Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

  • Chief EditorHarjinder Singh

  • Print ISSN 0971-4456

  • Online ISSN 0976-0563

  • NAAS Rating 5.44

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-Monthly (February, April, June, August, October & December)
Indexing Services :
Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Evaluation of Nutritional, Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) Incorporated Frozen Yoghurt 

T.M.P.M. Dissanayaka, K.H.I. Gimhani, W.A.H. Champa
  • Submitted09-05-2019|

  • Accepted17-03-2020|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Dissanayaka T.M.P.M., Gimhani K.H.I., Champa W.A.H. (NaN). Evaluation of Nutritional, Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) Incorporated Frozen Yoghurt. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. (): . doi: undefined.
The study was conducted to develop frozen yoghurt, flavoured with jackfruit pulp. Sensory data revealed that, the sample incorporated with 15% jackfruit pulp had the best qualities. Protein content of all jackfruit pulp incorporated frozen yoghurts was significantly higher (p < 0.05) and their fat content was significantly lower (p < 0.05) compared to the control. Significantly higher (p < 0.05) overrun was observed in the frozen yoghurt containing 20% of jackfruit pulp compared to the control. Titratable acidity increased and pH decreased in all samples during the storage. Though total plate count of all jackfruit pulp incorporated frozen yoghurts increased upon storage, it was less than that of the control. Escherichia coli, yeast and mould were not detected for a period of 35 days at frozen storage. In conclusion, physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory properties of frozen yoghurt improved significantly by adding jackfruit pulp at rate of 15% (w/w).
  1. Abdelazez, A., Muhammad, Z., Zhang, Q., Zhu, Z., Abdelmotaal, H., Sami, R. and Meng, X. (2017). Production of a functional frozen yoghurt fortified with Bifidobacterium spp. Journal of BioMed Research International. 1-10. DOI: http://doi. org/10.1155/2017/6438528.
  2. AOAC, (2003). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (18th ed.), Washington D.C., U.S.A.
  3. Davidson, R.H., Duncan, S.E., Hackney, C.R., Eigel, W.N. and Boling, J.W. (2000). Probiotic culture survival and implications in fermented frozen yogurt characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science. 83: 666–673.
  4. Desai, S.R., Toro, V.A. and Joshi, S.V. (1994). Utilization of different fruit in the manufacture of yoghurt. Indian Journal Dairy Science. 47: 870-874.
  5. El-Bakri, J.M. and Ibtisam, E.M. El Zubeir (2015). Chemical and Microbiological evaluation of plain and fruit Yoghurt in Khartoum State Sudan. International Journal of Dairy Science. 4: 1-7.
  6. FAO, (2013). Milk and dairy products in human rome. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 
  7. Fssai, (2015). Food Safety and Standards in India, Manual of Methods of Analysis of Foods Milk and Milk Products, New Delhi.
  8. Haq, N. (2006). Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) tropical fruit trees. Southampton, UK: Southampton Centre for Underutilized Crops, University of Southampton, pp.50-55.
  9. Igbabul, B. and Shember, J. (2014). Physicochemical, microbiological and sensory evaluation of yoghurt sold in Makurdi metropolis. African Journal of Food Science and Technology.5:129-135. 
  10. Jagadeesh, S.L. (2007). Food chemistry; chemical composition of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus lam) selections of Western Ghats of India. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 102: 361–365.
  11. Jagtap, U.B. and Bapat, V.A. (2010). Evaluation of antioxidant capacity and phenol content in jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus lam) fruit pulp. Journal of Plant Foods and Human Nutrition. 65: 99–104.
  12. Jetro, A.A. (2010). Specifications and standards for foods, food additives, etc. Under the food sanitation act (Abstract) 2010. Specifications and Standards for Foods, pp. 179.
  13. Lampert, C.P. (1970). Definitions of Milk and Milk Properties, Milton Publishers, England, pp. 2-3.
  14. Minitab, (2010). Minitab, version 16.1.0. In. Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania, USA. 
  15. Muangwong, K., Phianmongkhol, A. and Wirjantoro, T.I. (2013). Frozen yoghurt. Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry.6: 30-50.
  16. Muzammil, H.S., Haider, S., Rasco, B. and Sublanis, S. (2015). Physicochemical properties of probiotic frozen yoghurt with different levels of glycerol and overrun. International Journal of Development Research. 5: 3209-3213.
  17. Obi, T.E., Henshaw, F.O. and Atanda, O.O. (2010). Quality evaluation of plain-stirred probiotic yoghurt produced from skim and whole milk powder during refrigerated storage. Journal of Environmental Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 9: 7.
  18. Ozturk, S. and Akyuz, N.A. (1995). Study on the production of fruit yoghurt. National Productivity Press. 548: 111-121.
  19. Saarela, M. (2014). Functional dairy product: Vol 2, Food and Nutrition Sceince. Wood Publishing Limited, Cambrige. 
  20. Sarmini, N., Sinniah, J. and Silva, K.F.S.T. (2014). Development of a ripened jack (Artocarpus heterophyllus) fruit incorporated set yoghurts, Conference Proceeding of Jaffna University International Research Conference. 115-122.
  21. SAS, (2002). Statistical Analysis System. Users Guide Statistics. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA. 
  22. Syed, K. and Babar, K. P. (2018). Formulation and evaluation of traditional dairy product, Sheerqurma. Asian Journal of Dairy And Food Research. 37: 100–104. DOI: http://    dx.doi.org/10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1335.
  23. Tamime, A.Y. and Robinson, R.K. (2000). Yoghurt Science & Technology, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge.
  24. Tamine, A.Y. and Robinson, R.K. (2007). Yoghurt science and technology. Woodhead Publishing Limited, England.
  25. Temesgen, A.A. (2015). Flavoured yoghurt chemical, functional and rheological properties. International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research. 2: 22-28. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)