Physico-chemical parameters of the probiotic millet beverage samples
The data present in the Table 2 shows the various physico-chemical properties of finger millet based probiotic beverage over a storage period of 7 days. The optimum pH for probiotic beverages typically ranges between 4.0-4.5 as this pH balances probiotic
viability and sensory appeal of the product. This pH range offers a tangy taste to the beverage formulations and also helps in preventing the growth of spoilage microorganisms and pathogens. Fermentation process help in reducing the pH value of finger millet based probiotic beverages below 4.5 by production of organic acids and all beverage formulations exhibited a decrease in pH throughout fermentation and storage period
(Yulia et al., 2024). The pH values of the treatments ranges from 4.41-4.50 on day 1 and 3.98-4.01 on day 7. It is revealed from the table that pH level of the treatments decreased and total acidity level of the treatments increased during storage and pH values of all the samples were found around 4. The highest pH was found in control treatment 4.5 and the lowest was found in treatment S3 3.96. The pH evaluation results showed an increased acid content for all the treatments over the fermentation period (
Muncey and Hekmat, 2021).Total acidity of probiotic beverages is a key physico-chemical parameter, typically expressed as a percentage of lactic acid equivalents and influences the taste, microbial stability and overall quality of probiotic beverages. Total acidity of the beverage formulations can be varied according to the type of beverage, probiotic starter culture and fermentation conditions. The total acidity of the treatments ranged from 0.18-0.20 (day 1) and rose up to a range of 0.21-0.24 (day 7). This significant decrease in pH and increase in acidity were observed due to production of organic acids and other metabolite production by the probiotic bacteria. These results are similar to the results observed in the studies of
Shukla and Kushwaha (2017) and
Hatami et al., (2023). The specific gravity of the beverage treatments ranged from 0.99-1.04 and no significant difference was found during the end of the storage. This result was supported by the findings of
Hossain et al., (2020). Specific gravity of any beverage can be affected by solid content, sugar content, fermentation and storage duration. Furthermore, the total soluble solids (TSS) which are measured using the refractometer ranged from 5.43 oBrix -5.87 oBrix and however, it got lowered to 4.90
o Brix-5.40o Brix after a period of 7 days. There was a significant difference in TSS °Brix value on day 1 and day 7. The TSS content of the probiotic beverages depends on the sugar, dietary starch and dietary protein. The conversion of carbohydrates into lactic acid by probiotic bacteria lowers the total solid content in probiotic beverage formulations
(Meera et al., 2021). A slight decrease in TSS content during storage post fermentation may be due to the utilization of sugars and other metabolic byproduct of the probiotics in the beverage formulations and this report agrees with the result of
Adebayotayo and Akpeji (2016).
Microbial monitoring of the beverage samples
The total
viable count of finger millet based probiotic beverages fermented for 24 hours was examined on the 1
st and 7
th day of storage. This evaluation of probiotic cell
viability began after the 24 hour incubation period of the fermentation process. As per the regulatory guidelines probiotic beverage formulations should typically contain a minimum of 10
6-10
9 CFU per ml of live microorganisms at the time of consumption in order to consider it as a probiotic and achieve health benefits. However the prepared beverage formulations maintained this safe standard throughout the storage period of seven days. The total
viable count of beverage samples ranged from 9.03- 9.08 CFU/ml and is depicted in Table 3. There was a steady increase in the microbial growth in the first day and towards end of the storage, a slight decline in the
viable count was seen. The
viability count of the beverage formulations depends on factors like fermentation time, fermentation temperature, storage temperature and packaging material. The average counts of
Lactobacillus acidophilus and
Streptococcus thermophilus in the finger millet-based probiotic beverages showed no statistically significant differences among the samples, as all treatments contained similar ranges of probiotic bacteria. Considering the results it can be concluded that probiotic bacterial strains
Lactobacillus acidophilus and
Streptococcus thermophilus thrive equally well in all the beverage formulations, irrespective of the treatment variations. In contrast, the beverage samples showed a low probiotic density of the probiotic strain
S.
thermophilus in comparison to the probiotic density of strain
L.
acidophilus. Nevertheless, the probiotics contained in the beverage formulations were 109CFU per serving, they were deemed to be able to benefit the consumer
(Liew et al., 2022). It is possible that the dietary fibre, oligosaccharides and resistant starch found in finger millets will act as prebiotics and aid in the development of probiotics. These results are in agreement with the results reported from the study of
(Sertovic et al., 2019; Mahapatra and Das, 2022).
The beverage treatments were subjected to microbial studies for analyzing the total bacterial count, total coliform count and total fungal count during the storage period of 7 days and are represented in Table 4. The finger millet based probiotic beverage samples were free from coliform and fungal count throughout the storage period of 7 days. The total bacterial count was not detected in the day 1 but on day 7 it ranged from 4.35-4.39 CFUml-
1. Similar results were reported by (
Ghosh et al., 2015;
Mahejibin et al., 2021 and
Sharma et al., 2020).
Sensory assessment of the beverage samples
The sensory characteristics of different developed beverage treatments are presented in Table 5 and 6. The sensory profile was evaluated in terms of the attributes appearance, aroma, consistency, taste and mouth feel of the beverage samples. The organoleptic evaluation of beverage samples on the 1st day revealed an overall acceptability in the range of 6.7-8.7, whereas on day 7 it ranged between 5.8-7.7. Among the treatments S
3 attained highest overall acceptability score (8.7) followed by S
4 (8.6), S
2 (8.0), S1 (7.3) and least score of (6.7) by the control sample. The treatments S
3 and S
4 obtained a similar score for consistency, taste and mouthfeel (8.7), followed by S
2, S1 and Control. The prepared beverage’s appearance received positive ratings across all treatments, which indicates enhanced product’s visual enticement with highest value of 8.7 on the day 1 reduced to 7.7 on day 7 for S
3. The aroma had a sensory score of 8.7 on day 1 for treatment S4 which got reduced to 7.6 on day 7. However, a significant difference was found in the case of appearance, aroma and overall acceptability among treatments. The distribution of high sensory scores of each attributes suggests that, finger millet based probiotic beverages are in an acceptable range for a period of 7 days except the control sample. Positive acceptance of the sensory characteristics of S
1, S
2, S
3 and S
4 treatments during storage time was reported by the sensory panelists. Throughout the storage period, the S3 treatment maintained a higher score while the control treatment maintained a lower score for every attribute. It was evident from the sensory assessment data over the period of storage, the consumer approval criteria for every sample showed a declining tendency. The results of sensory assessment is in line with research result obtained by
Hossin et al., (2021).