Milk-based peanut
thabdi was prepared using different formulation, as suggested by the Design-Expert software and effect of Fat/SNF ratio, peanut and sugar levels on sensory quality is presented in Table 1. Regression equation to predict the sensory responses are presented in Table 2.
Effect of the Fat/SNF ratio of milk, peanut and sugar level on sensory attributes of Milk-Based Peanut Thabdi
Colour and appearance
The regression analysis of the colour and appearance score presented in Table 3 reveals that the coefficient of determination (
R2) for the quadratic model of colour and appearance was 0.86. The adequate precision value was found to be 10.60 appreciably higher than the minimum desirable 4 (for high prediction ability), indicating that this model was highly significant (p<0.01). The effect of peanut and sugar levels were found to be significant on colour and appearance at p<0.05 and p<0.01 level of significance, respectively. The effect of the sugar and peanut level on the colour and appearance score of milk-based peanut
thabdi is shown in Fig 1a. An increase in the level of peanut initially leads to an increase in the colour and appearance score, but at higher levels, the colour and appearance score decreased. The sugar level had major influence on the development of desired colour and appearance of milk-based peanut
thabdi. Increase in sugar content lead to increase in colour and appearance score of milk- based peanut
thabdi (Fig 1a).
Krupa et al., (2013) noticed a constant increase in the colour and appearance score of
thabdi when the amount of sugar added to
thabdi was increased from 6% to 10% and also observed that extended heating period may indicated detrimental effect on the colour and appearance of
thabdi. Increase in 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) concentration was reported by previous workers with increase in sugar levels, probably as a result of maillard browning and caramelization occurring during production.
Body and texture
The body and texture scores of milk-based peanut
thabdi ranged from 7.00 to 8.83. The coefficient of determination (
R2) for the quadratic model was 0.72. The regression analysis of the data presented in Table 3 reveals adequate precision value of 9.82. The effect of sugar level on the body and texture scores was highly significant (p<0.01).
Modha et al., (2015) reported that increased sugar and fat levels improved body and texture scores on a linear level, resulting in a soft body and smooth granules in
thabdi peda. A similar trend was observed in our study for the milk-based peanut
thabdi. Minimum and maximum scores for body and texture score were obtained for experiment number 17 and 18, respectively (Table 1). Increasing sugar levels increased the body and texture scores of milk-based peanut
thabdi (Fig 1b). The interaction between sugar and peanut levels was significant (p<0.05).
Flavour
Flavour is undoubtedly the most essential criterion for determining acceptance of a new product to consumers. The flavour score of milk-based peanut
thabdi ranged from 7.33 to 8.83. The regression analysis of the data presented in Table 3 revealed that the coefficient of determination (
R2) for the quadratic model was 0.74. Furthermore, the statistical analysis indicated that the model fitted the observed data well with adequate precision value of 9.14 and model was highly significant (p<0.01). Peanut and sugar levels significantly (p<0.01) affected the flavour score of milk-based peanut
thabdi. Maximum flavour score of 8.83 was found for the experiment number 8 in Table 1.
Modha et al., (2015) reported during study on
thabdi peda noted that owing to enhanced sweetness and caramelized flavour, sugar has a linear positive influence on the flavour score of
thabdi peda. Fig 1c also revealed that as sugar levels increased, the flavour score of the milk-based peanut
thabdi formulation also increased.
Overall acceptability
The coefficient of determination (
R2) for the quadratic model was 0.75 (Table 3). The adequate precision value was found to be 9.06 which was appreciably higher. The minimum (7.17) and maximum (8.80) overall acceptability score was obtained for the formulation indicated in experiment number 19 and 1, respectively. The effect of peanut and sugar levels on the overall acceptability score of milk-based peanut
thabdi were highly significant (p<0.01). The effect of peanut and sugar levels on the overall acceptability score of milk-based peanut
thabdi is shown in Fig 1d. Similar trends were also for
thabdi peda samples by
Modha et al., (2015), who observed that positive influence of milk fat and sugar level on the overall acceptability of
thabdi peda.
Optimization of milk-based peanut thabdi
Optimization was aimed at achieving the best levels of factors such as Fat/SNF ratio of milk, peanut and sugar levels based on maximizing reponses obtained for sensory scores. A Fat/SNF ratio of milk 1.11, 21% heat-treated and ground peanut level (% w/w of milk solids, dry basis) and 80% sugar level (% w/w of milk solids, dry basis) were found to be optimum as a result of numerical optimization with a desirability of 0.920. The optimized milk-based peanut
thabdi had a total solids content of 82.58±0.2%, moisture content of 17.42±0.2%, fat content of 28.5±0.36%, protein content of 8.4±0.26%, ash content of 2.52±0.05% and carbohydrate content of 43.16±0.37% (Table 4). Optimized formulation of peanut powder-supplemented
burfi suggested by
Yadav et al., (2018) contained 10% peanut powder, 80% khoa and 20% sugar.
Compositional aspects
The comparison between the optimized formulations with two market samples (A and B) in terms of compositional parameters is given in Table 4. Market sample B contained the highest total solids (83.51 ±0.09%), ash (2.31±0.08%) and carbohydrates (49.5±0.47%), whereas market sample A contained the highest moisture (20.18±0.11%) and protein (13.5±0.28%). The optimized formulations had a higher fat level (28.5±0.36%) than the market samples (A and B), which might be due to use of peanut ingredient (Table 4).
Textural parameters
The texture of the popular market
thabdi has firm to slightly loose grains with small pools of liquid fat or solid fat on the surface. Table 4 shows the comparison between the optimized formulations with two market samples (A and B) in terms of textural parameters. The hardness and springiness of the optimized product and market samples (A and B) were significantly different (p<0.05). Market sample A has the maximum springiness, cohesiveness and resilience, whereas market sample B has the maximum hardness and gumminess. Textural Profile Analysis of milk-based peanut
thabdi is shown in Fig 2.
Sensory characteristics
The popular market
thabdi had brown to dark brown colour, rich nutty, cooked, ghee-like flavour and characteristic granular texture. The comparison between the optimized formulations with two market samples (A and B) for sensory quality is presented in Table 4. The sensory attributes of the optimized formulation of milk-based peanut
thabdi, viz. colour and appearance, body and texture, flavour and overall acceptability, were significantly different (p<0.05) from those of market sample B. However, the optimized products were comparable to those of market sample A.
Effect of refrigerated storage on the physicochemical, sensory and microbial quality of milk-based peanut thabdi
Optimized milk-based peanut
thabdi was prepared, vacuum packed in a 75 µ LDPE pouch and stored in a refrigerator at 7±2°C for 28 days. The data pertaining to changes in the physicochemical, sensory and microbial qualities of milk-based peanut
thabdi are given in Table 5. The initial moisture content of the milk-based peanut
thabdi was 17.42±0.202%. There was no significant decrease in moisture content at the end of 28 days of storage under refrigeration (Table 5). However, the water activity of the milk-based
thabdi samples decreased significantly during storage. The findings for water activity by
Londhe et al., (2012) also indicated that storing brown
peda 30°C causes decrease water activity due to loss of moisture during storage.
The initial titratable acidity (% lactic acid) of milk-based peanut
thabdi was 0.315 which increased to 0.387 after 28 days of storage (Table 5). A significant (p<0.05) increase in acidity was observed during refrigerated storage of the samples after 28 days of storage. At 30°C the acidity of brown
peda were reported to increase considerably in various techniques of packaging
(Londhe et al., 2012). According to
Sharma et al., (2003), the acidity of
malai peda increased during storage when packed in Poster Paper/Al-foil/LDPE.
Sachdeva and Rajorhia (1982) also noted increased in acidity during the storage of
burfi. The pH of the samples significantly (p<0.05) decreased after 7, 14 and 28 days of storage.
Kumar et al., (1997) noted that the pH of
peda dropped while during storage at a temperature of 20°C.
The free fatty acids (FFA) content of fresh milk-based peanut
thabdi samples was 0.85 (% oleic acid), which increased significantly (p<0.05) after 21 days of storage at 7±1°C (Table 5). Comparable rise in free fatty acid concentration in brown
peda samples during storage was also reported by
Londhe et al., (2012). Increase in FFA of milk-based peanut
thabdi samples could be attributed to the metabolic activity of microorganisms during storage
Samarzija et al. (2012). There was a significant (p<0.05) increase in the hardness (g) of the milk-based peanut
thabdi samples from 2706 to 3080 during 28 days of storage under refrigeration, which could be attributed to the loss of moisture during storage which depends on the type of package and storage conditions.
Enumeration of standard plate count (SPC) and yeast and mould (YandM) count of milk-based peanut
thabdi samples revealed a significant increase from the initial count of 3.57 and 1.23 log cfu/g to 4.37 and 3.97 log cfu/g, (Table 5), respectively when stored under refrigeration for 28 days. Coliform count was not detected when the first dilution was plated on violet red bile agar (VRBA). Storage study of
burfi at 30°C and 5°C by
Sachdeva and Rajorhia (1982) reported increase in SPC and YandM count. The SPC as well as YandM during storage of brown
peda was observed
(Londhe et al., 2012). Rise in SPC during the storage of
burfi was also observed by many researchers (
Garg and Mandokhot, 1987;
Misra and Kuila, 1988).
Changes in the sensory quality of milk-based peanut
thabdi samples were significant when packed samples were stored at 7±2°C for 28 days (Table 5). The colour and appearance score of milk-based peanut
thabdi significantly (p<0.05) decreased after 21 days of storage. The body and texture scores of milk-based peanut
thabdi significantly (p<0.05) decreased after 14 days of storage. The flavour score of milk-based peanut
thabdi significantly (p<0.05) decreased after 14 days of storage. The overall acceptability score of milk-based peanut
thabdi was significantly (p<0.05) reduced from 8.47 to 7.43 at the end of 21 days of storage, which further reduced to 6.93. Hence, milk-based peanut
thabdi can be acceptably stored in a 75 µ LDPE pouch at refrigerated temperature (7±2°C) for 21 days. Shelf life of malai
peda as affected by modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) was examined by
Sharma et al., (2003). Author reported that malai
peda packed in Poster Paper/Al-foil/LDPE and stored at 11°C and 52% RH, the product was acceptable for up to 31 days. Packaging techniques such as vacuum packaging and MAP were reported to enhance the shelf life of brown
peda samples when compared to conventional packaging
(Londhe et al., 2012).