Sensory evaluation
The biscuits prepared using stevia powder and juice were analyzed and compared with the standard formulation. To find out the acceptable formulation, the SPB and SJB were evaluated for their sensory attributes. The results of the sensory evaluation of stevia powder biscuits have presented in Table 3.
The color, flavor, taste, texture and overall acceptability were significantly different among different formulations. According to Table 3, the formulation SPB1 got the significantly highest scores for color (6.95) and flavor (6.58), indicating ‘Like moderately’; on the other hand, SPB1 received significantly lowest scores against taste (5.59), texture (5.87) and overall acceptability (5.62) indicating ‘Like slightly’. Formulation SPB9 shows the highest scores for taste (6.88), texture (6.79) and overall acceptability (6.86) that represent SPB9 as ‘Like moderately’. The sensory values for color and flavor of SPB9 was (6.10) and (6.22) respectively which reveal the formulation as ‘Like slightly’. Based on overall scores against individual sensory attributes, results indicate that formulation SPB9 has more consumers’ preferences.
The results of the sensory evaluation of stevia juice biscuits have presented in Table 4. No significant differences were found for color and flavor in the stevia juice biscuit formulations (Table 4). The highest scores for color, flavor, taste, texture and overall acceptability achieved by the SJB were 7.22 (SJB2), 7.06 (SJB10), 7.62 (SJB10), 7.31 (SJB10) and 7.22 (SJB10) respectively. The SJB10 secured 7.01 for color attribute, which means ‘Like moderately’. The highest score (7.62) secured by taste attribute reveals that the SJB formulated with 55 ml/kg flour stevia juice (SJB10) tastes ‘Like very much’, indicating all other attributes as ‘Like moderately’. Therefore, the acceptable formulation for SJB with maximum consumers’ preferences is SJB10 that contains 55 mL stevia juice in 1 kg flour (Table 4).
Principal component analysis
To overview the sensory evaluation, data were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA). The data were auto-scaled before analysis. A two component PCA model was built. From the score plot it can be seen that principal component (PC) 1, explains 75% of the variation while PC2 explains 21% of the variation. Interestingly two clusters were formed for stevia powder biscuits and stevia juice biscuits (Fig 1a). Sample with lower numbers attributed to better color properties while higher numbers attributed to better texture, taste and acceptability (Fig 1b). SPB9 and SJB10 are the two biscuits highly preferred by the panelists (Fig 1).
Based on the results of sensory evaluation, for further proximate analysis, formulation SPB9 (Table 3) and SJB10 (Table 4) were taken into consideration, and obtained results were compared with that of SB.
Proximate composition analysis
The obtained proximate composition of acceptable formulation SPB9, SJB10 and SB is presented in Fig 2.
Moisture, ash, fiber, protein, fat and carbohydrate contents were significantly (p<0.05) different among SB, SPB9 and SJB10. As shown in Fig 2, the moisture contents in SB, SPB9 and SJB10 were 3.43%, 1.61% and 4.04% respectively, which are consistent with a previous study that reported 1-5% moisture in biscuits/cookies
(Miller, 2016). The moisture content in the control sample (SB) was higher than that of SPB9 (Fig 2), which might be due to the higher moisture-binding capacity of sugar, on the other hand, SPB9 and SJB10 (Fig 2) did not contain any sugar. Since the stevia juice had 10% TSS only, it might result in excessive free water in SJB10 as compared to SB and SPB9. Previous report showed that moisture content of biscuits varies with their formulations
(Schober et al., 2003). The higher amount of ash content 1.19%, fat content 32.68%, protein conten 15.56% and fiber content 3.53% in SPB9 (Fig 2) might be induced from stevia powder prepared from the stevia leaf. Besides, the control sample (SB) did not contain any stevia component rather contained only sugar as a sweetening agent and the sugar obviously supplied no ash, fat, protein and fiber in the SB. These results are in accordance with the findings of
Yildiz and Gocmen (2021).
Shelf-life evaluation
The control and formulated biscuits (SB, SPB, SJB) packed in various packaging materials were stored at room temperature (28±2°C). The shelf life of the packaged biscuits was studied in terms of organoleptic changes and microbial proliferation (
Ranganna, 1986).
In general, hermetically sealed packages for biscuits provide longer shelf life than non-hermetically sealed packages
(Alabakan, 1997). The results of the organoleptic study have shown in Fig 3. Most of the products did not show any changes over the storage period. Slight color changes in SB were observed on day 30 stored in a zipper bag. Interestingly all the vacuum-packed biscuits showed slightly changed color on day 30. No changes were observed for flavor properties. According to Fig 3, by 30 day’s storage period at room temperature (28±2°C) the texture of SB became ‘moderately soft’ while color of all biscuits (SB, SPB9 and SJB10) turned to ‘slightly changed’ which might be due to the evaporation of free water present in biscuits inside the vacuum packs
(Heldman, 2012). Odd flavor induces in the biscuits during storage due to oxidation of fat
(Rani et al., 2020). The reason of no off flavor might be due to the antioxidative properties of stevia
(Kim et al., 2011).
Different packaging systems greatly affected the texture of the biscuits. On days 21 and 24, 27 and 30, slight changes in textural properties of SB were observed for vacuum, zipper, and aluminum foil pack, respectively. However, moderate textural change was observed for vacuum packs and zipper bags only. SB was not acceptable on day 30 packed with a vacuum pack and zipped bag. SPB9 and SJB10 did not show any changes over the storage; hence were acceptable after 30 days of storage regardless of packaging materials. Both stevia biscuits performed well in terms of textural quality, the reason could be due to lees moisture absorption in the stevia biscuits
(Araste et al., 2015). Results suggest that zipper bag, aluminium foil pack and vacuum pack was not suitable for biscuits.
Microbial evaluation
A considerable amount of microbial colony in SB was found at 24 and 27 days of storage (8.9 × 10
3, 1.4 × 10
4 and CFU/g respectively) (Fig 4). Compare to the control sample, SJB10 showed lower microbial growth in all the packaged biscuits except for aluminium foil. On day 29 and 31, most product showed a level of 1-4 × 10
4 CFU/g. However, biscuits packaged in aluminium foil showed a significant increase in microbial load (2.14 × 10
6 CFU/g). Vacuum pack however showed best results in term of microbial activity. The results provide an understanding of which formulation and packaging combination is suitable. The FAO/WHO experts reported that maximum 10
6 mesophilic aerobic bacteria per gram egg product are safe for human consumption (
Frazier and Westhoff, 2003). Therefore, based on results obtained in organoleptic assessment and microbiological evaluation, the shelf life of formulated biscuits (SPB9 and SJB10) could be extended to 30 days by hermetically packaging them in glass jar, plastic jar, tin can and vacuum pack using no added preservatives. Moreover, aseptic packaging during industrial production would increase the shelf-life of the products
(Galić et al., 2009).