitable for a gummy confectionery product. The relatively high chewiness indicates that the product possessed the characteristic chewy texture expected of gummy confectionery. Overall, the texture properties contributed to the good structural integrity and sensory acceptability of RCOG II, supporting its selection as the optimized formulation.
The force and hardness values indicate the resistance offered by the gummy during compression, reflecting its firmness and structural integrity. An appropriate level of hardness is desirable in gummy confectionery because it helps the product retain its shape while still allowing easy biting and chewing.
The area under the texture profile represents the mechanical response of the product during compression and provides an indication of its resistance to deformation.
The springiness of RCOG II indicates the ability of the gummy to recover its original shape after compression. This property is particularly important in gummy products, as adequate elasticity provides the characteristic resilient and chewy mouthfeel.
The gumminess reflects the energy required to disintegrate the semi-solid gummy into a state suitable for swallowing, while the relatively prominent chewiness possesses the characteristic chewable texture expected from a gummy confectionery product.
Shelf life evaluation of red capsicum fortified orange gummies
The shelf-life of the gummies was examined over 30-days of period using zip lock packaging. At the end of the storage duration, the samples were assessed for microbial stability yeast and mold analysis to determine the effectiveness of the packaging material in preserving the gummies. Plate 1 demonstrates that the developed gummies were safe for consumption for 30 days, as no yeast or mold growth was observed during the storage period.
Cost calculation of the developed product
The production cost is a crucial factor in assessing value-added product for consumers. The costs involved in developing the value-added product was calculated based on the prices of raw materials at the time of purchase and during the development phase.
The Table 3 indicates that the calculated amount for the formulation of 100 g of the best value-added product. Developed mixture gives 15 pieces of gummies and the total cost was ₹30.50 (rounded off 31). This cost includes ingredients such as red capsicum, orange, gelatin, honey, lemon, turmeric for the formulation of red capsicum orange gummies.
The cost calculation presented in Table 5 shows that the total ingredient cost for preparing the Red Capsicum Fortified Orange Gummies (RCOG II) was ₹30.50. Among the ingredients, gelatin contributed the highest cost (₹ 18.00), followed by honey (₹4.15), red capsicum (₹4.68) and orange (₹3.00). Lemon and turmeric contributed only ₹0.624 and ₹0.05, respectively. The findings indicate that the developed RCOG II can be prepared using readily available ingredients at a reasonable ingredient cost, supporting its potential as an affordable functional confectionery product.
Statistical analysis of the developed product
The statistical analysis of sensory evaluation scores is presented in Table 6.
The statistical analysis of this research shows that the significant differences among the control and the formulated variations analysed for the F-value (44.214) and p-value (0.001). The p-value is 0.001, which is statistically significant.