Table 1 depicts the sociodemographic profile, BMI and WHR of the study participants. About 33.3 per cent were males and 66.7 per cent were female participants. Sixty-nine per cent were between 21 and 30 years and a meagre 1.4 per cent were 41 to 45 years. The Khasi tribals comprised 78.2 per cent and 21.8 per cent were from the Jaintia tribe. Unmarried study participants comprised 92.6 per cent and 1.6 per cent were divorced /separated.
Students comprised 83.8 per cent, 10.3 per cent were employed and 2.3 per cent were involved in small start-up businesses. The anthropometric measurements revealed 65.6 per cent fall under the normal BMI classification and only 3.1 per cent were obese. About 71.6 per cent of the study participants had an unfavourable WHR >0.85.
This result is supported by previous findings
(Chhajed et al., 2021), which suggest mustard oil consumption has an inverse relationship with BMI and that a decrease in the occurrence of overweight and obesity is observed in comparison to the use of other oils as the predominant oil. Although 65.6 per cent of the study participants may have a normal BMI, WHR predicts visceral fat better compared to WC and BMI according to
Gadekar et al., (2020).
The type, frequency and quantity of oil consumed are presented in Fig 1 and 2, respectively. A total of 72.7 per cent of the study participants used mustard oil daily and 15.3 per cent used soybean oil for cooking daily. Nearly forty per cent of the study participants used 6 teaspoons (30 ml) of mustard oil per day and about 30.8 per cent of them used 2 teaspoons (10 ml) of soy oil per day. 33.8 per cent of them do not use soybean oil and 3.8 per cent of them do not use mustard oil.
Predominant oil comprises oil that was consumed in more than 50 per cent of the total oils used in a household (
NSSO, 2014). Previous findings by
Chhajed et al., (2021) also supported that mustard oil was consumed by 90 per cent of the population in North and Northeast India. According to
Rahman et al., (2024), low levels of saturated fatty acids and higher MUFA, erucic acid, along with other bioactives like glucosinolates,omega-3 fatty acids, flavonoids, tannins, terpenols, phenylpropanoids and trace elements in mustard oil, contributes to its medicinal properties
Table 2 records the blood lipid profile and serum concentration of 25-hydroxy vitamin D. serum total cholesterol, triglycerides and VLDL-C levels were all within the normal range, demonstrating statistically significant (p<0.05). HDL-C mean was also higher (p<0.05). The LDL-C level did not show any statistical significance.
Prakash et al., (2019) reported that mustard oil with erucic acid and glucosinolate reduced serum triglycerides and increased HDL-C compared to mustard oils without erucic acid. The lipid profile of the study participants revealed a promising picture. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, VLDL-C and HDL-C values reflected a robust protective lipid profile supported by previous studies. Mustard oil’s hypolipidemic activities may have contributed to the normal levels in the study. Scientific evidence supported the hypolipidemic nature of mustard oil, which decreased total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, as suggested by
Mishra and Manchanda (2012) and
Akhtar and Khan (2024).
Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentration in the selected study participants was much lower than normal values at 95 per cent CI (p<0.05), indicating a deficient vitamin D level. Exposure to sunlight is a significant criterion in the synthesis of vitamin D. According to
Oliver et al., (2023), climate and urban lifestyle could affect the synthesis of vitamin D.
Table 3 presents Model I of regression analysis, which assessed the influence of age, gender and oil intake on BMI. Age was identified as a dominant predictor of BMI, revealing statistical significance at a one per cent level (p=0.003). This confirms age is a predictor of BMI(p<0.01), as supported by a study by
Gadekar et al., (2020).
Another Model II (Table 4) examined BMI, WHR, Mustard oil, Soybean oil intake and the dependent variable triglyceride levels. The model showed that the selected variables together explained 42 per cent of the variance in triglyceride levels. The overall model was highly significant indicating a good fit. With a p-value of 0.001, thus proving a strong association between the anthropometric indices, type of oil and triglyceride levels. Furthermore, WHR emerged as a significant predictor of serum triglyceride levels. The relationship was significant at one per cent level with a p= 0.005. Previous research had similar outcomes as reported by
Bailey et al., (2013), Lam et al., (2015) and
Miralles et al., (2015).
The third Model (Table 5) was fitted to test the association between VLDL-C levels, BMI, WHR, mustard oil and soybean oil intake, which resulted in an R value of 6.54 and R2 value of 0.428, where all selected variables together explain 42 per cent of the variance in serum VLDL-C levels. A statistical significance was observed in this model (p = 0.005). Among the independent variables, WHR emerged as the most significant contributor to VLDL-C levels; higher WHR was positively correlated with an increase in VLDL-C levels. Evidence by
Sam et al., (2008) and
Wei et al., (2022) also supported that WHR significantly influences lipid parameters, VLDL-C concentration and triglyceride levels.
Model IV (Table 6) indicated that predictors like BMI, WHR, intake of mustard oil and the amount of mustard oil did bring about a statistical significance in serum vitamin D concentration in the study participants, however the amount and intake of mustard oil was the significant predictor of serum vitamin D levels indicating frequent intake of mustard oil (p=0.21) and the amount of mustard oil (p=0.015) intake increased the serum vitamin D levels. The model resulted in 25 per cent of the deviation in serum vitamin D levels. However, the Model did not reveal any statistically significance (p=0.067).
Vitamin D bioavailability may be influenced by the type of fatty acids reported by
Silva and Furlanetto, (2018) and
Holmberg et al., (1990). Vitamin D absorption could be enhanced in mustard oil owing to the presence of MUFA in the oil. Similar research by
Niramitmahapanya et al., (2011) has established a significant correlation between MUFA and vitamin D absorption. Furthermore,
Amithabh et al., (2024) reported that vitamin D increased in mustard oil with exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Mustard oil, a structured triacylglycerol, may be a favourable medium for delivering vitamin D, suggests
Guo et al., (2022). It contains vitamin D naturally in considerable amounts and its intake may be positively and significantly associated with a favourable BMI and lipid profile among our study participants.