Sensory and nutritional evaluation of beans potato vegetables 

DOI: 10.18805/ajdfr.v36i02.7966    | Article Id: DR-1181 | Page : 173-176
Citation :- Sensory and nutritional evaluation of beans potato vegetables .Asian Journal Of Dairy and Food Research.2017.(36):173-176

Mamta Rani* and  Darshan Punia 

mamtarajoria12@gmail.com
Address :

Department of Foods and Nutrition, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004, Haryana, India

Submitted Date : 31-10-2016
Accepted Date : 9-03-2017

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the sensory and nutritional compositioaln of products prepared from fresh beans. Four types of fresh beans powder viz. cluster bean, cowpea bean, french bean and sem bean were used for dry beans-potato vegetable preparation. All the four types of vegetables were “Liked very much” on the basis of their organoleptic analysis. Moisture content of beans vegetable prepared using fresh beans ranged from 74.61 to 80.99 per cent. The crude protein content was the maximum in cowpea bean potato vegetable (13.85%) followed by french bean (13.65%), cluster bean (12.25%) and sem bean potato vegetable (11.99%). Crude fiber content in potato beans vegetable ranged from 5.94 to 6.79 per cent. Among the four types of beans-potato vegetables, total, insoluble and soluble dietary fiber content was found to be highest in cluster bean vegetable and the lowest in sem bean vegetable. Sem bean vegetable contained the maximum (131.86 mg/100g and 250.86 mg/100g) amount of calcium and phosphorus while french bean vegetable contained the minimum (49.25 mg/100gand 242.94 mg/100g) amount. All the four types of potato beans vegetable differed significantly (P<0.05) among themselves for iron content. French bean potato vegetable contained the maximum amount of zinc (5.32mg/100g) while cowpea bean contained the minimum (3.04). Total magnesium content of potato beans vegetable ranged from 63.65 to 98.52mg/100g. Potato bean vegetable prepared using four types of beans differed significantly (p£0.05) among themselves for their potassium content.

Keywords

Beans Crude protein Dietary fiber Iron Potassium Proximate.

References

  1. Adil, S., Changade S., Dhotere A., and Chopde. S. (2015). Studies on sensory and keeping qualities of pumpkin based kheer. Asian J. Dairy & Food Res., 34 : 270-274. 
  2. AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Agriculture Chemist. Association of Analytical Chemist, Washington. D.C. 
  3. Bajpai, P and Punia D. (2015(. Effect of cultivation practices on nutritional composition of vegetables. Asian J. Dairy & Food Res., 34 : 164-167
  4. Chaudhary, V., Khetarpaul N., and Jood S. (2012). Sensory and nutritional evaluation of vegetables prepared from dehydrated snap    peas. J. Dairying Food and H.S., 31 : 203-206.
  5. Deol, J.K. and Bains K. (2010). Effect of household cooking on nutritional and anti-nutritional factors in green cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) pods. J. Food Sci. Technol ., 47 : 579-581. 
  6. Furda, I. (1981). Simultaneous analysis of soluble and insoluble dietary fiber. The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food. W.P.T. James and O. Theander (Eds). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 163-172. 
  7. Gallegos-Infant, L.A., Bello-Perezz L.A, Guzman N.E.R., Laredo F.F.G., and Ontiveros M.A. (2010). Effect of the addition of common bean flour on the in vitro digestibility of starch and undigestible carbohydrates in spaghetti. J. Food Sci., 75 : 151-156.
  8. Joshi, P. and Jain. S. (2011). nutrient composition of drumstick (Moringa oleifera) pod powder and their product development. J. Dairying, Foods & H.S., 30 : 285 - 289.
  9. Kala, A. and Prakash J.. (2006). The comparative evaluation of the nutrient composition and sensory attributes of four vegetables cooked by different methods. Intr. J. Food Sci. Technol., 41: 163-171. 
  10. Kmiecik, W., Lisiewska Z., and Jaworska G. (20000. Contents of ash components in the fresh and preserved broad beans (vicia faba v major). J. Food composition and analysis., 13 : 905-914. 
  11. Laparra, J. M., Glahn R. P., and Miller D. D. (2009). Assessing potential effect of inulin and probiotic bacteria on Fe availability from common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to caco-2 cells. J Food Sci., 74 : 40-46. 
  12. Lindsey, W.L. and Norwell M.A. (1969). A new DPTA-TEA soil tests for zinc and iron. Agron. Abst., 61: 84. 
  13. Mamta Rani, Punia D., and Khetarpaul N.. (2013). Nutrient composition of pulao containing fresh beans. Annals of Agri-Bio Research, 18: 293-295.
  14. Punia, D., Gupta M., Yadav S.K., and Khetarpaul N. (2008). Nutrient composition of green beans and their products. J. Indian Dietetics Association., 33: 27-32.
  15. Rachna. (2006). Development and nutrient composition of value added products from Drumstick (Moringa oleifera). Ph.D. Thesis, CCS HAU, Hisar, India. 
  16. Saxena, K. B., Kumar R.V. and Gowda. C.L.L. (2010). Vegetable pigeon pea – a review. J. of Food Legumes., 23 : 91-98.
  17. Singh, G. (1999). Development and nutritional evaluation of value added products from pearl millet. Ph.D. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. 
  18. Singh, S., Punia D., and Khetarpaul N., (2009). Nutrient composition of products prepared by incorporating Amaranth leaf powder. Nutr. Food Sci., 39: 218-226.
  19. Vandana. (2004). Nutritional and organoleptic evaluation of value added products developed from faba bean (Vicia faba L.). M.Sc. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. 
  20. Yamaguchi, M., Rubatzky M. and Rubatzky V.E.. (1997). Pea, Beans and other vegetable legumes. World vegetables. International Thomson Publishing., pp 474-531. 
     

Global Footprints