The cattle population in India has been increasing from 190.90 million in 2012 to 192.50 million in 2019 (
Agricultural Research Data Book, 2019). Basic understanding about rumen methanogens microbial diversity in indigenous and exotic cattle is important to formulate the strategies for methane mitigation from Indian livestock. In the present study, diversity of methanogens is explored in the Gir native cattle along with crossbred cattle of Gir and Kangayam bred fed with standard milch animal diet using molecular approaches based on 16S rRNA and mcrA gene. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first report on the methanogens microbial diversity analysis in Indian Gir native cattle along with crossbred cattle of Gir and Kangayam.
PCR amplication and sequence analysis
The partial 16S rRNA gene of methanogenic bacteria of ruminal fluid from Gir, Gir cross and Kangayam cross bred was amplified using the methanogenic specific 16S rRNA primers with product size of 800 bp and sequenced (MW916668- MW916670 ) (Fig 1). There are several reports about the use of 16S rRNA gene for the identification of methanogens from environmental samples. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of all the three strains of methanogenic producing bacteria from Gir, Gir cross and Kangayam cross revealed 99-100% identity with other KX787709, KX787608 and HQ616028, respectively. The phylogenetic analysis also revealed that, all these three strains of 16S rRNA from Gir, Gir cross and Kangayam Cross were claded with EU330421 and M59142, which are methanogenic bacteria earlier reported from India which indicates our all the three strains belongs to
Methanobacteriales (Fig 3). The phylogeny of methanogens determined using mcrA sequences in accordance with those determined using 16S rRNA gene sequences (
Friedrich, 2005).
However, the use of 16S rRNA is imposes the risk of amplification of other bacteria along with Methanogenic bacteria. It is essential to detect the methanogens on the basis of functional genes that are found to be unique in methanogenesis. The Methyl coenzyme M. reductase (mcr) is the terminal enzyme involved in methanogenesis, which reduces the methyl group bond of methyl coenzyme M with the release of methane (
Friedrich, 2005). Because the a-subunit of mcr(mcrA) and its isoenzyme gene (mrtA) are highly conserved among methanogens and that these genes are almost exclusively found in methanogens, mcrA/mrtA-based detection of methanogens has been used.
Further in this study, mcrA gene of methanogenic specific bacteria of ruminal fluid from Gir, Gir cross and Kangayam cross bred was amplified using specific primers with the product size of 470 bp (Fig 2) and sequenced (MW757257, MW767001 and MW767003).The sequence analysis revealed that the all the sequence of mcrA gene has more than 99 percentage of identity with AB928466, AB615893 and AB617118 for Gir, Gir cross bred and Kangayam cross bred. The phylogenetic analysis of mcrA gene forms three different clade in which all the three sequences belongs to
Methanomicrobiales along with AF414044 (Wiltshire SP40JG, UK), HQ450171 (Haryana, India) and HQ450167 (Haryana, India) (Fig 4). Comparative studies between the 16S rRNA and mcrA gene revealed mcrA gene is more efficient for classifying the diverse group of methanogens in phylogenetically
(Juottonen et al., 2006, Jerman et al., 2009).
Our findings revealed the dominance of
Methanobrevibacter-related sequences on the basis of 16S rRNA and mcrA gene sequence homology. The presence of
Methanobrevibacter as major phylotype in the Gir cattle, Gir cross bred and Kangayam cross bred is in agreement with earlier reports of
Denman et al., (2007) who reported
Methanobrevibacter sp. are the dominant methanogens in Brahman crossbred steers (
Bosindicus). In another study,
Jeyanathan et al., (2011) revealed that
Methanobrevibacter sp. are dominant in cattle from New Zealand.
Franzolin et al. (2012) have also identified
Methanobrevibacter as the dominant genus in Holstein cattle, water buffaloes and crossbred buffalo, respectively. Dominance of genus
Methanobrevibacter observed in our study is in accordance to
Janseen and Kirs. (2008) who surveyed that 61.6% of the rumen archaea belongs to this genus.
Skillman et al. (2006) and
Wright et al. (2007) have reported the presence of
M. stadtmanae in bovine rumen. The majority of the sequences retrieved from bovine rumens and cattle dung are belongs to
Methanomicrobiales and
Methanobacteriales Rastogi et al. (2008). On the other hand, the same group observed that in Surti rumen 16S rRNA library, 97% clones were related to
Methanomicrobiales and
Methano bacteriales. Many studies are also carried out based on the 16s rRNA gene sequences due to their highly conserved nature and availability of the sequences from databases. However, based on the 16S rRNA sequence analysis it is very difficult to differentiate closely related taxons. Recently, studies were being carried out with mcrA gene instead of 16s rRNA gene since the mcrA has higher evolutionary rate, less conserved sequences and can also afford information related to the functional diversity of methanogens
(Sheppard et al., 2005). For these properties of mcrA gene it’s used as a marker for phylogenetic analysis in conjunction with or independent of, 16S rRNA genes (
Steinberg and Regan, 2008).
Montoya et al. (2011) reported the number of differences per site in the mcrA gene fragment is 2-3 times higher than that in the full length 16S rRNA and therefore, mcrA sequences offers conclusive resolution and assignment of genera than 16S rRNA gene sequences (
Meyer and Kuever, 2007). Overall, the findings from the present study indicate that methanogenic populations of Gir cattle and the crossbred of Gir and Kangayam cattle are predominant with
Methanobrevibacter related phylotypes. The diversity analysis using mcrA gene has provided better insight of
rumen methanogens than 16S rRNA gene.
Per cent identity of mcr agene
The mcrA gene reveals 92%, 92.5% and 95.9% percent identity to Gir, Gir cross and Kangayam cross bred with AF414044 and AF414044 respectively. Among the three mcrA gene sequences, Gir cattle reveals 100% identity with Kangayam cross and 99.8% identity with Gir cross bred (Table 3).
Deduced amino acids variations
The deduced amino acid variations of mcrA gene reveals, there are 57 amino acid variations while comparing with GU385700. The amino acid changes are conserved across Gir, Gir cross and Kangayam cross bred, however it varies for all other mcrA gene of methanogenic bacteria. The deduced amino acid variation was shown in Table 4.
Absolute quantification of methanogenic population of ruminal fluid by qRT-PCR
The total methanogen population,
Methanobrevibacter sp. and
Methanosphaera stadtmanae from the ruminal fluid of three cattle from each bred of Gir, Gir cross and Kangayam cross were analyzed using absolute quantification by real time PCR. This study reveals that the total methanogen populations of all the three Gir cattle is 0.26 mg/ml, 1.95 mg/ml and 0.31mg/ml, Gir cross is 0.23 mg/ml, 0.26 mg/ml and 0.44 mg/ml and for Kangayam cross is 4.91mg/ml, 5.08 mg/ml and 5.78mg/ml respectively. The absolute copy number of partial 16S rRNA gene of
Methanosphaera stadtmanae of all the three Gir cattle is 0.63 mg/ml, 1.12 mg/ml and 0.29 mg/ml, Gir cross is 0.17 mg/ml, 0.02 mg/ml and 0.38 mg/mlandfor Kangayam cross is 5.15 mg/ml, 5.94 mg/ml and 7.36 mg/ml respectively. This confirming more or less similar quantity of methanogen in the ruminal fluid. The absolute copy number of
Methanobrevibacter sp. of partial 16S rRNA gene of all the three gir cattle is 2.12 mg/ml, 2.18 mg/ml and 1.17 mg/ml, gir cross cattle is 0.29 mg/ml, 0.31 mg/ml and 0.55 mg/ml and for kangayam cross cattle are 5.66 mg/ml, 6.16 mg/ml and 7.17 mg/ml respectively (Table 5). This confirming more or less similar quantity of methanogens in the ruminal fluid.
The proportions of 16S rRNA genes of
Methanobrevibacter sp. and
Methanosphaera stadtmanae, the later reveals higher significance difference between these two methanogenic bacteria in the ruminal fluid of Gir, Gir cross and Kangayam cross.
Our results of qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the
Methanobrevibactersp is the most dominant gene in rumen and
Methanosphaera stadtmanae copy numbers are very low level in the rumen total methanogens. The unique combination of ruminal microbiota in each animal may have important roles in the host’s nutrient uptake and energy metabolism, phenotypes that are usually regulated by the genetics, diet and environment of the host.