Development of Nutrient-rich Cake with Supplementation of Pea Shells Powder and Nutritional Evaluation 

Amita Beniwal1,*, Savita1, Veenu Sangwan 1, Darshan Punia1
1Department of Foods and Nutrition, I.C. College of Home Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India.

Background: Bakery products like cakes are rich in starch, fat, and energy but deficient in fiber, vitamins, and minerals. The cake is becoming a well-known delicacy during festival periods between all age groups mostly in urban areas. Providing a healthy and nutritious cake remains a main problem on account of extreme sugar or fat content that predisposes the buyers to obesity. Mixing the flours with plant components helps solve problems of low nutritive value of cereals. Pea shells are an excellent source of nutrients and have excellent functional properties, the substitution of flour with pea shells powder is the best way for consuming the nutrients which are likely to contribute substantially to the fight against targeted hunger and to bridge the gap of malnutrition. Keeping the view of the potential of pea shells powder in formulated products the healthy and nutritious cakes were investigated. 

Methods: Three cakes were developed with different formulations that include refined flour and pea shells powder in the ratio of 100:0, 90:10, and 80:20 with other basic ingredients of baking. The developed cakes were analyzed for organoleptic and nutritional properties such as proximate, dietary fiber, and minerals. 

Result: The sensory mean score was increased by the supplementation of pea shells powder. The result showed that 10% level was the optimum level of incorporation. A significant increase (0>0.05) in the nutrient contents such as protein (10.97 to 12.38%), crude fiber 90.31 to 1.85%), ash, calcium (53.33 to 193.33 mg/100 gm), potassium (162.48 to 335.42 mg/100 gm), magnesium (56.75 to 253.33 mg/100 gm), iron (3.94 to 5.49 mg/100 gm), and potassium (162.48 to 335.42 mg/100 gm) of incorporated cakes and decreased the fat (25.55 to 21.72%), energy (451.83 to 413.76 kcal/100 gm) content compared to control cake. The calcium and magnesium content increased two or four times more than control cakes. From the present study, it can be concluded that cakes containing 20% pea shells powder were nutritionally rich. 

Bakery products are widely consumed and are rich in fat, starch and energy but depleted of fiber, protein, minerals and vitamins. Cakes are becoming a major component of the international food market (Kotsianis et al., 2002) and have made their space in Indian kitchens. Cakes are low in cost and associated with customers’ minds with appetizing, delicious, spongy products having desired sensory characteristics (Matsakidou et al., 2010). Cakes are classified based on production method and formulation such as 3 types i.e. foam, chiffon and batter cake. The quality of cakes depends upon the ingredients used in cake preparations, especially the flour and a high-quality cake is determined by its volume and moist crumb (Cauvain and Young, 2006). The health-conscious public demands high-quality and low-calorie products that are low in fat and sugar. However, altering the amount of ingredients to reduce calorie content may compromise texture, mouthfeel, flavor, and appearance. By mixing of two flours and other ingredients helps solve the problem of the low nutritive value of cereals (Patel and Rao, 1995).
 
Pea shells are excellent source of vitamins, minerals, bioactive compounds and are low in fat, energy or carbohydrates (Beniwal et al., 2022). Peas are grown all over the world, satisfying the purpose of both human use and animal feeding. India is the second producer after China; contributing 22.9% (4 million tones/annum) to the world production (FAO 2019). Peas processing industries generate a large amount of waste approx 1 million tons in India and pea peels are discarded as waste (Garg, 2015; Upsana and Vinay 2018). By-products of fruits and vegetables are promising source of bioactive compounds and have technological or nutritional properties (Aparicio et al., 2010) that can be appropriated for enrichment and functional product development (Sagar et al., 2018). The value addition, fortification and supplementation of products with plant by-products provide adequate nutrition or health benefits (Rasheed et al., 2008) and are effective for people having degenerative diseases (Kiran 2017). In recent research, the plant’s protein or fibers gained attention, primarily originating from industrial by-products. Pea shells could be used as functional ingredients to reduce calorie intake, increase micronutrients (Beniwal et al., 2022) and improve physiochemical properties such as change in texture, or viscosity in formulated products. The effective management of pea processing industries (by-products) waste has become important environmentally and economically.
 
The present study presents a novel approach to cake development with the supplementation of pea shells powder and find out the effect on organoleptic and nutritional properties; that can be effective for the baking industry. The proposed method aims to bridge the gap between traditional recipes and modern scientific knowledge, enabling bakers to create cakes that not only meet consumers’ preferences but also adhere to scientific standards. Bakery products are consumed by all age groups of peoples. The development of micronutrient-rich products will be needed for the community especially children and adults to alleviate degenerative disorders.
This study was performed in 2018 in February -May at the Foods and Nutrition Department, College of Home Science, CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana.
 
Procurement of material and preparation of sample
 
Peas were purchased in a single lot from the local market (Hisar). The pea shells powder preparation method was described earlier by Beniwal et al., (2022). All other ingredients were purchased from a local shop on campus.
 
Cake development
 
Composition of cake flour
 
Blends of refined flour and pea shells powder were prepared by combinations of; 100:00 (Control), 90:10 (Type I), 80:20 (Type II).
 
Ingredients used in cake batter preparations
 
Milkmaid (160gm), baking powder (¾ tsp), baking soda (1/4th tsp), vanilla essence (3-4 drops) used in equal proportions in all types of cakes. The water and refined oil ratio was as Control= 50 (water):100 (refined oil), Type I= 65 (water):105 (refined oil), Type II= 80 (water):110 (refined oil).
 
Method
 
First sift refined flour, pea shells powder, baking powder, salt and sodium bicarbonate in a bowl. After that creamed refined oil, sugar (milkmaid), vanilla essence for 1-2 minutes, followed by adding water to the creamed mixture and continued blending for 1-2 minutes with an electric beater. Folded the refined flour and pea shell powder in the above mixture. The prepared mixture was then poured into the greased pan (Plate 2). The cakes were baked at 180°C for 45 minutes (Plate 1). The cakes were left at room temperature for one hour for cooling and then analyzed.

Plate 1: Different type of cakes.



Plate 2: Types of cake batter.


 
Organoleptic evaluation of cake
 
A panel of 15 semi-trained (I.C. College of Home Science, HAU) or 30 consumer (different colleges HAU, campus) sensory evaluators participated in the blind testing cake. Each cake variation was rated on a scale (9 Hedonic scale) of 1to 10 for sensory parameters (Peryam and Pilgrim, 1957). The sensory evaluators were physically fit, willing to co-operate gave time for judging the products and were able to discriminate the taste. The respondent characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Characteristics of respondents.


 
Nutritional evaluation of value-added cake
 
All the developed cakes were oven-dried to a constant weight at 45°C. The dried cakes were ground to a fine powder and were analyzed for the nutrients such as proximate composition, dietary fibers and total mineral content. (Samples were done in triplicates). Proximate composition (moisture, crude protein, crude fat, ash, crude fiber) was examined by the standard methods (AOAC 2000) and total carbohydrate and energy were calculated by difference and multiplication method. Dietary fiber (Total, insoluble and soluble) was determined by Furda (1981) and total mineral were investigated by Lindsey and Norwell (1969), method by atomic absorption spectrophotometer 2380, (PERKIN-ELMER, USA) digested (acid) samples.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The data obtained from the present investigation was analyzed using standard statistical method ANOVA for data interpretation and given as mean (±) standard error. Significance accepted at p<0.05 by critical difference (C.D.) value (Sheoran et al., 1999).
Weight parameter of developed cake
 
The raw and cooked weight (Table 2) of the supplemented cake was increased after supplementation of pea shells powder at 10 and 20% levels. Higher weight loss during cooking was noticed in type II cake than in type I and control cake due to low batter viscosity that allowed bubble movements. A large volume of gas was created leaving behind large central holes and increasing the weight loss. In addition, control and type I cake had a higher standing height than type II cake. Those outcomes have been in accordance with Sanz et al., (2008); who suggested that the batter viscosity has an important effect on the bubble incorporation and movement which are considered controlling factors in the final cake volume. Water is lost more easily during the baking process so more weight is lost (Jahanbakhshi and Ansari, 2020).

Table 2: Weight measurement of cake at different level of supplementation.


 
Organoleptic characteristics
 
The highest scores for all the parameters of the developed cakes were obtained by type I, which fell in the category of “liked very much” by the panelists. The mean organoleptic scores of cake is presented in Table 3 all types of cakes were found to be sensorial acceptable in terms of appearance, colour, texture and taste. The mean score of colour and taste (8.5) improved in supplemented cakes (10% level) than in control (7.9) which fell in the category of “extremely liked”. Similar results were reported by Sayed et al., (2013) that taste and colour scores increased in cake supplemented with watermelon rind at 7.5% levels. The present study result, supported by Sharoba et al., (2013) that cake developed with pea peel flour got a higher score than the control and decreased at 20% supplementation. The studies reported by Singh (2016) and Sharam et al., (2019) that the organoleptic mean score was higher in supplemented cakes (5-10% level) of apple pomace and wheat grass powder than in control. According to Bourne (1986), the texture of a product is a main factor in the rejection of products; however, in the current study, the texture presented a higher score than the control. The present results are supported by Walker et al., (2014) and Sudha et al., (2015) who found that the replacement of wheat flour in bakery products by different fruits and vegetable by-products never exceeded 20% because it resulted in a reduction in volume, height, texture and an increase in crumb hardness. Other studies reported that the pea pod powder increased the sensory score, especially colour, and made it look appealing in biscuits (Garg, 2015), soup (Hanan et al., 2020) and cake (Fendri et al., 2016). The colour green is due to the presence of natural phytochemicals, which increase sensory qualities in terms of colour, smell and taste (Zhang et al., 2021). Previously, research showed that fruits and vegetable by-products; addition in product development provide contradictory results. Grapes by-products at 30% levels decrease significantly the acceptable scores (Mildner et al., 2016) while no significant differences were reported by Walker et al., (2014) at a 10% level of substitution with fruits and vegetable by-products. The sensorial mean scores were decreased or increased in cake development by fruits and vegetable by-products; as reported by Sudha et al., (2015), Kaur and Sharma (2018) and Ben et al., (2017). The differences may be due to colour, taste (influenced by phenolic compounds), texture and aroma. In all studies, sensory analysis was performed by an insufficient number of panelists (10-15). The present study results also supported that panelist’s sex and age influence the sensory mean scores.

Table 3: Mean scores of organoleptic evaluation of cake.



Nutritional composition   
 
Proximate
 
The results presented in Table 4 for the proximate composition of cakes indicated that the nutrient content was increased in moisture (17.30 to 19.84%), crude protein (10.97 to 12.38%), crude fiber (0.31 to 1.85%) and ash (1.39 to 1.98%) content significantly in pea shells incorporated cakes. The nutrients that are fat (25.55 to 21.72%), total carbohydrate (44.46 to 42.19%) and energy (451.83 to 413.76 kcal/100 gm) content decreased significantly after supplementation of 10 to 20 % pea shells powder. A lower amount of moisture (17.30 to 19.845%), ash, and total carbohydrate was found in the present study as compared to the values (27.40. 7.50 and 51.64% moisture, ash and total carbohydrate) reported by Sayed and Ahmed  (2013) in cake prepared with 7.5% watermelon rind powder and higher than the values (8.60% protein, 6.82% fat, 55.59% carbohydrate and 308 Kcal/ 100 g energy) reported by Kiran and Neetu (2017) for muffin prepared with 25% cauliflower stem and 25% potato peel powder. Crude fiber content was 0.31 to 1.85% in the cake which was significantly lower than the range (12.74 to 13.16 g/100 g) reported by Singh (2016) for fiber-rich pineapple pulp waste powder incorporated cakes. The difference might be due to the higher fiber content of the pineapple pulp waste. The result in our findings is almost similar to the reports of Olatunde et al., (2019), cake prepared with sweet potato (10 to 25%) and pigeon pea (20%) flour that is moisture (18.2 to 20.69%), carbohydrate (40.21 to 42.93%), fiber (0.69 to 1.19%) increased and fat content decreased from 232.71 to 27.98%. Sharma et al., (2019) reported an almost similar amount of ash (from 1.34 to 2.00%) content in cupcakes prepared with beetroot and wheat grass powder at a 10% level of supplementation. An increase in moisture content in cake has been associated with an increase in fiber content (Elleuch et al., 2011). The previous studies reported by researchers showed increased nutrient contents and decreased fat contents in developed cakes with by-products of fruits and vegetables such as mango and apple by-products (Aziah et al., 2011; Sudha et al., 2015), grapes by-products (Walker et al., 2014), berry pomace (Mildner et al., 2016).

Table 4: Nutrients content of value added cake (% dry weight basis).


 
Dietary fiber
 
The results presented in Table 4 indicated that the incorporation of pea shells powder into cake brought about a significant improvement in their total (from 2.82 to 6.42%), insoluble (from 2.18 to 5.13) and soluble (from 0.64 to 1.29%) dietary fiber content. The total dietary fiber content of Type I cake (4.62%) was almost double and Type II (6.42%) cake was almost three times that of the control (2.82%) value of the cake. Kiran and Neetu (2017) reported a higher amount of dietary fiber (12.5%) in muffins (prepared with 25% cauliflower stem and 25% potato peel powder) than the amount reported in the present study. Bender et al., (2017) reported total dietary fiber content increased from 4.47 to 7.20% insoluble dietary fiber ranged from 1.49 to 3.17% and soluble dietary fiber from 2.98 to 5.83% when grapes pomace (by-product) was incorporated into muffins. Sharma et al., (2019) reported 2.12% total dietary fiber in control (refined flour) cupcakes prepared with beetroot and wheat grass powder. The addition of fresh pea shells increased the dietary fiber content in products such as dry vegetables (Beniwal et al., 2022), tikki (Beniwal et al., 2022) and cutlets (Beniwal et al., 2022).
 
Total minerals
 
A significantly drastic increasing trend was observed (Table 4) in minerals content of value-added cake like calcium (53.33 to 193.33 mg/100 gm), iron (3.94 to 5.49 mg/100 gm), zinc (0.77 to 1.02 mg/100 gm), magnesium (56.75 to 253.33 mg/100 gm), potassium (162.48 to 335.42 mg/100 gm), sodium (17.22 to 23.65 mg/100 gm) and incorporation of pea shells powder to cake did not affect the manganese content, values were almost similar to control (0.65 mg/100 g) cake. The calcium, magnesium and potassium content increased four times and two times in supplemented cakes than in control cake due to pea shells powder being a good source of micronutrients (Beniwal et al., 2022). The results of the present study are consistent with previous studies by Mousa et al., (2021) and Garg (2015), who reported that pea pods are an excellent source of nutrients and increase the level of minerals in products developed the pea pods powder. The mineral contents recorded present study differs from those previously reported by Sharoba et al., (2013). The addition of fresh pea shells led to a noteworthy rise in the micronutrient profile of products such as dry vegetables (Beniwal et al., 2022), tikki (Beniwal et al., 2022) and cutlet (Beniwal et al., 2022). Another study reported by Robinson et al., (2019), pea and their pods contain many health-promoting bioactive compounds is beneficial for people who suffer from lifestyle diseases if they consume plant products.
It is evident from the present study that the cakes can be prepared with the substitution of refined flour without affecting sensorial qualities, up to 20% level but 10% level is the optimal level. The supplemented cakes with pea shells powder had higher nutrients than the control cake. The analytical study shows that the amount of all the nutrients (total minerals, dietary fiber, proximate) content was found to be significantly higher in the Type I and Type II cake as compared to the control cake. Our results suggest that pea shells contain biologically active constituents that can be utilized to obtain high-value-added products for nutraceutical use and the incorporation of pea shells is a viable and effective strategy for fortifying bakery products without sacrificing their organoleptic qualities. Hence development and utilization of such functional ingredients will improve the overall health of the population as well as prevent the onset of degenerative diseases and help in the management of metabolic disorders like diabetes and obesity with today’s changing lifestyles and environment thus improving the overall health of the population.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. AOAC, (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemist International. 17th Ed.AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

  2. Aparicio, I.M., Cuenca, A.R., Suárez, M.J.V., Revilla, M.A.Z. and Sanz, M.D.T. (2010). Pea pod, broad bean pod and okara, potential sources of functional compounds. Food Science Technology. 43: 1467-1470.

  3. Aziah, A.A.N., Min, W.L. and Bhat, R. (2011). Nutritional and sensory quality evaluation of sponge cake prepared by incorporation of high dietary fiber containing mango (Mangifera indica var. Chokanan) pulp and peel flours. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 62: 559-567.

  4. Ben, J.K., Bouaziz, F., Zouari E.S., Chaari, F., Ellouz, C.S., Ellouz, G.R. and Nouri E.O. (2017). Improvement of texture and sensory properties of cakes by addition. Food Chem. 217: 668-677.

  5. Bendera, B.B.A., Speronia, S.C., Salvadorb, R.P., Loureirob, B.B., Lovattob, M.N., Goulartb, R.F., Lovattoc, T.M., Mirandad, Z.M., Silvab, P.L. and Pennaa, G.N. (2017). Grape pomace skins and the effects of its inclusion in the technological properties of muffins. Journal of Culinary Science and Technology. 15(2): 143-157. 

  6. Beniwal, A., Singh, S., Sangwan,V. and Punia, D. (2022). Effect of partial substitution of potato by fresh pea shells (Pisum sativum) in tikki development and their quality evaluation. Pantnagar Journal of Research. 20(3): 457-465. 

  7. Beniwal, A., Singh, S., Sangwan, V. and Punia, D. (2022). Organoleptically and nutritional evaluation of value added cutlet supplemented with fresh pea shells (Pisum sativum L.). The Pharma Innovation. 11(6): 1776-1779. 

  8. Beniwal, A., Singh, S., Sangwan,V. and Punia, D. (2022). Prepared fresh pea shells (Pisum sativum L.) dry vegetable and evaluation their sensory score and chemical constituents. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews. 9(2): 314-319. 

  9. Beniwal, A., Vikram, Singh, S., Sangwan, V. and Punia, D. (2022). Chemical Constituents (Proximate, Minerals, Bioactive Compounds) of Pea [Pisum sativum (L.)] Shells. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. doi: 10.18805/ ajdfr.DR-1968.

  10. Beniwal, A., Vikram, Singh, S., Sangwan,V. and Punia, D. (2022). Pea shells (pisum sativum l.) powder: A study on physiochemical, in vitro digestibility and phytochemicals screening. Multilogic in science. VOL. XII, ISSUE XXXXIV: 251-257. 

  11. Bourne, M.C. (1986). Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement. Geneva, NY: Cornell University, Academic Press.

  12. Cauvain, S.P., Young, L.S.  (2006). Baked Products: Science, Technology and Practice.

  13. Elleuch, M., Bedigian, D., Roiseux, O., Besbes, S., Blecker, C. and Attia, H. (2011). Dietary fiber and fibre-rich by-products of food processing: Characterisation, technological functionality and commercial applications. Review in Food Chemistry. 124(2): 411-421.

  14. FAOSTAT, (2019). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.

  15. Fendri, L.B., Chaari, F., Kallel, F., Ellouzi, S.Z., Ghorbel, R. et al. (2016). Pea and broad bean pods as a natural source of dietary fiber: The impact on texture and sensory properties of cake. Journal of Food Science.  81(10): 2360-2366. 

  16. Furda, I. (1981). Simultaneous Analysis of Soluble and Insoluble Dietary Fiber. In: The Analysis of Fiber in Foods. [James, W.P.T. and Theander, O. (eds)]. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.

  17. Garg, M. (2015). Nutritional evaluation and utilization of pea pod powder for preparation of jaggery biscuits. Journal Food Process Technology. 6(12): 552.

  18. Hanan, E., Rudra, S.G., Sagar, V.R. and Sharma, V. (2020). Utilization of pea pod powder for formulation of instant pea soup powder. Journal Food Processing and Preservation. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14888.

  19. Jahanbakhshi, R. and Ansari, S. (2020). Physicochemical properties of sponge cake fortified by olive stone powder. Journal of Food Quality. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1493638. 

  20. Kaur, M. and Sharma, S. (2018). Development and nutritional evaluation of cake supplemented with pumpkinseed flour. Asian J. Dairy and Food Res. 37(3): 232-236.

  21. Kiran, B. and Neetu, S. (2017). Utilization of vegetable waste as a source of dietary fiber rich muffins and biscuits for old age. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition. 2(6): 31-34. 

  22. Kotsianis, I.S.V., Giannouand, C. and Tzia (2002). Production and packaging of bakery products using MAP technology. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 13: 319-324.

  23. Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1969). Equilibrium relationship of Zn, Fe, Ca and H with EDTA and DTPA in soils. Soil Science Soc. Am. Proc. 33: 62-68.

  24. Matsakidou A., Blekas G., Paraskevopoulou A. (2010). Aroma and physical characteristics of cakes prepared by replacing margarine with extra virgin olive oil. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 43: 949-957.

  25. Mildner, S.S., Bajerska, J., Gornas, P., Segli¸na, D., Pilarska, A. and Jesionowski, T. (2016). Physical and bioactive properties of muffins enriched with raspberry and cranberry pomace powder: A promising application of fruit by- products rich in biocompounds. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 71: 165-173.

  26. Mousa, M.M.H., El Magd, M.A., Ghamry, H.I., Nora, M.Y.A., El Wakeil, H.M., Hammad, E.M. and Galila, A.H.A. (2021). Pea peels as a value added food ingredient for snack crackers and dry soup. 11:22747 | https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-021-02202-5 www. nature.com/scientific reports.

  27. Olatunde, S.J., Ajayi, O.M., Ogunlakin, G.O. and Ajala, A.S. (2019). Nutritional and sensory properties of cake m.ade from blends of pigeon pea, sweet potato and wheat flours.Food Research. 3(5): 456-462.

  28. Patel, M.M. and Rao, G.V. (1995). Effect of untreated, roasted and germinated black gram (Phaseolus mungo) flours on the physico-chemical and biscuit (cookie) making characteristics of soft wheat flour. Journal of Cereal Science. 22(3): 285-291.

  29. Peryam, D.R. and Pilgrim, F.J.H. (1957). Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology. pp. 9-14. 

  30. Rasheed, P., Narayanan, T. and Gopal, P. (2008). Biogas production through mixed fruit wastes biodegradation. J. Sci. Indus. Res. 71: 217-220.  

  31. Robinson, G.H.J., Balk, J., andDomoney, C. (2019). Improving pulse crops as a source of protein, starch and micronutrients. Nutrition Bulletin. 44(3): 202-215.

  32. Sagar, A.N., Pareek, S., Sharma, S., Yahia, M.E. and Lobo, G.M. (2018). Fruit and vegetable waste: bioactive compounds, their extraction and possible utilization. Food Science and Food Safety. doi: 0.1111/1541-4337.12330.

  33. Sanz, T., Salvador, A.., Fiszman, S.M. (2008). Evaluation of four types of resitant starch in muffin baking performance and relationship with batter rheology. European Food Research and Technology. 227: 813-819.

  34. Sayed, M.A.H. and Ahmed, R.A. (2013). Utilization of watermelon rinds and sharlyn melon peels as a natural source of dietary ûber and antioxidants in cake. Annals of Agricultural Science. 58(1): 83-95.

  35. Sharma, S., Peter, S., Parimita, P.T., Ahmad, S. (2019). Studies on cup-cakes incorporated with beetroot and wheatgrass powder. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition. 4(4): 206-208. 

  36. Sharoba, A.M., Farrag, M.A. and Abd El-Salam, A.M. (2013). Utilization of some fruits and vegetables waste as a source of dietary fiber and its effect on the cake making and its quality attributes. Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies. 19(4): 429-444.

  37. Sheoran, O.P. and Pannu, R.S. (1999). Statistical Package for agricultural workers. “O. P. Stat” College of Agriculture, Kaul, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. India. 

  38. Singh, R. (2016). Development of fiber enriched bakery products by incorporating fruit pulp waste powder and their acceptability evaluation. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences. 3(6): 222-226. 

  39. Sudha, M.L., Indumathi, K., Sumanth, M.S., Rajarathnam, S. and Shashirekha, M.N. (2015). Mango pulp fibre waste: characterization and utilization as a bakery product ingredient. J. Food Meas. Charact. 9: 382-388.

  40. Upasana and Vinay, D. (2018). Nutritional evaluation of pea peel and pea peel extracted byproducts. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition. 3(1): 65-67. 

  41. Walker, R., Tseng, A., Cavender, G., Ross, A. and Zhao, Y. (2014). Physicochemical, nutritional, and sensory qualities of wine grape pomace fortified baked goods. Journal of Food Science. 79(9): 1811-1822. 

  42. Zhang, Y., Xiao, Z., Agera, E., Konga, L. and Tana, L. (2021). Nutritional quality and health benefits of microgreens, a crop of modern agriculture. Journal of Future Foods. 1- 1: 58-66.

Editorial Board

View all (0)