Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research
Chief EditorHarjinder Singh
Print ISSN 0971-4456
Online ISSN 0976-0563
NAAS Rating 5.44
SJR 0.151
Chief EditorHarjinder Singh
Print ISSN 0971-4456
Online ISSN 0976-0563
NAAS Rating 5.44
SJR 0.151
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Properties of Mao (Antidesma thwaitesianum Muell. Arg.) Fruit Juice Powders Prepared using Spray Drying and Foam Mat Drying Techniques
Submitted06-08-2024|
Accepted19-11-2024|
First Online 03-01-2025|
Background: The limitations of Mao (Antidesma thwaiteaianum) fruit juice are the short period of production and the weight of juice products with containers. Thus, the fruit powder is the most form of juice that is solved this problem, enhancing shelf life and convenience to drink.
Methods: Our study was conducted on the processing of Mao fruit powders prepared from spray and foam mat drying with their sensory evaluations; and comparison of their water activity, anthocyanin and tannin contents and antioxidant properties.
Result: The foam mat drying powder had more preferable physical appearance including regularly fine granules with rose colors. While spray drying powder was irregularly coarse granules with pale rose-colored. This sensory evaluation was associated with the appearance and color of fruit powders and foam mat powder had more likeness scores on appearance, color and overall, rather than spray drying powder. Therefore, the solubility, flavor, texture and taste of foam mat powder had slightly lower likeness scores. Only anthocyanin content of spray drying powder (118.92 mg/kg) was significantly higher than foam mat powder (75.03 mg/kg). Whereas, water activity (aw), tannin content (TC) and DPPH scavenging activity (DPPH) of spray and foam mat drying powders were not statistically different at p<0.05 (aw = 0.41 and 0.44; TC = 0.66 and 0.65 mg/kg; DPPH = 395.69 and 335.82 mg tannin equivalent/100 g and 355.33 and 299.05 mg ascorbic acid equivalent/100 g, respectively).
The Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research (AJDFR) follows a disclaimer policy that outlines the responsibilities of the journal, authors, reviewers, and readers. The policy is designed to ensure that all published content is accurate and meets ethical standards, and to protect the journal from any legal liability.
The AJDFR does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content published in the journal. The opinions expressed in published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or its editorial board. The journal does not accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content published in the journal.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is original, accurate, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for obtaining permission to use copyrighted material and for providing appropriate attribution.
Reviewers are responsible for ensuring that the content of articles is accurate, original, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for maintaining confidentiality and disclosing any conflicts of interest.
Readers are responsible for evaluating the content of articles and for making their own judgments about the accuracy and reliability of the information presented. They are also responsible for complying with copyright laws and ethical standards when using the content of articles.
AJDFR is committed to ensuring that all published content meets ethical standards and that all parties involved in the publishing process understand their responsibilities. The disclaimer policy is designed to protect the journal from any legal liability and to ensure that readers can rely on the accuracy and reliability of the content published in the journal.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.