It is evident from the Table 1. that the actual sensory score of fiber enriched
shrikhand with inulin, psyllium and PHGG was slightly higher over predicted, though statistically the difference was non-significant because calculated t value was less than the tabulated t value. The optimized combination comprising inulin 3.93%, psyllium 0.66% and 4.62% PHGG resulted in fiber enriched
shrikhand rated 8.6 score which was for flavour, 8.5 for body and texture, 8.4 for colour and appearance and 8.5 for overall acceptability. Thus it had highly desirable sensory quality.
Physico-chemical composition of optimized and markets shrikhand
The best product selected on the basis of sensory evaluation was subjected to the further study along with market sample. Here the physico-chemical composition of optimized and market
shrikhand were analyzed.
The requisite samples of
shrikhand enriched with fiber and market samples were subjected for analysis
viz. acidity, pH, fat, protein, sucrose lactose, moisture, total solid, total dietary fiber and ash. The result obtained on account of this parameter is presented in forthcoming table.
pH content of shrikhand
From the above Table 2 indicates that the mean pH value of optimized and market samples was 4.37, 4.08, 4.12, 4.43 and 4.55 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. It is also observed that the lowest pH content was observed in M
2 and the highest in M
4 Treatment O
1 was significantly different from remaining all market samples except M
3 which were at par to each other. The pH of M
4 shrikhand sample was significantly superior (P<0.05) over markets and optimized samples, while M
1 and M
2 at par with each other.
Titratable acidity content of shrikhand
From the above Table 2 indicates that the mean titratable acidity content of optimized and market samples was 1.10, 1.02, 0.97, 1.03 and 0.98 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. It is also observed that the lowest titratable acidity was observed in M
2 and the highest in O
1. Optimized sample O
1 was significantly different from remaining all market samples except M
3 which were at par to each other. The titratable acidity of M
2 and M
4 shrikhand sample at par with each other also M
1 and M
3 at par with each other.
Viscosity of shrikhand
From the above Table 2 it is observed that the mean of viscosity content of optimized and market samples was 54.22, 49.65, 50.55, 49.06 and 49.76 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. The viscosity of optimized sample of
shrikhand was significantly superior (P<0.05) over other markets samples; There is significant difference in viscosity content of
shrikhand between all samples. It is also observed that the lowest viscosity was observed in M
3 and the highest in O
1.
Moisture content in shrikhand
From the above Table 2 it is observed that the mean of moisture content of optimized and market samples was 39.05, 42.32, 45.60, 43.12 and 44.11 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. The moisture content of optimized sample O
1 of
shrikhand was significantly inferior (P<0.05) over other markets samples; There is significant difference in moisture content of
shrikhand between all samples. The moisture content of market sample M
2 of
shrikhand was significantly superior (P<0.05) over other market and optimized sample. It is also observed that the lowest moisture content was observed in O
1 and the highest in. M
2.
Fat content in shrikhand
From the above Table 2, it is observed that the mean of fat content of optimized and market samples was 6.10, 6.30, 6.57, 6.30 and 6.76 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. The fat content of optimized sample O
1 of
shrikhand was significantly inferior (P<0.05) over other markets samples; There is significant difference in fat content of
shrikhand between all samples. The moisture content of market sample M
4 of
shrikhand was significantly superior (P<0.05) over other market and optimized sample. It is also observed that the lowest fat content was observed in O
1 and the highest in. M
4.
Protein content in shrikhand
From the above Table 2, it is observed that the mean of protein content of optimized and market samples was 7.33, 6.49, 6.81, 6.99 and 7.07 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. The protein content of optimized sample O
1 of
shrikhand was significantly superior (P<0.05) over other markets samples; There is significant difference in superior of
shrikhand between all samples, except M
3 and M
4 at par with each other. The protein content of market sample M
1 of
shrikhand was significantly inferior (P<0.05) over other market and optimized sample. It is also observed that the lowest protein content was observed in M
1 and the highest in. O
1.
Sucrose content in shrikhand
From the above Table 2, it is observed that the mean of sucrose content of optimized and market samples was 36.33, 41.74, 37.56, 40.54 and 38.60 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. The sucrose content of optimized sample O
1 of
shrikhand was significantly inferior (P<0.05) over other markets samples; There is significant difference in
shrikhand between all samples, except O
1 and M
1 at par with each other. The sucrose content of market sample M
1 of
shrikhand was significantly superior (P<0.05) over other market and optimized sample. It is also observed that the lowest sucrose content was observed in O
1 and the highest in M
1.
Lactose content in shrikhand
From the above Table 2, it is observed that the mean of lactose content of optimized and market samples was 2.14, 2.48, 2.32, 2.21 and 2.34 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. The lactose content of optimized sample O
1 of
shrikhand was significantly inferior (P<0.05) over other markets samples; There is significant difference in
shrikhand between all samples, except M
2 and M
4 at par with each other. The lactose content of market sample M
1 of
shrikhand was significantly superior (P<0.05) over other market and optimized sample. It is also observed that the lowest lactose content was observed in O
1 and the highest in M
1.
Total solid content in shrikhand
From the above Table 2, it is observed that the mean of total solid of optimized and market samples was 60.95, 57.52, 54.20, 56.83 and 55.94 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. The total solid content of optimized sample O
1 of
shrikhand was significantly superior (P<0.05) over other markets samples; There was significant difference in
shrikhand between all samples. The total solid content of market sample M
2 of
shrikhand was significantly inferior (P<0.05) over other market and optimized sample. It is also observed that the lowest total solid content was observed in M
2 and the highest in O
1.
Ash content in shrikhand
From the above Table 2, it is observed that the mean of ash content of optimized and market samples was 3.48, 0.53, 0.94, 0.93 and 0.99 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. The ash content of optimized sample O
1 of
shrikhand was significantly superior (P<0.05) over other markets samples; There was significant difference in
shrikhand between all samples, except M
2 and M
3 at par with each other. The ash content of market sample M
3 of
shrikhand was significantly inferior (P<0.05) over other market and optimized sample. It is also observed that the lowest ash content was observed in M
3 and the highest in O
1.
TDF content in shrikhand
From the above Table 2, it is observed that the mean of dietary fiber content of optimized and market samples was 7.70, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 and 0.00 per cent in O
1, M
1, M
2, M
3 and M
4, respectively. The ash content of optimized sample O
1 of
shrikhand was significantly superior (P<0.05) over other markets samples; There was significant difference in
shrikhand between optimize and market samples, It is also observed that the dietary fiber content absent was observed in market samples and the highest in O
1.
The results recorded for above in present investigation where comparable with below mentioned research worker.
Chopade et al., (2011) reported that the highest mean value of fat was found in treatment T
1 i.e. 8.15 T
1, followed by 7.68 T3, 3.93 per cent T
2. The higher mean value (1.47) of titratable acidity was found in treatment T
1. The higher mean value of protein was found in treatment
i.e. 7.29, T
1 followed by 6.30 T
3 and 3.56 per cent T
2. The highest mean value of total solid was found in treatment
i.e. 58.59 T
1, 55.58 T
2 and 47.04 per cent T
3.
Jaybhay (2020) reported that the average of moisture content in samples 40.50% to 44.09%. The total solid content in samples was 55.50% to 59.13%. The fat content in
shrikhand samples were 8.33, 8.10, 5.73, 7.57 and 7.00 whereas the average protein content were 7.10, 7.12, 5.5, 5.75 and 7.20 in KS1, KS2, KS3, KS4 and KS5 respectively. However, the mean of total sugar content of
shrikhand samples in KS1, KS2, KS3, KS4 and KS5 were 42.32, 43.43, 43.83, 43.25 and 41.68 percent respectively. The average acidity (% LA) of market sample of
shrikhand KS1, KS2, KS3, KS4, KS5, were 1.01, 1.20, 1.45,1.00 and 1.50, respectively whereas, the pH in
shrikhand sample was ranged from 4.00 to 5.13. The ash content in market sample of
shrikhand ranged from 0.75 to 0.90.