Rice samples (500 g of each) were collected from dairy farmers adopting cooked rice-based feeding regimen for this trial. Rice samples were cooked with water in the ratio of 1:10, in boiling water bath to a gel like consistency which was similar to cooked rice fed by farmers
(Bhattacharjee et al., 2020).
Experimental design
The experiment was conducted with two different buffers MDB
(McDougall buffer, 1948) and MMDB (Modified McDougall buffer as per
Mickdam et al., 2016), whose composition of NaHCO
3 (MDB - 116.50 mmol/l Vs. MMDB - 50 mmol/l) Na
2HPO4.
2H
2O (MDB -26.30 mmol/l Vs. MMDB - 10 mmol/l), Nacl (MDB and MMDB - 8.04 mmol/l), Kcl (MDB and MMDB - 7.64 mmol/l), CaCl
2.
2H
2O (MDB and MMDB - 0.37 mmol/l) and MgCl
2.6H
2O (MDB and MMDB - 0.63 mmol/l). Whose composition is presented in Table 1. Two treatments were followed with undiluted Mc Dougall Buffer (MDB) and diluting Mc Dougall Buffer (MMDB) as per
Mickdam et al., (2016) in RUSITEC experiments with six replicates for each treatment. Sample size of cooked rice was eight grams on as such basis to equalize the requirement of RUSITEC analysis in both treatments.
RUSITEC experiment
For the
in vitro induction of acidosis, six fermentation vessels of a RUSITEC system
(Czerkawski and Breckenridge, 1977) were inoculated with rumen liquor was collected in slaughterhouse from six cows immediately prior to slaughter and brought to the laboratory by maintaining the temperature of rumen liquor at 39
oC under anaerobic condition during the transit. Ruminal fluid was filtered through four layers of muslin cloth and stored in pre warmed thermos container at 39
oC till its use. To begin the experiment the fermenters (800 ml capacity) were filled with 600 ml of strained rumen liquor and 100 ml of artificial saliva. Eighty grams of solid digesta (solid inoculum) and eight gram of test feed (cooked rice on DM basis) were taken in nylon bags and placed in feed container. The pore size of nylon bag was 100 microns. Artificial saliva was infused continuously into the fermenters at a flow rate of 326±19.2 ml/day. The solid inoculum bag was replaced by a feed bag after 24 hours. During the change of bags, the fermenters were flushed with carbon dioxide to maintain anaerobic condition. After removal, nylon bags were squeezed with pre-warmed buffer solution and the obtained fluid was given back into the fermentation vessel to ensure transfer of solid-phase-associated micro-organisms. This experiment was also conducted in two buffers (MDB Vs MMDB). The pH of artificial buffer was maintained at 7.4 during start of incubation for both buffers. Seven days of adaptation was followed by collection period.
Measurement of fermentation parameters
Starting at day one and in the end of collection period of 7 days at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 hours, the pH was measured immediately before feeding, fermentation fluid was sampled directly from each vessel through a three-way valve using a syringe and it was immediately determined for pH using a pH-meter
(Mickdam et al., 2016). Effluent samples were collected during collection period and stored at -20
oC for subsequent analysis of NH3-N concentrations, SCFA production and lactate concentrations.
The ammonia nitrogen concentration was determined as per method described by
Souza et al., (2013). Daily VFA production was calculated by multiplying volumes of effluents with concentrations determined by gas chromatography
(Koch et al., 2006). Lactic acid concentration of effluent was determined as per the procedure of
Lee et al., (2011).
Gas volume was measured by water replacement method at the specified incubation hours. Gas samples for assessing the composition of the fermentation gas were stored in vacutainer tubes (Venosafe type VF-109 SP, Terumo, Eschborn, Germany). The total gas was partitioned as carbon dioxide and methane, the percentages of CH
4 and CO
2 in the fermentation gas were analysed as described by
Meibaum et al., (2012).
The fluid samples were frozen at -20
oC for determination of Lipopolysacchrides (LPS) concentration. LPS was determined with a chromogenic kinetic Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay kit as per
(Gozho et al., (2006). Gram-positive organisms were identified and a count of them made from the ruminal effluent collected. The effluent samples were smeared on a glass slide followed by gram staining (Bartholomew and Mittwer, 1952). Bacterial count was made by direct microscopic count
(Newbold et al., 1998).
Loss in weight of nylon bag after 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 hours of incubation in RUSITEC after washing and drying was recorded to calculate dry matter disappearance. The rumen degradation kinetics of dry matter was calculated using the non linear model proposed by
Mc Donald, (1981). Effective degradability was calculated using equation described by
Orskov and Mc Donald (1979). Samples of feed and the collected substrate residues were analysed for OM and nitrogen according to
AOAC (2012).
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression analysis using IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 20.0 for Windows® software as per the
Snedecor and Cochran (1989). The critical difference between the groups was analysed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Data are presented as means±SE.