The results on nutritive value of maize silage incorporated with apple pomace and mulberry leaves are presented in Table 2. The DM content of silage ranged between 22.91 to 33.20 per cent (Table 2), with the highest DM in corn silage (T1) and lowest in T5 (60% Maize + 30 % pomace +10 per cent mulberry leaves). The findings of the study revealed that the DM content decreased with the increasing concentration of apple pomace in silage. The pH in the silage ranged between 3.65 to 4.24 per cent (Table 2) and the minimum pH was observed in T5. The pH content of the silage decreased significantly on addition of apple pomace in silage. Findings of the present study are in agreement to the previous study of
Pirmohammadi et al. (2006) who compared the ensiled apple pomace with corn silage and reported lower pH in ensiled apple pomace as compared to corn silage (3.4 and 4.6). The CP content in the silage ranged between 6.5 to 8.73 per cent (Table 2). The CP content of silage varied significantly among all treatment groups with the highest CP in T3 (80% maize +10% AP + 10% mulberry leaves). It was observed that with the increasing proportions of the apple pomace in the silage, the CP content of the silage decreased significantly but were higher than that of T1 and T2. The increase in CP content in T3 could be attributed to the fact that addition of mulberry leaves along with maize and low levels of apple pomace has resulted in increase in CP content of the silage.
Pirmohammadi et al. (2006) and
Kara et al. (2018) has also reported 7.2 and 6.84 per cent crude protein in the apple pomace silage made without addition of tree leaves in the silage.
Chaudhary et al. (2016) has also reported 6.1-9.15 per cent CP content in maize silage of different hybrids.
The fibre fractions
i.e. CF, NDF and ADF contents in the silage decreased significantly with the increasing levels of apple pomace in the silage. The CF content ranged from 21.53 to 27.46 per cent with the minimum CF in T5 and highest in T2. The NDF content ranged between 37.15 to 50.59 per cent with the lowest NDF in T5 and maximum in T2. The ADF content varied between 21.55 to 27.27 with lowest in T1 and highest in T2 treatment group. The CF and NDF contents decreased on increasing proportions of apple pomace in the silage with the highest CF and NDF in the silage prepared by ensiling apple pomace with wheat straw, which may be due to the higher percentage of these fractions in wheat straw. However, the ADF fraction was observed minimum in T1 (corn silage). Findings of the present study are in agreement with the previous studies of
Juracek et al. (2012) where 18.27 per cent crude fibre content was reported in maize silage.
Kara et al. (2018) also reported 32.08 per cent crude fibre in apple pomace silage. Similar NDF contents have been reported in apple pomace silage by
Abdollahzadeh et al. (2010) where 45.3 per cent NDF was observed in apple pomace silage.
Islam et al. (2018) also reported 42.5 per cent NDF in fermented apple pomace.
Kara et al. (2018) also reported 30.34 per cent ADF in apple pomace.
The total ash and acid insoluble ash content of the silage followed a decreasing trend on increasing the concentration of apple pomace in the silage. The total ash content was recorded highest in T2 and minimum in T5 with the corresponding values of 7.65 and 4.37 per cent, respectively. Similar trend was recorded in AIA content of the silage.
Fang et al. (2016) also reported similar results with 3.9 per cent ash content in apple pomace.
Massod et al. (2017) reported that the ash content in apple pomace was 2.77 per cent and 3.84 per cent in corn silage which are in agreement with findings of the study.
In the second experiment the silage prepared in treatment T3 (higher CP) was utilized in an animal feeding trial on jersey crossbred cows to evaluate the changes in milk production and composition. It was observed that feeding of silage to the crossbred cows (Fig 1) resulted in significantly higher average peak mean milk yield than that of control group (Fig 1). Feeding of silage to the crossbred cows in the treatment group resulted in 10.21 per cent higher milk yield as compared to the control group. The results in the present study were in agreement with the previous studies of
Edwards and Parker (1995) who reported that the supplementation of apple pomace resulted in the increase in the milk yields of dairy cows in late lactation.
Bal et al. (1997) also reported that the milk production in dairy cows increased by 1 kg day
-1 which were fed silage from corn harvested at 2/3 milk line stage.
Anrique and Dossow (2003) also reported that inclusion of apple pomace in cow’s diet resulted in 9 and 5.9 per cent increase in standardized (4% fat) and non-standardized milk production.
The data pertaining to the milk composition of the treatment and control group of animals are presented in Table 3. The average milk fat, SNF, total solids and milk protein per cent were significantly higher in the treatment group which were fed on silage. The average fat, SNF, total solids and protein content in the treatment group were 4.06, 9.19, 13.26 and 3.38 per cent, respectively. However, no significant difference in milk acidity and specific gravity was observed. The results obtained in the present study are in agreement to the previous study of
Dhiman et al., (2000), where an increase of 0.35 per cent in milk fat was observed on feeding of corn silage.
Anrique and Dossow (2003) also reported that inclusion of apple pulp silage in direct-cut grass silage resulted in higher milk fat and protein content of early lactating dairy cows, which are in conjunction with the findings of the present study. Earlier studies of
Edwards and Parker (1995) also reported an increase in milk protein and total solids contents on feeding of apple pomace in lactating animal diets.
Bio-economics of the trial
Data presented in Table 4 revealed that the cost (₹ cow
-1 day
-1) of daily feeding of silage was ₹ 17.5. In the treatment group, total maintenance cost day
-1 of ₹ 294.00 was observed, which was higher as compared to the control group (₹ 276.50). Average daily milk yield in treatment and control groups was 8.31 and 7.84 kg cow
-1, respectively. It was also observed that the gross return (₹ day
-1 cow
-1) was ₹ 419.50 and ₹ 443.00 in control and treatment groups, respectively (Table 4). Comparison of net returns between the control and treatment group revealed that the net return was relatively higher in the treatment group (cows fed with silage @ 5 kg day
-1 + standard ration) as compared to the control group (cows fed with only standard ration). The net return was higher (₹ 149.00 day
-1 cow
-1) in the treatment group as compared to the control group (₹143.00 day
-1).