Effects of storage period on moisture content in paneer at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C)
The moisture content in the fresh but treated samples was 54.45 (S
0) to 54.56 % (S
1). It was revealed that preservative treatments significantly affected the moisture content in the paneer (Table 2). Paneer samples treated with brine (S
1) contained more moisture, followed by S
3 and S
2. During the subsequent storage period, the moisture content in the paneer was reduced significantly (p<0.5) in almost all samples. It was indicative that the barrier of polyethylene bags might not be significant enough to check the moisture losses during storage. A significant difference was also observed in moisture content due to the preservative treatments. Similar observations were also recorded by
Rao et al., (1984) and
Bhosale (1989).
Effects of storage period on acidity content in paneer at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C)
Significant variation was noticed in the acidity level on the day of samples treated with preservatives and subsequent period of storage. The reason might be variation in the level of moisture content resulted due to treatments given to samples and microbial activity during subsequent storage (Table 2) as the microbial activity has a direct relation with the level of acidity. It is revealed from the observations that treatment S
2 was more potent to check the activity of acid-producing microorganisms in paneer, as there was a slow increase in acidity. The rise in acidity was from 0.60% on the day of preparation to 0.78% on the 18
th day of storage under refrigeration. Treatment S
1 stood second followed by S
3. On the 9
th day of storage, the control samples become unacceptable with rising acidity from 0.615 to 1.035%. In general, when the samples became unacceptable the level of acidity was slightly more than 1%, except in S
2 treatment somewhat similar observations were made by
Bhosale (1989). However,
Rao et al., (1984) and
Boghra et al., (1997) stated that there was no considerable rise in acidity of paneer during storage.
Effects of storage period on pH content in paneer at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C)
Significant variation was observed in the mean pH value of treated and control samples of paneer. However, the mean pH values among treated samples were on par. Similarly, significant variation in mean values was observed 3
rd day onwards (Table 2). There was a considerable decrease in pH value (5.84) in the control sample on the 9
th day. In general, there was a gradual decrease in pH values of the treated samples with the advancement of the storage period. However, the values observed when the product became unacceptable are comparable to those reported by
Bhattacharya et al., (1971).
Effects of storage period on soluble nitrogen content in paneer at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C)
On the day of manufacture, paneer samples (control and treated) were estimated for soluble nitrogen was in the range of 0.091 to 0.099%, which differed significantly (Table 2). An increase in soluble nitrogen was faster in control (S
0) samples as the period of storage extended, followed by samples S
3, S
1 and S
2. It is assumed that the content of soluble nitrogen has some relation with microbial activities particularly proteolytic organisms. Slow production of soluble N in S
1 and S
2 samples during storage, might be due to some restriction caused by these preservatives on the growth of specifically proteolytic microorganisms, A more or less similar trend in the values of soluble nitrogen was noticed in their studies by
Bhosle (1989) and
Sachdeva and Singh (1990) which confirmed the findings of the present investigation.
Effects of storage period on falvour of paneer at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C)
Fresh paneer samples (treated and control) evaluated organoleptically indicated significant variation in numerical values. However, Judges allotted a maximum score (8.0) to sample S
3 followed by S
0 (7.80), S
2 (7.67) and S
1 (7.63) for flavour (Table 3). It seems that preservative treatments of chemicals given to paneer samples lowered their acceptability. On the contrary treatment of paneer samples with whey (S
3) enhanced its flavour securing 8.00 points higher than that of the control sample (7.80).
During the subsequent periods of storage, there was a continuous decline in flavour score till the day on which the particular sample became unacceptable. The difference in values of flavour score within the preservative treatments and period of storage was significantly inferior at each successive interval of evaluation.
Further, it was observed that paneer with preservative treatment S
2 and S
1 remained acceptable up to 18
th days. Hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid might be more potent to restrict the growth of microorganisms responsible for off-flavour. The paneer samples S
0 and S
3 became unacceptable on the 9
th and 12
th day of storage due to off-flavour, putrefactive odour, developed acidity, bitter taste and slimy surface. Very similar observations were made in their studies by
Kumar and Bector (1991) and
Munjal and Bector (1996).
Effects of storage period on body and texture of paneer at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C)
The critical review showed that preservative treatments given to paneer did not influence the body and texture attribute (Table 3). However, control sample S
0 remained superior over others
i.e. S
1, S
2 and S
3. Absorption of water during the process of dipping might result in sponginess. There was the continuous decline of allotment of scores by the judges in almost all stored, samples, till the product became unacceptable. Somehow there was an improvement in body and texture in the case of brine treated samples (S
1) after the 9
th day of storage as seen from the numerical values. There was a decrease in stickiness.
In no case, the paneer samples were rejected based on undesirable body and texture. Though it became unacceptable based on flavour. In support of this,
Sachdeva and Singh (1990) observed that the body and texture score of the untreated paneer sample varied over a narrow range of 7.0 to 7.6 on zero-day and 6.5 to 7.0 at the end of storage.
Effects of storage period on colour and appearance of paneer at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C)
The scores allotted by the judges (Table 3) revealed that on the day of treatment, almost all samples were quite attractive in colour and appearance. A lower score (7.90) for the S
1 sample might have been due to a slightly higher moisture level on the surface of the product. As the period of storage extended, the scores allotted for each sample declined. But no specific trend was noticed. However, the difference in the values of the score was found significant. The reasons for low scoring reported were yellowish tinge, coloured mouldy growth and development of coloured bacterial colonies.
In the present investigation, from the result, it was observed that paneer with preservative treatment S
2 and S
1 remain acceptable up to 18
th days. But S
2 treatment was more effective in controlling the growth of microorganisms and thereby checking the chemical changes as compared to S
1. The paneer samples S
0 and S
3 became unacceptable on the 9
th and 12
th days of storage.
Effects of storage period on standard plate count content in paneer at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C)
A comparatively lower count of treated samples was indicative of the fact that preservative treatments given to the paneer might have destroyed some of the micro organisms (Table 4). From the results, it is observed that treatment S
2 was the most potent against microorganisms present in the paneer samples, followed by S
1 and S
3.
No doubt, there was a continuous increase in the total population of microorganisms in almost all samples throughout storage even under cold conditions. However, preservatives could extend the shelf life of the product as seen in this study. There is no specific standard mentioned for microorganisms in the paneer to decide its acceptance /rejection. In this study, paneer samples became unacceptable when SPC was more than 10 lakhs/g. A more or less similar trend in the microbial count was observed in the past when
Bhosale (1989) and
Sachdeva and Singh (1990) carried out their studies on various aspects of paneer.
Effects of storage period on yeast and mould count content in paneer at refrigeration temperature (7±2°C)
The presence of yeast and mould in fresh paneer samples (treated and control) revealed considerable contamination, with the exception of treatment S
2, which indicated that hydrogen peroxide with lactic acid eradicated all yeast and mould in paneer on the first day. When compared to other treatments, such as S
0, S
1 and S
3, the yeast and mould count was also very low (Table 4). Congenial environment (developed acidity and sufficient moisture) in paneer samples might have favoured their growth during further storage. Usually, the yeast and mould count less than 100 could be acceptable in similar products; however, paneer stored for 3 days showed a count of more than 100 in all samples except in S
2 treated paneer. Thus, it could be revealed from the results that treatment S
2 only restricted yeast and mould growth in paneer to satisfactory level up to 9
th days under refrigerated storage. A more or less similar trend in the microbial count was observed in the past when
Sachdeva and Singh (1990) carried out studies on various aspects of paneer.