Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research, volume 42 issue 1 (march 2023) : 60-64

Effect of Seasons on Expressions of Milking Parlour Behaviours and Milk Yield of Crossbred Jersey Cows in Tropical Climate

Ajit Kumar1,*, Dilip Kumar Mandal2
1Department of Livestock Production Management, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Kolkata-700 037, West Bengal, India.
2Department of Livestock Production Management, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute (Deemed University), Eastern Regional Station, Kalyani-741 235, Nadia, West Bengal, India.
Cite article:- Kumar Ajit, Mandal Kumar Dilip (2023). Effect of Seasons on Expressions of Milking Parlour Behaviours and Milk Yield of Crossbred Jersey Cows in Tropical Climate . Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 42(1): 60-64. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1816.
Background: Milking behaviour of dairy cows has remarkable influences on their production efficacy. A number of genetic and environmental features controls and affects lactating behaviour of dairy cow. The aim of present study was to investigate the influence of seasons on milking behaviour and milk production of Jersey crossbred cows in tropical climate.

Methods: The experiment was conducted on 94 Jersey crossbred cows maintained at organized dairy farm at ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Eastern Regional Station, Kalyani, West Bengal, India and there lactating behavioural features were studied during milking time inside the milking parlour under different seasons. The study period was divided into 3 season’s viz. rainy (September-October), winter (November-February) and summer (March-May).

Result: Seasons showed influence upon milking behaviour and milk yield of cows. Temperament of cows were least (1.91±0.03) during winter seasons as compare to rainy and summer (2.15±0.03; 2.09±0.03) respectively and it differed significantly (P<0.01), simultaneously daily milk yield were also more (9.36±0.11) kgs during winter seasons as compare to rainy and summer (6.63±0.13; 8.58±0.13) respectively and it differed significantly (P<0.01). It can be concluded from the study that seasons showed significant influence on the milking behavioural features and milk yield in Jersey crossbred cows in tropical climate, which suggests that if dairy animals get favourable micro-climatic environment and reduced level of environmental stress they will behave more favourably and simultaneously their production efficacy also inclines.
Heat stress is one of the utmost challenges faced by livestock persons around the world. Heat stress arises when any combination of climatic factors origins the actual temperature to be higher than the animals Thermo Neutral Zone. Bos taurus cattle shows significant physiological modifications when they are exposed to extended periods of elevated heat and humidity (Beatty et al., 2006). These changes continue for a few numbers of days even after the heat stress situations have been settled. Bos indicus also feels similar but less noticeable physiological changes as they are better in regulating their body temperature in response to heat stress than Bos taurus breeds (Dalcin et al., 2016).

Milking behaviour of cattle and buffaloes is a significant aspect of animal ethology because it has enormous impact on milk yield of animal, milk flow rate throughout milking, milking duration, ease of milking, selection of animals and eventually farm economics (Gergovska et al., 2012; Haskell et al., 2014; Bharti and Kamboj, 2019). Milking behaviour is positively associated with production efficacy of dairy cows. Animals showing ideal behaviour before, during and after milking frequently showed improved health status and are expected to give higher monetary returns to the farmers (Gergovska et al., 2012). Temperament one of the primary milking behavioural features of animal, specifies how animal responds to the external stimuli and it is one of the most significant features of milking behaviour, which is a valuable tool for refining productivity of cows (Haskell et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2019).

There are very less researches done on milking behaviours and its impact on production of Jersey crossbred cows and there is very scanty information available regarding association between milking behaviours with milk quantity as well as quality and also how different animal as well as environmental factors affects milking behaviour and milk yield in tropical lower Gangetic region. Therefore, present study was designed to assess the milking behaviours and impact of factors (parity, stage of lactation, time of milking and seasons) on milking behavioural features in milking parlour and milk yield in Jersey crossbred cows at tropical lower Gangetic region.
Location of the study
 
The present study was carried out on Jersey crossbred cows (N=94, 1st to 8th lactations) and maintained at organized dairy farm at ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Eastern Regional Station, Kalyani, West Bengal, India, during the year 2017 to 2018. The climate of Kalyani is warm and tropical; the extreme ambient temperature in summer goes up to 39°C and minimum temperature in winter falls down to about 8°C.
 
Management of cows during the experimental period
 
All animals were kept under loose housing system. The feeding management practices and feed ingredients were similar for the entire lactating herd. Concentrate mixture, seasonal green fodder (ad libitum) and chaffed paddy straw as dry fodder was provided to complete the nutrient requirement of all lactating animals. The quantity of concentrate was considered for every animal as per their body weight and milk production level. Concentrate was provided @1.5 kg/day as the maintenance ration between 8 to 8.30 A.M. and rest of the quantity was provided during milking time fortnightly adjusted depending upon milk yield as per farm schedule. Clean drinking water was provided throughout the day.
 
Recording of parameters
 
Milking was done at cattle yard, organized farm at ERS (Eastern regional station)- NDRI by semi-automatic machine milking (DeLaval India), two times in a day i.e., during morning from 5.00 to 7.00 AM and evening from 2.30 to 4.30 PM. The milk was measured in kg and noted for individual cow. Prior to milking, the animals were washed and groomed. Udders of cows were meticulously cleaned with clean water before the milking. Towels drenched with antiseptic solution were used for smearing of teats and udder just prior to attaching the teat-cups within the teats. The milking parlour behavioural features of cows were noted down during milking operations from 1m distance away from behind the animals without disturbing them. All the behavioural parameters were observed at weekly period of intervals by a single observer during the study period to evade personal error disparity.
 
Temperament score (TS)
 
Temperament of each individual animal was observed at the milking and temperament was scored under (1-5;1: Docile, 2: Slightly restless, 3: Restless, 4: Aggressive, 5: Nervous) of milking temperament score given by Prasad and Jayalaxmi (2014).
 
Milk yield
 
Every day, milk productions were noted at cattle yard, at ERS-NDRI. Milk recording continued for 9 months (morning and evening) following complete let-down for individual cows.
 
Parlour leaving speed or flight speed (m/s)
 
It is the duration of time engaged by cows to cross a certain specified distance in milk parlour afterward their release from milking byre once the milking operation is over. The time period to cover the measured fixed distance was noted down by means of stop watch. The parlour leaving speed was evaluated as the total area (distance) covered divided by time period taken by them to cover that certain specified distance and it is denoted as meter per second (m/s).
 
Exit score
 
Exit score stated patterns of movement of cows after liberation from parlour i.e., how animals are approaching out of milk parlour at the end of milking procedures. It was judged on a scale of (1 to 3; 1: Walked, 2: Trotted, 3: Ran out) as well-defined by Lanier and Grandin (2002).
 
Statement of animal rights (Ethical approval)
 
The usage of cattle in this trial (experiment) was permitted by the local institutional animal ethical committee vide institute approved project-NDRI/IRC Project code B-40 and it is an observational study.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The data obtained were analysed using SPSS software (SPSS Inc, 2007). The statistical methods used to analyse each parameter was General Linear Model and for categorical variables, data on frequency distribution were analysed using Chi-Square c2 test of independence. The significant difference levels were set at 5% (P<0.05) and 1% (P<0.01).
Overall milking behavioural features of Jersey crossbred cows
 
Study of milking behaviour of dairy cows is one of the very important aspects of milking management of dairy cow, because behaviour considerably affects the production efficiency of animals. Overall Mean±SE of milking behavioural features of crossbred Jersey cows throughout the study period of 9 months revealed that mean value of temperament score (1.98±0.02), no. of stepping/milking (1.25±0.02), exit score (1.14±0.01), flight speed/parlour leaving speed (0.47±0.01), milking durations (249.68±1.92), daily milk yield (DMY) (8.27±0.08), milk flow rate (1015.05±6.51) was within the normal range. The mean values of DMY observed in the present study were similar to others reported in Jersey crossbred cows under tropical climate (Mandal et al., 2016, 2018, 2021; Kumar et al., 2020). Gergovska et al., (2012) assessed the milking temperament scores of cows from Holstein Friesian (HF) and Brown Swiss breeds and the scale they used was reverse (1-very nervous and 5-very calm cow) than those most popularly used in many countries and the present study used the later one. The mean values of temperament scores of HF and Brown Swiss cows were 3.74 and 3.65, respectively which is similar to our findings revealing that calmer cows are having better efficacy of production. Rousing et al., (2004) reported that 27% of the cows showed stepping behaviour once during milking, 3% stepped more than once during milking which corroborate our findings. Abe et al., (2002) evaluated the milking temperament of Holstein cows in Japan and the mean score obtained was 2.31, which is in support to our findings.
 
Impact of season on milking behavioural parameters and milk yield
 
The study period was divided into three seasons i.e., rainy (July-October), winter (November-February) and summer (March-May) and data were analyzed to assess the effect of seasons on milking behavioural features.

Statistically analysed data (Table 1) revealed that temperament score was lower in winter season and varies significantly (P<0.01) as compared to rainy and summer seasons. Similar findings were observed in case of no. of stepping/milking and exit score. Milking durations, milk flow rate and milk yield were higher in winter season as compared to summer and rainy seasons that differed significantly (P<0.01). The above findings could be explained by the fact that during winter season environment was less stressful and more comfortable for the animals, so their production efficiency and milking behaviour were more conspicuous as compared to summer and rainy seasons, where THI became higher and their production levels also declined (Mandal et al., 2016; Prasanna et al., 2021). Enhancement in microenvironment of the cow shed through false roof reduced heat loads and assisted in maintaining standard physiological indices of cows and thereby showed more daily milk yield per cow (Mandal et al., 2018; Sahu et al., 2018; Sahu et al., 2019). In tropical climatic conditions environmental features are the most important elements for the declined milk yield of cows. Environmental features such as temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation and air movement and their relations frequently limit the performance of dairy cows (Mandal et al., 2002; West, 2003; Upadhaya et al., 2009).

Table 1: Least square (mean±SE) of milking behavioural parameters of Jersey crossbred cows in different seasons.



Thus, the impact of shelter comfort was not only limited to the performance and behaviours in living byre, but also its effect was prolonged up to their expressivity of behaviour in milking byre. Hence, it also indicates that behavioural rhythm of dairy cows might possibly be transformed in favourable directions through shelter management interventions during different seasons. Provision of proper micro-environmental (temperature, humidity, ventilation etc.) situations through relaxed housing designs improved milk yield and also modulated milking behaviours in Jersey crossbred cows during different seasons (Kumar et al., 2020). In case of Holstein cows, heat stress declined the daily milk yield by 21% as the Temperature-Humidity Index (THI) values went from 68 in the spring to 78 in the summer. Lesser milk yields were noted for confined Holstein cows in Mediterranean weather conditions during spring as compared to summer (Bouraoui et al., 2002). Our findings from this study (Table 2) were in line with the findings of Gangwar (1982) which suggested that milking time was higher in all the temperament scored Murrah and Nili-Ravi buffaloes during the hot-dry summer than during the other seasons. It was concluded that animals become more hostile and excited as the temperature and thermal stress increases which leads to a decrease in milk production and milk flow rate in hot-dry summer. In Jersey crossbred cows, as observed in the present study (Table 2) milk yield and milk flow rate was higher in winter, followed by summer and lowest in rainy season where stress conditions were more in later seasons. The said diverse effect among breeds and crossbred components was much more prominent on high yielders as compared to low yielders within tropical environments because of high air temperatures and relative humidity (Bryant et al., 2007; Martello et al., 2010; Mandal et al., 2016).

Table 2: Least square (mean±SE) of production parameters of Jersey crossbred cows in different seasons.

This investigation revealed that seasons significantly influence milking behaviour. In winter cows showed more docile temperament as compared to summer and rainy seasons because winter dairy animals get more favourable environment as compared to other seasons which simultaneously helped them to perform as per their efficacy.
Authors have sincere gratitude toward the Director, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal and Head, ERS, Kalyani for providing all facilities for this study and all who assisted in direct/indirect ways towards completion of this study work.
None

  1. Abe, N., Hirooka, H., Takazaki, H. and Kubota, Y. (2002). Possible factors affecting the milking temperament of Holstein cows. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho. 73(4): 515-520.

  2. Beatty, D.T., Barnes, A., Taylor, E., Pethick, D., McCarthy, M. and Maloney, S.K. (2006). Physiological responses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle to prolonged continuous heat and humidity. Journal of Animal Science. 84: 972- 985.

  3. Bharti, P. and Kamboj, M.L. (2019). Effect of habituation to milking and natural suckling on milking behaviour and milk production characteristics in primiparous Sahiwal cows. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 72(3): 312-317. https:// doi.org/10.33785/IJDS.2019.v72i03.012

  4. Bouraoui, R., Lahmar, M., Majdoub, A., Djemali, M. and Belyea, R. (2002). The relationship of temperature-humidity index with milk production of dairy cows in a Mediterranean climate. Animal Research. 51(6): 479-491, https:// doi.org/10.1051/animres:2002036.

  5. Bryant, J.R., LÓpez-Villalobos, N., Pryce, J.E., Holmes, C.W. and Johnson, D.L. (2007). Quantifying the effect of thermal environment on production traits in three breeds of dairy cattle in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 50: 327-338.

  6. Dalcin, V., Fischer, V., Daltro, D., Alfonzo, M., Priscila, E., Marcelo, S., Giovani, K., Marcos, S. and Concepta, M. (2016). Physiological parameters for thermal stress in dairy cattle Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 45: 458-65.

  7. Gangwar, P.C. (1982). The effects of seasons on behaviour during milking in buffaloes (Bos bubalis). International Journal of Biometeorology. 26: 147-151.

  8. Gergovska, Z., Miteva, T., Angelova, T., Yordanova, D. and Mitev, J. (2012). Relation of milking temperament and milk yield in Holstein and Brown Swiss cows. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 18(5): 771-777 

  9. Haskell, M.J., Simm, G. and Turner, S.P. (2014). Genetic selection for temperament traits in dairy and beef cattle. Frontiers in Genetics. 5: 368.

  10. Kumar, A., Mandal, D.K., Mandal, A. and Bhakat, C. (2020). Effects of loose housing designs on expressions of milking parlour behaviours and milk yield of crossbred Jersey cows. Journal of Animal Research. 10(2): 315-323.

  11. Kumar, A., Mandal, D.K., Mandal, A., Bhakat, C., Chatterjee, A. and Rai, S. (2019). Effects of milking temperament on milk yield, udder health and milk composition in crossbred Jersey cows. International Journal of Livestock Research. 9(1): 187-194.

  12. Lanier, J.L. and Grandin, T. (2002). The relationship between Bos Taurus feedlot cattle temperament and cannon bone measurements. Journal of Animal Science. 53.

  13. Mandal, D.K., Mandal, A., Bhakat, C. and Dutta, T.K. (2021). Effect of heat stress amelioration through open-ridge ventilated thatched roof housing on production and reproduction performance of crossbred Jersey cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250- 021-02574-w.

  14. Mandal, D.K., Mandal, A., Bhakat, C., Chatterjee, A. and Karunakaran, M. (2016). Effect of climatic stress on milk production in Crossbred Jersey cows herd. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Food Technology. 3(3): 230-232.

  15. Mandal, D.K., Rao, S., Singh, K. and Singh, S.P. (2002). Effect of macroclimatic factor on milk production in Friesian x Sahiwal half bred. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 55: 166-170.

  16. Mandal, D.K., Sahu, D., Mandal, A., Chatterjee, A., Bhakat, C., Rai, S. and Karunakaran, M. (2018). Alteration of microenvironment of animal shed through roof insulation by paddy straw- its seasonal efficacy and physiological impacts on Jersey crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 71(5): 483- 490.

  17. Martello, L.S., Junior, H.S., Silva, S.L. and Balieiro, J.C.C. (2010). Alternative body sites for heat stress measurement in milking cows under tropical conditions and their relationship to the thermal discomfort of the animals. International Journal of Biometeorology. 54: 647-652.

  18. Prasad, R.M.V. and Jaya Laxmi, P. (2014). Studies on the temperament of Murrah buffaloes with various udder and teat shapes and its effect on milk yield. Buffalo Bulletin. 33(2): 170-176

  19. Prasanna, J.S., Rao, S.T.V., Prakash, M.G., Rathod, S., Kalyani, P., Reddy, B.R. (2021). Effect of Seasons on Physiological Responses in Sahiwal and Crossbred Cows. Indian Journal of Animal Research. DOI: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4700.

  20. Rousing, T., Bonde, M., Badsberg, J.H. and Sørensen, J.T. (2004). Stepping and kicking behaviour during milking in relation to response in human-animal interaction test and clinical health in loose housed dairy cows. Livestock Production Science. 88: 1-8.

  21. Sahu, D., Mandal, D.K., Bhakat, C., Chatterjee, A., Mandal, A. and Mandal, M. (2018). Effects of roof ceiling and flooring on microclimate of shed and physiological indices of crossbred Jersey cows. International Journal of Livestock Research. 8(4): 272-280. 

  22. Sahu, D., Mandal, D.K., Dar, A.H., Podder, M. and Gupta, A. (2019). Modification in housing system affects the behavior and welfare of dairy Jersey crossbred cows in different seasons. Biological Rhythm Research. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09291016.2019.1619130.

  23. Upadhaya, R. C., Ashutosh, K.A., Gupta, S.K., Gupta, S.V., Singh, S.V. and Rani, N. (2009). Inventory of Methane Emission from Livestock in India. In: Global climate change and Indian Agriculture. Case Studies from the ICAR Network Project. [P.K. Aggarwal (Ed)], ICAR, New Delhi. 117-122.

  24. West, J. W. (2003). Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 86: 2131-2144.

Editorial Board

View all (0)