Full Research Article
Effects of Nigella Sativa Oil extract: Histopathological Changes and Blood Glucose Level in Diabetic Male Rats
- Email sura.maan@uomosul.edu.iq

Effects of Nigella Sativa Oil extract: Histopathological Changes and Blood Glucose Level in Diabetic Male Rats
Submitted17-04-2026|
Accepted01-09-2026|
First Online 19-09-2026|
Background: Nigella sativa has been traditionally used for treatment of different diseases and their complication including diabetes. The purpose of this study was to examine the consequences of diabetic mellitus on the tissue of pancreas and kidney and the curative and protective impacts of nigella sativa oil compared to metformin.
Methods: A total of 30 male Wistar rats were subclassified into 5 groups, control group on normal diet and no intervention, diabetic group administered 70 mg/kg STZ as a single IP injection, metformin group administered70 mg/kg STZ as a single IP injection and 150 mg/kg/day metformin. Nigella sativa 2 ml group administered70 mg/kg STZ as a single IP injection and Nigella sativa 2 mL/kg/rat daily. Nigella sativa 4 ml group administered 70 mg/kg STZ as a single IP injection and Nigella sativa 2 mL/kg/rat daily. The treatment continued for 40 days. Blood collected for glucose measurement every 10 days and animal sacrificed at the end of the study, pancreas and kidneys harvested for histological study.
Result: The serum glucose levels in STZ group significantly increased reaching up to 600 mg/dl over different time points compared to less than 100 mg/dl in control group. The glucose levels were significantly (p<0.05) reduced in STZ+Met, Nigella sativa 2 ml group and Nigella sativa 4 ml group compared to STZ group. The histological sections have shown comparable improvement of kidney and pancreas sections. Although the amount and rate of damage reduction differ between treatments, the results showed that both doses considerably lowered blood glucose levels over time. However, the most significant glucose-lowering effect was established by metformin, which is align with its well-established pharmacological profile.
The Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research (AJDFR) follows a disclaimer policy that outlines the responsibilities of the journal, authors, reviewers, and readers. The policy is designed to ensure that all published content is accurate and meets ethical standards, and to protect the journal from any legal liability.
The AJDFR does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content published in the journal. The opinions expressed in published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or its editorial board. The journal does not accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content published in the journal.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is original, accurate, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for obtaining permission to use copyrighted material and for providing appropriate attribution.
Reviewers are responsible for ensuring that the content of articles is accurate, original, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for maintaining confidentiality and disclosing any conflicts of interest.
Readers are responsible for evaluating the content of articles and for making their own judgments about the accuracy and reliability of the information presented. They are also responsible for complying with copyright laws and ethical standards when using the content of articles.
AJDFR is committed to ensuring that all published content meets ethical standards and that all parties involved in the publishing process understand their responsibilities. The disclaimer policy is designed to protect the journal from any legal liability and to ensure that readers can rely on the accuracy and reliability of the content published in the journal.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.