Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

  • Chief EditorHarjinder Singh

  • Print ISSN 0971-4456

  • Online ISSN 0976-0563

  • NAAS Rating 5.44

  • SJR 0.151

Frequency :
Bi-Monthly (February, April, June, August, October & December)
Indexing Services :
Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Screening of Oxytetracycline and Tetracycline Residues in Pork Marketed in Guwahati City and its Adjoining Areas and Confirmation by Ultra-fast Liquid Chromatography-UV/Vis

Param Debbarma1,*, Saurabh Kumar Laskar2, Ankur Das2, Sadhana Choudhury2, Santosh Upadhyay3, Nagendra Nath Barman4, Dhruba Jyoti Kalita5
1Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, R.K. Nagar, West Tripura-799 008, Tripura, India.
2Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati-781 001, Assam, India.
3AICRP on Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati-781 001, Assam, India.
4Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati- 781 001, Assam, India.
5Department of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati-781 001, Assam, India.

Background: The use of antimicrobial agents in livestock production is inevitable and helpful in majority of their applications. However, their indiscriminate frequency of use has resulted in the deposition of antimicrobial residues in animal products and when that exceeds the maximum residue limits (MRLs) beyond permissible daily consumption put human health at risk. The present study aimed to detect Oxytetracycline and Tetracycline residues in the most popular meat (pork) marketed in and around Guwahati City (Kamrup Metropolitan) and its adjoining areas.

Methods: The preliminary screening of the antimicrobial residues in 261 pork samples was carried out by microbial inhibition assay using endospores of Bacillus subtilis MTCC 441 as test organism. A total of 80 pork samples were further screened by Ultra-Fast Liquid Chromatography system-UV/Vis (Model: Shimadzu Prominence LC-20AD, Detector- SPD-20A-UV/Vis; RP C18 Column: BDS Premium, 250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 mm) to detect Oxytetracycline and Tetracycline residues.

Result: The preliminary screening revealed that none of the samples were positive for antimicrobial residues except 3 (three) which were doubtful to have traces of antimicrobial residues. On further screening, Oxytetracycline residues were detected in 2.5% of the samples, while none of the samples detected Tetracycline residue. The concentrations of the residues were 0.471 mg/g and 0.610 mg/g, respectively, which is well above the MRL value recommended by Codex Alimentarius. However, considering the detection of 2.5% Oxytetracycline residues and the absence of Tetracycline residue, it can be concluded that these antimicrobial compounds are not frequently misused in pig husbandry practices in these areas under study.

There are 3.9 million pigs in the North Eastern Region (NER) of India out of 9.06 million in the nation overall, of which, Assam alone hosts over 2.1 million pig population (20th Livestock Census, 2019, DAHD, GOI). It is well recognized in the country that people of the NER have a strong preference for foods of animal origin. Among the meat of different species, pork is the most commonly consumed meat in the region (Mahajan et al., 2015). This preferential choice for pork by the indigenous people of NER is perhaps due to their close relationship with the Mongoloid people of neighbouring countries where pork is mostly preferred. Thus, pig husbandry is becoming a popular livelihood option for the majority tribal population of NER of India. The rearing system of pigs is mostly backyard and scavenging type, with one or a few pigs per family. In recent times, people have started practicing intensive/semi-intensive farming of pigs. Thus, to control disease outbreaks, the routine use of antimicrobial agents has become an integral part of the livestock production system in the region.
       
The use of antimicrobial agents in livestock production is helpful in the majority of their applications. However, their indiscriminate frequency of use has resulted in the deposition of antimicrobial residues in animal products and when that exceeds the maximum residue limits (MRLs) beyond permissible daily consumption put human health at risk (Samanidou and Nisyriou, 2008; WHO, 2014). Food allergy and toxicity are the direct effects of antimicrobial residue throughout the food chain (Beyene, 2016; Samanidou and Nisyriou, 2008). The long-term negative impacts on human health include an increased chance of teratogenicity, carcinogenicity and disturbance in the normal microbiota of the gut (Beyene, 2016; WHO, 2014). Other issues caused by the antimicrobial residue include the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, drug abuse and reproductive issues (Samanidou and Nisyriou, 2008; Timothy et al., 2012; Hassan et al., 2014; Beyene, 2016). The emergence of antimicrobial resistance microorganisms has reduced antibiotics’ therapeutic efficacy, increasing death, morbidity and economic losses globally (Roberts et al., 2009). Currently, at least 700,000 people worldwide die yearly due to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that without new and improved treatments, this number might increase to 10 million by 2050, emphasizing a health issue that is not of secondary importance. Because of inadequate detection capabilities and insufficient residue control mechanisms, developing nations are more likely to have residues in foods originating from animals (Patel et al., 2022).
       
In recent years, antibiotic residues in meat, among other antimicrobial residues have become a growing concern in India (Waghamare et al., 2020). Kumar et al., (2020), reported that Oxytetracycline is the preferred choice of antimicrobial for the treatment of pig diseases and is also used as a growth promoter in different pig farms of NER of India. Similarly, several authors reported the detection of Tetracycline group of drugs residues in pork sold in different markets of North-eastern states of India posing serious health concerns to the consumers (Roy and Gogoi, 2014; Gogoi and Roy, 2017; Gogoi et al., 2017 and Roy et al., 2019). Guwahati city in Assam state is one of the fastest growing cities in India and the largest metropolis and commercial centre of the North- eastern region of India which is home to nearly 1.0 million human populations (15th Indian Census, MHA, GOI). Hence, the present study was undertaken to monitor the current status of Oxytetracycline and Tetracycline residues in one of the most popular meats (pork) marketed in and around Guwahati city under Kamrup metropolitan district of Assam state and its adjoining areas.
Location and period of the experiment
 
The experiment was conducted in the laboratory of All India Coordinated Research Project (AICRP) on Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology (PHET), Department of Livestock Products Technology, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam for a period of 18 months w.e.f., April, 2021 to September, 2022.
 
Sources and collection of samples
 
Two hundred and sixty-one pork samples were randomly collected from 3 districts of Assam (Kamrup Metropolitan, Kamrup Rural and Morigaon) and 1 district of Meghalaya (Ri-Bhoi). Each sample were collected aseptically in a separate sterile plastic bag and transported under the chilled condition to the laboratory of the AICRP on Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, Department of Livestock Products Technology, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam and stored thereafter at -20°C, until used for analysis.
 
Bacterial culture
 
The bacterial strain used in the present study was a pure freeze-dried culture of Bacillus subtilis MTCC 441 procured from Microbial Type Culture Collection and Gene Bank (MTCC), CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh. The bacterial culture was activated in sterile nutrient broth and sub-cultured 3-times before use. The culture was stored at 4°C, until further use.
 
Instrumentation
 
The UFLC system (Model: Shimadzu Prominence LC-20AD, Detector-SPD-20A-UV/Vis) equipped with RP C18 Column (BDS Premium, 250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 mm) was used for the study. A mobile phase of 0.01M Oxalic acid: Acetonitrile: Methanol (77:18: 5, v/v/v) at pH 2.0 was used. The flow rate was kept at 1.0 ml/min in an isocratic mode. The wavelength for the detector was set at 350 nm. The injection volume was 20 ml and the column thermostat was set at 35°C.
 
Bacteriological media, chemicals and reagents
 
Muller Hinton Agar, Nutrient Agar, Nutrient broth, Gentamicin disc (GEN), Oxytetracycline Dihydrate, Tetracycline Hydrochloride used in the study were procured from Hi-Media while, Acetonitrile, Methanol and HPLC Grade Water were from Qualigens. For analysis, 0.01 M oxalic acid (pH 1.6) and 0.1 M citric acid buffer were prepared in HPLC Grade Water, while, 0.01 M methanolic oxalic acid (pH 1.86) was prepared in methanol. 0.1 M EDTA-McIlvaine buffer was prepared by dissolving Di-sodium hydrogen phosphate (13.72 g), EDTA (32.62 g) and anhydrous citric acid (13.62 g) in 1000 ml of HPLC Grade Water and the pH was adjusted to 4.0 with extra citric acid solution. All these freshly prepared buffer solutions are filtered through 0.22 μm cellulose filter and were stored at 4°C until used.
 
Preparation of standard solutions
 
Stock solutions of the standard were prepared separately by dissolving 10 mg of the individual standard in 10 ml methanol (1000 mg/ml) and kept in amber coloured volumetric flask. A standard working solution of 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 and 0.1 mg/ml was prepared separately by diluting the stock solution with methanol. As it is unstable at room temperature, so the standard solutions are prepared daily and stored at 4°C.
 
Preliminary screening of antimicrobial residues in pork
 
The preliminary screening of the antimicrobial residues in pork samples was performed as per the method developed by Wasch et al., (1998) with slight modifications.
 
Harvesting and preparation of bacterial spore suspension
 
A heavy inoculum of Bacillus subtilis MTCC 441 was streaked over a freshly prepared sterile nutrient agar plate. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 10 days to induce sporulation. After completion of the incubation period, colonies were collected in a 15 ml sterile centrifuge tube and the volume was adjusted up to 10 ml with normal saline. The tube was then heated in a water bath at 70°C for 10 minutes to destroy the vegetative cells. The heated suspension was thereafter centrifuged for 10 minutes at a speed of 3000 rpm and the transparent supernatant was discarded. An additional 10 ml of sterile normal saline was added to produce a pure suspension of endospores and the same procedure was repeated twice. Suspension turbidity was adjusted to match with 0.5 McFarland standard solution (»1.5 x 108 CFU/ml) before use.
 
Preparation of the test plates
 
Muller-Hinton agar was prepared in a conical flask and sterilized by autoclaving at 15 psi for 15 minutes. After cooling to around 45°C, 0.1 ml inoculum of spore suspension (»1.5 x 108 CFU/ml) was added to each of 100 ml agar. About 15-20 ml of the molten agar were put into sterile petri dishes and allowed to cool. Plates were either used on the same day of preparation or were kept at 4°C and used within a week.
 
Detection of antimicrobial residues in pork samples
 
The sampling of meat was done in frozen condition and disk-shaped slices of 8 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness were prepared. Two disks of a meat sample were placed on opposite ends of inoculated plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Development of a transparent/clear zone/ ring ³2 mm was considered positive. However, a zone of 1-2 mm was considered doubtful and a zone <1 mm was considered as negative. The area of the inhibition zone was calculated as pr2. The mean areas of both inhibition zones were calculated.
 
Confirmation of antimicrobial residues in pork samples by ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UFLC)
 
Detection of Oxytetracycline and Tetracycline residues in pork samples were carried out by UFLC system (UFLC: Shimadzu Prominence LC-20AD, Detector-SPD-20A (UV/Vis; RP C18 Column: BDS Premium, 250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 mm) as per the method described by Biswas et al., (2007) with slight modifications.
 
Sample preparation
 
The stored frozen meat samples were thawed and on removing the fascia and exterior fat, it was finely diced with scissors. Each sample was grounded into a fine paste using a pestle and mortar. The representative sample (10 g) was collected in a beaker and homogenized with an equal amount of HPLC grade water for 1.5 minutes in a tissue homogenizer at 7500 rpm.
 
Extraction, clean-up, filtration and analysis of the samples
 
Five grams of the representative meat sample was transferred in a beaker. It was carefully mixed with 3 ml of 0.1 M EDTA McIlvaine buffer (pH 4.0). The sample was then ultrasonicated by setting the amplitude at 20 microns for 15 cycles with a stop time of 30 seconds by maintaining a low temperature using crushed ice. To allow the extract to dissolve in the solvent, the sonicated sample was left undisturbed for 15 minutes. The sample was then transferred to a centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 0°C for 15 minutes. The recovered supernatant was then filtered using Whatman filter paper no. 42. The filtrate was subsequently run through a C18 cartridge that had been pre-conditioned with 3 ml methanol and 3 ml water, eluted with 4.5 ml of 0.01 M Methanolic oxalic acid (pH 1.80) and then further filtered using 0.22 μm filter paper before being collected in a 2 ml HPLC autosampler vial. An aliquot of 20 ml was then injected into the UFLC system to analyse the residues.
Preliminary screening of antimicrobial residues in pork samples
 
A total of 261 pork samples collected from 3 districts of Assam and 1 district of Meghalaya were preliminary screened by microbial inhibition technique using Bacillus subtilis MTCC 441 as a test organism to detect antimicrobial residues in the pork samples. The result of the preliminary screening is presented in Table 1 and the graphical presentation in Fig 1. The screening test revealed that none of the pork samples have antimicrobial residue which could inhibit the growth of the test organism, except 3 samples (1 from Kamrup rural and 2 others from Ri-Bhoi district) which were doubtful to have traces of antimicrobial residues.

Table 1: Preliminary screening of antimicrobial residues in pork samples.



Fig 1: Inhibition zone (diameter<2 mm) of antimicrobial residues in doubtful pork sample.


       
The result of the present study was in the line of Wasch et al. (1998) who reported the detection of antimicrobial residues by microbial inhibition assay. The microbial inhibition assay or agar diffusion technique is a cheap screening method to detect antimicrobial residues when large numbers of samples are to be covered. They are essentially a qualitative screening test that detects any tissues/substance with the property of bacterial inhibition. But this method is less sensitive as it could not provide a clear zone of inhibition in 3 doubtful samples which agree with the observation of Javadi et al., (2011).
 
Detection of antimicrobial residues by Ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UFLC)
 
All the 80 pork samples collected from 3 districts of Assam (Kamrup metropolitan, Kamrup rural and Morigaon) and 1 district (Ri-Bhoi) of Meghalaya were screened by UFLC system to detect Oxytetracycline (OTC) and Tetracycline (TTC). All the positive samples were compared with recommended MRL values of Codex Alimentarius.
 
Detection of oxytetracycline (OTC) residues
 
The samples were screened by UFLC technique to detect OTC residues in pork. The result of the screening test by UFLC system is presented in Table 2 and the graphical representation in Fig 2. Out of 80 pork samples, 2 samples (2.5%) were positive for OTC residues. The concentrations of OTC residues in the positive samples were 0.471 μg/g and 0.610 mg/g, respectively and well above the MRL value recommended by Codex Alimentarius.

Table 2: Detection of oxytetracycline (OTC) and tetracycline (TTC) residues in pork samples by UFLC/Vis.



Fig 2: Chromatogram of oxytetracycline (OTC) residue in pork sample.


       
The use of OTC antibiotic in pig husbandry practices of the North-Eastern states of India was reported by Kumar et al., (2020). They reported that OTC is the most preferred choice of antibiotic for the treatment of pig diseases and also used as a growth promoter in different pig farms of the 3 North-Eastern states of India.
       
As in the present studies, Wasch et al., (1998) reported the detection of OTC residue in 0.38% of pork samples. Roy et al., (2019) also reported OTC residues in 2.32% of pork samples collected from various locations of Assam and the concentration of OTC residues in 2 pork samples was well above the MRL values recommended by Codex Alimentarius which is in close agreement with the results of the present studies. The obtaining of OTC residues well above the MRL values in the positive samples might be related to the administration of OTC prior to the slaughter of pigs i.e., enough time for excretion of residues was not available and thus their flesh had recorded high OTC residues.
 
Detection of tetracycline (TTC) residues
 
The procured pork samples were screened by the UFLC technique to detect TTC residues in pork. The result of the screening test (UFLC system) is presented in Table 2. It was revealed that none of the pork samples was detected positive for TTC residues.
       
Contrary to the present findings, Roy and Gogoi (2014) reported the detection of TTC residue in 2% of pork samples which were collected from different roadside pork stalls of various locations in Assam. Likewise, Nheim et al., (2006) also reported the detection of TTC residue in 5.5% of pork samples in Hanoi, Vietnam.
       
A survey report by Kumar et al., (2020) however stated that TTC is not a choice of antibiotic neither for treating diseases in pigs nor as a growth promoter in pig farms of North-East India, which indirectly supports the results obtained of the present study.
Based on the results obtained in the study, it can be concluded that the presence of Oxytetracycline and Tetracycline residues in pork marketed in Guwahati city and its adjoining areas till date are reasonably good considering the detection of 2.5% Oxytetracycline residues and absence of Tetracycline residues in the present findings indicates that the antimicrobials are not frequently misused in pig husbandry practices in these four districts under study, however, studies with larger sample size involving samples from different markets of the districts would be more desirable to validate the present findings.
The authors acknowledge the support of the All India Coordinated Research Project on Post Harvest Engineering and Technology, Khanapara, Guwahati for providing laboratory facilities to carry out the research work.

Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All animal procedures for experiments were approved by the Committee of Experimental Animal care and handling techniques were approved by the University of Animal Care Committee.
The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

  1. 15th Indian Census. (2011). Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India.

  2. 20th Livestock Census. (2019). Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Govt. of India. 

  3. Beyene, T. (2016). Veterinary drug residues in food-animal products: Its risk factors and potential effects on public health. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology. 7(1): 1-7.

  4. Biswas, A.K., Rao, G.S., Kondaiah, N., Anjaneyulu, A.S.R., Mendiratta, S.K., Prasad, R. and Malik, J.K. (2007). A simple multi- residue method for determination of oxytetracycline, tetracycline and chlortetracycline in export buffalo meat by HPLC-Photodiode array detector. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 15(3): 278-284.

  5. Gogoi, R. and Roy, D.C. (2017). UHPLC detection of OTC residues in swine tissues. The Pharma Innovation. 6(2): 97-99.

  6. Gogoi, R., Roy, D.C. and Sinha, S. (2017). Determination of chlortetracycline residues in swine tissues using high performance liquid chromatography. The Pharma Innovation. 6(3): 34-36.

  7. Hassan, M.M., Amin, K.B., Ahaduzzaman, M., Alam, M., Faruk, M.S. and Uddin, I. (2014). Antimicrobial resistance pattern against E. coli and Salmonella in layer poultry, Research Journal for Veterinary Practitioners. 2: 30-35.

  8. Javadi, A., Mirzaie, H. and Khatibi, S.A. (2011). Effect of roasting, boiling and microwaving cooking methods on enrofloxacin residues in edible tissues of broiler. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 5(2): 214-218.

  9. Kumar, S., Bharati, J., Yadav, A.K., Pegu, S.R., Doley, J., Paul, S., Das, B.C., Mohan, N.H. and Deb, R. (2020). Pattern of antibiotics use in pigs of North Eastern India. Indian Journal of Animal Health. 59(1): 50-54.

  10. Mahajan, S., Papang, J.S. and Datta, K.K. (2015). Meat consumption in North- East India: Pattern, Opportunities and Implications. Journal of Animal Research. 5(1): 37-45.

  11. Nheim, D.V., Paulsen, P., Suriyasathanoporn, W., Smulders, F.J.M., Kyule, M.N., Baumann M.P.O., Zessin, K.H. and Ngan, P.H. (2006). Preliminary analysis of tetracycline residues in marketed pork in Hanoi, Vietnam. Issue impact of emerging zoonotic diseases on animal health: 8th Biennial Conference of the Society for Tropical Veterinary Medicine. 1081: 534-542.

  12. Patel, N.M., Kumar, R., Savalia, C.V. and Kalyani, I.H. (2022). Public health risk assessment of fluoroquinolones, gentamicin and tetracycline residues in bovine milk of Peri-urban Area of Surat and Navsari of South Gujarat, India. Agricultural Reviews. 43(4): 505-510. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2335.

  13. Roberts, R.R., Hota, B., Ahmad, I., Scott, R.D., Foster, S.D., Abbasi, F., Schabowski, S., Kampe, L.M., Ciavarella, G.G., Supino, M. and Naples, J. (2009). Hospital and societal costs of antimicrobial-resistant infections in a Chicago teaching hospital: implications for antibiotic stewardship. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 49: 1175-1184.

  14. Roy, D.C. and Gogoi, R. (2014). HPLC and spectrophotometric analysis of tetracycline residues in marketed pork of Assam. Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research. 43(2): 98-103.

  15. Roy, D.C., Kafle, A., Laskar, S.K. and Roy, R.K. (2019). Residual analysis of oxytetracycline in marketed pork of North- East India. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 8(1): 953-957.

  16. Samanidou, V. and Nisyriou, S. (2008). Multiresidue methods for confirmatory determination of antibiotics in milk. Journal of Separation Science. 31(11): 2068-2090.

  17. Timothy, F.L., Cohen, B., Thomas, E., Elaine, W., Larson, L. (2012). A review of antibiotic use in food animals: Perspective, policy and potential. Public Health Reports. 127(1): 4-22.

  18. Waghamare, R.N., Paturkar, A.M., Vaidya, V.M., Zende, R.J., Kumar, A. and Bedi, J.S. (2020). Screening of antimicrobial residues and confirmation of doxycycline in samples collected from chicken farms and processing units located around Mumbai, India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 54(11): 1415- 1421. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3899.

  19. Wasch, K.D., Okerman, L., Brabander, H.D., Van Hoof, J., Croubels, S. and Backer, P.D. (1998). Detection of residues of tetracycline antibiotics in pork and chicken meat: correlation between results of screening and confirmatory tests. Analyst. 123(12): 2737-2741.

  20. World Health Organization. (2014). Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residue in food. Technical Report Series. 988: 7-32.

Editorial Board

View all (0)