Sensory evaluation
Blending could lead to the production of delightful and delicious beverages with improved organoleptic quality and hence the prepared blended beverages were compared for sensory parameters with the pure dragon fruit beverage. Though there was no significant difference between the sensory scores of blended beverages and pure dragon fruit beverage (Table 1); the blended beverage produced using dragon fruit: lime in 80:20 ratio recorded maximum mean score for flavour (7.26), texture (7.46), taste (7.53) and overall acceptability (7.53). RTS beverage prepared by blending dragon fruit: pineapple in the ratio 50:50 had maximum mean score of 7.68 (flavour), 7.65 (taste) and overall acceptability (7.86). Beverage produced by blending dragon fruit: watermelon in the ratio 10:90 had maximum mean score for appearance (8.0), colour (7.93), flavour (7.12), texture (7.68), taste (7.37) and overall acceptability (7.56). Compared to pure dragon fruit beverages, blended RTS beverages had higher overall acceptability scores and hence blending can be suggested as a viable option to improve acceptability of dragon fruit beverages. Similar findings have been reported by
Jalgaonkar et al., (2020) in dragon fruit-grape blended beverages and
Vishakha et al., (2021) in dragon fruit blended lemon and aonla juice. Based on high overall acceptability scores, dragon fruit: lime in 80:20 ratio, dragon fruit: pineapple in 50:50 ratio and dragon fruit: watermelon in 10:90 ratio were selected as the best blended RTS beverages and were subjected to quality evaluation.
Quality evaluation
The selected blended beverages were compared for chemical, nutritional and sensory quality parameters with the pure dragon fruit beverage. TSS of blended beverages was in the range of 11°Brix to 13.2°Brix (Fig 1a). Dragon fruit: pineapple RTS beverage recorded highest TSS (13.2°Brix) and lowest TSS was recorded for dragon fruit: lime RTS beverage. Minimum acidity (0.235%) was observed for dragon fruit: watermelon and pure dragon fruit RTS beverage and maximum acidity of 0.295 per cent was observed in dragon fruit: lime RTS beverage (Fig 1b). Dragon fruit: pineapple RTS beverage showed the maximum reducing sugar of 5.15 per cent and total sugar of 14.26 per cent (Fig 1c, 1d). Dragon fruit: watermelon RTS beverage showed the minimum reducing sugar of 2.84 per cent and total sugar of 7.58 per cent.
Except ascorbic acid, all the nutritional quality parameters of RTS beverages were significantly influenced by blending, indicating that blending did not reduce the ascorbic acid of the dragon fruit. Instead, though not significant, dragon fruit: watermelon RTS beverage recorded the maximum ascorbic acid of 9.53 mg 100 g-1 (Fig 1e). β-carotene content was also highest for the dragon fruit: watermelon RTS beverage (0.193 mg 100 ml-1) and pure dragon fruit RTS beverage recorded the minimum β-carotene content of 0.129 mg 100 ml-1 (Fig 1f). Owing to antioxidant-rich nature of dragon fruit, pure dragon fruit RTS beverage had recorded highest (63.8%) antioxidant activity (Fig 1g). Pineapple and watermelon blended beverages had next higher antioxidant activity. Compared to watermelon and pineapple, lime was proved to be a poor option for blending with dragon fruit in the present study.
Vishakha et al., (2021) reported good nutritional properties having immense health benefits for the blended dragon fruit drink developed by them. The increased/ decreased nutritional quality obtained for blended beverages are due to the quality parameters of the individual fruits used for blending. Increase in nutritional value of the drinks by blending has been reported using bitter gourd with lemon
(Singh and Gaikwad, 2012) and carrot juice with pineapple juice
(Imitiyaz and Singh, 2018).
When the overall acceptability of the beverages was assessed, all the blended beverages had higher scores compared to pure dragon fruit beverage (Fig 1h). Beverage blended with watermelon had the highest score (7.56) and the pure beverage the least (6.95).
When the cost of production of one litre blended beverages was calculated, the cost of blended beverages with lime, pineapple and watermelon were Rs. 39/-, Rs. 32/- and Rs. 24/- respectively whereas the cost of pure dragon fruit beverage was Rs. 40/- indicating that blended beverages with pineapple or watermelon are economical compared to pure RTS beverage.
Storage stability
Any processed commodity should retain maximum quality parameters after storage. The selected blended RTS beverages were analyzed for chemical, nutritional, organoleptic and microbial qualities at monthly intervals for 60 days.
There was significant increase of TSS from 12.55 to 13.69°Brix during storage period (Fig 2a). The gradual increase in TSS might be due to the co-polymerization of organic acids with sugars and amino acids
(Malav et al., 2014). Acidity has vital importance in determining the quality of RTS beverages and was increased during storage. Acidity had increased gradually from 0.262 per cent at the time of storage to 0.305 per cent at 60 days after storage (Fig 2b).
Thirukkumar and Vennila (2019) reported that an increase in acidity during storage might be due to the formation of organic acids by the degradation of ascorbic acid. Storage, the sugar content of all the RTS beverages had increased (Fig 2c).
Elbandy et al., (2014) reported that an increase in sugar content of mango nectar during storage was due to the inversion of sucrose into glucose and fructose under the acidic conditions of nectar.
All the nutritional quality parameters showed a decreasing trend during storage. Ascorbic acid of the RTS beverages decreased from 9.06 mg 100 g-1 to 8.03 mg 100-1 during storage (Fig 2d).
Nagpal and Rajalakshi (2009) reported decrease in ascorbic acid content of beverages during storage due to oxidation, as ascorbic acid is sensitive to oxygen, light and heat by both enzymatic and non-enzymatic catalysts. β-carotene content of stored beverages decreased from 0.159 mg 100 ml-1 to 0.094 mg 100 ml-1 during storage (Fig 2e).
Jan and Masih (2012) reported that gradual decrease in β-carotene value may be due to increasing temperature and heating time. During storage, antioxidant activity of stored beverages had decreased from 55.65% to 46.43% (Fig 2f). These results are in accordance with the findings of
Gao and Rupasinghe (2012) who reported a decrease in antioxidant activity of apple carrot juice blends during storage.
Tariq et al., (2020) reported that the decreasing trend of antioxidant activity during storage is linked with the fact of lower content of phenolic compounds and vitamin C that influence antioxidant activity directly.
The sensory quality profile is a prime factor to consider the marketability of any product
(Boghani et al., 2012). Appearance and colour of beverages did not differ significantly during storage (Fig 3). Flavour and texture were significantly influenced during storage and the highest mean score for flavour and texture were recorded for dragon fruit: pineapple RTS beverage and dragon fruit: lime RTS beverage respectively throughout the storage period. Overall acceptability of beverages was decreased throughout the storage period. Similar decrease in overall sensorial quality profile were reported during storage in papaya-aloe RTS beverage for three months
(Boghani et al., 2012) and in blended aloe, aonla and ginger therapeutic RTS beverages for four months
(Sasikumar et al., 2013). Though the sensory scores of the beverages were decreased during storage, microbial count was less than the safety limit of 50 cfu/ml prescribed by Food safety and Standards Regulations, 2011, hence can be considered microbiologically safe (Table 2) for a period of 60 days.