Physico-chemical qualities
The treated sausages with SPI and I recorded significantly (p<0.01) higher ES in comparison to control and T
3 containing SPI and I @ 2.5% each showed the highest (Table 1). This increased ES might be because dietary fiber like Inulin can lead to a compact gel formation due to the fibers ability to retain fat and water (
Fernández et al., 2005).
The treated formulation showed a significantly higher (p<0.01) CY than the control (Table 1) and might be due to the fibers in Inulin which can retain water and can form a barrier against fat absorption while cooking (
Kýlýnççeker and Kurt 2018). A significantly higher cooking yield was also observed with increasing soy protein addition in chevon patties by
Yadav et al., (2013).
A gradual significant (p<0.01) increment in WHC in the treated sausages was noted than the control product (Table 1), which might be due to increased water retention by increased levels of I and SPI.
Fernandez et al., (2005) reported that SPI has an outstanding ability to bind with water and enhance the WHC and solubility of emulsified meat. Similar findings were also reported by
Mendez et al., (2015).
The significantly (p<0.01) low calorie value was observed in treated formulations due to the replacement of fat and simultaneous substitution with SPI and I. Similar results were also observed by
Kumar et al., (2004) by reducing fat content from 15 to 10 per cent in low fat pork patties and by
Garcia et al., (2006) in reduced-fat sausages (10% fat) incorporated with Inulin.
The pH values of duck meat sausages with I recorded a significant (p<0.01) decrease. In contrast, the addition of SPI significantly (p<0.01) increased the pH values of the products than the control (Table 2). Reduced pH in sausages added with I may be attributed to low ionic strength, the chemical composition of dietary fiber and the protein content of the polysaccharides (
Méndez et al., 2015). The higher pH of SPI-treated sausages might be due to SPI’s high pH (7.52)
(Lee et al., 2017).
Significant differences (p<0.01) in the TBARS values among control and treated formulations were noted. There was also a gradual increase in TBARS values with the advancement in storage (Table 2). However, sausages with Inulin showed lower TBARS value than other formulations, which might be due to lower fat content than control.
Jairath et al., (2018) also observed significantly lower TBARS values in buffalo calf meat sausages incorporated with corn starch as fat replacers. The gradual increase in TBARS values on storage might be attributed to oxygen permeability of packaging material that led to lipid oxidation and production of volatile metabolites during the storage period
(Kumar et al., 2013).
The tyrosine value of the treated sausages with SPI and I revealed a significant (p<0.01) increase during the storage period in the control and treated products. However, no significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between control and treated formulations. During storage, the increase in tyrosine values might be due to the inherent enzymes of meat and bacterial proteolysis
(Strange et al., 1977).
Organoleptic qualities
Incorporation of SPI and I significantly (p<0.01) increased the appearance, colourand flavour scores in treated groups than the control (Table 3).
Alaei et al., (2018) and
Ahmad et al., ( 2010) also reported similar results in chicken sausage and buffalo meat sausages treated with I and SPI.
Lee et al., (2017) reported improved flavour in breakfast sausage enhanced with 1% wheat sprout protein and 1% SPI.
The sausages incorporated with SPI and I revealed significantly (p<0.05) higher texture and juiciness scores than the control, which might be due to the water-binding properties of SPI and I in treated formulations. Similar findings were also reported by
Akesowan (2010),
Ahmad et al., (2010) and
Garcia et al., (2006) in light pork burgers, buffalo meat sausages and reduced-fat sausages, respectively. The treated formulations had significantly (p<0.01) higher overall acceptability scores than the control product. The T
3 had the highest overall acceptability. It might be due to the improved flavour, juiciness and texture characteristics of the treated sausages
(Garcia et al., 2006 and
Ahmad et al., 2010).
In the present study, the sensory qualities of both the control and treatment formulations decreased significantly (p<0.01) during the storage period. Reduction in colour score might be due to oxidative fading and non-enzymatic browning
(Naveen et al., 2016). At the same time, the flavour deterioration during storage might be attributed to microbial growth and oxidative rancidity
(Suresh et al., 2003). Changes in chemical contents such as protein, moisture, fat collagen and pH value during storage resulted in texture change
(Dong et al., 2007). A decrease in all the sensory attributes during storage reflected significantly (p<0.01)lower scores for overall acceptability. The present findings were congruent with the observations of
Naveen et al., (2016) in duck meat sausages and
Biswas et al., (2011) in duck meat patties.