Submitted21-03-2020|
Accepted03-06-2020|
First Online 11-07-2020|
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Chocolates may have different percentages of cocoa liquor, cocoa powder, cocoa butter, sugar and milk powder based on different types of chocolates, namely dark, milk and white chocolates. Total solid content of chocolates varies from 65 to 75% depending upon the types of milk chocolate containing 20% of milk powder (Afoakwa et al., 2008; Lucisano et al., 2006). Cocoa butter is a pure vegetable oil derived from the beans of the cacao plant, which is the continuous phase of chocolate. It is responsible for dispersion of the other constituents of chocolate formulation during storage, handling and sensory evaluation (Nickless, 1996). Cocoa butter comprises a mixture of saturated and unsaturated fats which account for more than 95% of the fatty acids in cocoa butter. It contains high levels of triacylglycerols (TAGs) viz., Palmitic acid, Oleic acid and Stearic acid.
In this research chocolates were developed with the substitution of cocoa butter with coconut fats namely, coconut oil (10%), coconut milk (20%) and coconut cream (30%). Coconut has numerous health benefits and is promoted as a dietary supplement. The main fatty acids in coconut belong to the group of fatty acids called medium chain fatty acids over 50% of the total fatty acids. The major fatty acids being lauric acid 46% (12:0), myristic acid 17% (14:0) and palmitic acid 9% (16:0) (Abrahamsson et al., 2008). These are absorbed intact from the small intestine and do not undergo degradation and re-esterification processes. They are directly used in the body to produce energy. Lauric acid, the integral component of coconut is comparable to fat in human milk and have similar nutraceutical effects as that of human milk (Kabara, 1978, 1990). It is transformed into a substance called “monolaurin” in the human body which has antibacterial and bactericidal effects (Hegde, 2006). Monolaurin is currently used as a GRAS (generally recognized as safe) food emulsifier, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and is considered essentially a non-toxic compound even at relatively high dose levels (Skrivanova et al., 2006).
The health benefits of coconut fats can be obtained by substituting them in chocolates thereby reducing the cost of chocolate production. The chocolates developed during the current study were analyzed for their melting behavior and fatty acid profile which gives chocolate its unique properties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The chocolates were prepared with the commercially available ingredients such as cocoa butter, cocoa powder, icing sugar, lecithin, coconut oil, coconut milk and coconut cream. The control and chocolates substituted with coconut oil 10%, coconut cream 20% and coconut milk 30% were developed following the procedure given in Fig 1.
Differential scanning calorimetry
The thermal behaviour of chocolate was studied by using Differential Scanning Calorimetery (DSC). It is the technique in which the difference in energy input into a sample and a reference material is measured as function of time or temperature while the sample and the reference material are subjected to a controlled time - temperature program. Approximately 6-10 mg of sample was placed in an aluminum cup with a lid in hermetic pan and sealed with the lid. Temperature calibration was performed prior to measurements and an empty pan was used as reference which was about 56 grams. The DSC was calibrated and the samples were heated in the temperature range 25°C to 100°C at a heating rate of 5°C/min. Nitrogen was used to purge the thermal analysis system. Initial temperature, final temperature, peak width, peak maximum and heat required (J/g) was computed from the thermograms obtained.
Gas chromatography
The Fatty acid profile of chocolates were analysed by GC-MS by using AOCS Official Method. Three drops of sample were taken in a vial and mixed with 9ml of hexane and 1ml of KOH with methanol solution. 1ml of the clear layer was transferred to the GC vial for analysis. The percentage of fatty acids present in the samples were estimated from the chromatograms obtained.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The onset (Tonset) and end temperature of melting (Tend), peak width (J/g), peak maximum (Tpeak) and heat flow (mW/mg) of control, CO10%, CC20% and CM30% analysed from DSC thermogram is given in Table 1. The onset temperature (Tonset) of melting was observed at 28.72°C, 30.04°C, 28.18°C and 28.37°C and the peak maximum (Tpeak) was attained at a temperature of 39.9°C, 39.5°C, 39.7°C and 38.7°C for control, CO10%, CC20% and CM30% respectively. The specific heat (Cp) of the chocolates at which phase transition occurred were estimated to be 2.221, 1.64, 2.1 and 1.435 mW/mg for control, CO10%, CC20% and CM30% respectively. The time taken for complete melting of the chocolates were found to be in relation with the peak width which were 53.01 J/g, 38.12 J/g, 56.49 J/g and 36.14 J/g for Control, CO10%, CC20% and CM30% respectively. Fig 2 shows the thermograms obtained for the control and developed coconut based chocolate novelties (CO10%, CC20% and CM30%).
The control of the molecular structure and polymorphic forms of cocoa butter is particularly important in the manufacture of chocolate. Cocoa butter is responsible for the smooth texture, contraction, flavour release and gloss of chocolate. It shows brittleness below 20°C, begins softening at 30°C to 32°C and exhibits a sharp complete melting below body temperature. This quick meltdown in a narrow range of temperature results in a cool sensation, which is the appreciated organoleptic feature of cocoa butter. The melting behaviour of cocoa butter is not only responsible for mouth feel but also for flavour release from cocoa powder, which is dispersed within the fat (Schlichter-Aronhime and Garti, 1988).
Differential Scanning Calorimetry was utilized to exhibit the thermal behaviour of control and chocolates substituted with coconut variants. The peak onset corresponds to the temperature at which a specific crystal form starts to melt. The peak onset temperatures of all the chocolates were in the range of 28°C to 30°C. This implies that the crystal formed should be between IV (β’) and V (β) form on correlating with the polymorphic forms of chocolate of which form V (β) was the most preferred crystal form for chocolates. The peak maximum denoted the temperature at which melting rate was the greatest and it was found that chocolate with coconut cream had the highest peak maximum followed by chocolate with coconut oil and control. The chocolate with coconut milk substitution had the lowest peak maximum indicating that the melting rate was high at a lower temperature when compared with other samples. There was a time delay in complete melting of the chocolate with coconut cream followed by control, coconut oil and coconut milk with respect to area. The heat capacity (Cp) gradually and consistently increased to onset temperature (Tonset) and then progressively increased more rapidly until peak temperature (Tpeak), after which it decreased to the end temperature (Tend). All the samples exhibited similar distinct single endothermic transitions between 28°C and 53°C, which was in agreement with the results furnished by Afoakwa et al., (2008) that the range expected for chocolate melting profiles were between 15°C and 55°C. The difference in melting range was due to the changes in sample composition and crystalline state distribution and the results were found to be in concurrence with studies by McFarlane (1999). The structure characteristics of chocolate by measuring the strength of cocoa butter crystal network with DSC melting curves is studied by Svanberg et al., (2013). Coconut oil substituted chocolate showed melting at a temperature slightly higher than the control but the melting time was highest for chocolate with coconut cream. All the chocolates exhibited desired polymorphs but chocolate substituted with coconut oil is more suitable than other substitutions.
Analysis of fatty acid profile of coconut based chocolate novelties using GC-MS
The chocolate prepared with cocoa butter which was taken as control contained large amount of Stearic, Oleic and Palmitic acid as it was highly present in the cocoa butter.
Table 2 shows the fatty acid profile of control and chocolates made by substituting cocoa butter with 10% coconut oil, 20% coconut cream and 30% coconut milk. Control sample was found to contain 26.13%, 33.5% and 34.5% of palmitic, stearic acid and oleic acids respectively. Lauric acid content of control was 0.02%, it was found that lauric acid content has increased to 1.92%, 1.04% and 1.17% in CO10%, CC20% and CM30% respectively. Fig 3 depicts the comparison of fatty acid profile of control and coconut based chocolate novelties. Fig 4 shows the chromatograms of control, CO10%, CC20% and CM30% obtained.
@table2
The fatty acid profile of the chocolates shows a higher amount of Palmitic, Stearic and Oleic acid in the range of 24-35% owing to the fact that cocoa butter had higher amount of these fatty acids which were in conformity with the findings by Naik and Kumar (2014). The lauric acid content of control chocolate was estimated to be lesser than 0.02%, whereas in chocolates substituted with coconut oil, coconut milk and coconut cream were 1.92%, 1.04% and 1.17% respectively. There observed a significant increase in lauric acid content of coconut based chocolate novelties due to the presence of high lauric acid content in coconut products which were correlated with the findings recorded by Hegde (2006) who stated that about 50% of the fats present in coconut was composed of the medium chain lauric fatty acid. Thus, chocolate substituted with coconut oil had the highest content of lauric acid making it a premium chocolate with a healthier fat that is responsible for many functional properties.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
- Abrahamsson L andersson A, Becker W and Nilsson G (2008). Department of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics. Sweden: p. 116.
- Afoakwa EO, Paterson A, Fowler M and Vieira J (2008) Relationship between rheological, textural and melting properties of dark chocolate as influenced by particle size distribution and composition. European Food Research and Technology. 227(4): 1215-1223.
- Beckett ST (2009). The science of chocolate. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry Paperbacks. 240.
- Hegde BM, Sankaran JR, Hasan A, Parvez A, Shah A, Hodgson I and Larkin M (2006). Coconut oil-ideal fat next only to mother’s milk (scanning coconuts horoscope). Journal Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine. 7(1): 16-19.
- Kabara JJ (1978). Health oils from the tree of life. In: Pharmacological effect of lipids. [Kabara JJ, (ed.)],1st ed. London: AOCS Press: 624-9.
- Kabara JJ (1990). Lauric oils and health benefits. In: Pharmacological effect of lipids. [Kabara JJ, ed.)], 3rd ed. London: AOCS Press: 120-30.
- Naik B and Kumar V (2014). Cocoa butter and its alternatives: A Review. Journal of Bio-resource Engineering and Technology. 7-17.
- Nickless H (1996). Cocoa butter quality. In: Proceeding of the Malaysian international cocoa conference Kuala, [Selamat J, Lian BC, Lai TK, Ishak WRW, Mansor M (eds)]. Lumpur. 322-336.
- Schlichter-Aronhime J and Garti N (1988). Solidification and polymorphism in cocoa butter and the blooming problems. In: Crystallisation and polymorphism of fats and fatty acids, Ed. by Garti N. and Sato K., Marcel Dekker, Inc. 363-391.
- Skrivanova E, Marounek M, Benda V and Brezina P (2006). Susceptibility of Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp. and Clostridium perfringens to organic acids and monolaurin. Veterinarni Medicina-Praha. 51(3): 81.
- Sokmen A and Gunes G (2006). Influence of some bulk sweeteners on rheological properties of chocolate. LWT. 39: 1053- 1058.
- Svanberg L, Ahrne L, Loren N and Windhab (2013). Impact of pre – crystallization process on structure and product properties in dark chocolate. Journal of Food Engineering. 114: 90-98.
The Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research (AJDFR) follows a disclaimer policy that outlines the responsibilities of the journal, authors, reviewers, and readers. The policy is designed to ensure that all published content is accurate and meets ethical standards, and to protect the journal from any legal liability.
The AJDFR does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content published in the journal. The opinions expressed in published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or its editorial board. The journal does not accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content published in the journal.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is original, accurate, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for obtaining permission to use copyrighted material and for providing appropriate attribution.
Reviewers are responsible for ensuring that the content of articles is accurate, original, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for maintaining confidentiality and disclosing any conflicts of interest.
Readers are responsible for evaluating the content of articles and for making their own judgments about the accuracy and reliability of the information presented. They are also responsible for complying with copyright laws and ethical standards when using the content of articles.
AJDFR is committed to ensuring that all published content meets ethical standards and that all parties involved in the publishing process understand their responsibilities. The disclaimer policy is designed to protect the journal from any legal liability and to ensure that readers can rely on the accuracy and reliability of the content published in the journal.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.