Sensory evaluation
Mean scores for sensory attributes of foxtail millet incorporated
gulabjamun are presented in Table 2. The scores of
gulabjamun incorporated with foxtail millet ranged from 8.59 to 8.81 for appearance, 8.58 to 8.59 for colour, 7.82 to 8.68 for texture/consistency, 7.79 to 8.86 for taste and 7.97 to 8.77 for overall acceptability. Control had highest score for all of the sensory characteristics. Sensory scores were observed to decrease with increasing incorporation levels. Among the variations, GJF1 with 20% incorporation levels was found to be best accepted and GJF3 with 40% incorporation levels had the least score. Statistical significance was observed in sensory characteristics like texture, taste and overall acceptability at 5% level. Whereas, appearance and colour showed non-significant difference owing to the reason that each of them were formed into uniform balls and were fried till golden brown colour. A decreasing score was observed in case of texture with increasing levels of millet incorporation. Replacing
khoa with millet flour hardened the texture and reduced the sugar syrup absorption.
In line with the study,
Gulabjamun developed by incorporating
Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. (
Rajgara) showed the overall acceptability scores ranging from 6.67 to 7.88 on a scale of 10 (Shendurse and Chaudhary, 2020).
Nutritional analysis
Table 3 presents the nutritional composition of best accepted
gulabjamun. Owing to the addition of foxtail millet to
gulabjamun, crude fibre and iron content significantly increased (at 5% level) from 0 to 1.12 and 0.58 to 0.702 respectively. Whereas, a significant decrease in fat, protein, calcium and vitamin A content was observed as, per gram availability of these nutrients are higher in
khoa than in the millets.
The results obtained in the present study are in accordance with those reported by
Prajapati et al., (1992), Adhikari et al., (1994), Nalawade et al., (2015) and
Chaudhari (2016).
Texture analysis
Textural profile of best accepted
gulabjamun variations is tabulated as in Table 4. It was observed from the results that hardness, cohesiveness and gumminess of
gulabjamun increased with addition of foxtail millet; whereas, springiness, adhesiveness and chewiness showed a decreasing trend. However, significant difference among the variations in all of the rheological parameters was observed at 5% levels. It was evident that with addition of millets to
gulabjamun, the hardness increased. This increase might be due to the decrease in fat content and reduction in moisture content
(Gulhati et al., 1992).
Studies conducted by
Singh et al., (2009), Ghube et al., (2015) and
Yawale and Rao (2012) were in line with the above results.
Shelf life study
Shelf life study by sensory evaluation
Table 5 and 6 represent the effect of storage on sensory scores of
gulabjamun at room and refrigeration temperature respectively. The sensory scores of
gulabjamun during storage, regardless of storage at room temperature or refrigeration temperature, tend to decrease with the increase in storage period. Samples had acceptable sensory scores between ‘like very much’ to ‘like extremely’ till 5
th day when stored at room temperature and till 15
th day at refrigeration temperature.
During storage, experimental sample of
gulabjamun may have undergone various physicochemical and microbial changes, which tends to affect the sensory attributes of the product. The observed decline in overall acceptability of
gulabjamun could partly be attributed to development of change in flavour owing to development of flat, insipid taste with slight souring tinge.
A similar finding from a study conducted by
Chaudhary (2016) showed that at the room temperature (30±2°C) flavour, body and texture, colour and appearance and overall acceptability score of gulabjamun decreased significantly (P<0.05) from 8.83 to 6.4, 8.5 to 6.30, 8.67 to 7.85 and 8.67 to 6.3 respectively while at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C) from 8.83 to 6.43, 8.5 to 6.1, 8.67 to 7.27 and 8.67 to 6.13 respectively.
Shelf life study by moisture content
Effect of storage on moisture content of
gulabjamun at room and refrigeration temperature given in the Table 7 and 8 respectively. Moisture content of
gulabjamun samples decreased with increasing storage period. Control
gulabjamun had a decrease in moisture from 35.90 to 35.60 by 5
th day when stored at room temperature and to 35.32 by 15
th day when stored at refrigeration temperature. Foxtail millet incorporated
gulabjamun (20%) showed a decrease in moisture content from 33.51 to 33.31 by 5
th day at room temperature and to 33.03 by 15
th day at refrigeration temperature. All of the samples at both room and refrigeration temperature showed a significant difference at 5% levels.
Similar findings were also observed in a study conducted by
Vasava et al., (2018), gluten-free
gulabjamun packed in composite polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles and stored at refrigeration temperature showed a decrease in moisture from 32.9 to 31.57 by 35
th day of shelf life study.
Shelf life study by microbial population
Table 9 and 10 show the microbial population of
gulabjamun in room temperature at different intervals of storage. BIS specifications for
gulabjamun allow a maximum of 2000 cfu/g total bacterial count and 50 cfu/g fungi. The results reported during the study were well within the limits. However, foxtail millet incorporated
gulabjamun samples, on storage at room temperature, developed visible mold growth on 6
th day and was observed in control product on 7
th day.
Chaudhary (2016) also studied the effect of room and refrigerated storage on microbial population in
gulabjamun and results were in accordance with the present study.
Therefore, foxtail millet incorporated
gulabjamun (GJF1) was acceptable up to 5 days at room temperature and up to 15 days at refrigerated storage.