The investigation was carried out on a total of 200 children representing 10, 11 and 12 year age group (5
th, 6
th and 7
th class) belonging to two different schools
viz., GHPS (Government Higher Primary School) and OEHS (Oriental English High School) represented the sample size of 100 each, respectively. The samples drawn were cross sectional and included both boys and girls. Age wise classification showed that 75 (37.5), 77 (38.5%) and 48 (24%) children belonged to 10, 11 and 12 years respectively; whereas gender wise segregation revealed that 109 were boys (54.5%) and 91 were girls (45.5%). Boys outnumbered the girls in the present study (Table 1).
As per the socio-economic classification, nearly half of the families (49%) from GHPS School belonged to lower middle class whereas 65 per cent of the families of OEHS School belonged to upper middle class. The percentage of families being in upper class was found to be nil in GHPS School and 21 per cent in the OEHS School. There was significant difference found between the families of two schools with respect to socio-economic class (Table 2).
The results were in line with the findings of
Ashok et al., (2014) who reported that, 69 per cent of government school children belonged to Classes IV and V and 78 per cent of private school children belonged to Classes I and II socioeconomic group.
Breakfast behaviour includes consumption and skipping. Distribution of children according to breakfast skipping pattern is presented in Table 3. The breakfast skipping was found more in the children of GHPS compared to OEHS (73% vs. 37%). Of all the children studied, 22.5 per cent skipped 1-2 times a week, 23.5 per cent skipped 3-4 times in a week and 8.5 per cent skipped breakfast 5-6 times in a week period. Only one child in the GHPS School skipped breakfast regularly during a week period. When data was analyzed for chi-square test, there was no significant difference found between boys and girls of two schools (Boys:c
2 = 15.98
NS and Girls: c
2 = 13.19
NS).
The above results were in consistent with the study conducted by
Chitra and Reddy (2006) who reported that 42.8 per cent did not skip breakfast at all, 11.6 per cent skipped breakfast once in two days, 8.0 per cent skipped breakfast once in three days, 25.1 per cent skipped breakfast once a week, 10.8 per cent skipped breakfast once in two weeks and 1.7 per cent skipped breakfast every day. Similar findings were reported in the various studies
(Gajre et al., 2008, John and Narasihman, 2008). In contrast to the above results,
Arora et al., (2012) in the study reported that significantly more government school (lower SES) students consumed breakfast daily as compared to private school (higher SES) students (73.8% vs. 66.3%, p<0.001).
Government schools generally cater to the lower income and lower-middle income class in Indian context. Students belonging to lower income group are more likely to experience scarcity of good quality food amounting to a lack of wholesome breakfast as well as other meals of the day. Disparities in breakfast consumption across regions may be explained by differences in cultural practices, socio-economic factors and availability of school-meal programs.The dietary pattern followed by the children revealed that Non-vegetarians were predominated over vegetarians (86.0%
vs. 14.0%) irrespective of school type. Nearly 68 per cent of the school children were consuming three meals a day (67.5%) in both the schools (Table 4).
The intake of the selected nutrients was calculated for the children from the food intake records obtained by 24 hour intake recall method for past one week. The formulated per cent adequacy is a measure of association between Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) and the actual mean intake of nutrients by the subjects. The mean nutrient intake and percentage deficit/ excess of the school children are summarized in Table 5.
It can be visualized from the table that the mean intake of all the nutrients among all the children studied was less than RDA. When compared with the breakfast consumers, skippers had lower mean intake of all the nutrients studied. Among breakfast consumers, the mean intake and per cent adequacy for the nutrients
viz., protein (Mean - 32.50g, % adequacy - 81.0), fat (Mean - 28.19g, % adequacy - 80.0), energy (Mean - 1932 Kcal, % adequacy 88.0), iron (Mean - 15.97 mg, % adequacy - 76.0), calcium (Mean - 844.17 mg, % adequacy - 105.0), β-carotene (Mean - 2220.10 µg, % adequacy - 46.0) and vitamin C (Mean - 21.71 mg, % adequacy - 54.0) were found highest in OEHS as compared to GHPS. Similar trend was observed among breakfast skippers compared between the schools. Even though, the mean intake of all the nutrients were found higher among children in OEHS, still the per cent adequacy was not met for the nutrients except for calcium (105.5%). It was noticeable in the table that, the mean fat intake was found to be higher in the breakfast skippers compared to breakfast consumers (GHPS: 24.03g vs. 26.42; OEHS: 28.19 g vs. 31.53 g). Overall, the mean nutrients intake of government school children was found to be lower compared to private school children irrespective of breakfast consumption. The analyzed t value for these nutrients was found significant at one per cent level in children of all the groups except for calcium in GHPS group which showed non-significant among breakfast consumers.
Florentino et al., (2002) addressed the influence of diet on the children’s nutritional status from all public and private schools in the city of Manila and found that the children from private schools, who are generally of higher socioeconomic status than those from public schools, tended to have higher intakes of calories, protein, iron and vitamin A than public school children which were in concurrent with the present study findings.
Rani (2012) in the study revealed that as compared to government school children, matriculation school children seemed to have a better intake of nutrients
viz. calories, protein and fat which supports results of the present study where government school children had lower nutrient intake compared to private school children.
Kral et al., (2011) found a significant relationship between breakfast consumption and total daily energy intake.Table 6 depicts the similar results among girls as observed in boys. The mean energy intake was found to be 1569 kcal to 1639 Kcal, which meets 78 and 81.2 per cent of adequacy among government and private school children respectively. The per cent adequacy of β-carotene and vitamin C was found to be low in both the school children (β-carotene: 33.95 and 41.61; Vitamin C: 39.53 and 37.47 in GHPS and OEHS respectively). Among all the nutrients, energy and calcium had higher per cent adequacy compared to other nutrients. Calculated t value for all these nutrients found significant at one per cent in children of both the groups (breakfast consumers and skippers).
The results were in agreement with the findings of
Sunita and Jain (2005) who reported that the diets of both boys and girls (6-12 years) were deficient in most of the nutrients (energy, protein, calcium, iron, vitamin A, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin and ascorbic acid) except fat and folic acid. Among girls, vitamin A was less than 35 per cent and riboflavin was less than 42 per cent of RDA.