Characteristics of study participants
Sixty-seven participants were interviewed, including 61 learners (Grades 4-7) and six adults: Three principals, two teachers and one gardener from Masibambane day care centre. The adults, evenly split by gender, averaged 45 years old. Four had tertiary education, while two completed Grades 11-12. Their practical and academic experience provided important perspectives for the study. As the learners were children, data collection did not focus on their personal characteristics.
Alignment of the FSBH project with community collaboration principles
This study assessed how the FSBH project aligns with principles of effective community collaboration. University-community partnerships, such as MUT’s engagement with Umlazi schools, are crucial for advancing education and community development (
Jackson and Marques, 2019). The FSBH project enhances food security through school-based vegetable gardening, integrating institutional support with local participation. Its alignment is examined through four key aspects: Adherence to CBPR principles, CEAD Directorate’s framework, willingness of participants and stakeholder perspectives.
Alignment of the FSBH project with CBPR principles
The FSBH project aligns closely with the principles of CBPR by promoting collaboration between MUT and Umlazi schools to address food security and malnutrition in the community. CBPR prioritises active partnerships, knowledge co-creation and empowering marginalised communities to develop their own solutions
(Ford et al., 2012; Wood and McAteer, 2017). MUT lecturers and local schools collaborate with government departments such as Agriculture and Environmental Affairs, which provide seeds and seedlings. The project integrates sustainable agriculture and nutrition education into outdoor activities, equipping learners and educators with essential skills. Community extension students contribute by sharing practical knowledge, reinforcing experiential learning and capacity building. This hands-on, participatory approach ensures meaningful community engagement in addressing local challenges
(Goins et al., 2011; Huffman, 2017).
Emphasis on willingness in the FSBH project
The FSBH project prioritised schools that voluntarily participated, aligning with CBPR principles of collaboration, shared goals and mutual benefit. MUT provided expertise, tools and transport, while schools contributed land, water and garden management. Twenty learners per school, selected from Grades 3 to 6, cultivated vegetables such as cabbage, spinach, beetroot, onions, kale, green pepper, brinjal, tomatoes, lettuce and green chillies, under an educator’s supervision. MUT and CEAD officials conducted regular monitoring. This approach underscores the project’s commitment to community involvement, sustainability and education, reinforcing CBPR’s focus on meaningful, community-led outcomes.
Participants’ perspectives on the FSBH project
MUT staff engaged schools early, identifying gardening sites and assessing interest. Participant B2 recalled:
“MUT staff visited our school to show us how to grow fresh produce. They asked where we could garden and after we showed them, they promised to return to prepare the land. They explained the project and we were happy to participate.
”
This reflects MUT’s commitment to collaboration, aligning with PAR principles of mutual agreement (
Hawkins, 2015).
Burns and Worsley (2015) emphasised that involving participants ensures relevance and ownership. Participant N1 confirmed: “We were consulted and invited to a meeting where project goals were shared,” while Participant Z1 added: “We were invited to Mangosuthu University for a briefing before the project started.”
MUT staff provided land preparation, training and ongoing support. Participant N1 stated:
“MUT showed us how to do everything and assisted every time they came,” and Participant I2 noted: “If I have questions, I contact them.” This aligns with the view that universities can significantly support community projects (
Bhagwan, 2018).
At Masibambane Day Care Centre, Participants M1 and M2 highly rated MUT’s involvement. The project also fostered collaboration, as Participant B2 shared:
“We visited other schools to see their progress and encourage each other.” Educators were dedicated, with Participant N1 highlighting a volunteer educator’s passion for agriculture and Participant I2 noting shared responsibilities. Overall, the FSBH project strengthened food security and university-school partnerships through effective collaboration.
Commitment as a key factor in collaborative initiatives
Commitment and active participation are essential for achieving project goals.
Cen et al., (2021) defined commitment as a willingness to act for oneself or others. The experience at Bavumile Primary School highlights that success depends on the dedication of school staff, learners and external partners. Participant B2 noted the collective effort of MUT staff, the principal, teachers and learners:
“We were happy to participate.
” This enthusiasm led to active learner engagement, as Participant B2 observed:
“The learners watered the garden themselves and enjoyed it.
” However, challenges such as theft emphasised the need for external support and security. Participant B2 expressed frustration:
“The only issue was with the community. They stole all the crops.” This highlights that internal commitment must be complemented by external support and security measures for sustainability.
Bonow and Normark (2018) found that successful garden projects rely on participant commitment, with larger groups often struggling due to lower commitment levels. Therefore, dedicated participation is key to the long-term viability of garden projects. Participant N1 stressed the importance of school and MUT collaboration: “I love the project. Sometimes I was hands-on with the learners, assisting them with irrigation and other tasks.” Teachers also showed dedication, volunteering due to their passion for agriculture. Project coordinator Participant I2 played a key role in garden management: “My deputy principal appointed me to lead this project. I was happy to take on this role.” Strong school-MUT collaboration reinforced project success, with Participant I2 rating MUT staff a “10.” While learner participation was significant, consistency was a challenge, as Participant I2 noted:
“I give them a 9, because some could not always be on time.”
Participant Z1’s personal commitment exemplifies the role of individual dedication:
“I decided to run with it myself, as I also like agriculture.” High MUT staff involvement, rated “10 out of 10,” further underscores the importance of external support.
Bonow and Normark (2018) found that bottom-up initiatives thrive when participants take ownership. The experience at these schools reinforces that long-term success depends on both internal dedication and external collaboration, ensuring sustainability despite challenges.
Impact of the FSBH project as a university-community collaboration
This paper’s third objective is to assess the FSBH project’s achievements as a university-community collaboration, focusing on improving school nutrition and promoting a food gardening culture among learners.
Contribution to school feeding schemes
The study found that the FSBH project successfully enhanced vegetable production and utilisation. At Bavumile Primary School, despite theft challenges, the garden provided fresh produce for meals and generated income. Participant B2 noted,
“We used some vegetables for learners’ meals and sold some to teachers.” Similarly, Ngqayizivele Primary School benefited significantly. Participant N1 stated, “We use green peppers from our garden since the department does not supply them.” Participant M1 added, “Whenever I need green peppers for cooking, I go to the garden.” This integration improved meal quality. In South Africa, where the National School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) serves over 9 million learners, yet fewer than half of schools have gardens
(Devereux et al., 2018), initiatives like FSBH address this gap.
School-based vegetable gardens supplement nutrition programmes, combat hidden hunger and promote dietary diversity
(Araya et al., 2020). Participant I2 reported multiple harvests: “We’ve had about three to four harvests.” Participant M1 added, “We harvest regularly, using or selling the produce. With the money, we buy bread and other essentials.” Participant M2 noted, “The project not only benefits the school but also equips us with skills to share with our communities. Instead of buying food, we use our garden’s produce.” Participant Z2 highlighted that chilies and spinach were given to children, directly benefiting their nutrition. According to Food and Trees for Africa (
FTFA, 2024), school gardens improve learners’ nutrition, health, concentration and academic performance. The FSBH project is an effective tool for enhancing school meal quality and promoting healthier eating habits.
The FSBH project: Empowering young learners
The FSBH Project has successfully equipped learners with gardening skills and fostered a gardening culture in schools. Participant B2 noted, “Learners have shown interest and learned they can have their own gardens at home,
” demonstrating its impact beyond school. At Inkonkoni Primary School, learners were actively involved in both the planting of seedlings and watering of plants (Fig 1). Participant I2 observed particular enthusiasm among girls, who not only enhanced their gardening knowledge but were also inspired by female educators serving as role models. These educators actively participated in the project, reinforcing learners’ confidence and motivation, with one pictured harvesting fresh vegetables at Inkonkoni Primary School (Fig 2).
At Masibambane, the project’s success was evident in the cabbages cultivated in the garden and the harvested crops (Fig 3 and 4). Participants BL described these hands-on experiences in planting and harvesting, while Participants NL reported starting home gardens. Participant Z1 stated,
“The project makes learners develop a love for agriculture,
” reinforcing its effectiveness. Gardening is increasingly recognised as a valuable health promotion tool for children and adolescents (
van Lier et al., 2017).
Critical lessons from the project
The collaboration between MUT and primary schools in Umlazi offers key lessons for tackling food insecurity and malnutrition through community engagement:
Stakeholder engagement and collaboration
Inclusive planning
Involving diverse stakeholders, including university departments, local schools, government entities and the community, ensures a comprehensive understanding of needs and resources, promoting ownership.
Shared goals
Establishing common objectives aligns efforts and resources. In this project, the shared goal of tackling food insecurity created unity.
Resource pooling
Combining expertise and resources, such as MUT’s technical support and schools’ land, water and manpower, enhanced the project’s capacity and addressed resource constraints.
Collaborative efforts between MUT and Umlazi schools demonstrate how combining academic expertise with community resources effectively addresses local challenges. Clear roles and responsibilities ensured smooth operation, showcasing the FSBH Project as a model of university-community collaboration and effective teamwork.
Selection and commitment of participating entities
Willingness to participate
Selecting schools ready to engage ensures higher commitment and active participation, crucial for success. This reflects CBPR’s focus on mutual benefit and collaboration, alongside MUT CEAD Directorate’s policy of ‘reciprocity and equality’.
Terms and engagement
Clear engagement terms manage expectations and responsibilities. The agreement between MUT and the schools established a strong project foundation.
Schools with dedicated educators and committed learners showed better results, emphasising the importance of active participation. Variations in commitment levels across schools highlighted the need for consistent support to achieve success. The FSBH project demonstrates that the collective commitment of all parties is critical for the success of collaborative initiatives.
Sustainability and community involvement
Active Participation
Involving learners and teachers in garden management during the project team’s absence fosters responsibility and ownership, crucial for sustainability.
Capacity Building
Training learners, teachers and community members in agricultural practices strengthens local capacity, ensuring long-term benefits. Educating and empowering participants with agricultural skills has been vital for the project’s continued success.
Monitoring and evaluation
Continuous observation
Regular monitoring by the project team and CEAD officials ensures the project stays on track, addressing issues promptly. Documenting growth and assessing learner understanding through observations and photos aids in evaluating impact.
Baseline data
Collecting initial data from learners enables the measurement of progress and outcomes, which is essential for assessing effectiveness and making adjustments.
Education and awareness
Agriculture and nutrition education
Involving learners in gardening activities enhances their understanding of food production and healthy eating.
Community education
Raising awareness in the broader community about the FSBH project promotes support, encouraging a movement towards better food security and health.
Implications for agricultural extension/community engagement
Enhanced stakeholder collaboration
The FSBH project highlights the value of partnerships among universities, communities and key stakeholders. Extension services can harness such collaborations to pool resources, share expertise and address community issues more effectively.
Focus on education and capacity building
Integrating agricultural education into school activities raises awareness from a young age. Extension services can develop programmes in partnership with educational institutions to teach practical skills and promote farming careers. Providing training to community members, especially educators and learners, builds local capacity and empowers individuals to sustain agricultural projects.
Promoting food security and nutrition
Extension services can connect agricultural practices with nutritional outcomes, ensuring food security efforts also address malnutrition. Strengthening local food systems through community-based projects enhances resilience to food insecurity, particularly in vulnerable communities.
Documentation and knowledge sharing
Documenting and sharing success stories from projects like FSBH can guide similar efforts. Extension services can create platforms for knowledge sharing and replicating successful models.