General characteristics
The comparison among acute and chronic individuals with ITP yielded the following results: Age was not significantly different among acute and chronic individuals with ITP (5.6 ±3.81
vs. 7.54± 3.55 years, p=0.0749). Sex distribution was also comparable among the two groups (62.96% male in acute
vs. 47.83% in chronic, p=0.3926). BMI was similar among acute and chronic individuals with ITP (32
vs. 32.7, p=0.6261). As expected, the period of illness differed, with 33.34% of acute individuals with ITP having symptoms for <1 month and 78.26% of chronic individuals with ITP having symptoms for <1 year. Treatment status differed, with all chronic individuals with ITP receiving treatment and 25.93% of acute individuals with ITP not receiving treatment, as represented in Table 1.
Hematological study
Hematological parameters, including mean ± SD of RBC (4.78±0.483
vs. 4.64±0.41 × 10
6/µL, p=0.2685) and Hb (12.56±1.43
vs. 12.34±1.68 g/dl, p=0.631) as well as median of WBC (9.9
vs. 8.9 × 10
3/µL, p=0.674) and PLT (186
vs. 72 × 10
3/µL, p=
0.
2893) detected no significant variations among acute and chronic individuals with ITP, respectively, as represented in Fig 1.
Serological study
The comparison among acute and chronic individuals with ITP revealed the following results: ANA levels were not significantly different among acute and chronic individuals with ITP (8.2 vs. 4.7, p=0.3225). IL-40 levels detected a trend towards being greater in acute individuals with ITP, but the variation did not reach statistical significance (10.5 vs. 9.04, p=0.0676). PA-Ab levels were significantly greater in acute individuals with ITP compared to chronic individuals with ITP (16.6 vs. 9.5, p=0.0233), as represented in Fig 2.
Analyses evaluating the relative strengths of ANA, PA-Ab and IL-40 as diagnostic tools for differentiating between acute and chronic ITP showed mixed results. There was no statistically significant difference between ANA and chance, but the AUC of 0.603 was good and the sensitivity was high at 84.62% with a poor specificity of 50%. There is modest diagnostic potential for IL-40, as it produced a respectable AUC of 0.651, reasonable sensitivity (60.87%) and specificity (66.67%) and a
p-value (0.0674) that is approaching towards significance. PA-Ab shown promising biomarker potential with an AUC of 0.689, which was statistically significant (p = 0.0239) and had a well-balanced sensitivity (69.57%) and specificity (66.67%), as represented in Fig 3.
Molecular study
Gene expression
The comparison among acute and chronic individuals with ITP detected that
PTPN22 expression levels were not significantly different among the two groups (0.34
vs. 0.225, p=0.7799). The wide range of expression levels in both groups (0.01-2.84 in acute and 0.01-3.41 in chronic) suggests variability in
PTPN22 expression among individuals, but overall, the median expression levels were comparable among acute and chronic individuals with ITP, as represented in Table 2.
The study found that
PTPN22 expression fold is not a reliable biomarker for distinguishing between acute and chronic individuals with ITP. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.527, which is considered “unsatisfactory” and not significantly different from random chance (p
-value 0.7726). The optimal cut-off value had a sensitivity of 66.67% and specificity of 52.17%, which is not sufficient for a reliable diagnostic test, as represented in Fig 4.
Genotyping
The PCR amplification of rs2488457 specific region were performed and the results, as represented in Fig 5, indicated single band of 782 bp of rs2488457 for patients with ITP.
Sanger sequencing method were utilized in order to estimate the sequence of each SNP (rs2488457) in
PTPN22 gene, as represented in Fig 6.
The comparison of rs2488457 genotype frequencies among acute and chronic individuals with ITP detected no significant variation (p=0.4996). The distribution of genotypes was similar among the two groups, with homozygous wild-type being the most common genotype in both acute (55.6%) and chronic (69.6%) individuals with ITP, followed by heterozygous genotypes (37% in acute and 21.7% in chronic), as represented in Table 3.
Correlation study
The analysis of
PTPN22 expression based on rs2488457 genotype detected no significant variations in both acute and chronic individuals with ITP. In acute individuals with ITP, the median
PTPN22 expression levels were 2.84 for the wild-type genotype (limited to one value), 0.34 for the homozygous genotype and 0.19 for the heterozygous genotype (p=0.7965). In chronic individuals with ITP, the median
PTPN22 expression levels were 0.495 for the wild-type genotype, 0.165 for the homozygous genotype and 0.295 for the heterozygous genotype (
p=0.4313), as represented in Table 4.
The correlation analysis in chronic individuals with ITP revealed several significant relationships. Age detected a high negative correlation with BMI (r = -0.72, p
<0.0001). ANA levels detected significant high positive correlations with IL-40 (r
= 0.63, p
<0.05), as represented in Table 5.
This study focuses on the role of immunological biomarkers (IL-40) and genetic marker (
PTPN22 gene) in incidence of acute and chronic ITP cases.
Depending these outcomes, the difference in
PTPN22 expression of acute and chronic cases was not statistically significant. This contrasts with findings in other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, where
PTPN22 expression tends to be elevated. For instance,
(Ruan et al., 2022). reported an upregulation of
PTPN22 in immune cells within the aortic tissue of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), suggesting a pro-inflammatory role. Similarly,
(Hassan et al., 2024). observed significantly increased
PTPN22 expression in individuals with autoimmune inflammatory diseases (AID), further supporting its involvement in heightened immune response. On the other hand,
(Moneim et al., 2023) did not observe a significant difference in
PTPN22 mRNA expression between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and healthy controls, indicating disease-specific variation in gene regulation. In addition, gene expression of
PTPN22 decreased in patients of SLE in compared to healthy controls (HCs)
(Román-Fernández et al., 2022). Moreover,
(Menchaca-Tapia et al., 2023). reported a remarkable 17-fold increase in
PTPN22 expression in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS), highlighting a strong association between the gene and glandular autoimmunity. Similarly,
(Ramírez-Pérez et al., 2019). found that
PTPN22 was linked to higher gene expression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), reinforcing the gene’s role in T-cell regulation and autoimmunity. These findings collectively suggest that
PTPN22 may act as a regulatory hub in immune-mediated diseases, with expression levels varying depending on the underlying pathophysiology of each condition.
PTPN22 is expressed in most human leukocyte types, including neutrophils, CD4+ T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, monocytes, NK cells, B cells and CD8+ T cells. Of these cells, PTPN22 has the highest expressions in activated naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, followed by B cells and NK cells, with lower levels in monocytes
(Armitage et al., 2021). The
PTPN22 gene plays a significant role in immune regulation and is implicated in various diseases, particularly autoimmune disorders. Variants in this gene can lead to altered protein function, which affects T-cell activation and signaling pathways
(Brownlie et al., 2024).. This dysregulation can increase susceptibility to autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis
(Budlewski et al., 2023) type 1 diabetes
(Newman et al., 2023) and SLE
(Ates et al., 2025) where the immune system mistakenly attacks the body’s own tissues.
This study and
(Tian et al., 2022) focus on the association of the
PTPN22 gene SNP (rs2488457) with ITP. Tian
et al. found that carriers of genotypes of GG were 1.51 times more susceptible to ITP than carriers of CC, with a significant
p-value of 0.009. This suggests that while this study observed no difference in genotype frequency, Tian
et al. provided evidence of a meaningful association with susceptibility, highlighting a potential inconsistency in findings (
Zhang et al., 2022; Bhat et al., 2024) identified a significant relationship between rs2488457 polymorphisms and uveitis susceptibility, showing that the C allele was associated with increased risk (OR = 1.18, p = 0.029). This contrasts with this study, which reported no significant differences in the distribution of genotypes among both cases with ITP. The study by
(Menchaca-Tapia et al., 2023). found no significant differences in genotype frequencies for rs2488457 between primary Sjögren’s syndrome patients and HCs, aligning with the lack of significant findings in this study regarding ITP. This suggests a possible commonality in that both immune disorders may not exhibit strong associations with this particular SNP, indicating a need for further investigation into genetic risk factors for these conditions.
(Kaymaz et al., 2023) examined the frequency of the G allele in lung sarcoidosis, reporting a G allele frequency of 67%, whereas this study found 8% of ITP patients with the GG genotype. The stark difference in genotype frequencies suggests that the impact of rs2488457 may be disease-specific. This reinforces the notion that genetic susceptibility can vary significantly across different diseases, necessitating a tailored approach to genetic research in immune disorders.
(Jiménez-Becerra et al., 2024;
Ngurthankhumi et al., 2024) reported a range of 36% to 48% for the risk allele PTPN22 rs2488457G in systemic lupus erythematosus. In contrast, this study reported a lower prevalence of the GG genotype in ITP. The variation in allele distribution highlights the complexity of genetic influences on autoimmunity and suggests that while certain SNPs may be implicated in multiple conditions, their prevalence and impact can differ markedly.
Lu et al., (2022) found no contribution of rs2488457 to chronic spontaneous urticaria susceptibility, echoing the findings of this study regarding ITP. Both studies suggest that rs2488457 may not be a critical risk factor in certain immune-related conditions, prompting further research to identify other genetic variations that could better explain susceptibility.
(Bufalo et al., 2021) reported significant associations between the CC genotype of rs3789607 and Graves’ disease susceptibility, contrasting with this study’s focus on rs2488457 and its lack of significant findings in ITP. This highlights the specificity of genetic markers in different autoimmune diseases, suggesting that while some SNPs may be important for one condition, they may not hold the same relevance for another.
(Jabeen et al., 2024) demonstrated a notable association between the CT genotype of rs2488457 and type 1 diabetes, with significant odds ratios. This study, however, found no significant differences in genotype frequencies among ITP patients. The differing results suggest that rs2488457 may play a more prominent role in type 1 diabetes than in ITP, emphasizing the need for condition-specific genetic investigations.
Zhang et al., (2025) found rs2488457 significantly associated with acute lymphoblastic leukemia progression-free survival, highlighting its potential importance in hematological malignancies. In contrast, this study reported no significant associations in ITP, which may indicate that while certain SNPs can influence disease outcomes in cancer, they may not have the same implications in autoimmune disorders like ITP, underscoring the diverse genetic landscape across diseases.
(Su et al., 2025). revealed a significant association between rs2476601 and an increased risk of type 1 diabetes, while this study found no significant associations for rs2488457 with ITP. This divergence emphasizes the possibility that different SNPs may have varying impacts on distinct autoimmune diseases, suggesting a complex interplay of genetic factors that warrants further exploration in the context of immune dysregulation.