Physicochemical characteristics of raw and parboiled rice cultivars
The physical properties
viz., L, B, 1000 grain weight, BD and P were assessed and presented in (Table 1). The length and breadth ranged from 5.02±0.06 to 5.92±0.13mm and 1.00±0.06 to 2.28±0.07 mm in selected rice varieties. The findings were comparable to the results obtained by
Muthamilarasan et al., 2016 who analyzed the length, breadth and L/B ratios of 5.24 mm, 1.85 mm and 2.83 in navara, a traditional rice variety. The thousand grain weight of the rice cultivars ranged from 14.3 to 26.7 g. The bulk density ranged from 0.36±0.01 to 0.70±0.08 g/cc in selected rice cultivars.
Sareepuang et al., (2018) reported that the traditional rice varieties have higher 1000 grain weight, bulk density and porosity when compared to the white rice varieties. The maximum and minimum porosity was observed in raw-unpolished IR 20 of 58.32±0.74% and 49.22±0.45% in raw-polished mapillai samba.
Lee et al., (2011) stated that the porosity of basmati and non basmati rice varieties ranged from 40 to 54% respectively.
The cooking characteristics
viz., CT, KER, SL, WAI, WSI, amylose and amylopectin are presented in (Table 2). The traditional rice cultivars required more time for cooking then white rice cultivars. Furthermore, this is consistent with the study conducted by
Pushpama and Reddy (2017). The KER ranged from 1.02±0.02 to 2.32±0.03% for the selected rice cultivars. The solid loss values varied from 3.91 to 4.97% in selected rice cultivars. The highest WAI of 2.44±0.01g/g was noted in raw-unpolished mapillai samba.
Odenigbo et al., 2014 reported that this difference in WAI is due to the disparity between the hydrogen and hydroxyl groups in forming a bond between the starch structures. Among the traditional rice cultivars, raw-unpolished mapillai samba showed highest WSI of 6.58±0.10g/g and with a lowest of 4.82±0.08g/g in parboiled-polished karungkuruvai. In case of white rice cultivars, the highest WSI was noted in raw-unpolished IR 20 of 5.59±0.16 g/g and least of 5.30±0.03g/g in parboiled-polished improved white ponni. The amylose content of traditional rice cultivars ranged from 23.4 to 28.9% and white rice cultivars ranged from 22.0 to 24.9% respectively. The amylopectin content ranged between 71.3 and 78.0% for the selected rice cultivars.
Phytochemical constituents in raw and parboiled rice cultivars
The phytochemical constituents were analyzed and depicted in (Table 3). The highest TPC was noticed in raw-unpolished mapillai samba of 43.13±0.78 mgGAE/100 g.
Shen et al., (2012) stated that among 492 rice accessions, TPC ranged from 108.1 to 1244.9mgGAE/100 g. The maximum and minimum TFC was observed in raw-unpolished mapillai samba of 7.20±0.68 mgQE/100 g and 0.94±0.03 mgQE/100 g in parboiled-polished improved white ponni. The highest TAC was noted in parboiled-unpolished karungkuruvai of 54.22±0.03 mgcy-3glc/100 g.
Ghasemzadeh et al., (2015) analyzed and reported the mean flavonoid contents of red, black and white rice of 137.3, 125.7 and 194.2 mgRE/100 g.
The maximum DPPH activity was observed in raw-unpolished mapillai samba of 77.3±0.55% and minimum in parboiled-polished improved white ponni 11.9±0.30%. The FRAP activity ranged between 18.5±0.37 and 47.2±0.25%. The highest value of radical cation ABTS scavenging activity was noted in raw-unpolished mapillai samba of 40.2±0.05% and lowest in parboiled-polished improved white ponni of 15.2±0.16%. There was a significant difference in all the treatments of selected rice cultivars.
Lee et al., (2011) investigated 582 rice cultivars
viz., pigmented and non pigmented rice cultivars and stated that pigmented rice cultivars (red and blackish purple rice) had highest antioxidant activity then non pigmented rice cultivars.
Multivariate analysis
The principal components analysis (PCA) was used in the experiment to minimize the reduction of research data while keeping the maximum number of variables in the study. (Table 4) shows the ‘Eigen’ value, as well as the variability percent and cumulative per cent. The factor loading computed for the first four components (PCs) are presented in (Table 5). In the analysis of selected rice cultivars, the first four principal components (PC1, PC2, PC3 and PC4) accounted for 94.52% of the variance, while PC1 for 66.03%, PC2 for 18.05%, PC3 for 6.42% and PC4 for 4.02% respectively. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy is 0.689.
The data from the loading matrix presented in (Table 5) revealed that PC1=66.03% of the variability was positively correlated with variables such as L, B, 1000 g wt, CT, WAI, TPC, TFC, TAC, DPPH, FRAP and ABTS, whereas WSI was negatively correlated with BD (Fig 1), which determines physicochemical characteristics of traditional and white rice cultivars. The second component, had positive correlation with amylopectin (PC2=18.05%). The third component (PC3=6.42%) had positive correlation with CT and a negative correlation with the WSI. The fourth component (PC4=4.02%) had positive correlation with CT but a negative correlation with TFC.
On the left side of PC2, RUV
3, PUV
3, RPV
3, RUV
4 and PUV
4 treatments were linked to SL, KER, BD, P and amylopectin as shown in (Fig 1). RUV
1, RPV
1, PUV
1, PPV
1, RUV
2, PUV
2, RPV
2, PPV
2, RUV
2, PUV
2, RPV
2, PPV
2 are located on the right side of PC1 related to L, B, 1000 grain weight, amylose, CT, WSI, WAI, TPC, TFC, TAC, DPPH, FRAP and ABTS.