We have studied the effects of different concentrations of Tulsi (Ocimum sanctum) extract on the pH levels, acidity percentage and Direct Microscopic Count (DMC) of milk in different seasons and times in the T0 (without Tulsi extract), T1 (with 0.5% Tulsi extract), T2 (with 1% Tulsi extract) and T3 (1.5% Tulsi extract) groups. The pH levels, Percent (%) of acidity and DMC of milk samples of the control group and those treated with Tulsi extract were monitored at 2-hour intervals over 6 hours under three seasonal conditions (summer, rainy and dry seasons). We have analyzed the data by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range test and compared means.
Where,
Y
ij = Observation value of pH, acidity % of milk and DMC.
µ = Population means.
a
i = Effect of Season (i = =3).
e
ij = The random error of the season.
The information in Table 1, 2 and 3 shows how the pH level, percentage (%) of acidity and DMC count changed over time in milk samples with varying amounts of Tulsi extract during seasonal changes. The findings show how Tulsi extract affected the pH level, acidity percentage and DMC count with time and maintain a low microbial count at higher Tulsi extract concentration.
Summer season
In the summer, the pH values and acidity percentage of milk increased across all extract concentrations and control groups, but they were comparatively lower in milk samples with Tulsi extract. Initially, all treatment groups had similar pH levels. Over time, the pH level in the milk samples gradually decreased, consistent with the findings of
Marouf and Elmhal (2017),
Yang et al., (2023) and
Aydogdu et al., (2023). After 2 hours, the control group milk had a pH of (6.32±0.12), while the T1, T2 and T3 groups had a pH of (6.61±0.21,6.62±0.18 and 6.65±0.15). It indicates that with a higher concentration of Tulsi extract, the decrease in pH values, were comparatively lower. The potential antibacterial properties of Tulsi extract may contribute to the observed pH during summer when it is present. According to
Raghav and Saini (2018),
Anand et al., (2016), Anbarasu and Vijayalakshmi (2007) and
Okafor et al. (2021), the higher pH in milk treated with Tulsi also implies that Tulsi may act as a buffer to prevent abrupt pH fluctuations, which is essential for preventing spoilage. However, milk samples with higher concentrations of Tulsi, especially at 1% and 1.5%, showed relatively stable pH. It may be due to ursolic acid and eugenol in Tulsi that can influence microbial fermentation and inhibit microbial growth, which may explain the lower acidity in milk
(Sharma et al., 2001; Hanaa et al., 2016), thereby affecting pH levels. This suggests that Tulsi extract might help maintain pH stability, which is important for milk preservation. Tulsi leaves are rich in phenolic compounds, which can interact with milk proteins, potentially altering their structure and stability, thus influencing the bioavailability of amino acids
(Tosif et al., 2021) and likely also due to the antimicrobial effects of Tulsi in reducing acidification
(Khan et al., 2020; Zdolec et al., 2024; Bansavatar et al., 2015; Mehta and Sharma, 2020;
Goyal and Chauhan, 2021). The level of significance observed in the statistical analysis at 4 and 6 hours (p<0.05) might be indicative of these findings. A direct microscopic count revealed no significant differences in bacterial growth between the control and Tulsi extract-treated groups at the 2-hour interval. However, significant inhibition of growth was noted in the treatment groups compared to the control after 4 and 6 hours (p<0.05). The decrease in pH and increase in the percentage of acidity in milk levels were noted at 4 hours and 6 hours, indicating natural acidification of milk due to bacterial activity. This buffering capacity may be attributed to extending the shelf life of milk during warmer months. The direct microscopic count of milk showed that, in the summer season, the acidity percentage was slightly lower in Tulsi extract milk samples than in the control group (0.170±0.012). After the 2-hour mark, the level of acidity in the treated groups (T1, T2 and T3) was (0.155±0.021), (0.152±0.010), (0.148±0.011), whereas it was slightly higher for the control group (0.170±0.012). The acidity of the control groups was (0.192±0.015), (0.142±0.035) and (0.138±0.09) during the four hours, while it was significantly lower in the T2 and T3 groups. This decrease was statistically significant (*p<0.05). The result revealed that Tulsi extract helped maintain the pH balance of milk; this was a similar finding reported by
Zou et al., (2017). He admitted that microbial growth and acidity increases were greater and reduce the acidity per cent (%) in untreated milk.
At 2, 4 and 6 hours, the acidity percentage of Tulsi-treated samples remained lower (T1: (0.188±0.009), (0.178±0.007), (0.172±0.016) and the acidity percentage of the control group was higher (0.210±0.014). However, % of acidity was comparatively lower in milk samples with higher concentrations of Tulsi extracts, which indicates that plant extract rich in bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids and alkaloids, exhibit antimicrobial properties by disrupting microbial cell membranes, inhibiting enzymatic functions, or interfering with metabolic pathways, was similar to the finding of
Dahanukar et al., (2000). Tulsi (Ocimum sanctum) extract has broad-spectrum antibacterial action against lactic acid bacteria and other spoilage germs, as indicated by the research, which indicates that it notably delays the acidification of raw milk. The main bioactive ingredients in Tulsi, including rosmarinic acid, linalool and eugenol, are responsible for this effect. These substances have been found to break down microbial cell membranes and prevent vital enzymatic function (
Bhattacharjee and Dutta, 2019). There was a lower Direct Microscopic Count (DMC) count in summer with higher Tulsi extract added samples T1(4.30±0.07, 5.45±0.12, 6.55±0.16), T2(4.25±0.09, 5.10 ±0.11, 6.05±0.14) and T3(4.20±0.10, 4.95±0.09, 5.85±0.13) compared to the control group (4.35±0.08, 5.95±0.15, 7.20 ±0.18) which was more profound over time.
Khan et al., (2020) stated that the addition of Tulsi extract could inhibit the multiplication of bacterial population in the raw milk samples was an agreement to our study.
Rainy season
During the rainy season, the effect of Tulsi extract on milk pH mirrored the summer trend. After two hours, all treatment groups (T1: 6.72±0.19, T2: 6.75±0.19, T3: 6.73±0.21) exhibited a significantly higher pH compared to the Tulsi-treated group (6.38±0.14). Tulsi extract could have maintained a more balanced pH in milk even under humid conditions, as seen by the higher values compared to the control group. After four and six hours, a significant change in pH level was noted among different groups. Comparatively lower pH was noted in the Tulsi-treated group compared to the control group. Tulsi’s effect on pH stability decreased, with a slight variation in the pH levels of the milk samples. This might have occurred because of the lower temperatures and higher moisture content in the air
(Zou et al., 2017). In milder seasons, microbial growth is decreased and maintaining a stable pH is essential, especially for preserving milk’s freshness and preventing spoiling. Many studies have revealed that different concentrations of Tulsi extracts have different impacts on their antimicrobial and pH-buffering effects, with higher concentrations sometimes causing different microbial dynamics
(Dahanukar et al., 2000). The higher extract levels in the T3 group may have affected the overall composition of the milk, causing slight pH fluctuations.
A similar trend for acidity was noted in the rainy season in Tulsi-treated milk samples. During the 2-hour mark, the acidity levels of the control group were 0.150±0.007% and it was slightly lower in the Tulsi-treated groups (T1: 0.148±0.010, T2: 0.142±0.035, T3: 0.138±0.009%), which was statistically significant (*p<0.05). According to
Zou et al., (2017), this could be because Tulsi extract keeps milk’s pH stable even in humid environments, delaying its acidification. After 4 hours, the acidity level in the control group was (0.18±0.008)%, whereas the Tulsi-treated groups showed comparatively slower increase of acidity (T1: 0.165±0.008, T2: 0.152±0.009%, T3: 0.149±0.015). At 6 hours, a slow rise in acidity was still evident in the Tulsi-treated samples, though the effect was less pronounced than in the summer season (T1: 0.180±0.007, T2: 0.162±0.010, T3: 0.156±0.011). During the rainy season, the lower microbial activity due to low temperature may help maintain milk pH stability and freshness. It was also evident by the Direct Microscopic Count at 4 and 6 hours (5.70±0.13, 6.90±0.17) for T1, (5.40±0.12, 6.40±0.15) for T2 and (5.25±0.11, 6.20±0.14) hours compared to the control group (6.15±0.14, 7.10±0.19), where there was a significant difference between the control and Tulsi-treated group of samples (P<0.05) was similar to the finding of the acid production of the milk bacteria can decrease by the phytochemicals present in Tulsi extracts consequently increased shelf life up to 8 to 9 h
Joshi et al., (2011) and
Khan et al., (2020).
Dry season
Compared to the summer and rainy seasons, the pH data during the dry season showed a less clear trend. All Tulsi treatments showed a slight increase in pH at two hours, with no significant difference between the control and Tulsi-treated groups, where the control had the highest pH of (6.54±0.11). The pH remained stable across different extract concentrations but decreased as time increased to 4 and 6 hours. For example, the control and T3 groups exhibited greater variability over six hours, whereas the T1 and T2 groups maintained more consistent pH values.
The decrease in pH at 6 hours in the control group could be a result of natural microbial fermentation, which is still active in the dry season, more slowly compared to the rainy season
(Rahman et al., 2015). The antimicrobial properties of Tulsi extract may slow this fermentation process, contributing to a less acidic environment. However, the pH level of higher extract concentrations (T3) of high concentrations of Tulsi may not act linearly and it could introduce slight imbalances in milk composition, affecting pH stability as revealed by
(Khan et al., 2020) and
(Mittal et al., 2020).
The same pattern was noted in the dry season, where milk samples with Tulsi had lower in acidity per cent (%) after the 2-hour mark, with acidity levels in the treated groups (T1: 0.158±0.006, T2: 0.142±0.009, T3: 0.148±0.008) being slightly lower than those in the control (0.158±0.006).
The acidity level of the control group was 0.180±0.008 after 4-hour periods, whereas the treated samples had a lower level (T1: 0.168±0.006, T2: 0.152±0.008 and T3: 0.165±0.032%), revealing a statistically significant decrease (*p<0.05). This indicates that Tulsi extract plays a crucial role in slowing down the rate of acidification, which is particularly essential in hotter, drier environments where microbial activity can still be significant. Because microbial load was 4.25±0.07 after two hours in control group, whereas it was 4.22±0.08 in T1, 4.20 ±0.06 for T2 and 4.18±0.09 in T3 group. This was further evidence that the 6-hour milk preservation, which may be explained by an increased amount of Tulsi extract affecting the milk composition by controlling microbial load (7.00±0.17) in control group, (6.40±0.15) in T1, (5.90±0.13) in T2 and (5.70±0.12) in T3 group was supported by
Dahanukar et al., (2000).