Feeding rate
The average results of observations of nutrient digestibility and feeding rate of local sheep during the study are presented in Table 2. The feeding rate of the research sheep was around 8.15-9.69 g/head/minute. Treatment of P0 (control diet) with basal feeding in elephant grass silage and concentrate showed the highest feeding rate of 9.69±2.31 g/head/minute. The analysis of variance showed that the treatment had no significant effect (P>0.05) on the feeding rate of sheep. However, paying attention decreases the amount of feed consumed per minute. This can be due to several factors, including the physical characteristics of the feed, palatability, sex of livestock, condition of the livestock and feeding behavior. Sheep are livestock with a very picky character about the feed. This has an impact on the feeding behavior of the livestock itself. This is reinforced by the opinion of
Johansson (2011) that the percentage or amount of different feed can affect the feeding behavior of local sheep. The quality and composition of feed ingredients can affect chewing rate.
Upon observation, the eating behavior of sheep was different. Some sheep devour their feed without being picky about what to eat, some see and sniff their food first and some choose their feed when they eat. These behaviors affect feeding rate and feed intake. Table 2 shows that dry matter intake decreases with decreasing feeding rate. Several factors affect animal feed consumption are the feed’s appearance, aroma, texture and taste. This affects livestock feeding behavior, impacting animal feed consumption. The quality and composition of feed ingredients can affect chewing rate. From the conditions at the time of the study, the quality of basal feed (P0) was classified as low quality. Still, it had the fastest feeding rate compared to the feed supplemented with treatment. This is likely related to the level of palatability. Livestock palatability significantly affects the rate of feeding of livestock. Based on the feed given in the study regarding aroma or odor, basal feed (P0) has a distinctive silage aroma that stands out because it does not provide additional supplementary feed. Meanwhile, in the P1 and P2 treatments, there were additional Moringa leaf flour and palm oil so that the aroma of the feed tended to be slightly bitter.
Xin et al., (2025) said that using vegetable oil, especially protected palm oil in feed, makes animals eat more because they enjoy the smell, which makes the food more attractive to them. This is different from the results of the study, which showed that the feeding rate of sheep treated with the addition of vegetable oil in the form palm oil had the lowest feeding rate compared to other treatments, so the palatability of feed containing palm oil was considered low. The smell of palm oil and the texture of the feed, which tended to be sticky, were less preferred by livestock, so livestock tends to be picky about their feed. Apart from the texture and odor caused by the oil, the crude fat content in experimental feed can also affect the feeding rate of livestock. Table 2 shows a decrease in feeding rate in treatment P0 to P2, possibly due to increased feed quality, especially fat and energy.
Patra (2013) mentions that high levels of essential fatty acids in the food given to ruminant animals might reduce how much they eat.
Behan et al., (2019) suggest that adding fat to the diet of livestock that mainly eat forage-based feed works best, because fat acts as a source of energy. The reason energy efficiency improves when rumen-protected fat is supplemented is twofold: it reduces the amount of methane generated within the rumen and it enables the direct utilization of essential long-chain fatty acids by the animal. Palm oil contains an energy of 8300 kcal / kg, making the needed energy needed by sheep met faster. Strengthened by the opinion of
Davies (1982) that there is an inverse correlation between consumption and energy content in the feed. The decrease in the level of livestock consumption is partly due to the high energy content in the feed given.
Dry matter digestibility
The dry matter digestibility of the experimental sheep ranged from 64.05-72.22%. Treatment P2 with feeding supplemented with 2% Moringa leaf meal and 0.5% palm oil showed the highest dry matter digestibility, 72.22 ± 0.04%. The analysis of variance showed that the treatment had a significant effect (P<0.05) on the dry matter digestibility in sheep. This indicates that the ration’s nutritional composition affects the dry matter’s digestibility.
Oyedele et al., (2016) and
Sultana et al., (2015) stated that the dry matter digestibility of goats fed a diet of Moringa leaf meal was higher when compared to goats fed other leaves. This is because the availability of cellulose from the ADF can be digested by livestock.
Meel et al., (2019) stated that the fiber content of the feed also influences the digestibility of dry matter. Diets with low fiber content are more accessible to digest than high-fiber feeds.
Stated that the factors that affect the digestibility of dry matter include the level proportion of feed ingredients in the ration, chemical composition and protein levels. In line with the study’s results, the highest dry matter digestibility was found in P2 treatment with supplementation of 2% moringa leaf flour and 0.5% palm oil, in which moringa leaf flour contained a high enough protein, namely 16.83%. Palm oil supplementation, as much as 0.5% in this study, can be considered adequate because it increases feed digestibility. In line with this research,
Candyrine et al., (2019) stated that using oil supplementation could reduce the number of protozoa, thereby causing an increase in bacterial population and increased feed digestibility.
Bhatt et al., (2011) also stated that the population of ciliate rumen protozoa decreased due to providing free oil to sheep, thereby increasing the digestibility of the feed.
It can be seen from the feeding rate data (Table 2) that the feeding rate is inversely related to dry matter digestibility. Feeding rate decreased in each treatment, while dry matter digestibility increased in each treatment. This means that the faster the livestock eat, the quicker the digestibility flow rate will be. The absorption is not optimal because the microbial process of degrading the feed is shorter, so the digestibility is low. Conversely, if the flow rate is slower, it will give time for the microbes to digest the feed properly. There is a correlation between consumption and feed digestibility. Feed intake will increase with increased feeding rate or feed particle rate.
Bhokre et al., (2021) stated that the enhanced digestibility of diets supplemented with Moringa may result from low levels of structural carbohydrates and high-quality protein.
Organic matter digestibility
The organic matter digestibility in the experimental sheep ranged from 69.36 to 74.81%. Treatment P2 with feeding supplemented with 2% Moringa leaf meal and 0.5% palm oil had the highest organic matter digestibility value, 74.81 ± 0.03%. The analysis of variance showed that the treatment had no significant effect (P>0.05) on the digestibility of organic matter in sheep. The higher the value of the digestibility of organic matter causes the feed intake to increase or vice versa. Feed intake is influenced by feed quality, animal body weight and feed digestion rate. How much food animals eat is connected to how well their bodies can break down the nutrients in that food. And how well the nutrients are broken down depends on how much and what kind of nutrients the animals are eating
(Filleau et al., 2018).
The digestibility of organic matter describes the availability of a given feed nutrient. High dry matter intake will be followed by increased high dry matter digestibility. This causes the digestibility of dry matter and organic matter to increase as well. In line with the results obtained, which showed that the highest dry matter digestibility was found in P2 treatment with 2% moringa leaf flour supplementation and 0.5% palm oil, the highest organic matter digestibility was found in treatment P2. This relates to certain substances contained in the feed in each treatment. The chemical composition of feed can affect its digestibility of feed, because the digestibility of a feed is closely related to the quality of the nutrients in the feed.
It is known that in Moringa leaf flour, there are phytochemicals compounds in the form of tannins and saponins.
Penalver et al., (2022) mentioned that the leaves contain anti-nutritional components such as tannins, lecithins and protease inhibitors, which have little significance; therefore, they are safe for consumption. According to
Yogianto et al., (2014), tannins and saponins can improve the digestibility of feed when used in low doses by providing a defaunating effect. Defaunation agents inhibit the growth of protozoa, allowing bacteria in the rumen to thrive, which in turn helps bacteria work more effectively in digesting the feed, leading to increased feed digestibility.
The digestibility of organic matter in this study was relatively higher than that of dry matter in each treatment.
Yogianto et al., (2014) stated that the digestibility value of organic matter tends to be higher than that of dry matter digestibility. Organic matter is part of dry matter with reduced ash content, so the digestibility value of organic matter tends to be high. The ash content in treatment P1 was 13.08%, the highest compared to the other two treatments. This decreased the digestibility of organic matter in the P1 treatment and became the lowest digestibility of organic matter compared to other treatments. The digestibility of organic matter is higher than that of dry matter because the digestibility of dry matter still contains ash. Organic matter does not have ash and material without ash content tends to be easier to digest in the digestive tract. The higher the ash content in the feed, the worse the feed quality. Ash itself consists of minerals, but the types and amounts of minerals in the ash cannot be explained.