The product yield (recovery %), particle size, zeta potential and selenium content in nano form of selenium are furnished in Table 1. The recovery percentage of nano particle source of selenium produced by chemical method using selenium powder as a precursor is 75.73% while yield from sodium selenite is 40.97%. The result revealed that nano selenium derived from selenium powder contain 98.34% selenium whereas nano selenium derived from sodium selenite contain 97.62% selenium. The size assayed through both Transmission Electron Microscopy and particle size analyser, confirmed that the nano particle source of selenium produced was less than 50 nm. The TEM image of produced nano selenium is presented in Fig 1 and Fig 2. Mean size assessed through transmission electron microscopy is 43.46±2.31 nm and 21.6±2.11 nm for nano selenium derived from selenium powder and sodium selenite respectively. While mean size assessed through particle size analyser is 31.8±8.90 nm and 11.97±4.91 nm for nano selenium derived from selenium powder and sodium selenite respectively.
The X-Ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of synthesized nano selenium from both sources are presented in Fig 3 and Fig 4. X-Ray diffraction pattern confirms that the synthesized nano particle source of selenium was free of impurities as it does not contain any characteristic XRD peaks other than selenium peak and the samples are nano in nature. The typical FTIR spectrum of synthesized nano particle source of selenium from selenium powder showed well-defined peaks at around 3853 cm
-1 and 1163 cm
-1 and FTIR spectrum of synthesized nano particle source of selenium from sodium selenite showed well-defined peaks at around 3864 cm
-1 and 969 cm
-1. The observed FTIR results confirmed that synthesized selenium nanoparticles were without any significant impurities. Zeta potential for nano selenium derived from selenium powder is -33.1±6.5 mV while from sodium selenite is -37.3±5.67 mV assessed through particle size analyser. Nanoparticles with zeta potential values greater than +25 mV or less than -25 mV typically have high degrees of stability. Dispersions with a low zeta potential value will eventually aggregate due to Van Der Waal inter-particle attractions (
Nanocomposix, 2012). Nano selenium particles produced in this study could be thus classified as having good stability.
Similar to our study
Malhotra et al., (2016) prepared selenium nanoparticles by a wet chemical approach using ascorbic acid as a reducing agent and stabilized by coating with 10% dextrin with size of 64±0.158 nm.
Gangadoo et al., (2017) used solution phase synthesis approach for selenium nanoparticles by reducing selenium tetrachloride in the presence of ascorbic acid and recorded that nano selenium are 46 nm in size.
Zhang et al., (2018) synthesized nano selenium with mean particle size of 36.8±4.1 nm using beta lactoglobulin as a stabilizer in redox system of ascorbic acid and selenite.
The selenium content of the produced nano particle sources of selenium were same as that of the original mega particle source from which they were produced. This indicates no loss in the selenium during the synthesis process.
Kargar Razi et al., (2011) produced the sample with 99 percent selenium content in the nano sample. Concurring with this study, nano particles of selenium having similar size and shape were produced by other researchers.
Since every crystalline material has a special pattern of diffraction, the XRD technique can be used to identify crystalline structure of nanoparticles. The broadening of the peaks in XRD confirms the formation of particles in nano size (less than 50 nm). If the nanoparticles are produced in an amorphous structure, no diffraction peak will be observed. Moreover, the smaller the nanoparticles are, the broader the XRD peaks appear (
Noruzi, 2015). According to previous studies, the XRD spectrum of selenium nano particles usually have two strong and sharp reflection peaks at 2 h of 24° and 30°
(Cai et al., 2018).
The functional group of synthesized Se nano particles were analysed by Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectroscopy, which showed chemical bonding in a target material.
Kaviya et al., (2011) observed the shift in the absorption band after bio reduction at 1601 cm
-1 to 1584 cm
-1 and indicated the formation of nanoparticles. The appearance of this peak was due to the presence of hydroxyl group stretching vibration of phenolic compounds which was responsible for the formation and stabilization of synthesized nanoparticles.
Rudakovskaya et al., (2014) showed that the spherical nano particles compared to rods had higher magnetic property and stability. Thus, the nano selenium synthesised in this study possessed this advantage.
In vitro cytotoxicity study of nano selenium and organic selenium
The per cent
vero cell death for various concentrations of organic selenium particle and nano selenium (both) is presented in Table 2 and Fig 5. The cellular activities of cells exposed to test samples were also compared with the cell control. It shows the increased concentration of nano selenium would decrease the viability of cells which is indicated by round morphology of cells.
IC
50 (Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration) was calculated for nano selenium derived from both sources and organic selenium. The IC
50 is defined as the sample concentration that is required to reduce the absorbance to half that of the control and which would give the 50% cell death. Based on the calculations, IC
50 for nano selenium derived from selenium powder was 89.11 µg/ml while nano selenium derived from sodium selenite was 85.74 µg/ml and for organic selenium it was 86.77 µg/ml. Since for nano selenium derived from both sources and organic selenium, IC
50 value falls above 80 µg/ml, it is concluded that there is no significant difference between IC
50 values of nano selenium derived from both sources and organic selenium.
Alam et al., (2019) reported that IC
50 value of selenium nanoparticles against CHO pro-cells was obtained to be 88±2.1 μg/ml.
Salem et al., (2020) showed that IC-
50 value of selenium nanoparticle against two different cell cultures, namely; human normal lung fibroblast (Wi 38) and human cancer colorectal adenocarcinoma epithelial (Caco-2) was 171.8 and 104.3 μg/ml respectively, data also proclaimed that the IC
50 of Se-NPs for normal cell is higher than obtained from other cells.
Hashem et al., (2021) showed that IC
50 of mycosynthesized Se-NPs was 316.73 μg/ml towards
Vero cell line CCL-81. Some reports declared that, Se-NPs showed lower cytotoxicity on normal cells compared with cancer cells
(Vahidi et al., 2020).
Since, the synthesized nano-selenium had all the imperative characteristics of nano particles and our inclusion level of nano selenium in lamb feed is 0.3 mg/kg (
NRC, 2007). Result of cell cytotoxicity assay moreover affirmed that both types of nano selenium and organic selenium (selenocysteine) are safe to use as lamb feed supplement and would replace its inorganic source to increase bioavailability and effectiveness.