Sensory evaluation
On the basis of this above sensory assessment we prepared the final table of sensory evaluation of whey beverages which has been presented in Table 3 and depicted in Fig 1. The average point for appearance/color, taste and flavor for different whey beverages varies from 6.10 to 7.70. The average point for appearance/ color of control or plain whey beverage (T
0) was found to be 6.14±0.032 and for aloevera based whey beverage
i.e. for T
1A
1, T
1A
2 and T
1A
3, it was found to be 6.63±0.028, 7.02±0.017 and 7.56±0.052, respectively and for coconut water based whey beverage
i.e. T
2C
1, T
2C
2 and T
2C
3 the average point for appearance/ color were observed to be 6.43±0.027, 6.74±0.029 and 7.44±0.038, respectively.
It may be observed that T
1A
3 scored maximum point (7.56±0.052) for appearance/color by the panelists whereas control or plain whey beverage obtained minimum point (6.14±0.032) for appearance/color. So, it may be concluded that the inclusion of aloevera and coconut water improve appearance/color of treatment whey beverages as compared to control whey beverage.
The average point for flavor of T
0 was observed to be 6.23±0.027, whereas for T
1A
1, T
1A
2 and T
1A
3 were observed to be 6.73±0.048, 7.13±0.063 and 7.70±0.049, respectively and for coconut water-based whey beverages
i.e., T
2C
1, T
2C
2 and T
2C
3 were observed 6.12±0.026, 6.71±0.031 and 7.32±0.026, respectively. Thus, from the results obtained for flavor of different treatment beverages, it may be observed that T
1A
3 obtained maximum (7.70±0.049) for flavor by the panelists whereas control or plain whey beverage scored minimum point (6.23±0.027). Thus, it may be concluded that inclusion of aloevera and coconut water improve flavor of treatment whey beverages as compared to control whey beverage.
The average point for taste of T
0 (control) or plain whey beverage without addition of aloevera juice or coconut water was observed to be 6.10±0.052 whereas for T
1A
1, T
1A
2 and T
1A
3 were found 6.53±0.032, 6.95±0.038 and 7.38±0.027, respectively and for T
2C
1, T
2C
2 and T
2C
3 were observed 6.23±0.023, 6.63±0.044 and 7.11±0.043, respectively. From the results obtained for taste of different treatment beverages it may be observed that T
1A
3 scored maximum point (7.38±0.027) for taste by the panelists whereas control or plain whey beverage obtained minimum point (6.10±0.052). Thus, it may be concluded that inclusion of aloevera and coconut water improve taste of treatment whey beverages as compared to control whey beverage.
On the basis of data presented in Table 3 whey beverages with a composition of 79% whey and 15% aloevera juice (T
1A
3) had obtained maximum overall acceptability (7.54±0.050) whereas for coconut water based whey beverage the composition of 79% whey and 15% coconut water (T
2C
3) had obtained maximum overall acceptability (7.29±0.032).
All the parameters of sensory evaluation are highly significant from each other (P£0.01) for the all treatments of whey beverages. The variation in the sensory scores awarded for various fruit juice blends whey beverages on Overall acceptability can be due to customers’ personal preferences for certain colours, flavours and tastes. The results of present investigation related to appearance/ color, taste, flavor and overall acceptability are agreement with the results of (
Gorachiya, 2018) who also reported that control or plain whey beverage obtained minimum score for appearance/color, taste, flavor and overall acceptability than the treatment whey beverages. Similar study of sensory analysis was also conducted by
Bhavsager et al., (2010), Kumar (2015),
Abdulalim et al., (2018), Rohit et al., (2020) and
Sharma et al., (2020).
Antioxidant properties
The determination of the ABTS activity (% inhibition) was done to test the antioxidant properties of aloevera based whey beverages and coconut water based whey beverage as compared to control whey beverage. The analysis of ABTS activity (% inhibition) of whey based beverage was done under refrigerated storage condition (0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 days).
The data of ABTS activity (% inhibition) has been shown in Table 4 and depicted in Fig 2. The present investigation of ABTS activity are in accordance of significant decrease with respect to the storage period were reported by
Baba et al., (2016); Sady et al., (2013); Tak, (2017);
Singh, (2017);
Gorachiya (2018);
Prajapat (2019);
Singh (2020) and
León-López et al., (2020).
Proximate analysis
The data of proximate analysis of whey beverages which included moisture, dry matter, crude protein, ether extract and total ash has been presented in Table 5 and depicted in Fig 3. Present investigations are variable with the findings of
(Rohit et al., 2019) reported the moisture content of kiwi fruit whey drinks was 90.31, 86.35, 84.49 and 83.14%, 0.47, 0.51, 0.56 and 0.58% protein, 0.38, 0.47, 0.52 and 0.57% ash for T
1, T
2, T
3 and T
4 treatment, respectively. Whereas the treatments T
0 (control), T
1 (5%), T
2 (10%) and T
3 (15%) of the pineapple flavoured chhana whey beverage containing protein 0 57, 0.66, 0.73 and 12.67%, ash 0.44, 0.60, 0.76 and 0.78 per cent and moisture 86.71, 86.20, 85.62 and 85.50 per cent, respectively, these findings were reported by
Bhavsager et al., (2010).
Cost of whey beverages
The cost of production per liter of plain whey beverage (control or T
0) was worked out as Rs. 25 whereas aloevera based whey beverage (T
1A
3) was worked out as Rs. 36.2 and coconut water based whey beverage (T
2C
3) was worked out as Rs. 54.2.