Commercially Available Probiotic Products for Wellbeing of Mankind, Livestock and Fishery: A Review

A.C. Rathod1, C.D. Khedkar1,*, A.R. Sarode1, S.D. Kalyankar1, Shital S. Deosarkar1, V.K. Lule2, P.S. Patil1
1MAFSU-College of Dairy Technology, Pusad-445 204, Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India.
2MAFSU-College of Dairy Technology, Udgir-413 517, Latur, Maharashtra, India.
Abstract:In view the paucity of any consolidated attempt to review the literature on commercially available probiotic products for wellbeing and overall development of mankind, livestock and fishery, present review is conducted. The first evidence of health benefits of probiotics emerged when a report was published by Eli Metchnikoff (1908). Since then several studies have demonstrated that the probiotics have become an essential element in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases. Nowadays, wide variety of food, dairy products, beverages, livestock and fish feeds and supplements, infant formulas, dietary supplements, wellness products, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, etc. containing probiotics are available in the market. Consumption of such products is associated with their authenticated efficacy in modulation of the gut microbiota leading to improvement of immune system, reduction of serum cholesterol, prevention of cancer, treatment of irritable bowel-associated diarrhoeas, antihypertensive effects as well as improvement of lactose metabolism. The regular feeding of probiotic strains, both individual and combined, may shows greater effect on absorption and utilization of feed, daily increase of body weight and total body weight of livestock. Likewise, feeding of probiotics helps fish to absorb more nutrients, improve their feed utilization efficiency, as well as to digest them better and faster compared to their regular feeds. Evidence on feeding of probiotics resulted in improved quantity and quality of milk, meat and eggs are available.
The concept of probiotics has a very long history. It is associated with the consumption of fermented foods by human beings. The earliest types of probiotic foods includes dairy products fermented by lactic acid bacterial (LAB) and fungal fermentation, leavened bread fermented by yeasts and cheeses (Kopp-Hoolihan, 2001). A wide variety of probiotic products are available in market viz. food or dairy products, infant foods, dietary supplements, beverages, livestock feeds and fish feeds (Parvez, 2006), a swift emergence of the wave of pharmaceutical probiotic products was earlier projected (Sanders et al., 2003). The probiotics are contributing in the cosmetics. Nondairy and horticulture products are also used as a delivery media for probiotics (Sreeja and Prajapati, 2016).
       
The probiotics can modulate the gut microflora and improve the health status of the consumers. Similarly, the administration of probiotics in the feed stuffs of livestock and fishes leads to modulate the intestinal microbiotia leading to efficient digestion and assimiliation of feeds. There is a lack of knowledge about probiotics that are used as feed additives, mainly because research is mainly focused on human nutrition. Probiotic mechanisms that modify the conversion of nutrients also need to be discussed (Simon et al., 2001). Studies have demonstrated beneficial impact on reestablishment of friendly microbiota through different mechanisms such as appropriate intestinal homeostasis (Wilkins and Sequoia 2017). A consortium based approach wherein different strains from various genera of the proven probiotic organisms has been advocated (Timmerman et al., 2004, Mohammed et al., 2022).
Probiotics in food/ dairy products
 
Food industry is constantly evolving entailing innovation phenomena that generate constant research and emerging technologies. The change of consumers’ preferences, needs and acceptance is a dynamic process, hence the maintenance of food quality via technology-driven innovation is evident (Savino et al., 2018). The cultural heritage of consumers, habits and even sustainability factors can similarly affect technology innovations applied in the food industry Martin-Rios et al. (2018). Nowadays, consumers are becoming more health conscious and concerned about the beneficial value of food, directing manufacturers to emphasize on the promotion of functional foods. A key for successful marketing and acceptance of novel foods depends not only on the concept of food quality throughout the chain but also to added value food functionalities (Khedkar et al., 2017). These organisms when administered in defined quantitative and qualitative amount will provide clinically proven health benefits apart from those delivered by fundamental nutrients in the product in question (Brown, 2018).  
       
Food products containing probiotics can carry a single or many different bacterial strains. Specifically, in fermented food products, probiotics can be added as starter cultures while other bacterial or yeast strains co-exist. Food-based probiotic products account for a large number of formulations and can be divided in two distinct categories: Dairy products dahi, cheese, ice-cream, yoghurt, etc. and non-dairy products, e.g., meats and meat products, bread or other fiber snacks, chocolates, fruit juices and fruit preparations. The vast availability of food products makes them a good and potentially effective carrier system for the delivery of probiotics. Nevertheless, their ability to deliver viable cells to the human intestine may differ considerably, depending largely on the physicochemical properties of each composite food matrix (Antonia et al., 2019). Consumption of probiotic bacteria through dairy food products is an ideal way to re-establish the balance of intestinal microflora. It must conform to certain requirements for a dairy food product to be considered as a valuable alternative for delivery of probiotic bacteria on one hand and for variety of probiotic cultures to use as a dietary adjunct and to exert a positive influence in the other hand (Homayouni et al., 2008). It is not out of place to mention that the importance to report that probiotic bacteria should be present in a dairy food to a minimum level of 106 CFU/g or the daily intake should be about 108 CFU/g, with the aim to compensate for the possible reduction in the number of these vital microbes during the passage through the gut (Shah, 2007).
 
Probiotics in dietary supplements
 
The concept of functional foods has been evolved recently after extensive research to find out the role of nutrients on health (Gibson, 2007). It contains physiologically active components, which provide health benefits beyond basic nutrition by affecting one or more functions in the body in a targeted way (Anjuman et al., 2015). A dietary supplement is an orally administered substance designed to deliver a certain dietary ingredient to complement the diet (Sharma and Devi, 2014 and Thomas and Greer, 2010). These active ingredients are usually packaged in different forms of capsules, tablets, powders (in sachets) or liquids in measured doses (Webb, 2011 and Klayraung, et al., 2009). Probiotics must be able to tolerate the severe conditions of gastrointestinal tract and arrive viable to the site of action (Bansal and Garg, 2008). The manufacturing process of a dietary supplement is similar to medicines; however, the severe courses of action used in medicinal products are not necessary to pursue (Amaral, 2014). A strong negative correlation between bacterial viability and compression force has been observed, revealing that probiotic survival decreases via increasing the tablet compaction forces (Silva et al., 2013). Apart from food, we can add probiotics to our diet through dietary supplements. These are not drugs, so they do not need to be approved by the food (Federal) and drug administration (FDA).
 
Probiotics in infant feeding
 
A systematic review concluded that probiotics may be beneficial in preventing eczema in infants (Zuccotti et al., 2015). However, another study found probiotics to be a significant risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization and was suggested to mediate the acquisition and transfer of resistance genes of bacteria (Topcuoglu et al., 2015). Despite this, surveys have shown that clinicians and naturopaths recommend probiotic consumption for patients with a variety of pathologies including diarrhea, ulcerative colitis and infant colic due to their low cost, over-the-counter availability and acceptable safety profile in healthy adults (Abe et al., 2013 and Gasbarrini et al., 2015). There is a lack of evidence that the probiotics influence the gut microbiome when given exogenously and their effect on health outcomes in infants are largely unknown (Quin et al., 2018).
       
Reports on the colonizing capability of Lactobacillus GG have varied (Agarwal et al., 2003). About 86% colonization rate was reported in a randomized controlled trial of L. acidophilus. In Columbia, the prophylactic administration of L. acidophilus and Bif. infantis to all neonates in an intensive care nursery with a high incidence of NEC reduced the incidence of disease compared with historical controls (Dani et al., 2002).
 
Probiotics in pharmaceutical preparations
 
The use of probiotics is a new way to control and treat infections in this modern era (Sreeja and Prajapati, 2016). A wide range of probiotic products is available in the market and can be easily purchased over the counter and unlike pharmaceutical drugs, their commercial distribution is not strictly regulated. Several systems have been developed for the delivery of probiotics to the GIT such as pharmaceutical formulations and food-based products. Pharmaceutical preparations in particular are considered more effective compared to commercial food-based carrier systems although their preference mainly depends on consumers’ perception (Khedkar et al., 2017). Examples of pharmaceuticals for the delivery of probiotics currently include, capsules, liquids, powder beads, ampoules and tablets (Sokol et al.,2008). Strain selection and differentiation is considered a crucial step in both pharmaceutical and food systems. Likewise, an issue that needs evaluation is the method of preparation of the delivery matrix which may affect cell viability and effective target release in the GIT (Antonia et al.,2019). Some of the spore-forming strains of Bacillus are marketed commercially as they survive harsh gastrointestinal conditions and bestow health benefits to the host (Khatri et al., 2019). Clinical practitioners use probiotic pharma products mostly as supplements (Sreeja and Prajapati, 2016). Sarowska et al., 2013, Lakra and Krishnani, 2022 sowed the exact mechanism of action of probiotics has not been explained, but a number of aspects, the way it affects the human body was found and summarized.
 
Probiotics in beverages
 
The relationship between increased number of beneficial bacteria in gut and its biological effects are yet to be elucidated (Plaza-Diaz et al., 2015). The study by Hassan et al. (2012) showed rice and millet grains were fermented with ABT-2 starter culture (Str. Thermophilus, L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium BB-12) to obtain probiotic beverages, fortified with pumpkin and sesame seed milk in order to combine the high nutritive value of seeds and the health benefits of the probiotic culture. The levels of several factors, i.e. starter culture concentration, rice and millet level and the amount of honey, affecting the fermentation process, were established for completing a controlled fermentation for 16 h. At the end of fermentation the viable cell counts reached to about 4.3x10 cfu/ml. Changes were observed in acidity and counts of probiotic bacteria as a result of fortification with pumpkin and sesame milk at 10%. The shelf-life of the rice and millet fermented beverages was estimated to be 15 days under refrigerated storage (Amal et al., 2012).
       
There is also an increased demand for the probiotic containing vegetarian products. Furthermore, lactose intolerance and the cholesterol content are two major drawbacks related to the fermented dairy products (Heenan et al, 2004; Yoon et al., 2006). There is a wide variety of traditional non-dairy fermented beverages produced around the world. Much of them are non-alcoholic beverages manufactured with cereals as principal raw material. The non dairy probiotic beverages may be made from a variety of raw materials, such as cereals, millets, legumes, fruits and vegetables. Studies may be classified based on the source of raw material for the production of the non dairy probiotic beverage (Vasudha and Mishra, 2013).
 
Probiotics in cosmetic products
 
The concept of “probiotics” in cosmetics is defined as living microorganisms and/or their lysates, application of which in cosmetic products in adequate amount confer a positive effect on the human skin in addition to the characteristic of the main influence of the product (Tkachenko et al. 2017). According to the FDA, a cosmetic is defined as “a product (excluding pure soap) intended to be applied to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance”. The use of beneficial microbes for this purpose has seen the field of probiotics grow substantially (Hill et al., 2014). The probiotic applications range widely in type, scope and applications including cosmetics. There are numerous studies providing evidence of the benefits of specific probiotic strains for skin health (Yu et al., 2020). In addition, the mechanisms of anti-ageing suggest that some strains can help to regulate pH, reduce oxidative stress, protect from photo ageing and improve the skin barrier function (Sharma, 2016). Due to safety concerns, cosmetic products are expected to have a low content of microorganisms (below 500 cfu/g for eye-area products and 1000 cfu/g for the rest). Applications for skin care require local use (Tkachenko, et al., 2017). Orally administered probiotics have demonstrated to improve the intestinal microbiome leading to a potential improvement in skin conditions such as atopic dermatitis, acne, orrosacea (Knackstedt et al., 2020).
 
Probiotics in cattle feeds
 
The effect of probiotics was linked to the gastrointestinal tract and on incidence of diarrhea and other gut infections. However, the earlier research findings showed that the effects of probiotics may be more general (Fuller, 1992 and Cho et al., 2011). In general, the mode of action of probiotic feed additives is mainly based on competitive exclusion, bacterial antagonism and immune modulation (Hughes and Heritage, 2002). The use of probiotics in animal feeds could be enhanced by a preliminary in vitro screening of the candidate organisms for its antimicrobial activity, survival in the gut, adhesion studies and antibiotic susceptibility. The analyses of phenotypic and genetic properties are also useful for industrial production (Gaggia et al., 2010). Dose, timing and duration of administration of the probiotics may be a factor affecting efficacy (Sazawal et al., 2006 and Rosenfeldt et al., 2003). Another determinant is the age of the animals; during early life, colonization patterns are instable and the animals are susceptible to environmental pathogens. Probiotics have been proposed as a viable alternative to antimicrobials to enhance animal health and productivity (Markowiakand Slizewska, 2018). Effect of probiotics on disease prevention and performance indicators and host target system microbiota are yet to be quantified and documented (Siggers et al., 2007).
 
Probiotics in poultry feeds
 
Probiotics have a beneficial effect on health that stimulates the growth of friendly microorganisms and reduces/eliminates the population of pathogens, thus improving the intestinal microbial balance and lowering the risk of gastro-intestinal diseases. Markowiak and Slizewska (2018) reported that the role of probiotics in protection against the pathogens. An accurate dosage of administration has yet to be established despite the widespread use of probiotics. Probiotics have antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, hypocholesterolemic, antihypertensive, anti-osteoporosis and immunomodulatory effects in poultry birds. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Leuconostoc, Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Bacillus, Saccharomyces, Aspergillus and Pediococcus species are most commonly used probiotics in poultry production. The probiotics improve feed-intake, growth performance, meat quality, egg production, egg quality and have cholesterol lowering potential in poultry products. However, some studies reported no significant effect of probiotics on feed-intake, production traits, product quality and cholesterol level (Tarekegn, 2016). Probiotics are widely accepted as an alternative to in-feed antibiotics in poultry production. A probiotic containing novel strain such as Aspergillus oryzae is also in practice, but its effect on performance of poultry is limited (Lee et al., 2006). The ban on the use of antibiotic growth promotors in many countries in order to satisfy the consumers’ demands for healthy and safe meat leads to increasing researchers’ interest in finding strategies to maintain chicken health and production. The use of probiotics in poultry diets has been associated with positive effects on health and growth in birds. Changes in growth performance often affect various meat quality traits and in this context, using probiotics as dietary supplements exhibit potential as a natural way to improve poultry meat quality (Popova, 2017). The addition of probiotics to the feed improves growth performance and feed conversion in broilers and egg mass, egg weight and egg size in layers (Fig 1). This is attributed to (i) maintaining normal intestinal microflora by competitive exclusion and antagonism, (ii) altering metabolism by increasing digestive enzyme activity and decreasing bacterial enzyme activity and ammonia production, (iii) improving feed intake and digestion and (iv) neutralizing enterotoxins and stimulating the immune system (Jin et al., 2019).

Fig 1: Modes of action and beneficial activities of probiotics in poultry.


 
Probiotics in aquafeed
 
Aquaculture is an important food producing sector to fulfill nutritional food demand of a continuously growing population. However, disease outbreak has become a major problem in aquaculture which causes huge economic loss to aquaculture industries. The use of expensive chemotherapeutic drugs has negative impact on the aquatic environment. So there is a growing concern to find other safe, non-antibiotic based and eco-friendly alternative for the treatment of the diseases (Muziri et al., 2022). The use of probiotics is a promising alternative approach for the control and treatment of infectious agents and stimulation of growth, improved digestion, enhanced immune response and recuperate the water quality as well. Probiotics strengthen the fish to fight against various pathogens and improves the overall health as they show anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and anti-viral properties. The fish consuming probiotics absorb minerals and vitamins easily and in large amounts than average. Instead of using antibiotics as a treatment when the sickness is already there, it is much safer and cost-effective in all ways to use probiotics. The use of probiotics in aquaculture is a recent trend and its efficacy in aquatic environment has not been studied extensively (Chauhan and Singh, 2019). In shrimp/fish aquaculture, feed represents the most expensive production cost. The quantity and quality of diets are primary factors influencing shrimp/fish growth, health status, disease prevention, pond contamination and expenses. Utilization of probiotic bacteria has emerged as a solution with enormous applications in the aquafeed industry. The various routes of administration of probiotics and mechanism of action are shown in Fig 2 and 3. Bacillus species, principally B. subtilis are one of the most investigated bacteria due to: a) versatility of growth nutrients utilization, b) high level of enzymes production, c) secretion of antimicrobial compounds, d) spore producers, e) develops in aerobic and anaerobic conditions and f) B. subtilis is a GRAS. Functional feeds development with alternative economic nutrients and vegetable sources of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids and Bacillus subtilis probiotic strains, must be considered in shrimp/fish aquaculture production systems. This is an option to eliminate animal feed ingredients, improves digestion-assimilation, reduce water pollution and diseases and to increase yields and profits (Olmosand and Paniagua, 2014).

Fig 2: The mechanism of action of probiotic effects of Streptomyces bacteria and their applications in aquaculture.



Fig 3: Different routes of probiotics administration in aquatic environment.


 
We have presented evidence substantiating that there are huge number and a verity of commercial probiotic products available in the market aimed at well-being of mankind and to flourish the production traits in livestock and fish. It is clear that probiotics are multi billion dollar industry in world wide. The pivotal use of probiotics in food and feeds is to restore the gut microbiota leading to good health and improved productivity. The daily intake of probiotics should be about 108 CFU/g. Data on human trials have validated the efficacy of different probiotic species, the conditions for their applications, the optimal doses and the formulation. Clinical practitioners use pharmaceuticals mostly as supplements but their functions are still not clearly illustrated. Likewise, the cosmetic industry needs to be consistent and transparent in its labeling practices and direct efforts to generating more scientific evidence before making claims to advocate probiotics as routine therapies as cosmetics. The action of probiotics in dairy/food products/beverages in livestock and fish, cosmetic products etc. needs to be broadly studied in more detail preferably with placebo-controlled, double blind studies.
 
None.
 

  1. Abe, A.M., Gregory, P.J., Hein, D.J., Cochrane, Z.R. and Wilson, A.F. (2013). Survey and systematic literature review of probiotics stocked in academic medical centers within the united states. Hosp. Pharm. 48(10): 834-847.

  2. Agarwal, A.R., Sharma, N., Chaudhry, R., Deorari, A., Paul, V.K., Gewolb, I.H. and Panigrahi, P. (2003). Effects of oral Lactobacillus GG on enteric microflora in low-birth-weight neonates. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 36: 397-402.

  3. Amal, A., Mona, M.A. Aly. and Soher, T. El-Hadidie (2012). Production of Cereal-Based Probiotic Beverages. World Applied Sci. J. 19(10): 1367-1380.

  4. Amaral, M.H. (2014). Development of probiotic dosage forms in probiotic bacteria: Fundamentals, therapy and technological aspects. CRC Press: 227-234.

  5. Anjuman, A.B., Jakaria, D.M., Sharif, M.d. A., Mahfuzul, I. and Siraje, A.M. (2015). Market Assessment and Product Evaluation of Probiotic Containing Dietary Supplements Available in Bangladesh Market. J. of Pharmaceutics. Art. ID 763796, 5.

  6. Antonia, T., Aikaterini, P., Iliada, K.L., Vasiliki, K., Loulouda A.B. and Nikolaos, K. (2019). Probiotics in food systems: Signifificance and emerging strategies towards improved viability and delivery of enhanced benefificial value. Nutrients. 1591(11): 1-32.

  7. Bansal, T., Garg, S. (2008). Probiotics: From functional foods to pharmaceutical products. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 9(4): 267-287.

  8. Brown, L., Caligiuri, S.P.B., Brown, D. and Pierce, G.N. (2018). Clinical trials using functional foods provide unique challenges. J. Funct. Foods. 45: 233-238.

  9. Chauhan, A., Singh, R. (2019). Probiotics in aquaculture: A promising emerging alternative approach. Symbiosis. 77: 99-113.

  10. Cho, J.H., Zhao, P.Y. and Kim, I.H. (2011). Probiotics as a Dietary Additive for Pigs. J. of Animal and Vetey. Advances. 10: 2127-2134.

  11. Dani, C., Biadaioli, R., Bertini. G., Martelli, E. and Rubaltelli, F.F. (2002). Probiotics feeding in prevention of urinary tract infection, bacterial sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. A prospective double-blind study. Biol. Neonate. 82:103-108.

  12. Fuller, R. (1992). “History and Development of Probiotics”. Springer Netherlands. 1-8.

  13. Gaggia, F., Mattarelli, P. and Biavati, B. (2010). Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. International J. of Food Microbio. 141: S15-S28.

  14. Gasbarrini, G., Bonvicini, F. and Gramenzi, A. (2015). Probiotics History. J. Clin Gastroenterol. Nov/Dec 2016;50 Suppl 2, Proceedings from the 8th Probiotics, Prebiotics and New Foods for Microbiota and Human Health meeting held in Rome, Italy on September 13-15, S116-S119. 

  15. Gibson, G.R. (2007). Functional foods: Probiotics and prebiotics. Culture. 28(2): 1-3.

  16. Hassan, F. M., Hadi, R.A., Kassim, T. I. and Al-Hassany, J.S. (2012). Systematic study of epiphytic algal after restoration of Al-Hawizah marshes, Southern of Iraq. International J. Aqua. Sci. 3(1): 37-57.

  17. Heenan, C.N., Adams, M.C., Hosken, R.W. and Fleet, G.H. (2004). Survival and sensory acceptability of probiotic microorganisms in a non fermented frozen vegetarian dessert. Lebensmittel Wissenschaftund-Technol. 37: 461- 466

  18. Hill, C., Guarner, F., Reid, G., Gibson, G.R., Merenstein, D.J., Pot, B., Morelli, L., Canani, R.B., Flint, H.J., Salminen, S., Calder, P.C. and Sanders M.E. (2014). The international scientifific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11: 506-514.

  19. Homayouni, A., Ehsani, M.R., Azizi, A., Razavi, S.H. and Yarmand, M.S. (2008). Growth and survival of some probiotic strains in simulated ice cream conditions. J. of Applied Sci. 8(2): 244-247.

  20. Hughes, P., Heritage, J. (2002). Food and Agriculture Organization. (FAO) Antibiotic growth-promoters in food animals. Retrieved from Leeds, U.K. 

  21. Jin, L.Z., Ho, Y.W., Abdullah, N. and Jalaludin, S. (2019). Probiotics in poultry: Modes of action. World Poultry Sci. J. 53(4): 351-368.

  22. Khatri, I., Sharma, G. and Subramanian, S. (2019). Composite genome sequence of Bacillus clausii, a probiotic commercially available as Enterogermina and insights into its probiotic properties. BMC Microbiol. 19(307): 5665.

  23. Khedkar, S., Carraresi, L. and Bröring, S. (2017). Food or pharmaceuticals? Consumers’ perception of health-related borderline products. Pharma Nutrition. 5: 133-140.

  24. Klayraung, S., Viernstein, H. and Okonogi, S. (2009). Development of tablets containing probiotics: Effects of formulation and processing parameters on bacterial viability. Int. J. Pharm. 370(1): 54-60.

  25. Knackstedt, R., Knackstedt, T. and Gatherwright, J. (2020). The role of topical probiotics in skin conditions: A systematic review of animal and human studies and implications for future therapies. Exp. Dermatol. 29: 15-21.

  26. Kopp-Hoolihan, L. (2001). Prophylactic and therapeutic uses of probiotics: A review. J. of Ame. Dietary Association. 101(2): 229-241.

  27. Ladan, J., María, Á.E. (2018). Administration of Probiotics in the Water in Finfish Aquaculture Systems: A Review. Fishes. 3(33): 189-194. 

  28. Lakra, W.S. and Krishnani, K.K. (2022): Circular bioeconomy for stress-resilient fisheries and aquaculture. In Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals Circular Bioeconomy: Technologies for Biofuels and Biochemicals. Elsevier Publishers, U.K. pp 165-178.

  29. Lee, K.W., Lee, S.K. and Lee, B.D. (2006). Aspergillus oryzae as Probiotic in Poultry: A review. Int. J. of Poultry Sci. 5(1): 01-03.

  30. Mahmoud, A., Mohamed, E. A.b.d., Mayada, R.F., Swati, S., Kumaragurubaran, K. and Kuldeep, D. (2018). The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition. Environ. Sci. and Pollution Res. 25(5). DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1687-x.

  31. Markowiak, P. and Slizewska, K. (2018) The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut Pathog. 10:21.

  32. Martin-Rios, C., Demen-Meier, C., Gössling, S. and Cornuz, C. (2018). Food waste management innovations in the foodservice industry. Waste Manag. 79: 196-206.

  33. Metchnikoff, E. (1908). Optimistic studies new york: Putman’s sons. 161-183.

  34. Mohammed, A.E., Naiel, Abdelrazeq,  M.S., Abdullah, I., El-Kholyd, Karima, El-Naggare, Mayada, R., Faragf and Mahmoud Alagawanyg. (2022). A review: The mitigating role of probiotics against the adverse effects of suboptimal temperature in farmed fish: A review. Aquaculture 550: 737-877.

  35. Muziri, Mugwanya, Mahmood, A.O., Dawood, F.K. and Hani Sewilam. (2022). Anthropogenic temperature fluctuations and their effect on aquaculture: A comprehensive review. Aquaculture and Fisheries. 22: 457-476. doi.org/10.1016/ j.aaf.2021.12.005.

  36. Olmosand, J., Paniagua-Michel (2014). Bacillus subtilis a potential probiotic bacterium to formulate functional feeds for aquaculture. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 6(7): 361-365.

  37. Parvez, S., Malik, K.A., Kang, K.A., Kim, H.Y. (2006). Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health?- A review. J. of Applied Micro. 100: 1171-1185. 

  38. Plaza-Diaz, J., Fernandez-Caballero, J.A., Chueca, N., Garcia, F., Gomez-Llorente, C., Saez-Lara, M.J., Fontana, L. and Gil, A. (2015). Pyrosequencing analysis reveals changes in intestinal microbiota of healthy adults who received a daily dose of immunomodulatory probiotic strains. Nutrients. 7: 3999-4015. 

  39. Popova, T. (2017). Effect of probiotics in poultry for improving meat quality. Curr. Opinion in Food Sci. 14: 72-77.

  40. Quin, C., Estaki, M., Vollman, D.M., Barnett, J.A., Gill, S.K. and Gibson, D.L. (2018). Probiotic supplementation and associated infant gut microbiome and health: A cautionary retrospective clinical comparison. Scientific Reports. 8(1): 8283. 

  41. Rosenfeldt, V., Benfeldt, E., Nielsen, S.D., Michaelsen, K.F., Jeppesen, D.L. and Valerius, N.H. (2003). Effect of probiotic Lactobacillus strains in children with atopic dermatitis. J. of Allergy and Clin. Immunol. 111: 389-395.

  42. Sanders, M.E., Morelli, L. and Tompkins, T.A. (2003). Spore Formers as Human Probiotics: Bacillus, Sporolactobacillus and Brevibacillus. Comprehensive Review in Food Sci. and Food Safety. 2: 101-110.

  43. Sarowska, J., Choroszy-Krol, I., Regulska-Ilow, B., Frej-Madrzak, M. and Jama-Kmiecik, A. (2013). The Therapeutic Effect of Probiotic Bacteria on Gastrointestinal Diseases. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 22(5): 759-766.

  44. Savino, T., Testa, S. and Messeni, P. (2018). A. Researcher understanding of food innovations in Nordic and Southern European countries: A systematic literature review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 77: 54-63.

  45. Sazawal, S., Hiremath, G., Dhingra, U., Malik, P., Deb, S. and Black, R.E., (2006). Effificacy of probiotics in prevention of acute diarrhoea: A meta-analysis of masked, randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet Infectious Dis. 6: 374- 382.

  46. Shah, N.P. (2007). Functional cultures and health benefits. Int. Dairy J. 17(12): 62-72.

  47. Sharma, D., Kober, M.M. and Bowe, W.P. (2016). Anti-aging effects of probiotics. J Drugs Dermatol. 15: 9-12.

  48. Sharma, M., Devi, M. (2014). Probiotics: A comprehensive approach toward health foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 54(4): 537-552.

  49. Siggers, R.H., Thymann, T., Siggers, J.L., Schmidt, M., Hansen, A.K. and Sangilda, P.T. (2007). Bacterial colonization affects early organ and gastrointestinal growth in the neonate. Livestock Sci. 109: 14-18. 

  50. Silva, J.S., Sousa, S.C., Costa, P., Cerdeira, E., Amaral, M.H., Lobo, J.S., Gomes, A.M., Pintado, M.M., Rodrigues, D., Rocha-Santos, T. and Freitas, A.C. (2013). Development of probiotic tablets using microparticles: Viability studies and stability studies. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 14(1): 121-127.

  51. Simon, O., Jadamus, A. and Vahjen, W. (2001). Probiotic feed additives-effectiveness and expected modes of action. J. of Animal and Feed Sci. 10(1): 51-67. 

  52. Sokol, H., Pigneur, B., Watterlot, L., Lakhdari, O., Bermudez- Humaran, L.G., Gratadoux, J.J., Blugeon, S., Bridonneau, C., Furet, J.P., Corthier G Grangette, C., Vasquez, N., Pochart, P., Trugnan, G., Thomas, G., Blottière, H. M., Doré, J., Marteau, P., Seksik, P. and Langella, P. (2008). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflflammatory commensal bacterium identifified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105: 16731-16736.

  53. Sreeja, V., Prajapati, J.B. (2016). Probiotic Formulations: Application and Status as Pharmaceuticals: A review. Probiotics and Antimicro. Prot. 4(4). DOI: 10.1007/s12602-013-9126-2. Tan, Chan, Lee and Goh (2016). Streptomyces Bacteria as Potential Probiotics in Aquaculture. Frontiers in Microbiol. 7(202). DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00079.

  54. Tarekegn, G. (2016). A Review on Effects of Probiotic Supplementation in Poultry Performance and Cholesterol Levels of Egg and Meat. J. World Poult. Res. 6(1): 31-36.

  55. Thomas, D.W., Greer, F.R. (2010). Probiotics and prebiotics in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 126(6): 1217-1231.

  56. Timmerman, H.M., Koning, C.J., Mulder, L., Rombouts, F.M. and Beynen, A.C. (2004). Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics-A comparison of functionality and effificacy. International J. of Food Microbiol. 96: 219-233.

  57. Tkachenko, N., Chagarovskyi, O., Dets, N., Sevastyanova, E., and Lanzhenko, L. (2017). “Lving” and “probiotic” cosmetics: Modern View and Defenitions. 11(4): 90-102.

  58. Topcuoglu, S., Gursoy, T., Ovali, F., Serce, O. and Karatekin, G. (2015). A new risk factor for neonatal vancomyc in- resistant Enterococcus colonisation: Bacterial probiotics. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 28(12): 1491-1494.

  59. Vasudha, S., Mishra, H.N. (2013). Non dairy probiotic beverages, Int. Food Research J. 20(1): 7-15. 

  60. Webb, G.P. (2011). Dietary supplements and functional foods. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, UK. 205-213.

  61. Wilkins, T., Sequoia, J. (2017). Probiotics for gastrointestinal conditions: A summary of the evidence, American Family Physician. 96(3): 170-178.

  62. Yoon, K.Y., Woodams, E.E. and Hang, Y.D. (2006). Production of probiotic cabbage juice by lactic acid bacteria. Bioresource Technology. 97: 1427-1430.

  63. Yu, Y., Dunaway, S., Champer, J., Kim, J. and Alikhan, A. (2020). Changing our microbiome: Probiotics in dermatology. Br J. Dermatol. 182: 39-46.

  64. Zuccotti, G., Meneghin, F., Aceti, A., Barone, G., Callegari, M.L., Di, M.A, Fantini, M.P., Gori, D., Indrio, F., Maggio, L., Morelli, L., Corvaglia, L. (2015). Probiotics for prevention of atopic diseases in infants: systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 70(11): 1356-1371.

Editorial Board

View all (0)