Chemical composition of FCF
The proximate analysis of foxtail millet revealed moisture (7.95%), fat (3.45%), ash (2.65%), protein (10.75%) and crude fibre (3.33%). On the other hand, chickpea flour had 6.35% moisture, 4.96% fat, 18.94% protein, 9.19% crude fibre and 3.79±0.32% ash. The proximate standard values indicate that foxtail millet and chickpea flour have a comparable nutrient profile, making them effective ingredients for various food formulations that enhance nutritional quality.
Dough rheology
Frequency sweep analysis
The dynamic oscillatory rheological test was conducted to evaluate how ASG affected the viscoelastic characteristics of gluten-free dough made with FCF, with RWF as the control. The results of a dynamic rheological study indicated that all dough recipes behaved in a typical viscoelastic manner (G'>G''), indicating their characteristics as weak gels with both moduli increasing with frequency (Fig 2a). G' and G'' were lowest for RWF control, while the dough with 3% ASG had the highest G' and G'' values, suggesting a greater structural integrity of the dough and gel network strength. This structural enhancement may be due to tighter ASG interactions with the biological matrices of starch-protein that are formed from hydroxyl groups, which form hydrogen bonds between water and biopolymer and ultimately stabilize the dough matrix, thereby improving structure
(Lazaridou et al., 2007) (Fig 2c). In addition, the low tan δ values of ASG-enriched doughs confirmed them to have elastic behavior (Fig 2b), with 3% ASG forming the most rigid gel structure and indicating the effectiveness of ASG to improve the viscoelastic properties of gluten-free dough. Comparable observations have been previously documented concerning gluten-free formulations incorporating various hydrocolloids
(Dangi et al., 2020).
The Power Law model was utilized to quantify the relationship between frequency and the dough systems. The control sample had the lowest a and b values, indicating a weaker structure, while the 3% ASG dough had the highest values, suggesting a stronger structure (Table 1). The reduction in frequency dependence as the amount of ASG increased, noted in frequency sweep tests, indicates increased stability and lower deformability, which suggests ASG addition improved the processing stability and texture of the dough
(Liu et al., 2017).
Creep and recovery behavior
Creep and recovery tests were conducted to evaluate the viscoelastic properties of FCF doughs containing varying levels of ASG. The viscoelastic behavior was exhibited by all of the samples, with the RWF control demonstrating the highest Jo value and a reducing Jo value when ASG was added (1-3%), presenting a higher structural strength and resistance to deformation (Fig 3). The 1% ASG dough showed the lowest Jo, indicating a stiffening effect, while decreased J
1 and J
max values reflected reduced deformation. The progressive increase in λ
1 with higher ASG levels confirmed the formation of a more stable and resilient viscoelastic network (Table 2).
In the recovery phase, the dough with 3% ASG showed the lowest Jo and J1 values and the highest elastic recovery (58.53%), indicating the dough had greater bounce back and firmness. The extended retardation time for the dough with 3% ASG also contributed to elastic recovery, which suggested that the 3% ASG used in this study helps develop the matrix of the gluten-free dough by forming a stable and cohesive viscoelastic network, which supports previous research conducted with hydrocolloid-enriched systems
(Dangi et al., 2020).
Cooking characteristics of FCF noodles incorporated with ASG
The addition of ASG has influenced the cooking characteristics of FCF noodles, as cooking time was the highest for RWF noodles because of the contribution of the gluten network; whereas 1% of ASG noodles had the least cooking time, presumably due to a weaker structure. However, an increase in ASG (2-3%) resulted in a corresponding increase in cooking time (from 10.70 to 12.29 min). From these results, it appears that ASG made a positive contribution to augmenting matrix strength and water retention, thereby extending the cooking time required for gelatinization of the starch (Table 3). This observation aligns with the findings of
Tangthanantorn et al., (2021), who noted that hydrocolloids can enhance the strength of the structure through hydrogen bonding interactions with starch.
The cooking loss, which reflects the loss of solid materials, was most significant at 1% ASG, where there was a weak structure, followed by a substantial reduction in cooking loss at 3% ASG due to strong starch-gum interactions and cohesive matrix (Table 3)
(Dibakoane et al., 2025). The cooked weight was lowest at 1% ASG but increased to 14.79 g at 3% ASG, indicating improved water retention with higher gum levels, consistent with
Gasparre et al., (2019). WAC followed the same trend, increasing from 1.34 g/g (1% ASG) to 1.69 g/g (3% ASG), indicating an enhanced hydration potential of ASG at higher concentrations. The expansion ratio, however, declined with increasing ASG concentration, suggesting a denser, less swellable structure
(Detchewa et al., 2022).
Color analysis of cooked noodles
The control RWF noodles exhibited the highest lightness, whereas ASG-enriched noodles showed a pronounced darkening effect, with L* decreasing from 15.3 at 1% ASG to 20.0 at 3%. Simultaneously, the a* shifted from slightly green in RWF to distinctly redder tones in ASG samples and b* dropped sharply from 12.8 to values between 2.5 and 4.5 (Table 3). These changes reflect the inherent color compounds in ASG that suppress brightness while enhancing red hues and reducing yellow tones.
Texture analysis
The textural characteristics of FCF noodles were greatly influenced by the incorporation of ASG. The RWF control had the highest hardness attributed to its gluten network, while noodles with 1% ASG exhibited lower hardness, indicating a weaker structure. When the concentration of ASG was increased, the hardness increased to 1499 g at 3%, suggesting some reinforcement of the noodle structure due to gel formation and moisture interaction
(Sutheeves et al., 2020). Similarly, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess and chewiness all improved with the increased levels of ASG content, suggesting a greater level of internal bonding and viscoelasticity. The increased levels of resilience and extensibility are also enhanced, exhibiting greater elasticity and flexibility, which supports the positive influence of ASG on noodle texture (Table 4)
(Padalino et al., 2016).
Tensile strength, indicating noodle resistance to stretching or breaking, improved notably with increasing ASG concentration. While the RWF control showed the highest strength due to gluten, gluten-free noodles with 3% ASG achieved 30.25 g, which is significantly higher than lower ASG levels. This enhancement reflects ASG’s ability to form a cohesive and elastic matrix through gel formation and water binding, partially mimicking the structural role of gluten. Thus, 3% ASG effectively strengthened the noodle matrix, enhancing its mechanical integrity and flexibility
(Dahal et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2025).
Sensory analysis of cooked noodles
The sensory scores of RWF noodles and FCF noodles supplemented with different concentrations of ASG, evaluated for texture, flavour, colour, mouthfeel, aroma and overall acceptability (Fig 4a). RWF noodles received the highest sensory scores primarily as a result of gluten’s contribution to texture and quality. Among the samples supplemented with ASG, 3% of the ASG noodles exhibited superior texture, mouthfeel and overall acceptability, similar to the RWF control. These results align with ASG’s stated capabilities, with gel-forming attributes and water-binding abilities contributing to elasticity and cohesiveness. While the 1% ASG noodles lacked sensory appeal, higher levels of ASG, particularly the 3% ASG noodles, significantly enhanced the quality of gluten-free noodles (Fig 4b).
The instrumental texture results, which showed increased hardness, chewiness and extensibility in noodles with 3% ASG, aligned firmly with sensory panel evaluations of the texture and mouthfeel of this level of ASG. The structural integrity and elasticity achieved by ASG resulted in a firmer, more cohesive and more satisfying bite, which corresponded with sensory scores that corroborated this increase in functional quality. The precise alignment of texture and sensory data underscores ASG’s potential to enhance both the functional and consumer-perceived quality of gluten-free noodles, as evidenced by the 3% ASG treatment, which showed the most significant improvement in terms of texture, acceptability and nutritional quality.
PCA sensory and textural data analysis
The PCA score and loading plots enabled clear differentiation of the noodle samples based on their textural and sensory attributes (Fig 5a, b). Hardness, gumminess, chewiness and tensile strength were the primary characteristics of PC1 (57.4%), whereas cohesiveness, resilience and springiness were the primary characteristics of PC2 (27.8%), which together accounted for 85.2% of the variability. While samples on the negative side of PC1 demonstrated higher extensibility and sensory acceptability, those on the positive side demonstrated greater firmness and structural integrity. Although hardness and gumminess showed an inverse relationship, indicating that excessive firmness decreases consumer preference, the loading plot showed a positive correlation between tensile strength, texture, flavor and overall acceptability. Overall, PCA demonstrated how strongly textural and sensory characteristics interact to affect the acceptability and quality of noodles.