Comparative Study on Uttarakhand’s Indigenous Black Soybean Variety (Bhat) for Tofu Production

Madhuri Popat Dukare1, Sweta Rai1, Sabbu Sangeeta1, Preethi Ramachandran1,*, Poonam Yadav1, Santoshi Rawat1, Arun Prakash 1, Riya Joshi1
1Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Agriculture, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, Uttarakhand, India.

Background: Tofu is increasingly captivating the food industry as a milk-based product alternative. Diverse soybean varieties worldwide are harnessed to create various milk substitutes. This study assesses the potential of Uttarakhand’s indigenous bhat variety for producing soymilk and tofu, comparing its commercial viability and quality with conventional counterparts.

Methods: The study focused on Uttarakhand’s indigenous variety, bhat and the commercially popular PS-1347 for soymilk extraction. Preliminary investigations were conducted to optimize the process to maximize recovery and minimize beany flavor, grinding soybeans for 6 minutes and boiling for 20 minutes. Tofu was produced using CaSO4 as a coagulant at varying concentrations (0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%) and coagulating temperatures (75°C, 85°C, 95°C).

Result: Tofu produced from bhat, coagulated with 0.4% CaSO4 at 85°C, exhibited superior acceptability, making it suitable for large-scale commercial production. Its quality matched commercial counter parts, with protein at 16.45%, total mineral at 6.23%, calcium at 152.66 mg/100 g and iron at 14.62 mg/100 g.

The black seeded soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], belongs to the family Fabaceae, subfamily Faboideae, genus Glycine and subgenera Soja (Kumudini, 2010; Vyas and Chandel, 2013). In recent decades, black soybean is becoming more popular as compared to yellow, due to its richness in various essential nutrients and bioactive compounds (Joshi and Rahal, 2018). Yellow varieties of soybean are cultivated throughout India (Rehal et al., 2017) while black varieties of soybean are traditionally grown on a small scale in Himachal Pradesh, Kumaon hills of Uttarakhand, Eastern Bengal and Khasi hills. In Uttarakhand, black varieties of soybean are commonly known as bhat or bhatmash (Dobhal and Raghuvanshi, 2018). According to Zhou et al., (2017) black soybean is a rich source of phenolic compounds which include various secondary metabolic groups, ranging from simple molecules such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, to polymerized compounds such as lignin. Phytochemicals present in black soybean are potentially effective in human health, including treatment of cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and neurodegenerative diseases (Ganesan and Xu, 2017). Although black soybean is widely used since ancient times in China, Korea, Japan, Indonesia and Northwestern Himalayan hills of India as a remedial food, but its potential is still undervalued due to its black colored seed coat, which is not readily acceptable in many parts of world. Therefore, its cultivation and consumption remained confined to almost very small part of the globe.
 
Black soybean, an annual legume has a brief life cycle of 3-4 months and thrives in diverse environmental condition (Gunathilake et al., 2019). It plays a vital role in ensuring food and nutritional security, especially in hilly areas plagued by deficiencies, benefiting rural, tribal and backward populations practicing subsistence farming in marginal rainfed terrains. Black soybean cultivation is cost-effective and resilient, surviving adverse conditions, making it preferable to other crops during the rainy season. Soybeans, with various seed coat colors, serve as a rich source of vegetable oil, protein and animal feed. The protein content of soybean is considered complete, supplying essential amino acids for tissue building and repair. Notably, the only distinction lies in the black hull, signifying the presence of anthocyanin compounds, granting soy the highest antioxidant activity. This nutritional profile emphasizes the significance of black soybeans in promoting sustainable agriculture and addressing nutritional challenges in diverse communities.
 
The total area in Uttarakhand under black soybean production is 5,734 hectares, yet its potential for value-added products remains largely untapped. Although, several studies have been reported on nutritional and medicinal value of black soybean variety indigenous to Uttarakhand, but, very little information is available on its utilization for development of value added products. Its use is meagre due to lack of information on varieties (suitable for soymilk and tofu production), handling and processing. Unlike studies in Korea and Japan, Uttarakhand’s black soybean lacks exploration in product development and nutritional benefits. To address this gap, our study focuses on bhat’s suitability for tofu making, emphasizing quality attributes. The primary technological challenge involves optimizing the preparation method to align sensory and physicochemical characteristics with existing market offerings, promoting the utilization of this indigenous variety in the food industry.
In this study, mature bhat (black soybean) seeds and sugar were obtained from Pantnagar’s local market, Uttarakhand, India. Commercially popular yellow soybean seeds (variety PS-1347), were sourced from the Crop Research Centre, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. Analytical grade coagulants for tofu preparation and chemicals for quality evaluation of raw soybean seeds and tofu were purchased locally. The investigation took place at the Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Agriculture, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.
 
Tofu was prepared following Saini’s (2014) method, with minor adjustments based on the soybean variety. Soymilk was derived from bhat and PS 1347, optimizing grinding for 6 minutes and boiling for 12 minutes, according to preliminary studies (Fig 1). The soymilk was then cooled to various coagulating temperatures (75, 85, 95°C), with calcium sulphate added at concentrations of 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.6% as a coagulant. After coagulation, the soymilk stood undisturbed for 30 minutes at room temperature. Whey was removed by filtering through double-layered cheesecloth and the resulting curd was pressed at a constant pressure of 28 gm/cm2 for 15 minutes in a wooden box. Subsequently, the curd was stored for further analysis.

Fig 1: Standardized method for the preparation of tofu.


 
Whole grains of black soybean (Bhatt) and yellow soybean (variety PS 1347) were analyzed for various physico-chemical characteristics (Table 1).

Table 1: Method used for analysis of physico-chemical and sensory parameters of raw material and tofu.


 
Physical characteristics of soybean varieties were analyzed using standard deviation. Analysis of variance employed a completely randomized design (CRD) for various treatments of tofu, (Gomez and Gomez, 1985). Sensory evaluation data used a randomized block design (RBD), with the standardization experiment replicated three times.
Physicochemical characteristics of bhat and PS 1347
 
Table 2 represents the physical properties, while Table 3 outlines the chemical characteristics of bhat and PS-1347 soybean varieties. Past research highlights the significant impact of varietal differences on tofu recovery and nutritional composition.(Shenet_al1991; Cai et al., 1997; Bhardwaj et al., 1999; Poysa et al., 2002; Guo and Ono, 2005Min et al., 2005; Poysa et al., 2006).

Table 2: Physical characteristics of seeds of soybean varieties.



Table 3: Chemical characteristics of seeds of soybean varieties.


 
Effect of concentration of CaSO4 and temperature of coagulation on yield of tofu
 
Tofu is derived from soymilk through acid or salt coagulation. Factors like soymilk quality, coagulant type, concentration and temperature affect tofu yield and quality. This study used calcium sulphate as a coagulant, varying its level and coagulation temperature. The optimal combination was determined based on yield and sensory evaluation.
 
Table 4 presents the impact of coagulant concentration and coagulation temperature on tofu yield. The study indicates a non-significant effect of coagulant concentration and temperature on tofu yield for two soybean varieties. Regardless of coagulant concentration and variety, the highest tofu yield occurred at 85°C. The increase in temperature from 75 to 85°C resulted in higher yield, likely due to less loss of soluble protein (whey protein) along with water as more bonding occurs thus making the protein matrix more compacted. However, further temperature increase (95°C) led to reduced yield, attributed to protein structure changes, causing loss of soluble protein and water.

Table 4: Effect of concentration of CaSO4 and temperature of coagulation on yield (g) of tofu.


 
There was significant effect of coagulant concentration on the yield of tofu. With the increase in coagulant concentration from 0.2 to 0.4%, the recovery of tofu increased (122.79 to 123.43 g), which decreased (122.89 g) with further increase in concentration (0.6%). Gel strength of tofu depends on coagulating temperature and concentration of coagulant (Mathare et al., 2009). The coagulation of protein was highest at 0.4% of CaSO4 and the coagulated protein was less soluble in residual water due to its compact protein matrix. As the concentration of coagulant increased to 0.6% CaSO4, the structure of coagulated protein changed, thereby changing its functionality (solubility) and rendering it to be more soluble in residual water and consequently affecting the yield of tofu. Therefore, it can be concluded that the 0.4% of CaSO4 at 85°C coagulating temperature is appropriate for the maximum recovery of tofu, irrespective of the variety of soybean.
 
Effect of coagulation temperature and coagulant concentration on the sensory attributes of tofu
 
The effect of variety, coagulating temperature and coagulant concentration on the sensory attributes such as colour, odor, taste, texture and overall acceptability are presented in Table 5-9. There were no significant differences between the tofu samples made by both varieties. But there are significant differences in score of tofu color due to different concentration of calcium sulphate at different temperature. The tofu prepared by both the varieties, coagulated with 0.4% CaSO4 at 85°C got the highest score for color as 7.5 and 7.8, respectively (Table 5). Color of tofu depends on color of soymilk as well as surface properties of tofu, type and amount of coagulant and coagulating temperature. The temperature of coagulation influences the gel development as well as the surface properties of tofu, which subsequently effects the reflection, absorption and transmission of light. It may also be attributed to different hilum colour of soybean seed coat which could migrate to tofu during grinding (Goel et al., 2018).

Table 5: Effect of coagulant concentration and coagulating temperature on the colour of tofu.



Table 6: Effect of coagulant concentration and coagulating temperature on the odor of tofu.



Table 7: Effect of coagulant concentration and coagulating temperature on the taste of tofu.



Table 8: Effect of coagulant concentration and coagulating temperature on the texture of tofu.



Table 9: Effect of coagulant concentration and coagulating temperature on the overall acceptability of tofu.


 
Tofu prepared from both the varieties of soybean by employing 0.4% calcium sulphate at 85°C obtained maximum scores for odour (8.3). Possibly the influence of coagulating temperature and variety on the odor (Table 6) of tofu might be due to presence of odorous substances in soybean as well as their entrapment in tofu during formation of gel. The maximum score (8.7) for taste was obtained by tofu prepared from bhat using 0.4% CaSO4 at 85°C (Table 7). Variety, coagulating temperature and concentration of coagulant significantly affected the taste score of tofu as they affect formation of soy gel and ultimately leds to difference in the entrapment of flavor substances in the gel which impart taste to the tofu.

It can be observed that tofu samples prepared by bhat using 0.4% calcium sulphate at 85°C showed maximum scores as 8.7 for texture (Table 8). The texture score increased with increased concentration of calcium sulphate from 0.2 to 0.4%. It also increased with increasing in temperature from 75 to 85°C but at 95°C the texture of tofu found to be firm, which decreased its score. Texture of soy gel depends upon several factors and important ones are type and content of proteins, type and level of coagulants and temperature. Appropriate proportion along with ideal processing parameters are essential to form a well set gel with ideal textural properties. Hence, the differences in texture score of tofu samples as prepared in present investigation may be due to differences in variety and concentration of coagulant and temperature of soymilk at the time of coagulation.
 
Tofu prepared from bhat by using 0.4% calcium sulphate at 85°C was found most acceptable by panelist. Kao et al., (2003) studied the effects of calcium sulphate concentration on microstructure of tofu and protein content in tofu (Table 9). The firm tofu made with 0.4% concentration of calcium sulphate was found most uniform in microstructure.
 
Chemical characteristics of standardized soymilk and tofu
 
The physico-chemical parameter tofu prepared from black soybean variety i.e. bhat is presented in Table 10.

Table 10: Physico-chemical characteristics of tofu from black soybean variety (bhat).

The present study investigated the suitability of black indigenous variety of soybean of Uttarakhand for the preparation of tofu. The soymilk prepared after  6 minutes of  grinding and 20 minutes of boiling can be efficiently utilized for development of tofu using 0.4% CaSO4 as coagulating agent at 85°C coagulation temperature from bhat indicating that the prepared product was comparable to their commercial counterpart in terms of sensory attributes. In general, tofu samples had good nutritional composition and fell within acceptable limit.
The authors have declared no conflict of interest for this article.

  1. Ali-Khan, S.T. (1993). Seed hull content in field pea. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 73(2): 611-613.

  2. AOAC, (1984). Official Methods of Analysis. 14th edition., Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D.C. 

  3. AOAC, (1986). Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edition., Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D.C. 

  4. AOAC, (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. 20th edition., Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D.C. Bhardwaj, H.L., Bhagsari, J., Joshi, M., Rangappa, M., Sapra, V.T. and Rao, M.S.S. (1999). Yield and quality of soymilk and tofu made from soybean genotypes grown at four locations. Crop Science.  39(2): 401-405.

  5. Cai, T.D., Chang, K.C., Shih, M.C., Hou, H.J. and Ji, M. (1997). Comparison of bench and production scale methods for making soymilk and tofu from 13 soybean varieties. Food Research International. 30(9): 659-668.

  6. Dobhal, N. and Raghuvanshi, R.S. (2018). Physical characteristics and effect of germination on functional properties of black soybean (Glycine max). Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 37(1): 56-60. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1320.

  7. Ganesan, K. and Xu, B. (2017). A critical review on polyphenols and health benefits of black soybeans. Nutrients. 9: 455- 460.

  8. Goel, R., Kaur, A., Singh, J. (2018). Varietal evaluation of soybean for tofu making. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 37(1): 81-84. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1220.

  9. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A. (1985). Statistical procedure for agriculture research. Awibey-International Science Publication John and Sons. New York. 68-72.

  10. Guo, S.T. and Ono, T. (2005). The role of composition and content of protein particles in soymilk on tofu curding by glucono d lactone or calcium sulfate. Journal of Food Science.  70(4): 258-262.

  11. Gunathilake, C.D.M.C., Bhat J., Singh I.R., Tharanga K.A.K. (2019). Dynamics of the physical properties of soybean during storage under tropical condition. Legume Research. 42(3): 370-374. doi: 10.18805/LR-447.

  12. Joshi, J. and Anshu, R. (2018). Effect of processing method on nutritional quality of black soybean. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 37(2): 162-164. doi: 10.18805/ ajdfr.DR-1338.

  13. Kao, F.J., Su, N.W. and Lee, M.H. (2003). Effect of calcium sulfate concentration in soymilk on the microstructure of firm tofu and the protein constitutions in tofu whey. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 21: 6211-6216.

  14. Kumudini, S. (2010). Soybean Growth and Development, In: The Soybean Botany, Production and uses, edited by Singh, G. (CAB International). 2: 48-73. 

  15. Larmond, E. (1977). Methods for Sensory Evaluation of Food. Food Research Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa: Canada Department of Agriculture .

  16. Mangaraj, S., Agrawal, S., Kulkarni, S.D. and Kapur, T. (2005). Studies on physical properties and effect of pre-milling treatments on cooking quality of pulses. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 42(3): 258-262.

  17. Mathare, S.S., Bakal, S.B., Dissanayake, T.M. and Jain, S.K. (2009). Effects of coagulation temperature on the texture and yield of soy paneer (tofu). Journal of National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka. 37: 263-267.

  18. Min, S., Yu, Y. and Martin, S.S. (2005). Effect of soybean varieties and growing locations on the physical and chemical properties of soymilk and tofu. Journal of Food Science. 70(1): 8-12.

  19. Poysa, V., Woodrow, L. and Yu, K. (2006). Effect of soy protein subunit composition on tofu quality. Food Research International. 39: 309-317. 

  20. Poysa, V. and Woodrow, L. (2002). Stability of soybean seed composition and its effect on soymilk and tofu yield and quality. Food Research International. 35(4): 337-345.

  21. Ranganna, S. (2007). In Handbook of analysis and quality control of fruits and vegetable products. 3rd  Edition, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, India.

  22. Rehal, J., Vinod, B., Gill, B.S. (2017). Physico-chemical, engineering and functional properties of two soybean cultivars. Legume Research. 42(1): 39-44. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9109.

  23. Saini, D. (2014). Evaluation of suitability of different coagulants at various temperatures for making soy tofu. Thesis, M. Sc. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology. Pantnagar. 96p.

  24. Shen, C.F., De Man, L., Buzzell, R.I. and Man, J.D. (1991). Yield and quality of tofu as affected by soybean and soymilk characteristics: Glucono delta lactone coagulant. Journal of Food Science. 56(1): 109-112.

  25. Sumangala, S. and Kulkarni, U.N. (2019). Physico-chemical properties of black and yellow soybean (Glycine max L.) Genotype. The Pharma Innovation. 8(7): 33-37.

  26. Vyas, A.K. and Chandel, A.S. (2013). Soybean, In: Text book of field crops production-commercial crops Vol-II, edited by Prasad, R., (DKMA ICAR New Delhi). 1-39. 

  27. Zhou, R., Cai, W. and Xu, B. (2017). Phytochemical profiles of black and yellow soybeans as affected by roasting. International Journal of Food Properties. 12: 112-116.

Editorial Board

View all (0)