Phenotypic identification
The results showed the presence of three genera:
Lactobacillus, Enterococcus and
Lactococcus. The cells of strains had different shapes : cocci and rod.
63 rod-shaped were divided into four groups
Group 1
25 isolates (17 homofermentative and 8 heterofermentative), arginine dihydrolase positive (ADH) strains, growing at 15°C, 37°C and 45°C, at pH 4 and with 4% NaCl, but not at pH 9.6 and 6.5% NaCl, they did not ferment Arabinose and Xylose.
Group 2
36 heterofermentative, ADH positive, esculin-positive strains growing at pH 4 and 4% NaCl, at 37°C and 45°C, but not 15°C, at pH 9.6 and 6.5% NaCl. They did not ferment Sorbitol, Rhamnose and Xylose.
Group 3
01 homofermentative strain, ADH negative, esculin positive, grows at 15°C and 37°C, at pH 4 and with 4% and 6.5% NaCl, but not at 45°C, at pH 9.6. This strain did not ferment Mannitol, Sorbitol, Melibiose, Arabinose, Xylose and Ribose.
Group 4 : 01 heterofermentative strain, ADH positive, esculin positive, grows at 37°C, pH 4 and 4% NaCl, but not at 15°C and 45°C, pH 9.6 and 6.5% NaCl. It did not ferment Arabinose and Xylose.
53 strains in the form of cocci were also divided into three groups
Group 1
05 homofermentative strains, ADH negative, esculin positive, growing at 0.1% and 0.3% methylene blue, at 15°C and 37°C, at pH 4 and with 4% NaCl, but not at 45°C, at pH 9.6 and with 6.5% NaCl, they did not ferment Inositol, Sorbitol, Rhamnose, Melibiose, Amygdaline, Xylose.
Groups 2 and 3 are similar in all tests, except in the sugar fermentation test where there is some difference. 48 homofermentative strains, growing at 0.1% methylene blue, not 0,3%, at 15°C, 37°C and 45°C, at pH 4 and 9.6 and with 4% and 6.5% NaCl, esculin positive, ADH positive, all strains are thermoresistance, group 2 : they not ferment Inositol, Rhamnose, Saccharose, Melibiose, Amygdaline, Xylose and Ribose. Group 3: they not ferment Mannitol, Inositol, Sorbitol, Rhamnose, Saccharose, Melibiose, Amygdaline, Xylose and Ribose.
Molecular identification
Strains that were identified by MALDI-TOF MS generated mass spectra with peaks varying from one species to another. Fig 1 represent the spectra of some identified species. For each of them we have chosen an example of raw profile spectrum (F1, G1, H1, I1), the profiles of strains that were compared with those of the reference strains in the MALDI-TOF MS Biotyper database are represented as (F2, G2, H2, I2) in the form of stick spectra. The sticks of the upper part colored in green, yellow and red show the matching of the profiles of tested strains and the sticks of the lower part colored in blue refers to the profiles of the reference strains.
The results revealed a score close to and higher than 2.0. The score values found for each identified strain are detailed in the (Table 1). Among 116 strains were identified, 11 of them identified with log(score) ≥2.3, 65 with log(score) ≤2.3 and ≥2 and 40 strains with log(score) ≤2 and ≥1.7. The values found in our results are different and higher than those of the score values of the strains that were also isolated from some Algerian artisanal dairy products by
Arezki et al., (2019), who reported that among the twenty isolates identified as
Lactobacillus plantarum only four strains had scores higher than 2. On the other hand, the value of
Lactobacillus paracasei species is higher than the value found in our strain. This difference is explained by generation of spectra with bruises containing weak peaks which indicates that the colonies tested are not pures colonies or their ribosomal and membrane proteins are low. According to
Cherkaoui et al., (2010), the determination of the score value is based on three factors : the number of peaks corresponding to the tested colony, the total number of peaks in the spectra of the reference strain and the tested strain, correlation of the intensity related to similar peaks.
The identification of our isolates by the MALDI-TOF MS confirmed that they belong to the lactic acid bacteria with different species and divided into 7 groups. The first group includes the species
Lactobacillus plantarum which correspond to
Lactobacillus plantarum ssp plantarum DSM 20174T DSM,
Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 12028 DSM,
Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 2601 DSM. The strains of the second group were identified as
Lactobacillus fermentum, all strains correspond to the reference strain
Lactobacillus fermentum DSM 20391 DSM. The third and the fourth groups include only one strain correspond to
Lactobacillus paraplantarum DSM 10667T DSM and
Lactobacillus paracasei ssp paracasei DSM 2649 DSM respectively. The strains of the fifth group refer to
Lactococcus lactis ssp lactis DSM 20384 DSM,
Lactococcus lactis ssp lactis DSM 20661 DSM. The sixth group contains strains identified as
Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 7080 THL,
Enterococcus faecalis DSM 20409 DSM,
Enterococcus faecalis 20247_4 CHB, Whereas those in the seventh group belong to the reference strains
Enterococcus faecium 20218_1 CHB,
Enterococcus faecium 11037 CHB,
Enterococcus faecium DSM 2146 DSM
.
Representative strain with scores greater than 2 were grouped in the dendrograms shown in Fig 2. Then the dendrogram was performed by the standard Biotyper PCA (principal component analysis) method. The dendrogram provides the similarity relationships between strains belonging to the same species and obtained from different products, illustrated by different colours, the colours show the difference between the phylogenetic characteristics according to their protein component, strains belonging to the same colour are close and have the same characteristics. For example, the spectra of isolates belonging to the species
Lactobacillus plantarum with the numbers (2, 4, 10 and 12) colored red were closer and have identical phylogenetic characteristics to those of the other isolates in the dendrogram colored green and blue. With the separating branches connected a distance level of 0.9.
The data from the proteomic analyses of the general distribution of species showed that
Lactobacillus fermentum represents the dominant strains with a percentage of 31.04%, followed by
Enterococcus faecium (24. 14%),
Lactobacillus plantarum (21.55%) and
Enterococcus faecalis (17.24%), with the subspecies
Lactococcus lactis ssp lactis that represent 4.31% and finally the two subspecies
Lactobacillus paracasei ssp paracasei and
Lactobacillus paraplantarum with a low percentage of 0.86% (Fig 3).
Both species
Lactobacillus fermentum and
Lactobacillus plantarum were present in the five products. However
paracasei ssp paracasei, Lactobacillus paraplantarum and
Lactococcus lactis ssp lactis were found only in one type of product named “J’ben”. Interestingly, it was noted that all strains isolated from the samples of “L’ben and Raib” belong only to the genus. The strains isolated from the samples Zebda showed the existance of the genus
Enterococcus with the dominance of
Lactobacillus. However, the results of Smen samples highlighted the presence of two genera
Lactobacillus and
Enterococcus, in which
Enterococcus is quantitatively more important than
Lactobacillus (Fig 4).
In the present study the genus
Lactobacillus is quantitatively more important than the genera
Enterococcus and
Lactococcus.
Meghoufel et al., (2017) reporte the dominance of the genus
Enterococcus followed by the two genera
Leuconostoc and
Lactobacillus in traditional J’ben. Furthermore, the identification of lactic strains isolated from some dairy products by the same technique by
Arezki et al., (2019) showed the presence of the genus
Lactobacillus. To the best of our kcnowledge there is no much studies about the isolation and identification of LAB from five types « J’ben Smen, l’ben, Raib and Zebda » of Algerian artisanal dairy products collected from several regions by the MALDI-TOF technique. This technique was used to identify LAB from a Spanish artisanal cheese, showing the dominance of the genus
Lactobacillus which encompasses several species and subspecies compared to the genera
Lactococcus and
Leuconostoc (
Sánchez-Juanes et al., 2020). The identification the strains of lactic acid bacteria by the same technique isolated by
Gantzias et al., (2020) and by
Nacef et al., (2017) showed the predominance of the genus
Lactobacillus with the presence of seven species with both genus
Enterococcus and
Leuconostoc. This last one goes along with our results in terms of the two species
Lactobacillus paracasei ssp
paracasei,
Lactobacillus plantarum found in the sample “J’ben”. However,
Kanak and Yilmaz, (2019) have found that species of the genus
Enterococcus were predominant in turkey artisanal cheese.