The research aimed to the process standardization and quality assessment of a dietetic
lassi formulated with Barnyard millet and honey. The research progressed to standardizing the Barnyard Millet-honey blended dietetic
lassi using the selected
LAB strain, followed by rigorous sensory, physicochemical and microbial quality assessments. A techno-economic feasibility analysis, supported by product stability studies, demonstrated promising commercialization potential.
Physico-chemical analysis of raw materials
This study investigates the physico-chemical properties of milk, barnyard millet and honey, key ingredients in a nutritious
lassi formulation Table 1. Milk, with its high moisture content (86.60%) and significant caloric value (68.82 kcal), provides essential hydration and energy, containing 3.49% fat, 2.42% protein, 0.65% ash and 6.93% carbohydrates, aligning with previous research by
Ghule (2015) and
Jadhav (2002). Barnyard millet, noted for its low moisture (12.21%) and high fiber content (8.25%), supports digestive health and offers a robust nutritional profile with 3.25% ash, 6.85% protein, 4.21% fat and 73.50% carbohydrates, contributing 359.29 kcal, consistent with
Ugare et al., (2014).
Honey stands out with its low fat (0.26%) and protein (0.62%) levels but high carbohydrate content (82.83%) and substantial caloric value (336.17 kcal), enhanced by significant reducing sugars (54.65 mg/100 g) and ascorbic acid (19.65 mg/100 g), boosting its antioxidant properties. The total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of milk (4.97 and 3.45 mg/100 g, respectively), barnyard millet (22.63 and 48.31 mg/100 g) and honey (120.89 and 30.91 mg/100 g) underscore the combined nutritional and health benefits of these ingredients, particularly showing honey’s role in enhancing the
lassi’s nutritional value.
Standardization of Barnyard millet-honey blend of dietetic lassi
In the context of this study, sensory evaluation was conducted to evaluate the sensory characteristics of dietetic
lassi formulations containing different concentrations of barnyard millet and honey Fig 2. The study standardized the curd-to-barnyard millet ratio in dietetic
lassi, using samples with 0, 5, 7.5 and 10% barnyard millet, respectively. On the basis of sensory evaluation (Fig 2a), treatment B
2 (7.5% barnyard millet) secured the highest scores for colour (8.19), texture (8.19), flavour (7.97), mouthfeel (8.08) and overall acceptability (7.97). Thus, B2 was selected for further research due to its superior sensory profile. These findings align with previous studies by
Pardhi et al., (2014) and
Das (2015).
The standardized barnyard millet
lassi (B2-7.5%) was added with different levels of honey (0, 5, 7.5, 10 and 12.5%) for further standardization using sensory evaluation (Fig 2b). Sensory evaluation revealed that B
2H
2 (7.5% honey) had the highest scores for colour (8.33), texture (8.22) and overall acceptability (7.9), indicating optimal sensory performance. Comparatively, other samples showed good but slightly lower overall sensory performance compared to B
2H
2. The results were found consistent with literature
(Riazi et al., 2012 and
Ghadge et al., 2008).
The comparative sensory analysis of selected
lassi formulations B
0, B
2 and B
2H
2 revealed distinct profiles (Fig 2 c). B0 scored 8.2 for colour, 7.7 for flavour, 7.85 for texture, 7.65 for taste, 7.95 for mouthfeel and 8.03 for overall acceptability. B
2 had scores of 7.9 for colour, 7.9 for flavour, 7.85 for texture, 7.75 for taste, 7.95 for mouthfeel and 7.94 for overall acceptability. B
2H
2 achieved the highest scores with 8 for colour, 8.1 for flavour, 8.25 for texture, 8.15 for taste, 8.22 for mouthfeel and 8.01 for overall acceptability. These results indicate that B
2H
2 is superior in flavour, texture and overall acceptability.
Physico-chemical and microbial analysis of fresh lassi
The physicochemical and microbial analysis of selected
lassi variants B0, B2 and B2H2 revealed significant compositional differences Table 2. It is clearly seen that addition of Barnyard millet and replacement of sugar with honey caused significant decrease in TSS (15.03 to 12.50oBx), acidity (0.88 to 0.76%), carbohydrates (14.77 to 11.93%), calories (101.37 to 90.99Kcal), whereas significant increase in pH (3.81 to 4.93), proteins (2.52 to 2.92%), fibres (0.08 to 0.67%), ash (0.67 to 0.89%), total solids (21.47 to 22.26%), viscosity (337.33 to 343.25 cP), reducing sugars (4.12 to 8.19 mg/100 g), total phenolics (6.07 to 15.72 mgGAE/100 g) and anti-oxidant activity (4.65 to 9.36 mg/100 g). There was non-significant effect on fat content. B2H2 uniquely contained detectable ascorbic acid (1.45 mg/100 g) due to presence of honey. Similar results were reported in the literature
(Shuwu et al., 2011; Pardhi et al., 2014; Khupse et al., 2017). The results also indicated significant increase in total viable count of
lassi samples (8.25 to 8.45 log cfu/ml) suggesting that barnyard millet and honey influenced microbial growth. Yeast, mold and coliform counts were not detected in any samples, indicating no fungal or faecal bacteria contamination. These findings align with previous studies by
Chick et al., (2001); Krishna et al., (2019); Patel et al., (2020).
Shelf-life study of dietetic lassi
The shelf-life study of dietetic
lassi focused on monitoring its quality and stability over time, examining critical parameters during refrigerated storage (5±2
oC) in conjugation with effectiveness of packaging materials
viz. glass bottles, PET bottles and LDPE pouches.
Change in sensory analysis during storage
During the shelf-life study of dietetic
lassi, sensory properties were analyzed and shown in Table 3. There was a significant decline in the scores of samples for all the sensory parameters under acceptable limits like colour (8.50 to 6.50), flavour (8.70 to 6.80), texture (8.00 to 6.00), taste (8.60 to 6.40) and overall acceptability (8.45 to 6.53). Spoilage of
lassi samples packed in LDPE pouches was observed indicating less efficiency of package. Among the other samples,
lassi stored in glass bottles showed better retention of overall sensory scores (7.13) compared to that of PET bottles (6.53) indicating high efficiency of the package to store
lassi under acceptable condition up to 15 days. These findings found to be consistent with previous studies by
Patidar and Prajapati (1998);
Satkar et al., (2013); Kulthe et al., (2018a) and
Ahuja et al., (2017) who reported similar impact of both storage conditions and packaging materials on sensory quality of product during storage.
Physico-chemical analysis of dietetic lassi during storage
During the shelf-life study of dietetic
lassi, TSS, acidity, pH and consistency were monitored shown in Table 3. Initially, the TSS of the
lassi at day 0 was 12.50
oBx but decreased notably during storage in glass bottles (10.75
oBx), PET bottles (9.75
oBx) and LDPE pouches (10.75
oBx before spoilage occurred). This reduction in TSS reflects the consumption of sugars, likely due to microbial fermentation (
Ding and Shah, 2008). There was significant increase in acidity of samples (0.76 to 1.18%) with decrease in pH (4.93 to 3.53) across all packaging types, indicative of ongoing fermentation and the production of lactic acid and other organic acids (
Patidar and Prajapati, 1998 and
Bagal et al., 2007). Moreover, consistency increased during storage, indicating changes in the physical properties of the
lassi, likely influenced by the conversion of lactose to lactic acid and subsequent protein denaturation, as noted by
Amrinder (2018) in a similar context with aloe vera juice incorporated
lassi.
Microbial analysis of dietetic lassi during storage
During the shelf-life study of dietetic
lassi, microbial analysis revealed significant changes in the total viable count (TVC) and yeast and mold counts Table 3. Initially, the TVC was 8.40 log cfu/ml but over 15 days, decreased slightly in glass bottles (8.09 log cfu/ml), with more significant reduction in PET bottles (7.73 log cfu/ml) and LDPE pouches (7.98 log cfu/ml). Yeast and mold count initially was not detected but appeared in LDPE pouches (1.87 log cfu/ml) at 5 days, indicating higher susceptibility to contamination compared to that at 15 days in glass bottles (1.62 log cfu/ml) and PET bottles (1.75 log cfu/ml). Similar results were reported in the literature.
Patel et al., (2020) reported a decrease in TVC in amaranthus flour incorporated
lassi.
Sharma et al., (2016) reported an increase in yeast and mold count during the storage period of synbiotic
lassi containing honey, with a significant decrease in
LAB during storage.