Nutritional profile of RTCCCM
The results of nutritional and mineral analysis is shown in Table 2. The drying process lowered the moisture content of RTCCCM however, was within the prescribed limit for dehydrated products. Similar results have been reported for extended chicken cubes by
Shiby et al. (2015), dehydrated extended chicken meat rings
Mishra et al. (2015) and instant fish soup mix
Rahman et al. (2012). The mix however, had a high fat and protein content which may be related to the concentration of proximate components during dehydration. Moreover, FMP incorporation could have contributed to increased level of protein. Similar results have been recorded in dehydrated kebab mix
Modi et al. (2007). The addition of FMP, a rich source of calcium and phosphorus relatively increased the ash content in the mix and similar results have been noticed in dehydrated fish cutlet mix
Shaviklo et al. (2013). Dietary fibre content of 2.11±0.02% in RTCCCM may be attributed to the addition of DVM, which are high fibre sources. DVM incorporation may also serve certain technological characteristics like water binding, gelling and structure building of the product. Cholesterol content of RTCCCM was in agreement with
Mishra et al., (2015), who reported a cholesterol content of 2.83 mg/g in dehydrated chicken meat rings.
Addition of FMP (calcium -1.2%) and DVM increased the calcium and phosphorus content of RTCCCM. Minerals such as Zn, Cu, Co, Mn and Fe were lower than those reported by
Mishra et al. (2015) but higher than fresh chicken meat which may be attributed to the differences in product formulation and considering the fact that no specific meat cut was used.
Physico-chemical parameters
The results are presented in Table 3. The gradual significant decline in pH of RTCCCM during storage might be related to occurrence of chemical changes or growth of carbohydrate fermentable microbes resulting in lactic acid formation. Acidic pH of FMP (pH-4.40) resulted in low pH of the product as compared to other chicken meat products. The results are in accordance with those observed in meat biscuits and
kaddid, a salted, dried meat product by
Kumar et al. (2016) and
Bennani (2000).
The aw of RTCCCM during the study period was well within the threshold limits for dried products which usually have aw below 0.7 (
Lewicki, 2004). Increase, observed towards the end of storage might be due to a concomitant increase in moisture content after packaging and during storage. Similar reports have been made by
Shiby et al. (2015) and
Shaviklo et al. (2013) in dehydrated chicken meat cubes and instant fish cutlet mix stored at ambient temperature. According to
Rahman et al.(2012) lowering of water content resulted in lowered aw, although both these parameters were not directly proportional.
Initial TBARS values were quite high and showed a non-significant increase upto 30 days of storage which further increased significantly with storage time. Volatile compounds formed as a result of oxidation of PUFA led to an increase in TBARS value. Initial high TBARS value observed might be due to precooking of meat, high dry matter content, physical forces involved in preparation process, resulting in extensive destruction of cellular structure, allowing mixing of various meat constituents and pro-oxidants (
Rhee, 2004). Similar results have been recorded in freeze dried beef
Sun et al. (2002) and aerobically packed
pastirma Goak et al. (2008).
FFA increased significantly during storage which might be due to enzymatic/ microbial lipolysis of fat. During the 1
st month of storage non-significant increase was recorded however, with time gradual and significant increase were observed. In general, FFA content alone does not act as criteria for acceptability of products but may act as a strong quality indicator for oxidative changes in fat during storage. Similar results have been reported for a number of dehydrated products including chicken chunks
Hameed et al. (2007).
PV gives a measurement of peroxides and hydroperoxides formed initially during lipid oxidation. PV showed 44.55% increase from the initial day to the last day of storage. Significant difference in PV was recorded at the beginning of the study however, with progress in storage non-significant differences were recorded from end of 2
nd month upto the end of storage which may be due to decline in production of peroxides during later stages of storage (
Yan and White, 1990). Similar increase in PV has been recorded during storage of freezedried goat meat by
Rahman et al. (2012).
Instrumental color profile
The scores for the instrumental colour profile is represented in Table 3. High
L value of RTCCCM might be due to the incorporation of FMP that had a predominant white colour. Evidence of higher
L values and higher spectra curves in cooked chicken meat batters incorporated with skim milk powders and whey proteins has been cited by
Barbut (2010). Drying method adopted may have resulted in significant effects on the colour profile of RTCCCM, which reflects the degree of browning during drying as well as being a cause of variation in light scattering from the surface of the meat (
Van Oeckel et al. 1999). The same would have been the reason for decrease in
L value with advancement of storage period. A gradual non-significant increase was observed for
a value, however, was not much perceived due to the white color of FMP. Similar results were observed in dehydrated
kebab mix by
Modi et al. (2007) during storage at ambient temperature. Initially, a decrease in
b value was noted on day 15 which increased thereafter towards end of the storage period. However, this increase was significant only on day 90. Lipid oxidation and non-enzymatic browning, interaction of ingredients (
Osuna-Garcia et al. 1997), method of processing, packaging and exposure to light (
Kim et al. 2002) would have infiuenced color of the product during storage. Hue value followed an non-significantly increasing trend while Chroma values increased significantly towards the end of storage period. The increase in values may be correlated with the increasing
a and
b values observed during storage. Similar increase in chroma values have been noted by
Mishra et al. (2015) in dehydrated chicken meat rings. Colour change
i.e DE of RTCCCM followed an non-significant increasing pattern during storage. Despite changes in the
a and
b values, the DE was notably non-significant, indicating that increased values of
a and
b did not much affect the product color acceptability. Similarly,
Modi et al. (2007) reported that changes in the color of
kebab mix were quite acceptable even after 6 months of storage at 27±2°C.
Microbiological analysis
The mean values for different microbiological parameters are presented in Table 4. Results in the present study are in agreement with that of
Mishra et al. (2015) who reported an increase in SPC of dehydrated meat products. It was observed that even after 3 months of storage SPC were well below the permissible limit for dried products (5 log cfu/g) (
Jay, 1996) which may be due to thermal processing, low a and antibacterial effects of additives in RTCCCM while post processing contamination may be the reasons for increase in SPC during storage.
A gradual, but non-linear increase was observed in
Staphylococcus aureus count during storage. The presence of organism in the mix reveals post processing contamination.
Modi et al. (2007) recorded initial staphylococci counts of 3.3 log cfu/g which markedly decreased by 2 log cycles after 1 month of storage and thereafter increased to 2.0 log cfu/g during storage. Absence of coliforms may be related to the processing conditions of RTCCCM. YMC increased significantly (p<0.05) from day 15 till the end of storage period. Marked increase in YMC during storage was reported for various dehydrated meat products such as chicken noodles by
Bhaskaran et al. (2011).
Sensory evaluation
Critical appraisal of results from Table 5 revealed a non-significant decrease in appearance scores of cutlets with advancement of storage period which might be attributed to the deep fat frying technique which provided a similar appearance to the product. Similar decrease has been noted in
kebabs prepared from dehydrated mix (
Modi et al. 2007). Juiciness in rehydrated products may be attributed to the interaction of FMP, DVM, textured soy protein and their rehydration. The cutlets prepared from the mix had appreciable juiciness that decreased non-significantly during the study period. Similarly, decreased juiciness of
kebabs prepared from dehydrated mix has been reported upon storage at ambient temperature
(Modi et al. 2007). Flavor scored well upto day 15, thereafter decreased with the changes at various intervals being comparable to day 1 and day 90. The flavour score on day 90 ranged between moderately desirable to very desirable. Decline of flavor could be correlated to increase in TBARS value of meat products (
Witte et al.1970) and to the expected loss of volatile flavor components from ingredients during storage period. MFI followed a similar pattern as that of flavor.
Modi and Prakash (2008) reported an increase in MFI of meat cubes incorporated with vegetables due to the presence of sulfur and carbonyl compounds. A similar reaction would have resulted in improved flavor and MFI of cutlets.
Texture, declined with increase in storage time, however the decline was significant (p<0.05) only on day 90.
Modi et al. (2007) reported a not signiûcant difference in texture parameters of kebabs from dehydrated mix. With progression in storage non-significant decrease in OA was recorded till 75
th day while a significantly lower value was observed on day 90 as compared to day 15. The decrease in OA might be due to biochemical changes brought about by microorganisms and chemical reactions occurring in the product.