Effects of BPA on fertility hormones
Table 1 demonstrated a significant (P≤0.01) reduction in the level of FSH in treated groups with 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt of BPA (3.04±0.05, 2.63±0.12 and 1.61±0.25) μIU/ml, respectively, in contrast to the control group (3.65 ±0.32 μIU/ml). Furthermore, the findings revealed a significant (P≤0.01) reduction in the level of LH in treated groups with 25, 50 and 100 mg\kg b.wt of BPA (2.24±0.03, 2.13±0.04 and 1.45±0.21) μIU/ml, respectively, in contrast to the control group (2.53±0.09 μIU/ml). However, there was no significant difference between the group that was treated with 25 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA and the group treated with 50 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA.
Also, at the same Table 1, testosterone showed an obvious and significant (P≤0.01) decrease in all bisphenol A treatments (1.98±0.04, 1.63±0.14 and 0.983±0.04) ng/ml, respectively, in contrast to the control group (2.41±0.19) ng/ml. As for the estrogen hormone, it showed a significant (P≤0.01) difference according to the treatments. A significant (P≤0.01) reduction was observed in the treated control groups with 25 and 50 mg/kg b.wt of BPA (42.98 ±0.54 and 39.90±0.35) pg/ml, respectively, in contrast to the control group (46.20±1.00) pg/ml, while it was observed a significant (P≤0.01) elevation in the group receiving treatment with 100 mg/kg b.wt of BPA (49.46±0.84) pg/ml as compared with the control group.
Effects of BPA on semen parameters
The results in Table 2 showed that giving oral 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA for 35 days to adult male rats caused a significant (P≤0.01) reduction in the count of epididymal sperm (81.72±0.35, 79.02±0.66 and 72.12±0.62)x10
6/ml, respectively, as compared with that of the control group (83.81±0.52)x10
6/ml.
As well, for sperm motility, significant (P≤0.01) reductions were seen in each treated groups that were given orally 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA daily for 35 days (89.12±0.23, 83.23±0.22 and 78.88±0.32)%, respectively, as compared with that of the control group (93.28±1.15)%.
As for sperm viability, the adult male rats given 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA showed a significant (P≤0.01) decrease (87.62±0.46 and 87.40±0. 54)%, respectively, as compared with the control group (89.12±0.14)%. Nevertheless, no significant differences in the viability of sperm were observed in rats given 25 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA (88.63±0.57%), as compared with the control group (89.12±0.14%).
Effects of BPA on liver enzymes
ALT enzyme level significantly (P≤0.01) increased, according to the verified results in Table 3. in the treated groups with 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA (28.50±0.07, 33.76±0.12 and 39.36±0.24) IU/L respectively after 35 days of treatment compared to the control group (23.36±0.12) IU/L. The results in the same table also showed a significant (P≤0.01) increase in the AST enzyme in the treated group with 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA (30.40±0.14, 37.31 ±0.16 and 42.79±0.17) IU/L respectively after the passage of 35 days compared to the enzyme level for the control group (25.16±0.03) IU/L.
The histopathological changes of liver
Photomicrographs of rat liver sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin from various experimental groups. Hepatocytes in control (G1) rat liver sections had a normal structure (hp) (Fig1 A). The histopathological examination of the liver for rats administrated orally 25 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA was restricted as general central venous congestion and sinusoidal congestion and most hepatocytes were normal (Fig1 B). The results of histological changes for rats administrated orally 50 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA were multiple severe fibrosis of the portal area (Fig 1 C) and the other section showed oedema and congestion with fibrosis portal extension to neighboring areas and amyloid deposition. Finally, as for the concentration of 100 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA, the effect and the changes were very clear. The liver section showed multiple severe portal amyloidosis and congestion with fibro portal extension to neighboring areas (Fig 1 D).
The structural resemblance of bisphenol A to 17-b estradiol makes it one of the most extensively researched endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Its ability to bind as an agonist or an antagonist to estrogen receptors cause negative effects on the metabolism and endocrine system
(Mukhopadhyay et al., 2022). Under high temperatures and basic or acidic conditions, plastic products can release bisphenol A (BPA) into the air, water and food
(Welshons et al., 2006; Hasan et al., 2024). Therefore, BPA exposure to humans is inevitable in day-to-day living.
Iraqis rely on drinking water that is bottled in plastic bottles, whether at home or in public places, in addition to using plastic for food packaging. Iraq is renowned for its scorching summers when highs surpass 55 degrees Celsius. Furthermore, the government always alerts the public when the UV radiation index rises above 10. In addition to this extreme weather, there is inadequate storage of water bottles composed of polycarbonate or polyethene plastic. Instead of being kept in good condition, these bottles are kept outside of stores in direct sunlight. Because of the inherent possibility of exposure to BPA resulting from all these factors, research on the substance’s effects at various concentrations and an emphasis on its detrimental effects are necessary.
As shown in Table 1, our results indicate that administration of BPA at a concentration 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt. for 35 days leads to a significant (P≤0.01) decrease in male fertility hormones (FSH, LH, Testosterone and Estrogen) when comparison with the control group and these results agreed with
(Lü et al., 2024;
Hasan et al., 2024; Ezz et al., 2023; Alankooshi et al., 2023) and from the observed results can be attributed to the potential harmful effects of BPA, according to
(Cariati et al., 2019; Matuszczak et al., 2019; Pivonello et al., 2022; Ryu et al., 2023; Hasan et al., 2023;
Hameed et al., 2023). As well as this study also comes in agreement with
(Elashal et al., 2024; Hasan et al., 2022; Hasan et al., 2021) who gave the same concentration of BPA at a dose of 50/ mg/kg body weight and proved that giving BPA led to decreased serum levels of FSH, LH, testosterone, GSH concentration, total sperm count, motility and vitality. By contrast, a significant (P≤0.01) increase of Estrogen in rats treated with 100 mg\kg b.wt of BPA was observed as compared with the same control group , this could be due to that BPA induces oxidative stress and activates inflammatory signals
(Cho et al., 2018; Hasan et al., 2024).
As shown in Table 2, the results revealed that administering 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt. of BPA through 35 days, led to significantly (P≤0.01) decreased sperm count, motility and vitality compared with the control group, these findings come matched with
Barbagallo et al. (2020) and
Ullah et al., (2019). The influence of BPA on oxidative stress on testicular function and ability has been established according to
(Liu et al., 2022; ElGendy et al., 2020). These results can be ascribed to the potential adverse effects of BPA According to
(Gules et al., 2019; Campos et al., 2019). In mice tests, exposure to BPA causes a decrease in sperm motility and counts as well as an increase in ROS and lipid peroxidation
(Kaur et al., 2017).
As shown in Table 3, ALT and AST levels were significantly (P≤0.01) increased in rats orally administrated BPA at 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt. for 35 days, these findings are consistent with prior research that has shown the efficacy of BPA in increasing oxidative damage to hormones and liver enzymes caused by BPA According to
(Lv et al., (2019); Hameed et al., (2023). As well as these results match with those of
Elswefy et al., (2016); Hassan et al., (2012). This could be explained by either the hyperactivity of the liver or oxidative damage to the liver caused by BPA that releases hepatic enzymes into the blood
(Kourouma et al., 2015). It seems that in a normal state, corn oil preserves and enhances liver structure and function. Nevertheless, the groups that were given BPA dissolved in corn oil did not experience these positive effects. The liver enzymes of animals that ingest BPA may become less active
(Paul et al., 2024; Hasan et al., 2022). This could be because the chemical affects the liver cells’ metabolic processes and inhibits the activity of the enzymes that cause these processes, damaging the liver cells and causing enzymes to leak out of the cells and into the blood
(Abdulhameed et al., 2022; Hasan et al., 2023; Hasan et al., 2021).
The liver is more susceptible to BPA doses than other organs because it is the organ that metabolizes BPA through glucuronic acid conjugation
(Moon et al., 2012). Conversely, Fig 1 depicts the liver of the rat groups treated with BPA 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.wt. Following 35 days of treatment, the liver displayed a variety of histological changes, including multiple severe portal amyloidosis and congestion with fibro portal extension to neighboring areas. This agrees with
Elswefy et al. (2016) who gave the same concentration of 50 mg/kg body weight/day, for 8 weeks and demonstrated that BPA-induced liver damage and fibrosis are related to inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis.