Quality of Value Added Goat Meat Spread Enriched with Honey

DOI: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1654    | Article Id: DR-1654 | Page : 461-465
Citation :- Quality of Value Added Goat Meat Spread Enriched with Honey.Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research.2021.(40):461-465
M. Raziuddin, R. Narendra Babu, V. Appa Rao, S. Ramesh, R. Karunakaran dr_razi@rediffmail.com
Address : Department of Livestock Products Technology (Meat Science), Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chnnai-600 007, Tamil Nadu, India.
Submitted Date : 26-03-2021
Accepted Date : 17-05-2021


Background: Honey is largely used on a small scale as well as at an industrial level in beverages, baked products, confectionaries, candies, marmalades, jams and spreads. The nutritional value of honey is very high and it is highly acceptable by the consumers due to its characteristic flavour, sweetness and texture. Hence, a study was conducted to improve the quality of value added goat meat spread enriched with honey. 
Methods: Honey at different levels viz. 0, 1.0%, 3.0% and 5.0% was incorporated in the value added goat meat spread for which instrumental colour, physico-chemical properties and sensory quality analysis was carried out. 
Result: Redness (a*) score increased significantly (p<0.01) high in goat meat spread after incorporation of honey but in the lightness and yellowness score there was a non significant (p>0.05) increase noticed. There was no significant effect on hue and chroma due to incorporation of honey in goat meat spread. Cooking yield and spreadability were highly significant (p<0.01) and they increased with the increasing levels of honey as compared to control whereas, pH was decreased non significantly (p>0.05). Moisture content of meat spread decreased significantly (P<0.05), whereas protein content increased signiûcantly (P<0.05) with the increasing levels of honey. Sensory qualities in respect to appearance, flavor, spreadability, texture, after taste, adhesive ability and overall acceptability score were found to be significantly (p<0.01) increasing in 3% incorporated honey as compared to control, 1% and 5%. On the basis of all the above observations it was concluded that 3% incorporation of honey improved the quality of goat meat spread.


Goat meat Honey Instrumental colour Spread Physico-chemical properties Sensory qualities


  1. Antony, S., Rieck, J.R., Acton, J., Han I.Y., EL-Halpin and Dawson, P.L. (2006). Effect of dry honey on the shelf life of packaged Turkey slices. Poultry Science. 85: 1811-1820.
  2. AOAC (2012) Oficial methods of analysis, 19th edn. Association of Oficial Analytical Chemist Inc., Washington DC.
  3. Ashish Kumar, Mendiratta, S.K., Sen, A.R., Kandeepan, G., Talukder, S., Sharma, H., Soni, A., Irshad, A. and Kumar, S. (2015). Preparation and storage stability of meat spread developed from spent hens. Veterinary World. 8(5): 651- 655. 
  4. Azeredo, L. da, C., Azeredo, M.A.A., De Souza, S.R. and Dutra, V.M.L. (2003). Protein contents a physicochemical properties in honey samples of Apis mellifera of different floral origins. Food Chemistry. 80: 249-54.
  5. Bachhav, Y.G. and Patravale, V.B. (2009). Microemulsion based vaginal gel of fluconazole: Formulation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. International Journal of Pharmaceutic. 365: 175-9.
  6. Belewu, M.A. and Morakinyo, O.A. (2009). Nutritional, microbiological and sensory evaluation of honey treated and untreated soft cheese. European Journal of Scientific Research. 26: 124-131. 
  7. Bindu, J., Ravishankar, C.V. and Gopal, T.K.S. (2007). Shelf-life evaluation of a ready to eat black cam (Villorita criprinoides) product in Indigenous retort pouches. Journal of Food Engineering. 78: 995-1000. 
  8. Dawson, P.L. and Mathew, S (1998). Antioxidative properties of honey in Poultry meat. Retrieved from www.nbh.org on the 25th August, 2006.
  9. Dawson, P.L. and Mathew, S. (2000). Antioxidative properties of honey in poultry meat. Summary of research funded by the National Honey Board (NHB) and conducted at Clemson University. Available from NHB (www.nhb.org). 
  10. Dawson, P.L. and Acton, J.C. (1999). Honey in Processed Poultry Meat. National Honey Board 800: l-5. (www.nhb.org).
  11. Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 11(1): 1-42. 
  12. Echigo, T. and Takenaka, T. (1974) Production of organic acids in honey by honeybees. Journal    of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan. 48 (4): 225-230.
  13. Gheldof, N., Wang, X.H., Engeseth, N.J. (2002). Identification and quantification of antioxidant components of honeys from various floral sources. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 50: 5870-7.
  14. Haffejee, e.E. and Mossa, A. (2001). Honey in the treatment of infantile gastroenteritis. British Medical Journal. 209: 1866-1867.
  15. Haskim, I.B. McWarters, K.H. and Chuy (1999). Marination method and honey level affect on physical and sensory characteristics of roasted chicken. Journal of Food Science. 64: 163-166.
  16. Jin, S.K., Kim, I.S., Kim, S.J., Jeong, K.J., Choi, Y.J. and Hur, S.J. (2007). Effects of muscle type and washing times on physicochemical characteristic and qualities of surimi. Journal of Food Engineering. 81: 618-623. 
  17. Keeton, J.T. (1983). Effects of fat and NaCl/phosphate levels on the chemical and sensory properties of pork patties. Journal of Food Science. 48(3): 878-881. 
  18. Mouteria, M.C. Malacalzea, N.H. Lupano, C.E. and Baldi, B.M. (2006). Analysis of honey produced in the province of Buenos Aires, Argentine from 1997-2000. Retrieved from http://www.beekeeping.com/article/US/analysis_honey_buenes_aires.htm.
  19. Nagai, T., Inoue, R., Kanamori, N., Suzuki, N. and Nagashima, T. (2006). Characterization of honey from different floral sources. Its functional properties and effects of honey species on storage of meat. Food Chemistry. 97: 256-62.
  20. Phillips, R.D. (1995) Honey in reduced fat spreads. National Honey Board: Firestone, CO, USA, http://honey.com/foodindustry/resourcedb/reducedfatspreads.htm.
  21. Preston, M.B. and Smith, D.A. (1995) Honey fruit spreads. National Honey Board: Firestone, CO, USA. www.nhb.org. 
  22. Raziuddin, M., Babu, R.N., Appa Rao, V., Ramesh, S. and Karuna-karan, R. (2020). Impact of paprika (Capsicum Annuum) addition on quality of value-added goat meat spread. International Journal of Livestock Research. 10 (10): 230-238. 
  23. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1989). Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press. 
  24. Todd, F.E. and Vansell, G.H. (1942). Pollen grains in nectar and honey. Journal of Economic Entomology. 35: 728-31.
  25. Trout, E.S., Hunt, N.C., Johnson, D.E., Claus, J.R., Kastner, C.L., Kropf, D.H. and Stroda, S. (1992). Chemical, physical, and sensory characterization of ground beef containing 5 to 30 percent fat. Journal of Food Science. 57: 25-29. 
  26. Verma, A.K., Banerjee, R. and Sharma, B.D. (2012). Quality of low fat chicken nuggets: Effect of sodium chloride replacement and added chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) hull flour. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science. 25: 291-298. 

Global Footprints