Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research, volume 35 issue 4 (december 2016) : 331-334

Nutritional composition of fruit of four date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars grown in Haryana, India

Vinita*, Darshan Punia
1<p>Department of Foods and Nutrition, CCS Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar-12 5004, India.</p>
Cite article:- Vinita*, Punia Darshan (2016). Nutritional composition of fruit of four date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.)cultivars grown in Haryana, India . Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 35(4): 331-334. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.v35i4.6635.

The present investigation was conducted to evaluate the nutrient composition of four varieties of date fruit. The results of the study indicated that the variety Shamran had highest protein (2.77%) content and the variety Medjool the lowest (1.88%). Fat and crude fibre contents of date fruit varieties ranged from 0.17 to 0.50% and 1.71 to 2.22%, respectively. The variety Medjool had lowest amount of total soluble sugars (67.49g/100g) and reducing sugar (61.31g/100g). All the varieties of date fruit differed non-significantly among themselves for their non- reducing sugar content. The variety Khadrawi had the highest amount of starch content. Total dietary fiber (11.70g/100g) and soluble dietary fiber (3.34g/100g) were highest in variety Hillawi. All the four varieties of date fruit differed significantly from each other for their total dietary fiber content and soluble dietary fiber content. The varieties Khadrawi (8.46%), Hillawi (8.35%) and Shamran (7.94%) had significantly (p£ 0.05) higher insoluble dietary fiber as compared to variety Medjool (4.25%). The variety Shamran had highest amount of calcium (195.33mg/100g) and zinc (1.81mg/100g). The variety Medjool contained lowest amount of calcium (70.33mg/100g), iron (1.91mg/100g) and potassium (713mg/100g) while the highest amount of phosphorus (52.66mg/100g). A non-significant (p£0.05) difference was observed in magnesium content of all the varieties. Polyphenol content of date fruits from different varieties ranged from 228.79 to 253.21 mg/100g.


  1. Ahmed, I.A., Ahmed, A.W.K. and Robinson, R.K. (1995). Chemical composition of date varieties as influenced by the stage of ripening. Food Chem. 54: 305–309.

  2. Al-Farsi, M., Alasalvar, C., Morris, A., Baron, M. and Shahidi, F. (2005). Compositional and sensory characteristics of three native sun-dried date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties grown in Oman. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53: 7586–    7591.

  3. Al-Farsi, M. A. and Lee, C.Y. (2008). Nutritional and functional properties of dates: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 48: 877-87. 

  4. Al-Harrasi, A., Rehman, N.U., Hussain, J., Khan, A.L., Al-Rawahi, A., Gilani, S.A., M. Al-Broumi. and L. Ali. (2014). Nutritional assessment and antioxidant analysis of 22 date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) varieties growing in Sultanate of Oman. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 7: 591-598.

  5. Al-Hooti, S., Sidhu, J.S., Al-Otaibi, J., Al-Ameeri, H. and Qabazard, H. (1997). Processing quality of important date cultivars grown in the United Arab Emirates for jam, butter and dates-in-syrup. Adv. Food Sci. 19: 35–40.

  6. Ali, A., Al-Kindi, Y. S. M. and Al-Said, F. (2009). Chemical composition and glycemic index of three varieties of Omani dates. Int. J. Food Sci. and Nut. 60: 51–62.

  7. Al-Shahib, W. and Marshall, R. (2003). The fruit of the date palm: its possible use as the best food for the future. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 54: 247–259.

  8. AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Agriculture Chemist. Association of Analytical Chemist, Washington. D.C. 

  9. Assirey, E.A.R. (2014). Nutritional composition of fruit of 10 date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars grown in Saudi Arabia. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 8: 423-427.

  10. Besbes, S., Drira, L., Blecker, C., Deroanne, C. and Attia, H. (2008). Adding value to hard date (Phoenix dactylifera L.): compositional, functional and sensory characteristics of date jam. Food Chem. 112: 406–411.

  11. Biglari, F., Al-Karkhi, A.F.M. and Easa, A.M. (2008). Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of various date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) fruits from Iran. Food Chem. 107: 1636-1641.

  12. Elleuch, M., Besbes, S., Roiseux, O., Blecker, C., Deroanne, C. and Drira, N.E. (2008). Date flesh: chemical composition and characteristics of the dietary fiber. Food Chem. 111: 676-682.

  13. El-Sohaimy, S. A. and Hafez, E.E. (2010). Biochemical and nutritional characterizations of date palm fruits (Phoenix dactylifera L.). J. Appl. Sci. Res. 6: 1060-67.

  14. Falade, K.O. and E.S. Abbo. 2007. Air-drying and rehydration characteristics of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) fruits. J. Food Eng. 79: 724-730.

  15. Furda, I. (1981). Simultaneous analysis of soluble and insoluble dietary fiber. In W.P.T. James, and O. Theander (Eds.), The Analysis of dietary fibre in food. Marcel Dekker, New York. 163-172.

  16. Habib, H.M. and Irahim, W.H. (2011). Nutritional quality of 18 date fruit varieties. Inter. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 62: 544-551.

  17. Hasnaoui, A., Elhoumaizi, M.A., Hakkou, A., Wathelet, B. and Sindic, M. (2011). Physico-chemical characterization, classification and quality evaluation of date palm fruits of some Moroccan cultivars. J. Sci. Res. 3: 139-149.

  18. Iqbal, M., Ullah, I., Munir, M. and Niamatullah, M. (2011). Physiochemical characteristics of date palm varieties. J. Agric. Res. 49: 249-252.

  19. Ishurd, O., Zahid, M., Xiao, P. and Pan, Y. (2004). Protein and amino acid contents of Libyan dates at three stages of development. J Sci. Food Agric. 84: 481–484.

  20. Ismail, B., Haffar, I., Baalbaki, R., Mechref, Y. and Henry, J. (2006). Physico-chemical characteristics and total quality of five date varieties grown in the United Arab Emirates. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 41: 919-926.

  21. Lindsey, W.L. and Norwell, M.A. (1969). A new DPTA-TEA Soil test for zinc and iron. Agron. Abst. 61: 84-89.

  22. Nadeem, M., Salimur, R., Anjum, F., Zahoor, T., Saeed, F. and Ahmad, A. (2011a). Anti-nutritional factors in some date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties grown in Pakistan. Inter. J. Food Safety. 13: 386-390.

  23. Nadeem, M., Rehman, S.U., Anjum, F.M. and Bhatti, I.A. (2011b). Quality evaluation of some Pakistani Date Varieties. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 48: 305-313. 

  24. Sadiq, I., Izuagie, T., Shuaibu, M., Dogoyaro, A., Garba, A. and Abubakar, S. (2013). The nutritional evaluation and medicinal value of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Inter. J. Modern Chem. 4: 147-154.

  25. Saffi, E.B., Trigui, M., Thabet, R., Hammami, M. and Achour, L. (2008). Common date palm in Tunisia: chemical composition of pulp and pits. Int. J. Food Sci. and Tech. 43: 2033-2037.

  26. Sahari, M. A., Barzegar, M. and Radfar, R. (2007). Effect of varieties on the composition of dates (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Food Sci. and Technol. Inter. 13: 269–275. 

  27. Singh, U. and Jambunathanan, R. (1981). Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars, levels of protease inhibitors, polyphenolic compounds and in vitro protein digestibility. J. Food Sci. 46: 1364-1367.

  28. Vinson, J.A., Zubik, L., Bose, P., Samman, N. and Proch, J. (2005). Dried fruits: Excellent in vitro and in vivo antioxidant. J. American college nutri. 24: 44-50.

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)