Functional characteristics of processed jackfruit seed flour
The functional characteristics of processed seed flour are outlined in (Table 1). The solubility values of the seed flour variations fluctuated from 9.1% to 13.6%, with RoJSF showing the lowest solubility and BJSF showing the maximum. These values are similar with (
Eke-Ejiofor et al., 2014), which ranged from 9.72% to 14.47%. The swelling capacity ranged from 5.96% in BJSF to 7.9% in RJSF, which is more than that 4.77% testified by
Ocloo et al., (2010). In this study, For BJSF, the highest bulk density value recorded was 0.29 g/ml for BJSF, while RoJSF had the lowest at 0.23 g/ml. These values are lower than the 0.26% to 0.33% range reported by (
Eke-Ejiofor et al., 2014). The water absorption capacity (WAC) ranged from 423% to 506%, with RJSF having the lowest and RoJSF having the highest values, exceeding the 203.4% WAC for raw and blended jackfruit seed flour documented by
(Chowdhury et al., 2012). The oil absorption capacity ranged from 149% for RoJSF to 309% for RJSF, surpassing the 164.76% fat absorption capacity of baked jackfruit seed flour reported by
Borgis and Bharati (2020). The flour’s dispersibility increased from 51% to 60.30%, with BJSF having the lowest value and RJSF the highest. These values are highest than the 30% dispersibility reported by
Airani (2007).
Physicochemical properties of processed jackfruit seed flour
Pasting properties
Pasting properties are summarized in Table 2. The results revealed that peak viscosity ranged from 163.12 to 259.61, with RJSF at the lower end and RoJSF at the higher end. These values are lower than the 798 BU peak viscosity reported by
Ocloo et al., (2010). Higher peak viscosity indicates a better thickening capacity for starch
(Hajj et al., 2022).
The trough viscosity of the processed samples ranged from 103.71 to 120.37. A lower trough viscosity value indicates higher paste stability
Hajj et al., (2022). In this study, RoJSF had the lowest trough viscosity, followed by BJSF and RJSF.
Eke-Ejiofor et al., (2014), which reported through viscosity values ranging from 696 RVU to 3126 RVU for jackfruit seed flour with autoclaved samples having the lowest and roasted samples the highest the values, these values are higher than those obtained in the present study. RJSF had the highest breakdown viscosity at 78.46, which might suggest instability of the paste. BJSF and RoJSF had the lowest values, at 34.41 and 33.77 respectively, which are lower than the 186 BU reported by
Ocloo et al., (2010). The final viscosity of processed jackfruit seed flour ranged from 151.25 to 216.32. The results indicated that RoJSF had the highest final viscosity, followed by BJSF and RJSF. These values are relatively low compared to the 364.13 reported for jackfruit seed starch by (
Rengsutthi and Charoenrein 2011). The setback viscosity ranged from 42.12 to 77.47. Among all the flours, RJSF had the lowest setback viscosity, while both RoJSF and BJSF had the highest. The low setback value of 42.12 for RJSF indicates that the paste has non-cohesive properties. The current values are higher than the 18.53 RVU and 10.56 RVU reported for wet and dry jackfruit seed flour by
Mukprasirt and Sajjaanantakul (2004). The peak time for the processed jackfruit seed flour samples ranged from 6.18 minutes to 7.46 minutes, with RJSF having the shortest time and BJSF and RoJSF having the longest. Similar peak time values, ranging from 5.29 minutes to 8.46 minutes for different processed jackfruit seed flours, were recorded by
Eke-Ejiofor et al., (2014). The highest pasting temperature was observed for RJSF at 98.5
oC, followed by BJSF at 80.5
oC and RoJSF at 76.1
oC. These pasting temperatures are slightly higher than the 88.2
oC reported by
Ocloo et al., (2010) for jackfruit seed flour.
Colour attributes
Colour significantly influences consumer preferences and perceived product quality, reflecting external characteristics of jackfruit seed flour. Colour indexes L*
, a* and b* for RJSF, RoJSF and BJSF was outlined in Table 3. Hunter color ‘L’ values for jackfruit seed flour varied significantly (p<0.05) among the processed flour types, with RoJSF having the highest value of 68.16 and BJSF the lowest at 51.3, indicating their respective degrees of lightness. The highest L* parameter for RoJSF at 68.16 indicates it is lighter in colour than the other jackfruit seed flours. RoJSF had the highest Hunter colour ‘a’ value of 8.39, significantly different from RJSF at 7.1 and BJSF at 6.93. RoJSF also had the highest ‘b’ value of 28.41, showing a greater degree of yellowness, being significantly different (p<0.05) from RJSF at 16.11 and BJSF at 11.4.
Proximate composition of processed jackfruit seed flour
Proximate composition of raw, roasted and boiled
Artocarpus heterophyllus seed flour illustrated in Table 4. The moisture content for RoJSF, RJSF and BJSF jackfruit seed flour was 4.98%, 5.23% and 6.01%, respectively. It was noted that RoJSF had a lower moisture content than both RJSF and BJSF. According to
Suzihaque et al., (2022), dry and wet milled jackfruit seed flour had moisture contents of 6.34% and 8.57%, respectively. The ash content in various processed jackfruit seed flours ranged from 2.41% and 2.82%, with no significant differences observed between RoJSF, RJSF and BJSF. The ash content for both raw and processed jackfruit seed flour was between 2.45% and 2.56%, aligning with the findings of
Eke-Ejiofor et al., (2014). The findings of this study align with the results reported by
Albi Abraham and Jayamuthunagai (2014), who reported an ash content of 2.47% for jackfruit flour. Processed jackfruit seed flour was found to have a considerable amount of energy. The total energy values ranged from 337.9 kcal/100 g for RJSF to 357.93 kcal/100 g for RoJSF.
Sulaiman et al., (2019) reported an energy value of 344.99 kcal per 100 grams, which is very close to the value obtained in the present study and
Sultana et al., (2015) reported similar calorific values for jackfruit seed flour, ranging from 367.08 to 371.01 kcal/100g. The carbohydrate content in both RoJSF and BJSF was found to be 71.72% and 72.03%, respectively, while RJSF had a carbohydrate content of 69.99%. These results are similar to the values reported by
Eke-Ejiofor et al., (2014), which were 72.05% and 72.16%. RoJSF had a protein content of 16.79%, which was higher than the 13.14% found in BJSF and the 11.56% in RJSF seed flour. This study reported a higher protein value compared to the 13.67% noted by
Sulaiman et al., (2019). The fat content in jackfruit seed flour varied from 0.41% to 1.3%, with the highest in RJSF (1.3%), followed by BJSF (0.78%) and RoJSF (0.41%). These findings align with
Tulyathan et al., (2002), who reported that jackfruit seed flour contained between 0.99% and 1.01% crude lipid, depending on whether the brown spermoderm was included.
The crude fibre content of RJSF, at 3.69%, is lower than that of RoJSF and BJSF, which have 4.01% and 5.12% respectively. This suggests that both roasting and boiling the seeds increase their crude fibre content. These results are similar to the 4.68% reported by
Hajj et al., (2022) reported.
Nutritional composition of processed jackfruit seed flour
The nutritional composition was presented in Table 5. RJSF had the highest vitamin A content 64 mg/100 g, followed by RoJSF at 53.3 mg/100 g and BJSF at 51.5 mg/100 g. These values significantly surpass the 16.58% vitamin A content in jackfruit flour reported by
Arefin et al., (2020). Thus, 100 g of processed jackfruit seed flour, including RJSF, RoJSF and BJSF, provides approximately 90.3 mg, 89.9 mg and 86.8 mg of phosphorus per 100 g respectively. These values are nearly identical to the 93.78% phosphorus content reported by
Hajj et al., (2022). The results also indicate that processed jackfruit seed powder has higher magnesium content, ranging from 93.4 mg/100 g to 104 mg/100 g, with RoJSF showing the highest value compared to RJSF and BJSF. This study’s magnesium values are higher than the 48.1 mg/100 g reported by
Arefin et al., (2022). The study found that calcium levels ranged from 41.6 to 44.8 mg/100 g and iron levels varied between 1.8 to 2.9 mg/100 g. These results are higher than the calcium and iron contents reported by
Arefin et al., (2020), which were 37.54 mg/100 g and 1.02 mg/100 g, respectively. RoJSF had the highest sodium content at 15.2 mg/100 g, followed by RJSF at 14.6 mg/100 g and BJSF at 10.6 mg/100 g. These sodium values exceed those reported by
Hajj et al., (2022) for soft and firm varieties of jackfruit seed flour, which were 3.07 mg/100 g and 4.86 mg/100 g, respectively. In the present study, potassium levels ranged from 766 mg to 912 mg per 100 g, making it the most abundant minerals. RJSF had the highest potassium content, followed by BJSF and RoSJF. These levels are significantly higher than the 705.71 mg/100 g reported by
Sultana et al., (2017) for jackfruit seed flour.
Antioxidant properties of processed jackfruit seed flour
Antioxidant properties of different processed jackfruit seed flours presented in Table 6. The total phenolic content ranged from 686.21 mg GAE/100 g to 863.15 mg GAE/100 g, with RoJSF having the highest value, followed by RJSF and BJSF. These levels are higher than the 750.98 mg GAE/100 g reported by
Kamal et al., (2023) for cabinet-dried jackfruit seed flour at 50
oC. The total flavonoid content ranged from 33.74 mg CE/100 g to 54.30 mg CE/100 g, with BJSF having the lowest and RoJSF the highest. These results are higher than the 21.06 mg CE/100 g reported by
Bossi et al., (2024) for roasted jackfruit seed in aqueous extract. The DPPH assay results for processed jackfruit seed flour were 76.51% for BJSF, 83.20% for RJSF and 101.1% for RoJSF. The DPPH radical, known for generating free radicals, is widely used to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of compounds. These results are lower than the DPPH assay values reported by
Trejo Rodriguez et al., (2021), which varied from 1579 to 1617 µmol Trolox/100 g.
The current study found that RoJSF had the highest reducing power at 2996.43 mg TE/100 g, followed by RJSF at 2400.51 mg TE/100 g and BJSF at 2123.19 mg TE/100 g. These values are significantly higher than the reducing power values for jackfruit seed and pulp powder incorporated crackers, reported by
Ooi (2024) at 43.12 mg FeSO4E/100 g dry solids. Among all the processed jackfruit seed flours, RoJSF exhibited the highest levels of all antioxidant properties.
Microbial analysis of processed jackfruit seed flour
The findings of the microbial analysis were shown in Table 7. A high microbial count can threaten consumers’ health and contribute to the decomposition and nutrient depletion of the food. For RJSF the TPC, fungi and mold values ranged from 0.1×10
-6cfu/g to 0.2×10
-6 cfu/g and for RoSJF, the TPC, fungi and mold values ranged from 0.1×10
-6 cfu/g to 0.1×10
-6 cfu/g. The jack fruit seed flour TPC and fungi and mold were periodically estimated during the 6 months storage period. According to the findings, the TPC, fungi and mold significantly rose RJSF and RoJSF having the same TPC, fungi and mold values as the amount of storage days increased. The study revealed that for BJSF, both TPC and fungal counts ranged from 0.1×10
-6 cfu/g to 0.3×10
-6 cfu/g over the period of 0 to 6 months. However, mold counts significantly increased to 0.3×10
-6 cfu/g during the 4
th and 6
th months. During the storage period, no significant microbial load was detected and the studies showed that jackfruit seed flour has excellent storage stability. Among the three processed jackfruit seed flours, RoJSF has the lowest TPC, fungi and mold values compared to RJSF and BJSF. The results were similar to the shelf life of tamarind seed flour by
Hemalatha and Parameshwari (2023).