Fresh fish samples employed in the preparation of fish powder was procured hygienically from local fish market of Raha, Assam (26
o13'41"N 92
o31'10"E). The collected fish sample was transported within 30 minutes to the Fish Processing Laboratory housed in the Department of Fish Processing and Technology, College of Fisheries, Assam Agricultural University. During transportation, care was taken to prevent or delay the spoilage by keeping them in an insulated box with the internal temperature maintained at 0 to 4
oC. Low internal temperature was maintained through use of gel ice in a ratio of 1:1 (fish : gel ice). Later, the transported fish was kept at a temperature of -18
oC in a deep freezer until further use. The research investigation was conducted in the year 2019 in the Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Community Science, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam.
Fish powder preparation
Fish powder preparation was done according to the method of
Abbey et al., (2016) with certain modifications. The process involved thorough washing of fresh fish samples thrice using chilled potable water (4±1
oC) for removal of dust, impurities and foreign matters. The fish and water ratio of 1:1 was kept for washing. Washed samples were descaled, degutted and de-gilled on a clean stainless steel working table using pre-sterilized tools. All the processing operation were performed using stainless steel equipment. The dressed samples were washed again to remove any blood stains or impurities, if left. Washed-dressed fish was then subjected to blanching operation for 5 minutes keeping fish and water ratio at 1:1. This was followed by mincing of fish in a meat mincer. Minced fish was spread onto a stainless-steel tray and dehydrated in a cabined drier at temperature 55
oC and air velocity 70-75 m/min for 8 hours. Later, the dried fish cakes were grounded to powder in a domestic grinder at the rate of 100 g/ 2 minute followed by storage in High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) container at refrigerated temperature (0-4
oC) until further application.
Nutritional composition
Moisture, protein, fat and ash contents of sample was determined as per
AOAC 2000 method 925.10, 950.36, 963.15 and 942.05 respectively. Difference method was used for determination of total carbohydrate content and the total energy was calculated as per the formula given by
James (1990). The mineral contents of fish samples were estimated using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS). The solution for mineral estimation was prepared by wet ashing technique of
AOAC (2005) method 975.03 in which sample was digested using nitric acid (HNO
3) and perchloric acid (HCLO
4). The prepared ash solution was than analysed for calcium (Ca), potassium (K), magnesium (mg), phosphorus (P) and Iron (Fe) using AAS equipped with deuterium lamp, a hollow cathode and a background corrector.
Functional properties of fish flour
Bulk density of developed fish powder was prepared following the method of
Jagnam and Thorat (2010). Foaming capacity of samples was analysed as per the procedure given by
Narayana and Rao (1982). Water absorption capacity (WAC) and fat absorption capacity (FAC) was determined by the method of
Sosulski et al., (1976).
Storage study
The storage stability of fish powder stored at refrigerated condition (0-4
oC) in a HDPE container was determined by examining the change in sensory scores, colour, moisture, pH, peroxide value (PV), free fatty acid (FFA) and total plate count (TPC) across 90 days.
Sensory evaluation was performed for the developed fish powder for a period of 90 days at an interval of 30 days
i.e., 0
th day, 30
th day, 60
th day and 90
th day. Fish powder was evaluated by 20 semi-trained panellists in terms of its appearance, odour, texture and overall acceptability using nine-point hedonic scale (9-liked extremely, 8-liked very much, 7-liked moderately, 6- liked slightly, 5-neither liked nor disliked, 4-disliked slightly, 3-disliked moderately, 2-disliked very much and 1-disliked extremely) (
Kaushik Shandilya et al., 2017).
Color intensity of fish powder was determined using Hunter Lab Colorimeter (Mini Scan XE Plus Colour Meter, Hunter Associate Laboratory, Inc., Reston, VA) which was fitted with a large area port of 2.5 cm diameter aperture. Calibration of instrument was done using black and white tile ahead of taking sample reading. Measurement of CIE L* a* b* value was done which was further used for measurement of chroma [(a2 + b2 )1/2] and hue angle [tan”1(b*/a*)]. The L* a* b* of fish powder was recorded by placing the cuvette filled two-third with sample in front of smallest aperture (
Kumar and Kumar, 2011).
The change in moisture content across storage was measured as per the
AOAC (2000) method 925.10 and the TPC was determined as per the protocol mentioned in
AOAC (1995) method 990.12. The peroxide value of fish powder was determined by titration method given by
AOAC (2000) method 965.33 with some modifications. FFA content of fish powder was determined as per the titration method described in the
AOAC (2003) method 940.28 with some modifications.
Statistical analysis
The data obtained in the study were analysed statistically to test significant difference among samples at P<0.05. The statistical analysis was performed using Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) version 20.