Sources accessed for acquiring knowledge
The use of internet by the respondents was ranked 1st followed by WhatsApp 2
nd, Personal contact 3
rd, Phone calls 4
th, Technical literatures 5
th, books 6
th, journals 7
th, TV 8
th, Apps 9
th, SMS 10
th and email 11
th, respectively. The reason might be the veterinarians were having android mobiles with internet connectivity facility. The reason for maximum use of personal contact might be their accessibility to the fellow vets working nearby. Use of WhatsApp for accessing the information was also ranked 2
nd the reason being availability of android mobiles with all the respondents and easy to access the source. The reason of the least accessing to TV, email and journal sources for acquiring information might be the less interest of veterinarians the above sources. It can be inferred that the use of ICT has become a trend among the veterinarians working even in the rural situations. The reason might be availability of internet facilities and penetration of different ICT providing companies into the rural areas. A research stated that the usage of internet by Extension professional for sustainable and society in sub Himalayan region was ranked II while the use of mobile phones was ranked I
Vara Prasad et al. (2019).
Effect of gender on usage of different sources
As observed in Table 1, the mean estimates for the usage of books for male and female respondents are 0.96±0.08 and 1.41±0.12 with significant difference between them. Similar trend in result is obtained in case of usage of journals with mean estimates of 0.67±0.06 and 1.04±0.14 for male and female respondent veterinarians respectively. This shows that female respondent veterinarians were using books and journals more than their male counterparts. Moreover, higher estimates were observed for males in case of information acquiring sources like Television, SMS, e-mail and Apps and higher estimates for females were seen in cases of personal contact, Technical literature, phone calls, WhatsApp and Internet. A study conducted at the University of Zimbabwe revealed that most used information sources by veterinary students include books, lecture notes, handouts, internet and projects (
Chikonzo and Aina, 2006).
Effect of age on usage of different sources
The Table 2 reveals that significant difference was observed in usage of books for acquiring information between the respondent veterinarians of young age group (up to 35 years) and old age group (>50 years). Moreover, it was also observed that numerically, the estimates were higher to lower from young age group to old age group in case of information sources like personal contact, journals, phone calls, whatsapp and apps. The reason might be due to advancement of age, of senior veterinarians and their busy administrative and other responsibilities did not find enough time to read books for acquiring information. In a study conducted in US, it was concluded that the veterinary practitioners used journals, books, colleagues and continuing education courses to help them keep updated (
Pelzer and Leysen, 1991).
Effect of education on usage of different sources
The findings in Table 3 say that, the respondent veterinarians with M.V.Sc. and above degree devote more time for reading books and journals, differing significantly from the respondents with B.V.Sc. and AH degree. The reason might be the veterinarians with higher qualifications are more exposed towards the scientific literature and therefore, they tend to acquire latest information for further enhancing their knowledge. Moreover, estimates as observed to be numerically higher for respondents with B.V.Sc. and AH qualification towards the information acquiring sources like personal contact, television, SMS, e-mail, apps and internet. The reason might be the younger veterinarians are more conversant with use of digital communication tools than the aged veterinarians. It was concluded from a research that the students of veterinary medicine in a Nigerian university usually visited library, surfed in the internet and consulted their personal collections for meeting their information needs (
Mabera and Sadiku, 2021).
Effect of job experience on usage of different sources
Significant differences were observed between the respondent veterinarians with <10 years of job experience and >20 years of experience for using personal contact method with the lower estimates for the higher experienced group. Numerically, the estimates were observed to be higher to lower from less job experience (<10 years) to high job experience (>20 years) in case of information sources like Phone calls, WhatsApp and Apps. The Reverse estimates
i.e. lower to higher from less job experience (<10 years) to high job experience (>20 years) group in case of SMS and email. This suggests that the less experienced individual tend to access the information faster through the above mentioned sources unlike the more job experienced veterinarians who handles the e-mail. With increase in experience, the veterinarians become confident enough to handle cases on their own and therefore, they seldom seek advices from their seniors. Similar trends were observed in case usage of books. The reason might be the senior veterinarians hold the administrative posts and therefore, they might not find time to read books to enrich their knowledge on Dairy Husbandry. They may be referring any other sources to gather information quickly in order to save time.
Effect of trainings on usage of different sources
The Table 4 shows that significant difference was observed in usage of personal contact, books and TV between the veterinarians who have attended less than 10 trainings with the veterinarians who have attended more than 20 trainings on Dairy Husbandry. Numerically, estimates observed to be in a higher to lower manner for respondents who have attended <10, 10-20 and >20 number of trainings were for journals, technical literature, phone calls, apps and internet. The reason might be that attending more training might have empowered them with more knowledge on management of dairy animals for which the result depicts lower estimate. The mean estimates for usage of books for acquiring information is found out to be 1.37±0.13, 0.95±0.09 and 0.93±0.15 for respondent veterinarians who have less than 10 trainings, between 10 and 20 trainings and more than 20 trainings respectively with significant difference between the first group with the other two separately. The reason might be the veterinarians with less training experience tend to read books more to gather knowledge which is generally imparted in the trainings for the other two groups.
It was also observed from the results that significant difference was observed for the usage of TV for acquiring information on Dairy Husbandry between the veterinarians with less than 10 number of training experience and the respondents who have attended trainings between 10 and 20 in number. The reason might be the former group remains busy with a lot of work like treatments, report making and maintaining records that they hardly find time to watch TV, while the latter group remains more involved in implementation of the schemes and treatment and therefore, they find it interesting to gather information from TV programmes pertaining to dairy husbandry.
Effect of working area on usage of different sources
The mean score for the usage of journals for acquiring information on dairy husbandry is found out to be 0.96±0.11, 0.62±0.06 and 0.84±0.15 for veterinarians posted in rural, semi-urban and urban areas, respectively with significant difference between the veterinarians in rural and semi-urban areas with higher estimates for rural areas. Moreover, it was also observed that, numerically higher to lower estimates were obtained from rural areas to urban areas in referring books, journal, technical literature, phone calls WhatsApp, apps, the reason being more number of young veterinarians are posted in the rural area in their first posting and are assigned the field duties for which they tried to keep them abreast with the latest developments through the electronic/digital gadgets.