Physical characteristics of quinoa seeds
Physical properties of seeds are important for the design of equipment necessary for harvesting and post-harvest handling, transportation and processing of agricultural produce into different consumable and marketable food items
(Dobhal and Raghuvanshi, 2018). Knowledge of physical properties of grains is useful in farming, harvesting, storage and processing
(Dobrzanski and Stepniewski, 2013). Seed weight is an ecologically important life history trait in plants as it influences both the dispersal ability and seedling establishment
(Gross and Kromer, 1986). Table 1 shows that thousand seed weight of quinoa was 2.6±0.01 g, which is comparable to the value of 2.57 g reported by
Beniwal et al., (2019) and falls within the range of 1.1-3.6 g, as reported by
Shahid and Thushar (2021). Thousand seed volume of quinoa seeds was 2.43±0.03 ml which was less than the values of 4.49 and 2.86 ml, as reported by
Badr and Eissa (2018) and
Beniwal et al., (2019), respectively. The seed density of quinoa was 1.06±0.11 g/ml which is lower than the value reported by
Badr and Eissa (2018) as 1.27 g/ml but higher than the value of 0.9 g/ml reported by
Beniwal et al., (2019). According to
Kaur et al., (2005), the seed volume along with its weight positively correlates with hydration capacity, swelling capacity and cooking time.
Hydration parameters play a crucial role in various treatments of seeds like soaking, germination, dehusking and elimination of antinutritional components. Hydration capacity is defined as ability of food or its components to store water under particular conditions. Hydration capacity of quinoa seeds in present study was 0.07±0.01 g/100 seeds, which lies between the range observed by
Ghumman et al., (2021) as 0.02-0.07g/ 100 seeds. Hydration index of quinoa seeds was 0.26±0.03, which is lower than the value reported by
Beniwal et al., (2019) as 0.879.
Swelling capacity gives an indication of increase in the volume upon absorption of water. It is a very important parameter as changes in volume during processing may change the acceptability of the final product
(Ayodele and Beatrice, 2015). In the present study, swelling capacity of quinoa seeds was 0.4±0.07 ml/g and swelling index was found to be 1.48±0.15.
Singh and Punia (2020) reported the swelling capacity of amaranth seed flour as 2.54±0.01 ml/g which is significantly higher than the findings of the present study. This might be due to the structural differences in the amaranth and quinoa seeds.
Bulk density of seed flours is determined with two key factors
i.
e. particle size and packing density. This physical property is affected by polymer structure of starch of seed. Bulk density lowers with loosening of the polymer structure of starch
(Manju and Dobhal, 2022). Bulk density of quinoa seeds in the present study was 0.76±0.01 g/ml which is similar to the value reported by
Beniwal et al., (2019) but lower than the value given by
Singh and Punia (2020) as 6.06±0.06 g/ml.
In the present study, sprout length was measured at different intervals. The average length of quinoa sprout was found to be 0.70±0.02 mm, 1.03±0.05 mm and 1.50±0.03 mm on 24, 48 and 72 hours of germination, respectively.
Pritham et al., (2021) reported the quinoa sprout length as 1.96 mm on 24 hours of germination. The finding of present study is lower than the sprout length of germinated quinoa seeds reported by
Guardianelli et al., (2022) as 0.9 and 1.3 cm at 24 and 48 days of germination, respectively. Sprouting rate gives information about the age of seeds. With the ageing of seeds, sprouting rate and sprout length gets retarded.
Functional properties
Functional properties are the fundamental physicochemical properties that reflect the complex interaction between the composition, structure, molecular conformation and physicochemical properties of food components with the nature of environment in which these properties are associated and measured. Findings on water and oil absorption capacity of raw and 72-hours germinated quinoa flours are presented in Fig 2.
Water absorption capacity (WAC) is the amount of water taken up by the flours to attain the desired consistency and produce a high-quality food product. In the present study, water absorption capacity of germinated quinoa flour (144.7±1.15 per cent) was non-significantly (p<0.05) higher than raw quinoa flour (143.4±0.44 per cent). WAC of both the quinoa flours was found higher than the value reported by El
Sohaimy et al., (2018) as 141.5±0.54 per cent.
Singh and Punia (2020) and
Jain and Agarwal (2015) reported a significantly higher WAC for amaranth seeds flour as 420 and 484 ml/100 g, respectively.
Beniwal et al., (2019) reported significantly high WAC in germinated quinoa flour (214 per cent) than the raw quinoa flour (125 per cent). The increase in the water absorption capacity of germinated quinoa flour might be due to the breakdown of polysaccharides and rise in the sugar content during germination which increased the sites for water molecules to interact.
Kousala et al., (2019) didn’t observe any increment in WAC of quinoa flour with germination. Water absorption capacity of product is directly related to the juiciness or moistness upon hydration, determining the texture of the product. Protein content of food is an important factor for affecting WAC. Food products with high protein content have higher WAC
(Rehrah et al., 2009).
The food’s oil absorption capacity is determined by the physical entrapment of oils, which may be beneficial for their binding to foodstuffs in terms of preserving flavour, improving palatability and prolonging shelf life. In the present study, raw quinoa flour and germinated quinoa flours had the oil absorption capacity of 100±0.36 and 106±1.37 per cent, respectively. Germination led to significant (p<0.05) increase of 6 percent in OAC of raw quinoa flour. This finding is in accordance to the observation of
Beniwal et al., (2019), where germinated quinoa flour had higher OAC (253 percent) than raw quinoa flour (173 per cent). The increase in the oil absorption capacity can be positively related to the quality of protein, its surface hydrophobicity and ability to hold fat globules
(Sibian et al., 2017). Singh and Punia (2020) reported lower values for oil absorption capacity (58.16±0.67%) in another pseudocereal
i.
e. amaranth seed flour.
Flour solubility is an important thermodynamic parameter affecting other properties of food such as emulsification, foaming and gelation. Solubility of raw quinoa flour (22.6±0.75 per cent) was found to be significantly (p<0.05) higher by 34 percent than germinated quinoa flour (14.75±1.14 per cent) (Table 2).
Beniwal et al., (2019) reported the solubility of raw and germinated quinoa flours as 17.63 and 10.29 percent, respectively.
Ogungbenle (2003) and
Oshodi et al., (1999) investigated solubility as a function of pH and reported solubility values of quinoa flour in the range of 15-52 per cent corresponding to a low solubility at pH 6 and a maximum solubility at pH 10.
Shi et al., (2020) observed the lowest solubility of quinoa flour
i.
e. 17.7 percent at pH 3 and the highest solubility of 46.3 per cent at pH 7.
Ghumman et al., (2021) reported the quinoa flour solubility between 30 to 53.3 per cent. High flour solubility shows high digestibility therefore, the flours with high solubility like quinoa flours can be used in developing infant feeds.
Emulsification properties including emulsion activity and stability are significantly related with polysaccharides and both soluble and insoluble proteins. Proteins help to emulsify oil droplets, regulate their surface tension and produce electrostatic repulsion on their surface. Emulsion capacity is defined as the ability of the solution to emulsify oil whereas the ability of the protein to withstand changes in its physicochemical qualities over a period of time is known as emulsion stability. In the present study, emulsion activity and stability of germinated quinoa flour (102.8% and 46.2%) was found significantly higher (p<0.05) than raw quinoa flour (89.9% and 41.3%) (Table 2). The values for emulsification properties of raw quinoa flour in the present study were lower than the values reported by El
Sohaimy et al., (2018). The increase in the emulsion capacity with germination may be due to high interaction of protein with fat and other components in the germinated flour. Emulsion stability might be increased due to the improvement in protein quantity and quality.
The capacity of proteins to enhance the formation and stabilization of emulsion is important for many applications in cakes, coffee whiteners and frozen desserts. In these products varying emulsifying and stabilizing capacities are required because of different compositions and stresses to which these products are subjected
(Elkhalifa and Bernhardt, 2010).
Foaming properties are the functional properties, where aeration and overrun are required
e.g. whipped toppings, baked foods and ice-cream mixes. Foaming capacity is defined as the amount of interfacial area formed by beating the food/flour. In the present study, foaming capacity of germinated quinoa flour (14.83±0.80 per cent) was found to be significantly higher (p<0.05) by 22 percent than raw quinoa flour (12.1±1.20 per cent) (Table 2) which is comparable to 14.33 percent as reported by
El Sohaimy et al. (2018). The increase in foaming capacity might be due to the decrease in surface tension of the air-water interface allowing soluble protein molecules to absorb and interact with hydrophobic compounds.
Foam stability is defined as the time taken to reduce 50 percent of its volume from foam. Foam stability of raw quinoa flour was found to be 8.3±0.59 per cent which was non-significantly (p<0.05) lower than that of germinated quinoa flour with 10.2±0.52 per cent. Germination increased the foam stability by 23 per cent.
El Sohaimy et al. (2018) reported the foam stability of quinoa flour as 9.63 percent. The increase in foam stability with germination might be due to the increased solubility of proteins.