Annual temperature at Satkhira District in Bangladesh
Fig 1 illustrated that Satkhira’s climate experienced average temperatures around 28.95°C, but ranged between 32.37°C and 25.52°C. The warmest month and the coolest month were found in May (36.77°C) and January (16.45°C) respectively. In March (36.52°C) and April (36.72°C), temperatures were found almost similar to that of May (36.77°C). Similarly, the second and third coolest months were found in December and February with temperatures of 17.12°C and 18.55°C respectively. The temperature ranged from 34.11 to 29.61, 34.17 to 28.67, 35.45 to 28.44, 33.49 to 27.61, 31.33 to 26.52, 25.46 to 17.12, 24.12 to 16.45, 26.17 to 18.55, 36.52 to 25.78, 36.72 to 28.67, 36.77 to 29.67 and 34.18 to 29.18 in July, August, September, October, November, December, January, February, March, April, May and June respectively.
In Satkhira, the wet season is hot, oppressive and mostly cloudy and the dry season is warm and mostly clear. Over the year, the temperature typically varies from 57°F to 93°F and is rarely below 52°F or above 98°F
(MoAg, 2020).
Bedding temperature, shed temperature and humidity
In the summer month average shed temperature was found higher than the average bedding temperature. However, shed temperature was found lower than bedding temperature in winter months
i.e. December and January. From July to September, the average shed temperature remained almost similar (34°C), then dropped continuously up to January and reached 23.99°C. Similarly, the average bedding temperature remained at the nearly same temperature (30°C) from July to October and then started dropping and reached 24.08°C in January 2020. In January 2020, average shed temperature and average bedding temperature were found almost similar (24°C). In both cases in succeeding months, the temperature started rising. The average shed temperature reached the maximum (36.69°C) in April and then started decreasing and reached 32.10°C in June. However, in the case of DBP, the maximum average temperature was observed in March and April (31°C) and then remained almost similar up to June (30.50°C). Average annual bedding temperature and shed temperature were recorded at 28.92°C and 31.78°C, respectively.
However, in DBP, the average bedding temperature ranged from 24.08°C (lowest) to 31.00°C (highest) in the same year. The temperature difference was found 12.7°C and 6.92°C in average shed temperature and average bedding temperature in the study year respectively. The temperature difference between average shed temperature and average bedding temperature was found 5.78°C. In the summer months, the average bedding temperature in DBP was ranged from 29.75°C to 31.00°C which was ranged from 32.10°C to 36.69°C in CF. In addition to that in the winter months (December and January), the average bedding temperature in DBP was found higher than the shed temperature. That is why animals can feel more comfortable and do not suffer from high and low heat stress in deep bedded pack than in a concrete floor.
Findings manifested that the annual average humidity (%) in DBP shed was found at 69.30%. Humidity was recorded at more than 80% in four months (July, September, October and June). In July, the humidity value was recorded as the highest (85.84%). In August, it was found at 79.94%, however, it was observed almost similar (65%) in the months November to January. The humidity value was recorded as the lowest in February (53.71%). Furthermore, March, April and May it was found almost similar (54%). From May to June, humidity values were found to more fluctuate (54.52% to 85%).
Barberg et al., (2007) studied CBP in Minnesota and reported a mean pack temperature of 42.5°C at depth of 20 cm. Similarly, in CBP using wood chips and aeration systems, the pack temperature at a depth of 20 cm ranged from 34.6 to 57.7°C, whereas in CBP with no aeration systems using organic waste compost as bedding, the pack temperature at the same depth was between 16 and 34°C
(Galama, 2011).
According to
MoAg (2020) average relative humidity (RH) in the Satkhira district in the year 2019 was recorded at 66.16%. The RH was recorded 47.3%, 44.47%, 50.38%, 60.90%, 66.74%, 73.41%, 82.30%, 85.08%, 86.13%, 80.07%, 64.09% and 52.91% in January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December respectively
MoAg (2020).
Heat stress to the animals
Results clarified that animals in concrete floor shed suffered from severe stress with THI values of 90.26, 90.12 and 91.00 in July, August and September. Furthermore, in October, March, April, May and June animals were found suffering from moderate heat stress with THI values of 86.69, 86.92, 88.01, 86.23 and 87.13 respectively. In addition to that animals were observed affected by mild heat stress in November, December and February with THI values of 79.27, 73.28 and 76.59. The highest THI was observed in September (91.00) and the lowest THI was observed in January (71.54). However, in the case of the deep bedded pack; animals were not affected by severe stress. In most of the months
i.e. June, July, August, September and October animals were observed suffering from moderate stress with THI values of 84.49, 83.31, 83.23, 84.12 and 82.63 respectively. Moreover, in February, March, April, May, November and December animals were found suffering from mild stress with THI values of 73.22, 79.89, 79.87, 79.66, 77.62 and 75.37 respectively. In January, animals were found in comfort zone with a THI value of 71.67. The highest THI was observed in June (84.49) and the lowest THI was observed in January (71.67). In all months THI value in the DBP was found lower than the THI value in the concrete floor except in January and February. Therefore, it can be concluded that animal feels more comfortable in DBP system than in CF system. Details of THI value and classes of heat stress are presented in Table 1.
Heat stress is a common problem on dairy farms worldwide in tropical climates. Psychological stress can be increased with changes in the social structure of cattle
(Moberg and Mench, 2000). Increasing ventilation rates may increase the evaporation of moisture from the bedded pack barn and prevent heat stress during warmer times of the year
(Dhar, 2019;
Leso et al., 2019). Heat stress results from a combination of several weather variables including high ambient temperature, humidity, solar radiation and wind speed, with negative impacts on both animal welfare and productivity
(Thornton et al., 2022). Depending on species and breed, cattle can experience thermal stress at temperatures higher than 20°C
(Herbut et al., 2019). Fans can increase the air movement rate over the surface of the bed, which increases bed drying and reduces heat stress
(Polsky and Von-Keyserlingk, 2017).
Dhar (2019), in his experimental period from December 2018 to June 2019, the highest average temperature-humidity index (THI) were 66.22±5.55, 69.82±5.83, 72.80±5.42, 76.43±2.89, 78.93±1.75, 80.29±2.06 and 83.58±2.77 in December, January, February, March, April, May and June, respectively. The summer and winter months altered the internal temperature for compost bedded back barns (31.8 to 48.1°C and 13.8 to 40.6°C, respectively
(Shane et al., 2010). Bjerg and Klaas (2014) reported that compost bedded pack barns maintained internal pack temperatures 20 to 40°C above the ambient temperature (0°C in the winter months).
Leso et al., (2019) calculated a lower THI value in CBP than in free stall barn and straw yard. A similar result was also obtained in a study by
Dhar (2019). Alteration in housing and management strategies can reduce the heat stress in dairy cows. Provision of fans, mister, showers, proper selection of barn construction materials, beddings, feeding and reproductive management can provide thermal relief for dairy cows when challenged by an abrupt environmental heat load
(Polsky and Von-Keyserlingk, 2017).