Sensory profile of piperine and curcumin co fortified paneer
The sensory evaluation of fortified paneer at different concentrations of piperine and curcumin extract was carried out in comparison to control (Paneer without piperine and curcumin) sample. The rubric for sensory evaluation comprised of colour, appearance, flavour, texture, mouth feeland overall acceptability parameters. The semi trained panel set-up at MIT School of Food Technology assessed the quality parameters of developed test samples (S0, S1, S2 and S3) on hedonic scale of 9-points. The average scores for the samples are represented in graphical format in Fig 2.
For treatments S0, S1, S2 and S3, the corresponding color and appearance scores were 8.40, 8.30, 7.90 and 7.00, respectively. S1 had the highest score against other treated samples. The paneer sample’s flavor score for treatments S0, S1, S2 and S3 were, in that order, 8.50, 8.70, 7.70 and 7.30. The paneer with 0.3% Piperine and 0.3% Curcumin received the highest score of 8.70 against rest of treated samples. The same trend recorded by
Mishra et al., (2021) for the addition of black pepper extract. The highest scores were recorded by sample S1 for the texture as compared to other piperine and curcumin treated sample.
Control S0 and treatment S1 received the highest overall acceptance scores, 8.70 and 8.40, respectively. (0.3% Piperine and 0.3% Curcumin) against other samples. Hence, 0.3% level of each piperine and curcumin was recorded to be best level for co fortification in paneer with highest overall acceptability.
Nutritional composition of fortified paneer with piperene and curcumin
Piperine and Curcumin co fortified Paneer analyzed for selective nutritional proximate parameter and results depicted in Table 1 indicated nutritional upgradation of paneer.
It was discovered that the moisture level of paneer for treatments S0 and S1 was 51.59% and 52.27, respectively. With the addition of various combinations of piperine and powdered curcumin, the moisture content of paneer reduces. The treatment S1 was discovered to be better than and comparable to S0 (the control). The values are in good agreement with
Eresam et al., (2015). The fat percentages of the treated paneer (S1) and control (S0) are, respectively, 22.40 and 23.80. The decreasing trend was observed in fat in piperine curcumin treated sample. The lipid level of paneer dropped from 27.77 per cent according to
Buch et al., (2012), who made the paneer by adding turmeric powder as a preservative.
As piperine and curcumin powder were combined at varying levels, the resulting paneer’s protein content increased. For treatments S0 and S1, respectively, the generated product’s protein content varied from 15.30 to 16.10. S0 (15.30) has the lowest protein content while S1 (16.10) has the highest. A higher proportion of varying quantities of piperine and curcumin powder resulted in a lower final product’s carbohydrate content. Regarding carbohydrate, the average values for treatments S0 and S1 were 4.48 and 5.73 correspondingly. The more or less similar values were recorded by to
Singh et al., (2018) and
Mhatre (2018) for paneer with different spices.
Chemical analysis of piperine and curcumin co-fortified paneer
Chemical parameters of piperine and curcumin fortified samples are presented in Table 2.
The percentage of acidity in paneer made using varying combinations of piperine and curcumin powder treatment was found to be 0.46, 0.38, 0.31and 0.29 for S0, S1, S2 and S3 accordingly. S0 had the greatest acidity percentage (0.46%), while S3 had the lowest (0.29%). Each treatment was very different from the others. The decreasing trend of acidity was observed with increasing level of piperine and curcumin level. The similar trend was recorded by by
Buch et al., (2012). The rise in values of pH from 4.80 to 5.59 was recorded with increase in co fortification level of piperine and curcumin in paneer. The similar result was recorded by
Khobragade et al., (2020a).
Effect of piperine and curcumin co-fortification on antioxidant activity of Paneer
Antioxidant activity as one of the functional attributes of paneer was assessed and the effect of incorporation of bioactive compounds (Piperine and curcumin) on paneer is presented graphically in Fig 3.
Curcumin and piperine are well recognized as an antioxidants. The value of S0 9.59% was found to be the lowest antioxidant percentage and S3 45.58% to be the highest. As piperine and curcumin extract powder were fortified from 0% to 0.50%, rising trends were seen. This trend suggests that higher levels of fortification with piperine and curcumin extract powder result in significantly enhanced antioxidant activity in paneer. Antioxidants like piperine and curcumin are known for their ability to neutralize free radicals, which can contribute to various health benefits, including reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. Therefore, increasing the fortification level appears to be an effective strategy to enhance the antioxidant properties of paneer. The similar rise in antioxidant activity in cheese with addition of spice powder was recorded by
Arkan et al., (2024).
Shelf life assessment piperine and curcumin co fortified paneer
The shelf life of a product denotes its capacity to remain viable for a specific duration without compromising its quality. This storage duration also reflects the product’s market viability. Presently, consumer preferences lean towards foods devoid of chemical preservatives due to concerns over potential toxicity. There’s a growing insistence on food items with extended shelf lives and minimal risk of causing foodborne illnesses. Additionally, there’s a rising demand for foods enriched with natural ingredients. Responding to these consumer demands, the food industry is increasingly exploring natural alternatives to synthetic antimicrobial compounds. Spices present a compelling option for enhancing food safety. Renowned for their medicinal, preservativeand antioxidant attributes, spices not only add flavor but also extend the shelf life of food. Some spices exhibit bacteriostatic or bactericidal properties, effectively inhibiting bacterial growth, while others prevent food from turning rancid through their antioxidant effects.
The standardized and overall acceptable level of piperine and curcumin co fortification was recorded as 0.3% each. Hence, standardized finished paneer along with control sample was evaluated for shelf life at refrigerated temperature (4±1
oC) using Polyvinylidene dichloride as packaging material. The co fortified paneer was analyzed for Physico-chemical (Titrable acidity, pH and Antioxidant) and microbial yeast-mold, Colliform count and total plate count.
Effect of refrigerated storage on titrable acidity and pH of co-fortified paneer
The standardized piperine and curcumin cofortified paneer was subjected to shelf life study. The acidity values were determined during storage study and graphically represented in Fig 4. Both the co-fortified and control paneer’s acidity rose when they were kept in a refrigerator. For control paneer, acidity increased from 0.46 to 1.9% lactic acidin 15 days, while for co-fortified paneer, 0.38 to 1.09% lactic acid in 15 days. An increase in paneer’s titratable acidity was a sign that lactose-fermenting bacteria had caused bacterial deterioration. Compared to control paneer, co fortified paneer developed its acidity at a slower rate. The similar increasing trend was recorded by
Sachdeva and Singh (1990).
As shown in Fig 5, the pH values of the piperine and curcumin-fortified paneer (S1) and the control paneer (S0) were 4.80 and 6.20, respectively. The graph showed that after the paneer was refrigerated, the pH of both the control and fortified paneer dropped. In 15 days, the pH of the control paneer (S0) dropped from 4.80 to 3.89, while for the co-fortified paneer, it went from 6.20 to 5.80. The pH of paneer samples was also found to drop after storage, according to
Arora and Gupta (1980).
Effect of refrigerated temperature on antioxidant activity of co-fortified paneer during storage
The study evaluated the antioxidant activity of control paneer (S0) and co-fortified paneer (S1) with piperine and curcumin extract powder over 15 days presented graphically in Fig 6, revealing significant differences. Initially, the control paneer exhibited an antioxidant activity of 9.59±0.5%, which gradually declined to 7.26±0.08%, while the co-fortified paneer started at 31.19±0.45% and decreased to 28.03± 0.51%. Despite the decrease, the antioxidant activity in the co-fortified paneer remained substantially higher than in the control throughout the study period. This suggests that fortification not only boosts initial antioxidant levels but also provides a more sustained antioxidant effect over time, potentially enhancing both the nutritional quality and shelf life of paneer.
Microbial parameter assessment of co-fortified paneer during storage
The microbial parameters (Standard plate count, yeast and mould and coliform count) were assessed during storage study to establish shelf life of standardized piperine curcumin co-fortified paneer and presented in Table 3 . The increase in standard count, yeast and mould count was recorded during 15 days duration at refrigerated temperature in both control and standardized samples. The all counts were found to be within prescribed limits of FSSAI (Standard Plate count- 35 x 10
4, Yeast and mold count-1 x 10
2 CFU/g, Coliform count-1 x 10
2 CFU per g). It is observed that piperine curcumin co-fortified standardized paneer exhibited slower rate of growth of microorganism compared to control sample. This may be attributed to antimicrobial activities of both bioactive compounds in paneer. The similar trend was recorded by
Jyoti et al., (2022) for paneer spread incorporated with ginger and garlic.
Sensory evaluation of co-fortified paneer during storage
The sensory evaluation of the piperine and curcumin co-fortified paneer during storage from 0 to 15
th Days is presented in Table 4. The decline in the sensory score was recorded as days advanced but found to be acceptable at the end of 15
th day.