Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

  • Chief EditorHarjinder Singh

  • Print ISSN 0971-4456

  • Online ISSN 0976-0563

  • NAAS Rating 5.44

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-Monthly (February, April, June, August, October & December)
Indexing Services :
Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Quality Profiling of Gluten and Dairy Free Probiotic Beverages from Finger Millet

P. Shruthi1, Suma Divakar1,*, K.N. Anith1, G.K. Beela1
1College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Kerala Agriculture University, Thiruvananthapuram-695 001, Tamil Nadu, India.

Background: Fermented millet-based beverages are a nutrient-dense non-dairy beverage choice that has been a part of our diets since ancient times. Finger millet is a nutritious cereal rich in vitamins, minerals, dietary fiber and other phytochemicals. The present study aimed to ascertain the use of finger millets in the formulation of non-dairy probiotic beverages and examine the effect of different treatments on the sensory acceptance of the beverages.

Methods: Finger millet-based beverages were developed using four distinct pretreatment methods, including soaking and germination of grains, while the control beverage was prepared with grains that were neither soaked nor germinated. pH, total acidity, specific gravity and TSS of the beverages were investigated along with microbial quality.

Result: Results revealed that finger millet stands out as an excellent substrate for the development of fermented beverages, particularly when combined with probiotic strains such as Lactobacillus acidophilis and Streptococcus thermophilus. Treatment S3 was the most acceptable beverage among the developed formulations based on sensory evaluation results.

Millets are small seeds belonging to the grass family that can be processed in a variety of ways to provide a range of valuable foods. Their high nutritional content, gluten-free status and ability to withstand challenging growth conditions make them a promising crop for the future (Panigrahi  et al., 2024). Finger millet was referred to as “nrittakondaka” meaning the Dancing grain in ancient Indian sanskrit literature which is a super food with various health benefits that can fight against malnutrition and other illness including osteoporosis, diabetes, rickets and obesity (Maharajan and Ceasar, 2022). Food products made from finger millets have been shown to have anti-cancer and anti-aging properties and are thought to lower blood pressure and cholesterol (Gebreyohannes et al., 2024). The fast rising prevalence of coeliac disease and lactose intolerance has raised demand for gluten-free and dairy-free products. Finger millet therefore has the potential to serve as a primary ingredient for producing a functional beverage that is free of gluten and dairy.
       
World Health Organization defined probiotics as “live microbial supplements when administered in adequate amounts, confer health benefits on the host” (Sugandhi, 2018). The tradition of consuming foods containing beneficial microbes or fermented foods has been in the long run culture of mankind (Narayanan and Subramonian, 2023). Probiotics are regarded as microbiological sources of viable nutraceuticals that, provides a number of health benefits (Adriani et al., 2024). Furthermore, probiotics support intestinal health and significantly boost immunity (Bhavya and Lakhvinder, 2023). The most often utilized probiotics in food items are microbial species from the genera Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus (Vijaya Kumar et al., 2015). The incorporation of microbial cultures into food not only enhances its nutritional qualities but also augments its flavor and extends its shelf life, a practice that has been recognized for generations.
       
The rise in consumer preference favoring vegan, healthy, nutrient dense food and beverage choices increased the demand of novel ingredients as substrates for probiotic supplementation. This shift has fuelled the formulation of various functional foods and beverages and its market growth. Hence, the present study focused on developing millet based probiotic beverages using the bioprocessed finger millet and their sensory evaluation. Finger millet beverages were prepared by inoculating probiotic strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus thermophilus and incubating at 37oC for 24 hours.
 
This study was carried out in the Food and Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Community Science, College of Agriculture, Vellayani and the Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Microbiology at the College of Agriculture Vellayani, Kerala Agricultural University, Trivandrum for a research period of 12 months.
 
Procurement of materials
 
Finger millet (Eleusinecoracana) commonly known as ragi, was procured from the nearby supermarket store, at Trivandrum. The probiotic starter culture strains Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDC 13 and Streptococcus thermophilus NCDC 75 was procured from NCDC NDRI Karnal for developing probiotic beverages. Glass bottles and Sugar was purchased from local market of Trivandrum.
 
Starter culture preparation
 
The probiotic strains Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDC 13 and Streptococcus thermophilus NCDC 75 were activated by pure culturing in Lactobacillus acidophilus media and Streptococcus thermophilus media at 37oC for 24 hours and then on broth for required growth. The microbial culture was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the pellets were washed with double distilled water. An initial concentration of 108cfu/ml was constituted by diluting the microbial culture with sterile distilled water with aid of a turbidity meter and the starter culture was stored under 4oC.
 
Production of the beverage samples
 
The finger millet grains were first cleaned to remove any dirt and impurities, then washed thoroughly with tap water and dried properly. For soaking, the grains were immersed in water for either 12 hours or 24 hours. For sprouting, they were initially soaked for 8 hours and then left to germinate for two different time periods-12 hours and 24 hours. The control sample was prepared by using the ragi grains without soaking or germinating.  In order to extract the milk, 250 millilitres of water was added to grind the treatment variants of finger millet grains. The extracted finger millet milk was strained and a known quantity of sugar was added to the extracted milk treatments after they had been heated to 100oC for 10 minutes. After cooling to room temperature, 8% probiotic culture mix was added and the beverage mixes was incubated for 24 hours at 37oC before being stored below 4oC.  Fig 1 depicts the flowchart of beverage formulation. Table 1 represents the treatment details of beverage samples.

Fig 1: Flowchart of beverage formulation.



Table 1: Treatment details of the beverage samples.


 
Physico-chemical parameters of the probiotic millet beverage samples
 
The quality parameters including pH, total acidity, specific gravity and total soluble solids of the developed beverage samples were analyzed using standard AOAC procedures (AOAC 2000). The pH of the beverage samples were measured using a pH meter. The total acidity content of the samples was measured by titrating the samples with standardized Sodium Hydroxide solution to the phenolphthalein end point. The total soluble solids were measured by standard AOAC method using a refractometer (AOAC 2000). Specific gravity of beverage samples were measured using pycnometer according to Hossin et al., (2021); Memon et al., (2009).
 
Microbial monitoring of the beverage samples
 
Microbial enumeration was conducted to determine the total viable count, total bacterial count, total fungal count and total coliform count in the beverage samples. The total viable count of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus thermophilus in the beverage samples was enumerated by spread plate count method. Plates were incubated in inverted position in an incubator at 37oC for 24 hrs. Spread plate count on Nutrient agar media, Rose Bengal Agar Media and EMB Agar media was used to measure total bacterial count, total fungal count and total coliform Count (Saeid and Rana, 2020).
 
  
 
Sensory assessment of the beverage samples
 
Sensory evaluations of the beverage samples were conducted on the 1st and 7th day of storage of beverage samples stored in glass bottles under refrigeration. Sensory attributes such as appearance, aroma, consistency, taste, mouth feel and overall acceptability of the samples were evaluated by semi trained panelists by adopting a 9 point hedonic scale method. All the samples were prepared on the same date and stored in glass bottles at 4oC. Each sample was served in 50 ml portion in plastic cups and presented to the panelists in a balanced random order. All sensory evaluations were carried out in separate booths and saline water was offered as a palette cleanser along with a ranking questionnaire for the beverage samples. The sensory evaluation card is shown in Fig 2.

Fig 2: Sensory evaluation card.


 
Statistical analysis
 
All the tests were performed in three replications and data were transferred to KAU Grapes Software for statistical analysis (Gopinath et al., 2020). Kruskal Wallis test was performed to determine the statistical difference of the sensory assessment data. CRD analysis was performed on all other physico- chemical and microbial data to determine the significant difference between each sample.
Physico-chemical parameters of the probiotic millet beverage samples
 
The data present in the Table 2 shows the various physico-chemical properties of finger millet based probiotic beverage over a storage period of 7 days. The optimum pH for probiotic beverages typically ranges between 4.0-4.5 as this pH balances probiotic viability and sensory appeal of the product. This pH range offers a tangy taste to the beverage formulations and also helps in preventing the growth of spoilage microorganisms and pathogens. Fermentation process help in reducing the pH value of finger millet based probiotic beverages below 4.5 by production of organic acids and all beverage formulations exhibited a decrease in pH throughout fermentation and storage period (Yulia et al., 2024). The pH values of the treatments ranges from 4.41-4.50 on day 1 and 3.98-4.01 on day 7. It is revealed from the table that pH level of the treatments decreased and total acidity level of the treatments increased during storage and pH values of all the samples were found around 4. The highest pH was found in control treatment 4.5 and the lowest was found in treatment S3 3.96. The pH evaluation results showed an increased acid content for all the treatments over the fermentation period (Muncey and Hekmat, 2021).Total acidity of probiotic beverages is a key physico-chemical parameter, typically expressed as a percentage of lactic acid equivalents and influences the taste, microbial stability and overall quality of probiotic beverages. Total acidity of the beverage formulations can be varied according to the type of beverage, probiotic starter culture and fermentation conditions. The total acidity of the treatments ranged from 0.18-0.20 (day 1) and rose up to a range of 0.21-0.24 (day 7). This significant decrease in pH and increase in acidity were observed due to production of organic acids and other metabolite production by the probiotic bacteria. These results are similar to the results observed in the studies of Shukla and Kushwaha (2017) and Hatami et al., (2023). The specific gravity of the beverage treatments ranged from 0.99-1.04 and no significant difference was found during the end of the storage. This result was supported by the findings of Hossain et al., (2020). Specific gravity of any beverage can be affected by solid content, sugar content, fermentation and storage duration. Furthermore, the total soluble solids (TSS) which are measured using the refractometer ranged from 5.43 oBrix -5.87 oBrix and however, it got lowered to 4.90o Brix-5.40o Brix after a period of 7 days. There was a significant difference in TSS °Brix value on day 1 and day 7. The TSS content of the probiotic beverages depends on the sugar, dietary starch and dietary protein. The conversion of carbohydrates into lactic acid by probiotic bacteria lowers the total solid content in probiotic beverage formulations (Meera et al., 2021). A slight decrease in TSS content during storage post fermentation may be due to the utilization of sugars and other metabolic byproduct of the probiotics in the beverage formulations and this report agrees with the result of Adebayotayo and Akpeji (2016).

Table 2: Physicochemical parameters of the beverage samples.


 
Microbial monitoring of the beverage samples
 
The total viable count of finger millet based probiotic beverages fermented for 24 hours was examined on the 1st and 7th day of storage. This evaluation of probiotic cell viability began after the 24 hour incubation period of the fermentation process. As per the regulatory guidelines probiotic beverage formulations should typically contain a minimum of 106-109 CFU per ml of live microorganisms at the time of consumption in order to consider it as a probiotic and achieve health benefits. However the prepared beverage formulations maintained this safe standard throughout the storage period of seven days. The total viable count of beverage samples ranged from 9.03- 9.08 CFU/ml and is depicted in Table 3. There was a steady increase in the microbial growth in the first day and towards end of the storage, a slight decline in the viable count was seen. The viability count of the beverage formulations depends on factors like fermentation time, fermentation temperature, storage temperature and packaging material. The average counts of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus thermophilus in the finger millet-based probiotic beverages showed no statistically significant differences among the samples, as all treatments contained similar ranges of probiotic bacteria. Considering the results it can be concluded that probiotic bacterial strains Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus thermophilus thrive equally well in all the beverage formulations, irrespective of the treatment variations. In contrast, the beverage samples showed a low probiotic density of the probiotic strain S. thermophilus in comparison to the probiotic density of strain L. acidophilus. Nevertheless, the probiotics contained in the beverage formulations were   109CFU per serving, they were  deemed to be able to benefit the consumer (Liew et al., 2022). It is possible that the dietary fibre, oligosaccharides and resistant starch found in finger millets will act as prebiotics and aid in the development of probiotics. These results are in agreement with the results reported from the study of  (Sertovic et al., 2019; Mahapatra and Das, 2022).

Table 3: Total viable count of the beverage samples.


       
The beverage treatments were subjected to microbial studies for analyzing the total bacterial count, total coliform count and total fungal count during the storage period of 7 days and are represented in Table 4. The finger millet based probiotic beverage samples were free from coliform and fungal count throughout the storage period of 7 days. The total bacterial count was not detected in the day 1 but on day 7 it ranged from 4.35-4.39 CFUml-1. Similar results were reported by (Ghosh  et al., 2015; Mahejibin  et al., 2021 and Sharma et al., 2020).

Table 4: Microbiological evaluation of beverage samples.


 
Sensory assessment of the beverage samples
 
The sensory characteristics of different developed beverage treatments are presented in Table 5 and 6. The sensory profile was evaluated in terms of the attributes appearance, aroma, consistency, taste and mouth feel of the beverage samples. The organoleptic evaluation of beverage samples on the 1st day revealed an overall acceptability in the range of 6.7-8.7, whereas on day 7 it ranged between 5.8-7.7. Among the treatments S3 attained highest overall acceptability score (8.7) followed by S4 (8.6), S2 (8.0), S1 (7.3) and least score of (6.7) by the control sample. The treatments Sand S4 obtained a similar score for consistency, taste and mouthfeel (8.7), followed by S2, S1 and Control. The prepared beverage’s appearance received positive ratings across all treatments, which indicates enhanced product’s visual enticement with highest value of 8.7 on the day 1 reduced to 7.7 on day 7 for S3. The aroma had a sensory score of 8.7 on day 1 for treatment S4 which got reduced to 7.6 on day 7. However, a significant difference was found in the case of appearance, aroma and overall acceptability among treatments. The distribution of high sensory scores of each attributes suggests that, finger millet based probiotic beverages are in an acceptable range for a period of 7 days except the control sample. Positive acceptance of the sensory characteristics of S1, S2, S3 and S4 treatments during storage time was reported by the sensory panelists. Throughout the storage period, the S3 treatment maintained a higher score while the control treatment maintained a lower score for every attribute. It was evident from the sensory assessment data over the period of storage, the consumer approval criteria for every sample showed a declining tendency. The results of sensory assessment is in line with research result obtained by Hossin et al., (2021).

Table 5: Sensory assessment of beverage samples day 1.



Table 6: Sensory assessment of beverage samples day 7.

The inclusion of probiotic foods as a part of diet claims numerous health benefits to the consumers. The present study investigated the potential of utilizing finger millet as the main substrate in formulating gluten and dairy free probiotic functional beverages. The pretreatments such as soaking and germination of finger millet grains and incorporation of Lactobacillus acidophilis and Streptococcus thermophilus probiotic cultures significantly enhanced the beverage’s sensory attributes, shelf life and overall acceptability. The results demonstrated that finger millet based probiotic functional beverages exhibit desirable appearance, aroma, consistency and taste while maintaining an adequate microbial viability over the storage period, without any growth of pathogenic or spoilage microorganisms. There upon finger millet based probiotic beverages can serve as a promising addition to the functional beverage market catering to both the health-conscious consumers and those seeking novel dietary options.
The present study was supported by College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Kerala Agricultural University, Thiruvananthapuram.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. AdebayoTayo, B. and Akpeji, S. (2016). Probiotic viability, physicochemical and sensory properties of probiotic pineapple juice. Fermentation. 2(4): 20.

  2. AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis: Official Method for Ash. Method No. 936.03. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.

  3. Adriani, L., Latipudin, D., Mayasari, N., Mushawwir, A., Kumalasari, C. and Nabila, T. I. (2024). Consortium probiotic fermented milk using Bifidobacterium sp. and Lactobacillus acidophilus protects against Salmonella typhimurium and repairs the intestine. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 43(2): 216-218. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DRF-326.

  4. Bhavya, K. and  Kaur, L. (2023). Development and sensory characteri- zation of finger millet probiotic beverage. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology. 30(4): 677-684. https://doi.org/10.53555/jptcp.v30i4.2544.

  5. Gebreyohannes, A., Shimelis, H., Mashilo, J., Odeny, D. A., Tadesse, T. and Ojiewo, C.O. (2024). Finger millet (Eleusine coracana) improvement: Challenges and prospects-A review. Plant Breeding. 143(3): 350-374.

  6. Ghosh, K., Ray, M., Adak, A., Dey, P., Halder, S.K., Das, A. and Mondal, K.C. (2015). Microbial, saccharifying and antioxidant properties of an Indian rice based fermented beverage. Food Chemistry. 168: 196-202.

  7. Gopinath, P.P, Parsad, R, Joseph, B, Adarsh, V. S. (2020). GRAPES: General Rshiny Based Analysis Platform Empowered by Statistics. https://www.kaugrapes.com/home. version  1.0.0. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4923220

  8. Hatami, S., Tajabadi, N., Massoud, R. and Sharifan, A. (2021). Chemical and sensorial properties of probiotic beverage based on rice bran extract and honey. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. pp: 1-6.

  9. Hossain, M.A., Hoque, M.M., Hossain, M.M., Kabir, M.H., Yasin, M. and Islam, M.A. (2020). Biochemical, microbiological and organoleptic properties of probiotic pineapple juice developed by lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Scientific Research. 12(4): 743- 750.

  10. Hossin, M.S., Debnath, S., Alam, M.N., Islam, M.S., Miah, M.K., Mollah, M.S.H. and Saeid, A. (2021). Physico-chemical, sensory and microbiological characteristics of strawberry flavored milk under refrigerated storage. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 40(1): 82-87. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-187.

  11. Mahejibin, K., Kanika, S. and Shruti, P. (2021). Quality Aspects of Rice Based Fermented Beverage. Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research. pp 1-9.

  12. Vijaya Kumar, B., Vijayendra, S.V.N. and Reddy, O.V.S. (2015). Trends in dairy and non-dairy probiotic products-A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 52: 6112-6124.

  13. Liew, Y.K., Aung, K., Chan, L.L., Baskaran, S. and Mak, S.T. (2022). Probiotic viability, pH and lactic acid concentration of opened commercial probiotic dairy drinks stored at different temperatures and durations. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 46(1): 216.

  14. Mahapatra, D. and Das, M. (2022). Health-promoting effects of developed probiotic orange beverage: An in vitro Study. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 41(4): 403- 409. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1690.

  15. Maharajan, T., Ceasar, S.A. and Ajeesh Krishna, T.P. (2022). Finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn]: Nutritional importance and nutrient transporters. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 41(1): 1-31.

  16. Meera, P.M., Sharon, C.L., Thomachan, S., Aneena, E.R. and Lakshmy, P.S. (2021). Utilisation of passion fruit and mango for the development of a probiotic drink. The Journal of Research ANGRAU. 49(3): 64-71.

  17. Memon, S., Gadahi, J., Khaskeli, M., Bhutto, B. and Panhwar, S. (2009). Physical and chemical quality of market milk sold at Tandojam, Pakistan. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 29.

  18. Muncey, L. and Hekmat, S. (2021). Development of probiotic almond beverage using Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GR-1 fortified with short-chain and long-chain inulin fibre. Fermentation.  7(2): 90.

  19. Narayanan, R. and Subramonian, B. S. (2023). Probiotics for augmenting health. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 57(1): 40-43. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4246.

  20. Panigrahi, S., Nanda, A., Sagar, P. and Singh, N.N. (2024). Characteri- zation and standardization of a millet-based probiotic beverage via physicochemical and microbial analysis.  Asian Journal of Food Research and Nutrition. 3(2): 371-380.

  21. Saeid, Abu and Rana, Masud. (2020). Comparative Studies of Nutritional, Microbial and Organoleptic Properties of Different Indigenous Dried Fish from Local Market in Bangladesh. Advanced Journal of Chemistry. 3: 318-328. 10.33945/ SAMI/AJCA.2020.3.9.

  22. Sertovic, E., Saric, Z., Barac, M., Barukcic, I., Kostic, A. and Bozanic, R. (2019). Physical, chemical, microbiological and sensory characteristics of a probiotic beverage produced from different mixtures of cow’s milk and soy beverage by Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and yoghurt culture. Food technology and biotechnology. 57(4): 461.

  23. Sharma, R., Garg, P., Kumar, P., Bhatia, S.K. and Kulshrestha, S. (2020). Microbial fermentation and its role in quality improve- ment of fermented foods. Fermentation. 6(4): 106.

  24. Shukla, P. and Kushwaha, A. (2017). Development of probiotic beverage from whey and orange juice. Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences.7(5): 5-8. https://doi.org/10.4172/ 2155-9600.1000629.

  25. Sugandhi, G.P. (2018). Probiotics conventional benefits and cautions in intake-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 39(3): 251-254. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-1749.

  26. Yulia, N., Rubiyanti, R. and Yuliana, A. (2024). Formulation and characterization of instant probiotic powder from orange sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas L ) using Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus bacterial cultures. Acta Scientific Microbiology. 7(1): 34-40. https:// doi.org/10.31080/ASMI.2024.07.1329.

Editorial Board

View all (0)