Qualitative assessment of BAs
Milk and selected milk products were assessed for the presence selected BAs such as histamine, spermidine, spermine, putrescine, cadaverine, tyramine and tryptamine as are reported more prevalent in the selected dairy products.
BAs in raw and pasteurized milk
The qualitative determination was carried out for the assessment of BAs in the raw milk. The sampling time for the qualitative analysis of BAs was 12 h for the fresh raw milk and 24 h for the pasteurized milk. The chromatogram of HPTLC for detection of the selected BAs present in raw milk and pasteurized milk from cow and buffalo confirming the presence of BAs (Fig 1 and 2). Raw as well as pasteurized milk from cow and buffalo found to show the presence of histamine, spermidine and tryptamine (Table 2). While putrescine, spermine, cadaverine, tyramine and tryptamine were found to absent in all milk samples. The presence of these BAs confers the possible health hazards or could indicate quality concerns in the raw milk and pasteurized milk. Therefore, it necessitates the milk to be evaluated further for quantitatively for BAs.
BAs in curd and lassi
Curd and lassi used in the present studies is the standardized product with shelf life of 15 and 90 days respectively. Considering worst case scenario, qualitative analysis of curd and lassi samples were carried out on 15
th and 90
th days respectively. None of these samples showed presence of selected BAs. These products have low pH and high salt concentrations, as well as the microbes used in the preparation are standardized. These could be a reason for the absence of BAs and product confirms to be of high quality.
BAs in selected varieties of cheese
Presence of BAs were assessed in four selected cheese varieties. From the selected cheese varieties, cheddar cheese is unprocessed, while mozzarella, feta and gouda are the processed cheese. The qualitative estimation for BAs were carried out from the samples after 120 days of their manufacture. The results of the presence of BAs are shown in the HPTLC chromatogram (Fig 3). BAs such as histamine, putrescine and tryptamine were detected in the cheese samples (Fig 3, Table 2). Based on results, all cheese samples were further analysed quantitatively for the BAs during storage.
Qualitative analysis of the selected milk and milk products were revealed the presence of BAs in the milk and cheese samples (Table 2). These samples were further studied for the quantitative analysis at various intervals throughout their shelf life.
Quantitative assessment of BAs
Selected BAs from raw and pasteurized cow and buffalo milk were identified and quantified throughout shelf life period using HPTLC method.
Quantitative estimation of BAs in raw milk of cow and buffalo
It was observed that histamine, spermidine and tryptamine were present in the fresh raw milk of cow as well as buffalo (Table 3). Other BAs such as cadaverine, putrescine, tyramine and spermine were found to be absent in all raw milk samples. The histamine and spermidine concentrations were found to be below 1 mg/kg and remains unaffected during the storage as shown in Table 3. While, tryptamine was found to increase during the storage of the raw milk of caow and buffalo. Cadaverine, putrescine, tyramine and spermine were absent in all raw milk sample. Spermidine is one of the BAs naturally present in milk
Novella-Rodriguez et al. (2002). While the presence of mesophilic bacteria such as LAB,
Pseudomonas and
Acinetobacter are responsible for the accumulation BAs and increment in their concentration during storage
(Serio et al., (2007). It was observed that the concentration of tryptamine increases with increase in the storage time of the milk samples shown Table 3.
Microbial activity, storage conditions and biochemical parameters such as protein, pH, fat and salt are some of the major factors that are responsible for the production of BAs in milk. The concentration of tryptamine slightly increases in first 4 h in both cow and buffalo raw milk sample. But after 4 h, more amount of tryptamine is found in buffalo raw milk as compared to cow raw milk. This is might be due to the presence of higher amount of protein and fat present in buffalo milk than the cow milk. The increase in tryptamine production not only signifies the improper hygienic storage condition of milk but also affect its shelf life. The tryptamine concentration above 10 mg/kg limit is signifies health hazard
Novella-Rodriguez et al. (2002). The maximum level of BAs (2.97 mg/kg) present in raw buffalo milk is even suitable for consumption as per the safe limit. However, the tryptamine content in cow and buffalo milk raise an indication of some issues pertaining to the quality and safety.
Quantitative estimation of BAs in pasteurized milk of cow and buffalo
Pasteurized cow and buffalo milk were analyzed quantitatively for selected BAs. It was observed that histamine, spermidine and tryptamine were present (Table 4). While, cadaverine, putrescine, tyramine and spermine were absent in the pasteurized milk. Similar results were observed after 4, 6 and 8 h of storage. The concentrations of the BAs detected were >1.00 mg/kg and therefore is safe for consumption. Pasteurization is responsible for reducing the microbial load in milk and therefore microbial transformation for production of BAs is prevented
Novella-Rodriguez et al. (2002). BAs have been detected but are in safe limit in pasteurized milk as compared to raw milk. Considering this, it is apparent that pasteurized milk is less susceptible to hazards of BAs, if initial load of BAs in raw milk is satisfactory. Study reveals that the pasteurization and good hygiene condition during processing are very important to prevent the formation of BAs.
Quantitative of estimation of BAs in selected varieties of cheese
Selected BAs from cheddar, mozzarella, feta and gouda cheese verities were identified and quantified by using HPTLC method during their storage up to 120 days. It was observed that histamine and tryptamine were present in the fresh samples of all the cheese verities under study. Other BAs such as spermidine, cadaverine and spermine were found to be absent in the fresh samples. However, after 60 days, putrescine was detected in all the samples along with histamine and tryptamine. The results were found similar to the study conducted by
Bunkova et al., (2010).
The presence of various BAs in different types of cheese is shown in Table 5. The concentration of histamine, putrescine and tryptamine found in all cheese samples, were below the >1.00 mg/kg, which is safe and it was not increased significantly up to the storage period of 120 days confers them safe from any hazards due to BAs.