The mean percentage score for knowledge was 62.26 (SD: 16.68). It can be observed in Table 1 that more than half (56.11%) of the dairy farmers had knowledge that dog and cats are the source of rabies. A similar finding was reported by
Digafe et al. (2015) and
Dabuma et al. (2017). There were only 45.00 per cent of the dairy farmers gave correct answer on the question “is there any specific treatment for rabid animals?” and remaining 55.00 per cent of them believed that it is treatable. A study conducted in Ethiopia by
Digafe et al. (2015) who reported that 27.8 per cent of the respondents believed that rabies is a treatable disease. Majority of the dairy farmers (92.22%) had knew about transmission of rabies through ingestion of contaminated food, meat or milk. More than half of the dairy farmers knew about the symptoms of rabies in animal and human. Majority of the dairy farmers had knew about prevention of rabies through post bite vaccination and washing the dog bite site with soap and running water. There are two surprising findings; one is that more than two-thirds (66.67%) of the dairy farmers had believed that red chili powder helps to cure rabies and the second is more than one-third (38.89%) of them believed in bhuva-dhaga or superstition for curing the rabies in animals. A similar finding was observed by
Singh and Choudhary, (2005) indicated that 19.20 per cent were the believer of some religious customs such as chilli application or tobacco leaf application or tie a bell to Hadakwa Mata temple and others. There is a belief of dairy farmers about rabies that it can be treatable. This will be the most challenging task for veterinary public health and veterinary extension functionary to convince them that the disease is totally fatal and non-treatable after the manifestation of clinical symptoms. Majority of the dairy farmers had sensitive towards the impact of rabies on human health, vaccination, washing dog bite site with soap and running water and avoid and control of stray dog population. The mean percentage score for sensitivity was 81.30 (SD: 14.06). Majority of the dairy farmers had positive attitude towards the control of rabies like vaccination (82.33 Mean Percent Score), awareness (81.44 MPS) and constant monitoring (79.89 MPS). Most of the dairy farmers felt that rabies is hazardous to human health (84.44 MPS). A similar finding was observed by
Abdela et al. (2017) and reported that majority of the respondents (80.0%) considered rabies as a fatal disease. Majority of the dairy farmers (80.22 MPS) believed that rabies can be successfully controlled through managemental practices. A contrary finding was observed by
Abdela et al. (2017) and reported that more than two-third of the participant do not believed that rabies not to be prevented by vaccination and eliminating stray dog like managmental practices. Perceived human health hazards effect of rabies as a zoonotic disease on animals and human beings by the dairy farmers as well as economic losses caused by such a disease was the major reasons for the formation of positivism toward control of rabies might be the possible explanation for this result. The mean percentage score for attitude was 78.44 (SD: 9.30). The detailed analysis of knowledge, sensitivity and attitude of dairy farmers towards prevent and control of rabies is described in Table 1.
The majority (72.22%) of dairy farmers fall under medium to high level of knowledge about rabies (Table 2 and Fig 2). This might be due to that rabies is one of the oldest and fatal diseases as known by dairy farmers. These findings were in accordance with
Tiwari et al. (2019) who reported that majority of the dairy farmers was well known about rabies. The vast majority (91.11%) of dairy farmers had high to very high sensitivity towards rabies. This is because of the majority of dairy farmers were known about effect of rabies on animal and human health. A similar finding was reported by
Munisamy et al. (2017). A vast majority (95.55%) of the dairy farmers had favorable to most favorable attitude towards control of rabies. A similar finding was observed by
Bagherian et al. (2018) and reported that almost all (91%) of respondents categorized as good attitude regarding animal bite and rabies.
The majority (67.78%) of dairy farmers had high level of consciousness about rabies, followed by 22.78 per cent very high level of consciousness (Table 3). Knowledge of the dairy farmers about rabies (especially on prevention and control aspect) as a component of consciousness is still to work for enhancing consciousness level of dairy farmers regarding rabies as a zoonosis.
Costa and Fernandes, (2016) indicated a clear need to increase public consciousness with regard to the potential risk of rabies and the means of avoiding the disease, through educational initiatives directed at the local population. In line with our report,
Singh and Choudhary, (2005) indicated that 98.60 per cent of people from a rural community of Gujarat, India were aware about rabies and also by
Abdela et al. (2017) and
Dabuma et al. (2017) who reported that the overall KAP scores were good implying that the communities had good awareness about rabies.
The Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to identify the relationship between factors affecting the consciousness of dairy farmers about rabies and independent variables. In Fig 3, out of fifteen independent variables, nine variables had established a positive and significant relationship with the consciousness of dairy farmers about rabies. The result shows that the consciousness of dairy farmers about rabies was significantly increasing with increase in education, participation in extension activities and training programmes, exposure of mass media and internet with scientific orientation and economic motivation. Correlation between knowledge level with sensitivity level (0.256) and attitude level (0.420) and sensitivity with attitude (0.225) of dairy farmers regarding rabies was found to be positive and significance at 1 per cent. This is in agreement with study by
Costa and Fernandes, (2016) who reported that the education of individual had a significant influence on their knowledge of rabies but not by age.
Path analysis - direct effect
The data in Fig 4 revealed that major variables contributing the maximum direct positive effect on the consciousness of rabies were scientific orientation (0.3900), mass media exposure (0.2908), family size, dairy farming experience, professional training received, social participation, internet exposure, economic motivation, annual income and extension participation in descending order.
Path analysis - total indirect effect
Fourteen variables had a positive total indirect effect out of fifteen on the consciousness of dairy farmers about rabies. Further, it can be observed that economic motivation had maximum total indirect effect (0.3871) through substantial indirect effect-1 [scientific orientation (0.2621)] and substantial indirect effect-2 [mass media exposure (0.1096)].
Path analysis - substantial indirect effect
Data further revealed that out of 30 substantial indirect effects, thirteen routed through scientific orientation and twelve routed through mass media exposure, four routed through education and one routed through professional training received.
To epitomize the result, it can be concluded that scientific orientation and mass media exposure of dairy farmers was the key variables in exerting considerable direct and substantial effect for determination of consciousness of rabies, whereas economic motivation, extension participation, education and training had exerted the higher indirect effect on the consciousness of dairy farmers about rabies which are seen in Fig 4.