Time and place
The study was conducted from January to July, 2022 in Department of Food Science and Technology at Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Kochi.
Collection and preparation of raw material
Azolla pinnata and
Azolla caroliniana samples were purchased from Kerala Agriculture University, Mannuthy. Azolla is mainly propagated by vegetative means. Purchased samples were adequately cleaned in cold water to eliminate contaminants and they were grown in cement tanks under-regulated climatic conditions at a temperature of 28-30°C and a light level of 50 k lux. In about 8-10 days, both Azolla species were harvested, dried using a cabinet tray dryer at 40°C for 6 hours and stored under ambient conditions for further studies. For estimation of anti-nutritional factors, 7.5 g of Azolla was extracted using 150 mL of 60% ethanol, filtered, rotary evaporated and stored in chiller (4°C).
Chemicals and reagents
Acetone, ethanol, hydrochloric acid, potassium ferrocyanide, ferric chloride, ammonium thiocyanate, phytin phosphorus, methyl orange indicator, potassium permagnate, alkaline picrate, diethyl ether, n-butanal and sodium chloride reagents of analytical grade procured from Nice Chemicals (Kochi), SRL Chemicals (Chennai) and Sigma-Aldrich, India were used for the study.
Analysis of micronutrients
Estimation of total caroteniods
The standard method of
Pandey et al., (2003) with slight modification was used. Using 85% acetone, entire carotenoids were extracted from the ferns
Azolla pinnata and
Azolla caroliniana. 50 mL falcon tube containing 20 mL of acetone was filled with precisely weighed 5 g of fresh leaves. Two stages of the mixture were separated after being ground in a mortar and pestle and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3000 rpm. Pigment-containing supernatant was collected and kept at 4°C. Acetone was used to extract the material repeatedly until the supernatant was colorless. The supernatant fractions were collected and combined to get a final known volume. At 450 nm, optical density measurements were made using a blank solution of 85% acetone.
Where,
A= Absorbance measured.
V= Total extract volume.
W= Sample weight.
Spectrum was taken in the range of lmax 400-500 nm.
Determination of chlorophyll, carotene and xanthophyll
Methodology by
Singh et al., (2011) was adopted for this study. Chilled acetone was used for the extraction of carotene and chlorophyll. 40 mL of acetone was added to 5 g of samples
viz.,
Azolla pinnata and
Azolla caroliniana in dark condition. The solution was triturated in a mortar and pestle after being kept at -20°C for 18 hours. In a 15 mL falcon tube, the supernatant was filtered and collected. At 470, 645 and 662 nm, xanthophyll, carotene, along with chlorophyll a and b (µg/g) was measured using a spectrophotometer. Calculations was done as per
Khuantrairong et al., (2012).
Chlorophyll a = 11.75A
662 - 2.35A
645
Chlorophyll b = 18.61A
645 - 3.960A
662
(C
a = Chlorophyll a, C
b = Chlorophyll b)
Xanthophyll = Total carotenoid - Carotene
Estimation of anti-nutritional factors
Determination of tannin content
The standard method by
Gupta and Verma (2011) was used for determining tannin content. Mechanically shaken cake residue of two species of
A. pinnata and
A. caroliniana amounting to 0.5 g was weighed into a 100 mL container. The following step was adding 50 mL of purified water and shaking the bottle strongly for one hour. The mixture was brought up to specification after filtering it in a 50 mL volumetric flask. A test tube containing 5 mL of the filtrate was filled and 2 mL of 0.1 M FeCl
3 in 0.008 M potassium ferrocyanide and 0.1 N HCl were added. The absorbance was measured using spectrophotometer (Spectrum Lab 23A, England) at 725 nm wavelength.
The equation below was used to calculate the amount of tannin in the sample:
Where,
C
T = Tannin concentration in mg%.
A
T = Absorbance of the test sample.
C
S = Concentration of tannin in standard.
A
S = Absorbance of the standard.
Determination of phytic acid content
The standard method of
Marolt and Kolar (2020) was used for determining phytic acid content. About 4.0 grams of cake residue of two species of
A. pinnata and
A. caroliniana was soaked in 100 mL of 2% HCl for three hours before being filtered. Titrated against 0.01 M standard FeCl
3, 5 mL of 0.3% NH
4SCN, 25 mL of the filtrate and 53 mL of purified water were combined until a brownish-yellow tint persisted for 5 seconds. The amount of phytin phosphorus (1 mL = 1.19 mg phytin phosphorous) was measured and the amount of phytic acid was estimated by multiplying the result by 3.55.
Phytate content (mg %) =Tv (mL) × Phytin phosphorous (1.19 g) × 3.55
Where,
Tv= Volume obtained after the color change.
Determination of oxalate content
In accordance with the standard method of
Karamad et al., (2019), 10 mL of 6 M HCl and 190 mL of purified water were added to a 250 mL volumetric flask together with 2 g of the cake residue of
A. pinnata and
A. caroliniana. An hour was spent digesting the combination in a hot water bath before it was cooled, brought to the proper consistency and filtered. A beaker containing 50 mL of the material was filled and 20 mL of 6 M HCl was then added. The solution was filtered after being evaporated to about 1/2 its volume. Following several rounds of washing with warm distilled water, the residue was added to 25 mL of the filtrate together with 3 drops of methyl orange indicator and the mixture was then titrated against a 0.1 M KMnO
4 solution until a light pink hue developed and remained for 30 seconds. The following equation was used to get the total oxalate content.
Oxalate content (mg %) = TV × 0.0045
Where,
Tv = Volume obtained after the color change.
Determination of hydrocyanic acids (Cyanide) content
The standard method of
Fukushima et al., (2016) was adopted for the study. The normal technique included weighing 5 g of the cake remnant of
A. pinnata and
A. caroliniana in a volumetric flask, adding 50 mL of purified water and corking the flask with cotton wool. After being maintained for 24 hours, the solution was filtered. 1 mL of the filtrate was combined with 4 mL of alkaline picrate and the test tube was sealed. For five minutes, the substance was incubated at 25°C in a water bath. After the solution had cooled, the absorbance at 490 nm was calculated in comparison to a blank for the reagent. The following equation was used to determine the cyanide content.
Determination of saponin content
The standard method of
Ezeonu and Ejikeme (2016) was used. The normal procedure included weighing 20 grams of the cake remnant of
A. pinnata and
A. caroliniana in a conical flask and adding 100 mL of 20 per cent aqueous ethanol. The mixture was continuously stirred and cooked at roughly 55°C over a hot water bath for four hours. The mixture was filtered before being extracted once again using 200 mL of 20% ethanol. Over a water bath set at around 90°C, the combined extract was reduced to 40 mL. 20 mL of diethyl ether was then added to a 250 mL separating funnel along with the concentration and the solution was rapidly mixed. The aqueous layer was collected and the ether layer was removed. The cleansing procedure was performed again. The solution received 60 mL of n-butanol. After being extracted, the mixed n-butanol underwent two items of washing with 10 mL of 5 per cent aqueous NaCl. After evaporating the leftover solution in the water bath, it was dried in an oven until the weight remained consistent. The following equation has been used to determine the saponin content.
Statistical analysis
Values from the experiment were done in triplicates and were expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was performed with tukey’s significant difference test, based on significant difference of p≤0.05 to analyse the results.