Serological detection of leishmaniasis
After calculation of Cut Off value at ≥ 0.230, the findings of qualitative ELISA detected that 15.38% (14/91) of study cats were serologically positive to leishmaniasis whereas 84.62% were seronegatives (Fig 1).
According to their titers, values seropositives (0.369857±0.025774) were significantly (p<0.0001; 95%CI: 0.9799 to 15.23) higher than recorded for seronegatives (0.172896 ± 0.003906), (Fig 2).
In some endemic areas, serological surveys have been carried out in cats using indirect hemagglutination antibody test (IHAT) in Egypt, Western blot (WB) in France and indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) in Italy (
Mancianti, 2004). In Egypt, serological testing using an ELISA technique was performed on 104 cats living in Jerusalem area and the seropositive findings were observed in 6.7%
(Nasereddin et al., 2008). In Spain,
Ayllon et al., (2008) observed that the prevalence rate of leishmaniasis in blood samples of 233 cats tested by IFAT was 4.29% (10/233), which involving 1.29% (3/233) under the cutoff 1:100 and 3% (7/233). In another recent Spanish document,
Alcover et al., (2021) revealed leishmaniasis in blood samples of 2.2% (4/179) stray cats tested serologically by ELISA and 14.5% (26/179) by WB. Among different Brazilian reports,
Bezerra et al., (2019) detected that the serological prevalence rates of leishmaniasis in diseased cats with feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus were 15.38% and 28.57%, respectively. On other hand,
Costa-Val et al. (2020) found 29.80% positive cats among 64 blood samples tested serologically by ELISA; while,
Leonel et al., (2020) recorded that the seropositive rates of leishmaniasis in blood samples of 94 cats were 31.91% and 29.79% through ELISA and IFAT respectively. In Northern Italy, 12.5% of 152 cats were shown a positive reactivity using IFAT with a titer of ≥1:80
(Urbani et al., 2020). In Iran, a cross-sectional descriptive study involved the testing of blood samples of 60 stray cats by ELISA and the findings recorded that the prevalence of
L. infantum was 6.7%
(Akhtardanesh et al., 2017). In Turkey,
Aksulu et al., (2021) indicated that an overall of 47 out 301 (15.6%) cats were having the anti-Leishmania antibodies using the IFAT. Based on these data, considerable variation among the findings of various studies might be attributed to differences in the parasite species (strains), host immune response, specific test platform used, targeted antigen and geographical endemicity of disease.
Molecular identification of L. infantum
Targeting the
ITS1 and
5.8S rRNA gene, the findings shown that 9.89% (9/91) of study cats were infected with
L. infantum while 90.11% (82/91) were negatives (Fig 3).
In a previous review article,
Mancianti (2004) mentioned that the typing of clinical cases described in several European countries as France, Italy, Portugal and Spain identified
L. infantum in all reported cases. Comparatively,
L. infantum infection was detected molecularly in 0.43%
(Ayllon et al., 2008) and 5.6%
(Alcover et al., 2021) of Spanish cats, 16.7% of Iranian stray cats
(Akhtardanesh et al., 2017), 10% of Brazilian cats (
Costa-Val et al., 2020) and 2.3% of Turkish cats
(Aksulu et al., 2021). Among the various molecular targets, the
ITS1 and
5.8S rRNA gene has emerged as particularly valuable due to its high variability and conserved flanking regions, which facilitate species-specific amplification and differentiation (
Gunderina and Katokhin, 2020). Also, the inherent genetic diversity within the
ITS1 region coupled with the stability of the
5.8S rRNA gene enables the development of highly sensitive and specific PCR-based assays capable of identifying
Leishmania at the genus and species level, even in samples with low parasite loads
(Usmael et al., 2022). This makes them superior to other targets like the
18S rRNA gene that, despite its abundance, requires more intricate amplification methods and often presents challenges in achieving species-level discrimination (
Alsulaimany, 2025). Moreover, the tandem repeat organization of rDNA units, which can be present in tens to hundreds of copies per
Leishmania cell, significantly enhances the sensitivity of
ITS1-based assays, allowing for robust detection even in clinical samples with limited parasite DNA
(Salloum et al., 2016).
Comparative accuracy of diagnostic assays
This study found significantly that the number serologically positive samples (15.38%) was higher (p<0.0474; 95%CI: 22.24 to 47.51) than reported by molecular PCR assay (9.89%), which accordingly indicated that the levels of sensitivity and specificity for ELISA were 100% and 93.9% respectively (Fig 4, Table 2).
In contrast to our data,
Akhtardanesh et al., (2017) obtained that the prevalence rates of positive
Leishmania infection by ELISA and PCR were 6.7% and 16.7%, respectively. However, this high sensitivity and specificity might be attributed to the high efficacy of ELISA’s kit applied in current study or to the role of testing similar sample sources in a study.
Sherry et al., (2011) determined that serology and PCR results are positively associated and moderate agreement was found between Leishmania ELISA and PCR since the total rate of
L. infantum infection derived from seroreactivity and / or positive PCR was 15.4%.
Alcover et al., (2021) found that the overall rate of leishmaniasis among 179 stray cats was 15.6% and only two cats tested positive by all the diagnostic methods (IFAT, ELISA, WB and PCR). However, several studies have been reported inconsistent results when using different types of tissue samples for PCR-based diagnosis compared with the parasitological and serological data indicating that sampling from different tissues together with serological analysis is required when screening for leishmaniasis
(Rihs et al., 2025; Gow et al., 2022; Castelli et al., 2021; Costa-Val et al., 2020).
Phylogenetic analysis of study L. infantum isolates
Sequencing data of study positive
L. infantum isolates were named as Feline isolates and documented in the NCBI-GenBank database following specified accession numbers (PQ327040.1, PQ327041.1, PQ327042.1, PQ327043.1, PQ327044.1, PQ327045.1, PQ327046.1, PQ327047.1 and PQ327048.1). Comparative analysis of study
L. infantum isolates with the NCBI-BLAST
L. infantum isolates detected an existence of nucleotide alignment similarities (*) ranged 89-100% and substitution mutations ranged 0.000-0.0583%. However, the marked significant identity was observed between the study isolates named Felin1, Feline 2, Feline6, Feline7 and Feline9 with the NCBI-GenBank
L. infantus Iranian (ID: KF705514.1) isolate that identified in ticks of naturally infected dogs; while, the study isolates named Feline3, Feline4, Feline5 and Feline8 were identical with the NCBI-GenBank
L. infantus Brazilian (ID: MH231229.1) isolate obtained from the conjunctive of naturally infected dogs (Table 3, Fig 5-9).
In the only available study in Iraqi animals, phylogenetic analysis of
L. infantum isolates identified in dogs revealed a significant identity to Brazilian, French and American. This demonstrates that many strains of
L. infantum might be circulated in Iraq particularly Brazilian ones suggesting that cats could attract their infection from dogs (
Fadhil and Ali, 2025). Also, low levels of biosecurity in Iraq allows to introduction of various animals and breeders which may act as a reservoir to infection or infected asymptomatically. Nonetheless,
Costa-Val et al. (2020) refer to the genetic complexity of
Leishmania spp. populations which circulate in a different geographical area but the same species.